According to the literature, psychological assessment in forensic contexts is one of the most controversial application areas for clinical psychology. Forty-six psychological reports written by psychologists, court consultants, have been analyzed with content analysis to identify typical judgment errors related to the following areas: (a) distortions in the attribution of causality, (b) inferential errors, and (c) epistemological inconsistencies. Results indicated that systematic errors of judgment, usually referred also as "the man in the street," are widely present in the forensic evaluations of specialist consultants. Clinical and practical implications are taken into account.
You can submit articles in our peer reviewed Journal at http://scitechnol.com/submitmanuscript.php