ISSN: 2476-2067

Toxicology: Open Access
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Short Communication   
  • Toxicol Open Access 2018, Vol 4(1): 137
  • DOI: 10.4172/2476-2067.1000137

Chromium III in Gezira Tannery Corporation Wastewater (Wad Medani, Sudan)

Ammar MS Abdalla1*, Nabil HH Bashir2 and Yousif OH Assad3
1Department of Crop Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences (FAS), University of Dongola, Dongola, Sudan
2Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, Blue Nile National Institute for Communicable Diseases (BNNICD), University of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan
3Department of Pesticides & Toxicology, FAS, University of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan
*Corresponding Author: Ammar MS Abdalla, Department of Crop Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences (FAS), University of Dongola, PO Box 47, Dongola, Sudan, Tel: +249911428013, Email: dr.ammar@uofd.edu.sd

Received: 22-Oct-2018 / Accepted Date: 15-Nov-2018 / Published Date: 18-Nov-2018 DOI: 10.4172/2476-2067.1000137

Abstract

This study was initiated to investigate the level of chromium III in Gezira Tannery Wastewater and compared with the permissible limit stander for chromium III. Samples of Gezira Tannery Corporation (GTC) wastewater (WW) were collected from both the mouth and the tail of the drainage stream. These samples were analyzed to determine the concentrations of Cr using atomic absorption spectrometric (AAS) method. Results of AAS method showed high quantities of Cr III (1.85%), i.e. above the permissible limit (0.0001%).

Keywords: Chromium III; Atomic absorption spectroscopic method; Waste water

Introduction

The leather tanning industry is well-known for its severe negative impact on the environment. In this industry animal hides are transformed into leather in a succession of several complex stages, consuming high quantities of water and using large amounts of chemicals such as lime, sodium sulfide, ammonium sulfate, sodium chloride, bactericides, vegetable tannins, and chrome salts, etc. Tanneries wastewaters (WW) are mainly characterized by high salinity, high organic loading, and specific pollutants, such as sulfide and chromium [1]. The tanning processes are contaminating the environment mainly because of its high organic load and sulfidecontent, as well as its content of inorganic salts of chloride, ammonia, chromium, and sulfate [2]. Pollution by tanneries did not receive enough attention in the Sudan. Large amount of un-reacted (untreated) WW from Gezira Tannery Corporation (GTC), Wad Medani, Central Sudan, is discharged into the nearby areas, viz. the natural forest east of the tannery, which lies between the tannery and the blue Nile and Atra village. Such Waste Water contains a percentage of chromium and this practice has resulted in a total destruction of the forest surrounding the tannery. Moreover, some of these effluents are suspected to drain into the Blue Nile, which is very close to the premises of the tannery.

The objective of the present work is to determine the level of chromium III in GTC wastewater and compare with the permissible limits.

Methodology

The experiments were conducted in the Environment and Natural Resources Research Institute (ENNRI), National Center for Research (NCR), Khartoum, Sudan.

Sampling

Samples of Waste Water were collected from two locations: the outlet of the stream of Waste Water and the pond inside the previous forest which is used as an evaporation site(Figure 1). Samples from both locations were tested to determine the concentration of chromium.

toxicology-inhibitory-stream-location

Figure 1: (A) The outlet of the WW stream (Location A), (B) The forest (Location B).

The collected samples were acidified at the time of collection with nitric acid (2 ml of 69-72% concentration) to minimize precipitation and adsorption of the chromium cat ion on the walls of the container (100 ml). Time between collection of samples and analysis was about 24 h.

Waste Water (WW)

The determination of chromium-content in the WW was achieved by using the atomic absorption spectroscopic (AAS) method which is widely used in water analysis field [3].

Procedure

To a 100 ml sample, 2 ml nitric acid (HNO3; 69-72%) and 5 ml HCl were added; then the solution was heated for 15 min on a hot plate, cooled slightly and filtered with suction through a sintered-glass into a clean flask. The filtrate was transferred to a 100 ml-volumetric flask. The solution was diluted to the 100 ml mark, mixed thoroughly and used directly for determination of chromium by atomic AAS model: 3110 (Perkin- Elmer Type). Data were taken directly from AAS.

Analysis of the data

The data were subjected to ANOVA analysis.

Results

The results of chemical analysis of the WW collected from the two locations, i.e. LA and LB for the determination of the concentrations of chromium are presented in Table 1. The concentration (g of Cr/100 ml; i.e. %) obtained from location (LA) at the beginning of the stream (1.85%, i.e. 18500 ppm) was higher than that detected at location (LB), i.e. the forest (0.25%=2500 ppm; tail of stream). Both values are higher than the permissible limits (i.e. 0.0001%) according to Richard and Ivanildo [4].

Analysis Location A (Mouth of stream; %) Location B (Tail of stream; %)
Mean ± SE 1.85 ± 0.04 0.25 ± 0.25
CV% 3.61 17.44

Table 1: Concentration of chromium III (g/ml or %) in the WW of GTC, Wad Medani, Determined by AAS method.

Conclusion

The tanning industry uses some compounds that are known to be toxic. Therefore the waste/effluents of GTC are expected to be toxic, too. The indicators for such toxicity were the death of almost all trees of the forest closer to the GTC, where this WW is released for a very long period of time. GTC used to have water treatment unit during the 1970s, which is not functioning now for some reasons.

Chemical analysis for GTC wastewater using AAS demonstrated the presence of high quantities of chromium (1.85%). Their concentrations were more than the permissible limits (0.0001).

Recommendations

Wastewater from GTC and the other tanneries must be treated to remove all toxicants, and should not be allowed to be released untreated to bare land or a forest.

Currently, since the water treatment unit is not working, WW must be released into specially designed evaporation ponds; the remaining residues must be collected for final proper disposal.

Chromium must be substituted by another input because of its high toxicity and accumulation.

References

  1. Song Z, Wlliams CJ, Robert GE (2000) Sedimentation of Tannery Wastewaters-Water Res 34: 2171-2176.
  2. Menendez C, Diaz M (1998) Tannery Waste Water Treatment. Technologia de Agua 183: 27-32.
  3. Parker CR (1972) Water Analysis by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (2nd edn). Varian Techtron, Palo Alto, USA pp: 78.
  4. Richard H, and Ivanildo H (1997) Water Pollution Control – A guide to the use of water quality management principles, (1st edn.). E & FN Spon, London, UK pp: 459.

Citation: Abdalla MA, Bashir NH, Assad YH (2018) Chromium III in Gezira Tannery Corporation Wastewater (Wad Medani, Sudan). Toxicol Open Access 4: 137. DOI: 10.4172/2476-2067.1000137

Copyright: © 2018 Abdalla MA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

https://sekillinickyazma.com.tr/

Top