ISSN: 2155-9872

Journal of Analytical & Bioanalytical Techniques
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Research Article   
  • J Anal Bioanal Tech 2019, Vol 10(1): 416
  • DOI: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000416

Detection of the Concentration of Some Metals in the Honey Product in Dawuro Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia

Destaw Engidaw*, Ketema Alemayehu and Seid Mustofa
Department of Chemistry, College of Natural and Computational Science, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
*Corresponding Author: Destaw Engidaw, Department of Chemistry, College of Natural and Computational Science, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia, Tel: +251 967805858, Email: destawtakele@gmail.com

Received: 09-Mar-2019 / Accepted Date: 27-Mar-2019 / Published Date: 02-Apr-2019 DOI: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000416

Abstract

Naturally honey contains a variety of mineral elements which mostly indicates the botanical origin of honey and contamination by environmental sources. This study was done to determine the concentration of metals and to investigate the effects of season and location on concentration of metals in honey produced in Dawuro zone. The ash content of honey was determined by muffle furnace and the content of metals was determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). The mean values of ash and different metals within the three honey production seasons in Dawuro zone were ranged as: ash content, 0.10-0.14 g/100 g and content of metals (mg/kg): Na, 12.66-29.92; K, 74.84-154.90; Mg, 17.00-24.21; Ca, 40.39-72.96; Mn, 0.37-0.49; Fe, 1.82-3.79; Co, 0.14-0.51; Cu, 0.08-0.27 and Cd, 0.055-0.063. The study area was not free of heavy metals however, the concentrations were below the maximum limits permitted and the study area was free of environmental pollution which conforms to international standards concerning the good quality of honey. Finally, further study on other physicochemical parameters of honey and regular follow up of hazardous substances in this study area were suggested

Keywords: Dawuro; Honey; Metal concentration; Season

Introduction

Honey is a thick, golden liquid produced by industrious bees and it is made using the nectar of flowering plants which is a sugary liquid and is saved inside the beehive for eating during times of scarcity [1,2].

Honey usually contains a variety of mineral elements naturally which mostly indicates the botanical origin or contamination by environmental sources [3,4]. Environmental, geographical and botanical factors have an impact on the trace element content of honey, and it is better to consider all of these factors when studying honey metal composition. The mineral content is about 0.04%-0.2% depending on if it is a light or dark honey type [3-6]. There are a large variety of elements in honey but the most abundant element was potassium [1,6,7].

Because honey is the ingredient of most industrial products for sweetening and improving food composition and has been used for a long time for other human health care, it must be free of any uncomfortable material content and should contain only the small amount of pollutants such as heavy metals [8-11]. Different physicochemical parameters were applicable to study the composition and quality of honey samples but in this study, the determination of ash content and elemental concentration has been performed to assess the levels of essential and trace elements [12,13]. Mineral content of honey is highly dependent on the soil type and the type of flower used by bees for nectar and the ash content of honey is also one criterion for the determination of the botanical origin of honey [3,14,15].

In Dawuro zone there are different apiculture areas with the high potential of honey production that is produced in different seasonal variation especially during October, December and around June. However, currently, no study has been conducted about the content of metals and other physicochemical parameters. Specially investigating the content of trace metals in honey is important to know about pollution by environmental sources and thus it is useful to assess potential health risks associated with the intake of honey. Having information about honey quality characteristics would help the beekeepers and different unions to collect and store the honey samples in a proper manner. Therefore, this study was implemented to have a recorded data about the content of metals in honey that makes honey producers of different woredas of Dawuro zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia to be known in the honey international market.

Materials and Methods

Description of the study area

Dawuro zone is located in southern nation nationalities and people regional (SNNPR) state of Ethiopia with an approximately 500 km from Addis Ababa the capital city of Ethiopia and it is found between 6°36' to 7°21' north latitudes and 36°68' to 37°52'east longitudes with an altitude of 500 to 3000 meters above sea level. Therefore, the study was conducted in this zone with four woredas namely Loma, Mareka, Tocha and Isara that were selected purposefully depending on the areas where the high honey product is available.

Sample collection

The honey samples were collected in three different honey production seasons in a year; December (2015), June and October (2016) for each woreda. The collected honey samples were labeled and transported to Wolaita Sodo University and stored at room temperature for 5-6 months until sample preparation and analysis.

Analysis of honey samples

Unwanted materials such as wax, sticks, dead bees and particles of combs were removed by straining the samples by clean cloth before analysis.

The ash content of samples was determined by taking 5 g of each honey sample in a preheated and pre-weighed quartz ash dish. In the weighed samples two drops of olive oil were added and the contents were charred in an oven until the samples are dry and smokeless. The samples then ignited in a muffle furnace at 550°C to constant weight [13].

Ash content (%) = (W2-W1)/M × 100

Where W1 is weight of empty dish, W2 is weight of ash + dish after ignition and M is mass of honey sample taken.

The detection of content of selected metals was carried out after ash determination by dissolving the ash with 5 mL of 1 M nitric acid solution and the mixture was stirred on a heating plate to almost complete dryness. A stirring rode was used to transfer quantitatively through a funnel into a clean dry 25 mL volumetric flask. Then, 10 mL of the same acid was added, and the mixture was made up to 25 mL with distilled water. This solution of ash was then used for the determination of metals: Na, K, Ca, Fe, Mn, Cr, Co, Cu, Cd, and Pb by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (Perkin Elmer, USA) equipped with deuterium background corrector and hollow cathode lamps with air-acetylene flame. Na and K were analyzed by flame atomic emission spectrometry (FAES) while Ca, Mg, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Cd and Pb were analyzed by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). The instrument response was periodically checked with known standards and the standard solutions of metals were prepared using appropriate stock solutions (1000 mg/L) for calibration [6,7,16]. All measurements during each season were carried out in triplicate to determine the total ash and content of metals.

Statistical analysis

The data were collected, coded and entered in a Microsoft spreadsheet excel and analyzed in SPSS (version 16). ANOVA was used to assess the association of each season and location on quality parameters. Further analysis on differences among the means was determined using the Tukey test at 5% significant level.

Results

The content of ash and metals was determined in four woredas of Dawuro Zone SNNPR of Ethiopia during the three honey production seasons in a year. The analysis results of ANOVA showed that there were significant differences (p<0.05) for ash and different metals analyzed between the different studied areas except for Mn (0.15=p>0.05) during the third season.

According to the Post hoc multiple comparison test (Tukey HSD) at 0.05 levels analysis of ash values showed that there was no significant difference in ash contents between Loma and Tocha (0.09=p>0.05) and between Mareka and Tocha (0.11=p>0.05) for the first season, there was significant difference between Isara and Mareka (0.01=p<0.05) and between Isara and Tocha (0.003=p<0.05) for the second season and during the third season there was a significant difference (p<0.05) only between Isara and other three honey production areas.

  Season one in four places (December 2015)      
Parameter Loma Maraqa Tocha Isara
Ash 0.14 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.03
Na 31.27 ± 0.40 26.60 ± 0.32 21.45 ± 0.27 40.38 ± 0.64
K 143.06 ± 0.77 127.36 ± 0.30 162.49 ± 0.67 186.70 ± 0.95
Mg 25.78 ± 0.89 17.28 ± 0.58 21.51 ± 0.45 32.26 ± 0.41
Ca 74.88 ± 0.75 57.83 ± 0.44 67.85 ± 0.72 91.22 ± 0.53
Mn 0.49 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.03 0.76 ± 0.04 0.37 ± 0.03
Fe 4.64 ± 0.25 3.02 ± 0.05 3.15 ± 0.10 4.33 ± 0.12
Co 0.07 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01 1.74 ± 0.02
Cu 0.13 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.0 0.12 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.02
Cd 0.09 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01

Table 1: Ash (g/100 g) and content of metals (mg/kg) of honey in season one: mean ± SD.

  Season two in four places (June 2016)      
Parameter Loma Maraqa Tocha Isara
Ash 0.10 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.02
Na 14.38 ± 0.08 9.98 ± 0.09 8.12 ± 0.13 18.14 ± 0.09
K 64.60 ± 0.4 74.39 ± 0.93 62.65 ± 0.49 97.74 ± 0.55
Mg 19.12 ± 0.12 16.21 ± 0.06 11.38 ± 0.13 21.29 ± 0.09
Ca 41.58 ± 0.14 32.26 ± 0.14 36.85 ± 0.34 50.86 ± 0.53
Mn 0.39 ± 0.06 0.43 ± 0.09 0.48 ± 0.01 0.37 ± 0.04
Fe 2.01 ± 0.02 1.26 ± 0.03 1.57 ± 0.02 2.44 ± 0.02
Co 0.20 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.01 0.16 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.01
Cu 0.26 ± 0.04 0.20 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.01 0.46 ± 0.04
Cd 0.06 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01

Table 2: Ash (g/100 g) and content of metals (mg/kg) of honey in season two: mean ± SD.

  Season three in four places (October 2016)      
Parameter Loma Maraqa Tocha Isara
Ash 0.12 ± 0.02 0.10 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.01
Na 27.76 ± 0.21 24.58 ± 0.13 19.62 ± 0.36 31.19 ± 0.10
K 93.99 ± 0.29 71.62 ± 0.33 83.07 ± 0.23 118.87 ± 0.48
Mg 22.26 ± 0.80 18.64 ± 0.67 13.94 ± 0.23 27.25 ± 0.58
Ca 54.44 ± 0.39 44.55 ± 0.53 39.42 ± 0.92 63.55 ± 0.58
Mn 0.23 ± 0.02 0.36 ± 0.04 0.39 ± 0.03 0.50 ± 0.03
Fe 2.31 ± 0.25 2.05 ± 0.16 2.09 ± 0.14 3.20 ± 0.23
Co 0.09 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01 0.20 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.01
Cu 0.03 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.01 0.14 ± 0.01
Cd 0.08 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01

Table 3: Ash (g/100 g) and content of metals (mg/kg) of honey in season three: mean ± SD.

Results of the mineral contents of honey are mentioned in Tables 1-3 above.

During the first season the Tukey HSD tests at 0.05 levels proved that there was no significant difference in manganese concentration between Mareka and Isara (0.73=p>0.05), iron concentrations between Loma and Isara (0.12=p>0.05) and between Mareka and Tocha (0.7=p>0.05) and concentrations of cadmium between Loma and Isara (0.34=p>0.05) and between Mareka and Tocha (0.52=p>0.05) while for the content of copper there was significance difference (p<0.05) only between Isara and other places.

In the second honey production season the Tukey HSD tests indicated that there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between all honey production areas in manganese concentration, for the content of cobalt there was significant difference (p<0.05) only between Mareka and other places, for the content of copper there was insignificant difference between Loma and Mareka (0.23=p>0.05) and between Mareka and Tocha (0.42=p>0.05) and for cadmium concentration there was insignificant difference between Loma and Tocha (0.22=p>0.05) and between Tocha and Isara (0.48=p>0.05).

During the third honey production season the Tukey HSD showed that there was insignificant difference in manganese concentration between Mareka and Tocha (0.80=p>0.05), cobalt content between Loma and Mareka (0.93=p>0.05), while for iron there was significant difference (p<0.05) only between Isara and other three places and for cadmium concentration there was significant difference (p<0.05) only between Loma and other three places. The elements of Cr and Pb were not detected in all examined honey samples.

Note: the statistically significant values which did not mentioned here are the opposite of explanation.

Discussion

The ash content of honey samples investigated in the four woredas of Dawuro zone was varied from 0.09-0.17 g/100 g (Table 4). The highest ash content observed in Isara would be due to the dark color of the honey samples which contributed to the high mineral content [3,17]. The Tukey tests evidenced that there was a significant difference in ash content only between Isara and other studied woredas in Dawuro zone.

The ash content of honey in Dawuro district through the three honey production seasons ranged between 0.10%-0.14% (Table 5). The lowest ash value was observed during the second honey production season (around June 2015) and the highest was during the first honey production season (December 2015). The ash values of honey during the three production seasons showed a slight significant difference (0.038=p<0.05) only between season one and season two. All the honey samples during the three production seasons showed very low ash values which mostly depends on the nectar composition of predominant plants [3,18]. This range of ash content of honey was in agreement with ash content of honey produced in the Homesha district of western Ethiopia with ash value of 0.17%, honey produced in Sekota district, northern Ethiopia, with mean value of 0.14 %, Harenna forest honey, Bale, Ethiopia with a mean of 0.19% and Venezuelan honey in the range of 0.03-0.13 g/100 g [19-22]. Studies on honey produced in West Shewa zone, Oromia region Ethiopia reported fewer ash values, 0.03-0.095 %, then our study area [23]. But high ash value, 0.23-2.33%, of honey from different origins was reported compared to our study [24]. Therefore, the ash values of honey in our study were below 0.6 g/100 that confirmed the botanical origin of the honey samples were floral (blossom) types [13,25].

Honey also contains different types of elements which contributed to ash content and electrical conductivity values [26-28]. As shown in Table 4 the metals studied in this zone were Na, K, Mg, Ca, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, and Cd. The average content of these metals in the different studied areas of Dawuro zone (Loma, Mareka, Tocha and Isara) was ranged from;16.40-29.91 mg/kg, 91.12-134.44 mg/kg, 15.61-26.93 mg/kg, 44.88-68.55 mg/kg, 0.37-0.54 mg/kg, 2.11-3.33 mg/kg, 0.09-0.71 mg/kg, 0.12-0.29 mg/kg and 0.05-0.08 mg/kg respectively. In the studied areas, it was observed that the honey samples collected in Isara woreda were close to black in color, which contributed to the highest ash levels and the highest concentration of metals, except manganese that showed the highest level in Tocha, than other areas in Dawuro zone. In contrast, the honey samples from Mareka area showed the lowest levels of K, Ca, Fe, and Co while Na, Mg, Cu, and Cd showed the lowest concentration in Tocha. The metal contents in Table 4 indicated that potassium being quantitatively the highest; calcium is the second predominant while cadmium showed the lowest contents in the four different studied areas.

The Tukey HSD tests at 0.05 levels (Table 6) showed that there were both significant and insignificant differences of the content of metals between the different woredas of Dawuro zone. The considerable variation in metal composition in the four studied woredas in Dawuro zone (Loma, Mareka, Tocha, and Isara) was because of difference in soil composition, floral type or environmental conditions [3,14,29].

Minerals   Ash Na K Mg Ca Mn Fe Co Cu Cd
 Places Loma 0.12 24.47 100.55 22.39 56.98 0.37 2.99 0.12 0.14 0.08
  Mareka 0.09 20.39 91.12 17.38 44.88 0.38 2.11 0.09 0.14 0.06
  Tocha 0.09 16.4 102.73 15.61 48.04 0.54 2.27 0.16 0.12 0.05
  Isara 0.17 29.91 134.44 26.93 68.55 0.41 3.33 0.71 0.29 0.06

Table 4: Mean values of ash (g/100 g) and metal content (mg/kg) of honey in all four places of Dawuro district, SNNPR, Ethiopia in a year.

The average contents of metals during the three honey production seasons in Dawuro zone (Table 5) was ranged as (mg/kg); Na (12.66-29.92), K (74.84-154.90), Mg (17.00-24.21), Ca (40.39-72.96), Mn (0.37-0.49), Fe (1.82-3.79), Co (0.14-0.51), Cu (0.08-0.27) and Cd (0.055-0.063). Cr and Pb were also analyzed but their amount was below the detection limit which indicated these study areas were free of environmental pollution. In this study, the average amount of metals showed significant differences (p<0.05) between some honey production seasons in Dawuro zone that confirmed the influence of seasonal changes on the concentration of metals in honey [30].

Based on the Tukey HSD tests those which could not show significant differences between different productions seasons are summarized in Table 7 below.

Minerals Ash Na K Mg Ca Mn Fe Co Cu Cd
Season one 0.14 29.92 154.9 24.21 72.95 0.49 3.79 0.51 0.16 0.063
Season two 0.1 12.66 74.84 17 40.39 0.42 1.82 0.15 0.27 0.055
Season three 0.11 25.79 91.89 20.52 50.49 0.37 2.41 0.14 0.08 0.058

Table 5: Seasonal mean values of ash (g/100 g) and content of metal (mg/kg) of honey samples in Dawuro district.

Element p< 0.05 (significantly different) p>0.05 (no significance difference)
Na Isara and Tocha others
K   All
Mg Others Loma and Isara, Mareka and Tocha
Ca Mareka and Isara, Tocha and Isara Others
Mn Loma and Tocha, Mareka and Tocha Others
Fe Mareka and Isara Others
Co Isara and Others Others
Cu Isara and Others Others
Cd Loma and Others Others

Table 6: Tukey HSD tests at 0.05 levels for metals between different places.

Element p-value Insignificant difference between seasons
Na 0.17 Season one and three
K 0.09 Season two and three
Mg 0.18, 0.21 Season one and three (0.18), season two and three (0.21)
Ca 0.051 Season two and three
Mn P>0.05 Between all seasons
Fe 0.051 Season two and three
Co P>0.05 Between all seasons
Cu 0.052 Season one and three
Cd P>0.05 Between all seasons

Table 7: The Tukey HSD tests at 0.05 levels for metals between the three production seasons.

It was noticeable that for the elements Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, and Cd the highest concentration was detected during the first and the lowest has during the second honey production seasons. The highest amount of Mn and Co has been observed during season one and the lowest content was in season three, while for Cu the highest content was observed during season two and the lowest was during season three. As observed in Table 5 till potassium has the highest and calcium showed the second largest concentration while cadmium showed the lowest values in all honey production seasons. Most of the results reported in other study areas also indicated that potassium was quantitatively the highest detected element [16,26]. Comparable reports to our study were given in other geographical areas such as Argentinean honey [31]. Honey samples collected in Saudi Arabia showed the highest content of metals than our detected metals except for the comparable concentration of sodium [32]. Lazio region (central Italy) honey showed the highest concentration of minerals except for the comparable content of Calcium [7]. Kinds of honey from different regions of Turkey also illustrated the highest quantity of minerals including chromium and a large amount of lead [33]. In our study lead could not be detected, which might be due to impossible transportation of it by plants [34]. In contrary to our study low content of Mg, Mn, Fe, and Cu were reported in Kahramanmaras city, Turkey honey samples [35]. The high abundance of trace metals was detected in the studied areas of Dawuro district, but these values could be safe for human consumption [36].

Conclusion

The present study on ash content showed that the honey produced in Dawuro zone was floral types. Regarding seasonal effect the highest mineral content was found during the first season and the lowest was seen in the second season. In all the studied seasons and honey production areas potassium had the highest and cadmium showed the lowest concentration. Chromium and lead were not detected at all which prevail the honey production areas are free from environmental pollution. The levels of metals assessed in honey for its quality comparing with permissible limits showed that the concentrations were in a safety baseline level for human consumption. There was no health risk to consumers through the intake of honey in the studied agricultural areas, nevertheless further study on other physicochemical parameters of honey, regular follow up of harmful substances and training of beekeepers about good beekeeping practices should be carried out.

Acknowledgments

The Authors would like to thank Wolaita Sodo University for financial support and Mr. Merga H/Mariam from Arba Minch University who participated during sample analysis.

References

  1. Baglio E (2017) Chemistry and technology of honey production. Springer.
  2. KaskonienÄ— V, Venskutonis PR, ÄŒeksterytÄ— V (2008) Composition of volatile compounds of honey of various floral origin and beebread collected in Lithuania. Food Chemistry 111: 988-997.
  3. Bogdanov S, Haldimann M, Luginbühl W, Gallmann P (2007) Minerals in honey: environmental, geographical and botanical aspects. J Apicul Res 46: 269-275.
  4. Bontempo L, Camin F, Ziller L, Perini M, Nicolini G, et al. (2017) Isotopic and elemental composition of selected types of Italian honey. Measurement 98: 283-289.
  5. Batista BL, Da Silva LR, Rocha BA, Rodrigues JL, Berretta-Silva AA, et al. (2012) Multi-element determination in Brazilian honey samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and estimation of geographic origin with data mining techniques. Food Res Int 49: 209-215.
  6. Hernández OM, Fraga JM, Jiménez AI, Jimenez F, Arias JJ (2005) Characterization of honey from the Canary Islands: determination of the mineral content by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Food Chem 93: 449-458.
  7. Conti ME (2000) Lazio region (central Italy) honeys: a survey of mineral content and typical quality parameters. Food Con 11: 459-463.
  8. Bogdanov S, Jurendic T, Sieber R, Gallmann P (2008) Honey for nutrition and health: A review. J Am Coll Nutr 27: 677-689.
  9. Alnaqdy A, Al-Jabri A, Al Mahrooqi Z, Nzeako B, Nsanze H (2005) Inhibition effect of honey on the adherence of Salmonella to intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. Int J Food Microbiol 103: 347-351.
  10. Atwa AD, AbuShahba RY, Mostafa M, Hashem MI (2014) Effect of honey in preventing gingivitis and dental caries in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Saudi Den J 26: 108-114.
  11. Meo SA, Al-Asiri SA, Mahesar AL, Ansari MJ (2017) Role of honey in modern medicine. Saudi J Biol Sci 24: 975-978
  12. Gomes S, Dias LG, Moreira LL, Rodrigues P, Estevinho L (2005) Physicochemical, microbiological and antimicrobial properties of commercial honeys from Portugal. Food Chem Toxicol 48: 544-548.
  13. Bogdanov S, Martin P, Lullmann C, Borneck R, Flamini C, et al. (1997) Harmonised methods of the European Honey Commission. 28: 1-59.
  14. Anklam E (1998) A review of the analytical methods to determine the geographical and botanical origin of honey. Food Chem 63: 549-562.
  15. Fernández-Torres R, Perez-Bernal JL, Bello-Lopez MA, Callejon-Mochon M, Jimenez-Sanchez JC, et al. (2005) Mineral content and botanical origin of Spanish honeys. Talanta 65: 686-91.
  16. Silva LR, Videira R, Monteiro AP, Valentão P, Andrade PB (2009) Honey from Luso region (Portugal): Physicochemical characteristics and mineral contents. Microchem J 93: 73-77.
  17. Dag A, Afik O, Yeselson Y, Schaffer A, Shafir S (2006). Physical, chemical and palynological characterization of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) honey in Israel. Int J Food Sci Tech 41: 387-394.
  18. Al-Khalifa AS, Al-Arify IA (1999) Physicochemical characteristics and pollen spectrum of some Saudi honeys. Food Chem 67: 21-25.
  19. Gobessa S, Seifu E, Bezabih A (2012) Physicochemical properties of honey produced in the Homesha district of Western Ethiopia. J Apicul Sci 56: 33-40.
  20. Alemu T, Seifu E, Bezabih A (2013) Physicochemical properties of honey produced in Sekota district, northern Ethiopia. Int Food Res J 20: 3061-3067.
  21. Belay A, Solomon WK, Bultossa G, Adgaba N, Melaku S (2013) Physicochemical properties of the Harenna forest honey, Bale, Ethiopia. Food Chem 141: 3386-3392.
  22. Vit P, Rodríguez-Malaver A, Roubik DW, Moreno E, Souza BA, et al. (2009) Expanded parameters to assess the quality of honey from Venezuelan bees (Apis mellifera). J Apiprod Apimed Sci 1: 72-81.
  23. Mulugeta E, Tadese M (2017) Physicochemical characterization and pesticide residue analysis of honey produced in West Shewa Zone, Oromia. Am J App Chem 2017;5 (6):101-9.
  24. El Sohaimy SA, Masry SH, Shehata MG (2015) Physicochemical characteristics of honey from different origins. Ann Agric Sci 60: 279-287.
  25. QSAE (2005) Honey specification: Ethiopian standard, ES 1202:2005. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia:Quality and Standards Authority of Ethiopia (QSAE).
  26. Alves A, Ramos A, Gonçalves MM, Bernardo M, Mendes B (2013) Antioxidant activity, quality parameters and mineral content of Portuguese monofloral honeys. J Food Compos Anal 30: 130-138.
  27. Derebas E, Bulut G, Col M, Güney F, Yaşar N, et al. (2014) Physicochemical and residue analysis of honey from Black Sea region of Turkey. Fresenius Environ Bull. 23: 10-17.
  28. Khalil M, Moniruzzaman M, Boukraâ L, Benhanifia M, Islam M, et al. (2012) Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of Algerian honey. Molecules 17: 11199-11215.
  29. Baroni MV, Arrua C, Nores ML, Fayé P, del Pilar Díaz M, et al. (2009) Composition of honey from Córdoba (Argentina): Assessment of North/South provenance by chemometrics. Food Chem 114: 727-733.
  30. Bilisik A, Cakmak I, Bicakci A, Malyer H (2008) Seasonal variation of collected pollen loads of honeybees (Apis mellifera L. anatoliaca). Grana 47: 70-7.
  31. Cantarelli MA, Pellerano RG, Marchevsky EJ, Camiña JM (2008) Quality of honey from Argentina: study of chemical composition and trace elements. J Arg Chem Soc 96: 33-41.
  32. Alqarni AS, Owayss AA, Mahmoud AA, Hannan MA (2014) Mineral content and physical properties of local and imported honeys in Saudi Arabia. J Saudi Chem Soc 18: 618-625.
  33. Tuzen M, Silici S, Mendil D, Soylak M (2007) Trace element levels in honeys from different regions of Turkey. Food Chem 103: 325-330.
  34. Ciobanu O, Rădulescu H (2016) Monitoring of heavy metals residues in honey. Res J Agri Sci 48: 9-13.
  35. Erbilir F, Erdoĝrul Ö (2005) Determination of heavy metals in honey in Kahramanmaraş City, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 109: 181-187.
  36. Sharma AK (2005) Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants, Seventy-third report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Indian J Med Res 135: 446.

Citation: Engidaw D, Alemayehu K, Mustofa S (2019) Detection of the Concentration of Some Metals in the Honey Product in Dawuro Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. J Anal Bioanal Tech 10:416. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000416

Copyright: © 2019 Engidaw D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top