Dersleri yüzünden oldukça stresli bir ruh haline sikiş hikayeleri bürünüp özel matematik dersinden önce rahatlayabilmek için amatör pornolar kendisini yatak odasına kapatan genç adam telefonundan porno resimleri açtığı porno filmini keyifle seyir ederek yatağını mobil porno okşar ruh dinlendirici olduğunu iddia ettikleri özel sex resim bir masaj salonunda çalışan genç masör hem sağlık hem de huzur sikiş için gelip masaj yaptıracak olan kadını gördüğünde porn nutku tutulur tüm gün boyu seksi lezbiyenleri sikiş dikizleyerek onları en savunmasız anlarında fotoğraflayan azılı erkek lavaboya geçerek fotoğraflara bakıp koca yarağını keyifle okşamaya başlar
Managing Project Complexity in Construction Projects: The way Forward
ISSN: 2168-9717
Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
  • Editorial   
  • J Archit Eng Tech 2013, Vol 2(1)
  • DOI: 10.4172/2168-9717.1000e111

Managing Project Complexity in Construction Projects: The way Forward

Edward Ochieng* and Lauren Hughes
Faculty of Technology and Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK
*Corresponding Author: Edward Ochieng, Faculty of Technology and Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK, Tel: 0151-231-2850, Email: [email protected]

Received: 11-Jan-2013 / Accepted Date: 16-Jan-2013 / Published Date: 17-Jan-2013 DOI: 10.4172/2168-9717.1000e111 /

Numerous studies have attempted to explain project complexity by exploring the various approaches adopted by researchers [1,2]. The theoretical perspective of project complexity; and the “actuality” of complexity within construction projects has been investigated in the literature reviewed, highlighting the lack of consensus on the subject matter [3]. According to Baccarini [4] complexity is one of the critical project characteristics that determine appropriate actions to result in successful project outcomes, with construction projects continuously displaying higher levels of complexity since the mid-1940’s. Many other researchers supported Baccarini’s [4] view that project success is dependent on the complexity of a project, having a direct effect on the overall project performance [1,5,6]. Evidently, much of the research produced to date by the construction community has failed to consider the application of lean construction as a way to improve project performance by managing project complexity, ensuring the successful delivery of construction projects. Research undertaken by Smith et al [7] and Bhasin [8] supported this view, noting that the application of lean is what needs to happen for successful project delivery.

In recent years, an increasing amount of research has been undertaken in relation to the subject of project complexity [3]. When evaluating the issue of project complexity, researchers predominately focused on the core platforms of simple project complexity classification and complex systems theory [9]. Azim et al. [3] recognised a lack of agreement among researchers in relation to the definition of complexity. This observation was supported by Xia and Chan [2] who writes that project complexity has not been clearly defined. The only definition of complexity utmost acknowledged by researchers was that of the Oxford English Dictionary, which defined complexity as “consisting of many different and connected parts” and “not easy to understand, complicated or intricate” [3]. As a multi-dimensional concept, defining construction project complexity is incomprehensible. A recent study by Azim et al. [3] obtained several varying definitions of project complexity, with participant responses ranging from; a variety of people in terms of skills and experience, to a multidisciplinary, multi-national, multi-site and a lot of stakeholders. In review of the findings, Azim et al. [3] identified a direct link between project complexity and ‘people, products and processes’. Azim et al. [3] paper however would have been much more useful, had the authors not failed to consider the implementation of lean tools and techniques in managing people, products and processes of the project environment, which as acknowledged by Winter et al. [10] would subsequently reduce project complexity.

Wheeler [11] suggested that difficulties tend to surface throughout the project duration where the project is initially ill-defined. It is generally the negotiation and consensus building to overcome these difficulties, which result in the project being classified as complex. Dombkins [12] supported Wheeler’s [11] assessment, recognising complexity in projects as the unattainable act to undertake accurate detailed long-term planning. It must be noted; that the findings put forth by Wheeler [11] and Dombkins [12] might have been more convincing had they highlighted the need for the construction research community and industry to implement lean construction as a way to overcome project complexity in construction project delivery. Although extensive research has been carried out on project complexity, to date all existing accounts have failed to provide a single, clear definition of project complexity.

Up to now the literature reviewed of project complexity has focused predominately on the lack of consensus regarding its definition and the complexity typology. From the theoretical approaches explored, it could be argued that managing project complexity through the utilisation of effective lean construction techniques should be fairly straightforward. However failure of the theoretical approaches to address the relationship between theory and practice challenged this supposition. Complexity theory, in relation to construction project delivery has been strongly challenged in recent years by a number of researchers. Xia and Chan [2] pointed out that if construction project complexity was addressed via the behaviour of complex network in complexity theory, then the unpredictable and emergent nature of such a network would potentially inhibit the application of any linear approach. The context of complexity within construction projects has raised the question as to how senior construction managers can go about facing the challenges of project complexity, developing an infrastructure of improved construction project delivery. Lean construction ensures predictable flow, and an enhanced capability to deal with uncertainty and complexity in construction project delivery. Lean methods have been found to improve the dependability of construction project delivery in complex sites, by decomposing the scope of the project into small manageable parts. Construction projects are not intrinsically multifaceted, but because of the challenges encountered during implementation they can become complex. It is crucial that throughout the project life cycle senior managers develop plans and standardise with the purpose of managing complexity in the most efficient way. Incessant communication and coordination during the delivery of a complex construction project facilitates effective management of project complexity.


  1. Bosch-Rekveldt M, Yuri J, Herman Mooi YM, Hans Bakker H, AlexanderVA (2011) Grasping projectcomplexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organisationaland Environmental) framework. InternationalJournal of Project Management 29: 728-739.
  2. Xia B, Chan APC (2012) Measuring complexity for building projects: a Delphi study.Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 19: 7–24.
  3. Azim S, Gale A, Lawlor-Wright T, Kirkham R, Khan A, et al. (2010) The importance ofsoft skills in complex projects. International Journal of Managing Projects inBusiness 3: 387-401.
  4. Baccarini D (1996) The concept of project complexity–a review. International Journal ofProject Management 14: 201–204.
  5. Molenaar KR, Songer AD (1998) Model for public sector design-build projects selection. Journalof Construction Engineering and Management 124: 467-479.
  6. Chen Q, Wakefield RR, O’Brien M (2004) Lean Applications on Residential ConstructionSite. 1-4.
  7. Smith RE, Mossman A, Emmitt S (2011) Editorial: Lean and Integrated Project delivery.Lean Construction Journal 01-16.
  8. Bhasin S (2007) Lean and performance measurement. Journal of Manufacturing TechnologyManagement19: 670-684.
  9. Geraldi JG, Adlbrecht G (2007) On faith, fact, and interactions in projects. Project Management Journal 38: 32-43.
  10. Winter M, Smith C, Morris P, Cicmil S (2006) Directions for future research in projectmanagement: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network.International Journal of Project Management 24: 638-649.
  11. Wheeler D (2008) Unravelling complexity – the sunshine coastmulti-modal transport corridor project.” In Proceedings: Australian Institute of Project Management Annual NationalConference, 2008, Canberra.
  12. Dombkins DH (2008) The integration of project management and systemsthinking. The Annual Publication of International Project ManagementAssociation, International Project Management Association, Nijkerk 16-21.

Citation: Ochieng E, Hughes L (2013) Managing Project Complexity in Construction Projects: The way Forward. J Archit Eng Tech 2: e111. Doi: 10.4172/2168-9717.1000e111

Copyright: ©2013 Ochieng E, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Article Usage
  • Total views: 15475
  • [From(publication date): 7-2013 - Jan 28, 2023]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 11044
  • PDF downloads: 4431
Share This Article