Occupational Medicine & Health Affairs
Open Access

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) has long been a cornerstone of workplace safety, especially in industries such as construction, healthcare, manufacturing, and emergency services. Traditional PPE—helmets, gloves, masks, goggles, and protective clothing—has proven effective in reducing injuries and exposure to hazards. However, with the growing complexity of modern workplaces and rising concerns over occupational health and safety, technology has begun to transform conventional equipment into more advanced, intelligent systems. Smart PPE integrates sensors, connectivity, and data-driven features to provide real-time monitoring, enhance worker protection, and support proactive safety management [1,2].

Discussion

Smart PPE goes beyond simple protection by incorporating digital technologies that collect and transmit data about the user’s health, environment, and potential risks. For example, wearable helmets equipped with sensors can detect fatigue, monitor body temperature, or even measure exposure to toxic gases. Smart gloves can track hand movements to reduce repetitive strain injuries, while connected vests may alert workers to heat stress or hazardous air quality. These innovations not only protect workers but also provide valuable information for employers to prevent accidents before they happen [,].

One of the most important features of Smart PPE is real-time communication. Devices can send alerts directly to supervisors or safety officers, ensuring rapid responses in emergencies. For instance, if a construction worker falls, a smart helmet with motion sensors can immediately trigger an alarm and share the worker’s location. Similarly, in healthcare, smart masks and gowns with embedded biosensors can monitor exposure to pathogens, helping reduce the spread of infectious diseases [-].

The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies has further advanced Smart PPE. Connected devices can be part of a larger safety ecosystem, where data from multiple workers is analyzed collectively. This allows organizations to identify patterns, detect high-risk zones, and implement preventive measures. Data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) enhance decision-making by predicting risks, improving resource allocation, and reducing downtime caused by accidents [,].

Despite these benefits, Smart PPE also presents challenges. High costs of production and implementation may limit access, particularly for small and medium-sized businesses. Data privacy is another concern, as continuous monitoring raises questions about how personal information is collected and used. Moreover, overreliance on technology could reduce workers’ own situational awareness if not implemented carefully. Training and proper integration with existing safety protocols remain essential for maximizing effectiveness.

Conclusion

Smart PPE represents one of the most significant challenges to human health, agriculture, and the environment. Their potential to cause widespread harm underscores the importance of awareness, prevention, and global cooperation. By investing in biosafety measures, education, and international collaboration, societies can mitigate the risks posed by biohazards while continuing to benefit from scientific and medical advancements. Ultimately, safeguarding against biohazards is not only a matter of protecting individuals but also of preserving the well-being of entire communities and ecosystems.

References

• Nikfar R, Shamsizadeh A, Darbor M, Khaghani S, Moghaddam M. (2017) A Study of prevalence of Shigella species and antimicrobial resistance patterns in paediatric medical center, Ahvaz, Iran. Iran J Microbiol 9: 277.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.

• Kacmaz B, Unaldi O, Sultan N, Durmaz R (2014) Drug resistance profiles and clonality of sporadic Shigella sonnei isolates in Ankara, Turkey. Braz J Microbiol 45: 845–849.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.

• Akcali A, Levent B, Akbaş E, Esen B (2008) Typing of Shigella sonnei strains isolated in some provinces of Turkey using antimicrobial resistance and pulsed field gel electrophoresis methods. Mikrobiyol Bul 42: 563–572.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.

• Jafari F, Hamidian M, Rezadehbashi M, Doyle M, Salmanzadeh-Ahrabi S, et al. (2009) Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella species associated with acute diarrhea in Tehran, Iran. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 20: 56–62.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.

• Ranjbar R, Behnood V, Memariani H, Najafi A, Moghbeli M, et al. (2016) Molecular characterisation of quinolone-resistant Shigella strains isolated in Tehran, Iran. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 5: 26–30.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.

• Zamanlou S, Ahangarzadeh Rezaee M, Aghazadeh M, Ghotaslou R, et al. (2018) Characterization of integrons, extended-spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC cephalosporinase, quinolone resistance, and molecular typing of Shigella spp. Infect Dis 50: 616–624.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.

• Varghese S, Aggarwal A (2011) Extended spectrum beta-lactamase production in Shigella isolates-A matter of concern. Indian J Med Microbiol 29: 76.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.

• Peirano G, Agersø Y, Aarestrup FM, Dos Prazeres Rodrigues D (2005) Occurrence of integrons and resistance genes among sulphonamide-resistant Shigella spp. from Brazil. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 301–305.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.

• Kang HY, Jeong YS, Oh JY, Tae SH, Choi CH, et al. (2005) Characterization of antimicrobial resistance and class 1 integrons found in Escherichia coli isolates from humans and animals in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 639-644.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.

• Pan J-C, Ye R, Meng D-M, Zhang W, Wang H-Q, et al. (2006) Molecular characteristics of class 1 and class 2 integrons and their relationships to antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 288–296.

  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at.