ISSN: 2332-2608

Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Editorial   
  • J Fisheries Livest Prod 13: 632, Vol 13(3)

Underwater Acoustics for Environmental and Resource Assessment

Wiley Zoe*
College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, China
*Corresponding Author: Wiley Zoe, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, China, Email: wileyzoe@gmail.com

Received: 01-Mar-2025 / Manuscript No. jflp-25-164391 / Editor assigned: 03-Mar-2025 / PreQC No. jflp-25-164391 / Reviewed: 17-Mar-2025 / QC No. jflp-25-164391 / Revised: 21-Mar-2025 / Manuscript No. jflp-25-164391 / Published Date: 28-Mar-2025

Keywords

Underwater acoustics; Marine environment; Resource assessment; Sonar systems; Acoustic monitoring; Oceanography

Introduction

The exploration and understanding of the marine environment are pivotal to managing and conserving Earth's oceans. As much of the ocean remains unexplored due to its vastness and inaccessibility, innovative tools and technologies are required to bridge the knowledge gap [1]. One such powerful tool is underwater acoustics. Often referred to as hydroacoustics, underwater acoustics involves the generation, transmission, and reception of sound waves in water to study and assess marine environments and resources. From tracking fish populations to monitoring environmental health, underwater acoustics has become indispensable in both scientific research and commercial operations. This article explores the role of underwater acoustics in environmental and resource assessment, providing insights into its principles, applications, and potential for sustainable ocean use [2].

Brief Description

Underwater acoustics is based on the principles of sound propagation in water, a medium through which sound travels much more efficiently than light or electromagnetic waves [3]. It is widely applied in marine studies due to its capability to penetrate the ocean's depths and gather information about underwater features, organisms, and activities [4]. There are two primary types of acoustic methods: active acoustics, which involve emitting sound waves and measuring their reflection, and passive acoustics, which involve listening to natural or anthropogenic sounds in the marine environment. These methods have become essential for assessing marine biodiversity, mapping seafloors, detecting underwater hazards, and evaluating the impact of human activities on marine life [5].

Discussion

Underwater acoustics has become an indispensable tool in the assessment of marine environments and the exploration of underwater resources. Acoustic technologies, including sonar systems, echo sounders, and passive listening arrays, enable researchers and industry professionals to map the seafloor, detect subsea structures, and monitor marine life with remarkable precision [6]. In environmental assessments, acoustic sensors help track biodiversity, monitor marine mammal presence, and detect changes in oceanographic parameters such as temperature, salinity, and currents often in real time and with minimal ecological disruption [7]. These capabilities are particularly crucial in sensitive habitats or protected zones, where traditional intrusive methods are not feasible. In the context of resource assessment, such as offshore oil and gas exploration or seabed mining, acoustics aid in identifying geological formations, gas seeps, and sediment composition [8]. The use of multibeam sonar and sub-bottom profilers allows for detailed 3D imaging of subsurface structures, which informs safe and sustainable development decisions [9]. However, concerns remain regarding the potential impacts of anthropogenic sound on marine fauna, especially species that rely on echolocation. As such, there is a growing push toward developing low-impact acoustic technologies and implementing best practices that balance exploration with conservation. Overall, underwater acoustics stands at the intersection of innovation and environmental stewardship, offering a non-invasive and scalable approach to understanding and managing the world beneath the waves [10].

Conclusion

Underwater acoustics has revolutionized the way we explore, monitor, and manage the marine environment. By harnessing sound to overcome the challenges of underwater observation, scientists and resource managers gain invaluable insights into ocean dynamics, biodiversity, and resources. From fish stock assessment and habitat mapping to monitoring environmental impacts and supporting conservation policies, acoustic technologies offer versatile and non-invasive solutions for sustainable ocean stewardship. As the world seeks to balance economic development with ecological preservation, the continued advancement and responsible application of underwater acoustics will be crucial. Promoting collaboration, innovation, and accessibility in acoustic science will ensure that we can protect and sustainably utilize the invaluable resources of the ocean for generations to come.

References

  1. Surtida AP (2000) Middlemen: the most maligned players in the fish distribution channel.
  2. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  3. Rajeev M, Nagendran P (2019)Should They Avoid the Middlemen? an Analysis of Fish Processing Firms in India. Institute for Social and Economic Change.
  4. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  5. Bjorndal T, Fernandez-Polanco J, Lappo A, Lem A (2014) Consumer trends and prefences in the demand for food. SNF Working Paper 17/14.
  6. Google Scholar

  7. Petetin L (2020) The COVID-19 crisis: an opportunity to integrate food democracy into post-pandemic food systems.Euro J Risk Reg11: 326-336.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Hamilton ND (2011) Moving toward food democracy: Better food, new farmers, and the myth of feeding the world.Drake J Agric L16: 117.
  10. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  11. Aday S, Aday MS (2020) Impact of COVID-19 on the food supply chain.Food Quality and Safety4: 167-180.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. BBC (2020) Coronavirus: How can society thrive post-pandemic?
  14. DeBroff S (2020) How COVID-19 Has Impacted Consumer Food Habits.Retrieved July 10: 2020.
  15. Google Scholar

  16. Galanakis CM (2020) The food systems in the era of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic crisis.Foods9: 523.
  17. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  18. Rodriguez- Perez C, Molina-Montes E, Verardo V, Artacho R, García-Villanova B, et al. (2020) Changes in dietary behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak confinement in the Spanish COVIDiet study.Nutrients12: 1730.
  19. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Citation: Wiley Z (2025) Underwater Acoustics for Environmental and Resource Assessment. J Fisheries Livest Prod 13: 632.

Copyright: © 2025 Wiley Z. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top