Wearable Sensors and IoT in Community Care: Transforming Health Beyond Hospital Walls
Received: 01-Apr-2025 / Manuscript No. JCPHN-25-171070 / Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2025 / PreQC No. JCPHN-25-171070 / Reviewed: 17-Apr-2025 / QC No. JCPHN-25-171070 / Revised: 22-Apr-2025 / Manuscript No. JCPHN-25-171070 / Published Date: 28-Apr-2025 DOI: 10.4172/2471-9846.1000642
Introduction
The landscape of healthcare delivery is rapidly evolving, driven by advances in digital technologies that extend care beyond the traditional hospital setting. Among the most transformative innovations are wearable sensors and the Internet of Things (IoT), which enable continuous monitoring, real-time data collection, and remote care management. Wearable devices, such as smartwatches, fitness trackers, and biosensors, can capture vital health metrics including heart rate, blood pressure, glucose levels, sleep quality, and physical activity. When integrated with IoT systems, these devices connect seamlessly to healthcare providers, caregivers, and patients, facilitating timely interventions and personalized care. In community care, where the focus lies in prevention, early detection, and chronic disease management, wearable sensors and IoT hold immense potential to improve outcomes, reduce hospitalizations, and empower individuals to take an active role in their health.
Discussion
Wearable sensors and IoT technologies have redefined how health information is collected and utilized in community care. Unlike traditional models that rely heavily on episodic visits to healthcare facilities, these tools allow continuous and non-invasive monitoring in everyday environments. For example, individuals living with hypertension or diabetes can benefit from devices that track blood pressure or glucose levels and transmit the data to healthcare providers in real time. This capability not only enhances clinical decision-making but also promotes preventive care by identifying warning signs before conditions escalate into emergencies.
One of the most significant impacts of wearable sensors and IoT is their ability to support aging populations and those with chronic illnesses. Remote monitoring enables older adults to maintain independence while ensuring safety and timely intervention. For instance, wearable fall detection devices connected to IoT networks can immediately alert caregivers or emergency services, reducing complications and mortality. Similarly, cardiac monitoring devices can detect arrhythmias early and transmit alerts for medical follow-up, preventing costly hospital admissions. In these ways, wearable and IoT solutions extend healthcare support into homes and communities, shifting the paradigm from reactive to proactive care.
Beyond individual benefits, the integration of IoT and wearable data contributes to population health management. Aggregated data from communities provide insights into health trends, risk factors, and service needs, informing targeted interventions and policy planning. Public health professionals can leverage these insights to design prevention campaigns, allocate resources more efficiently, and respond to emerging health challenges. This data-driven approach strengthens the link between clinical care and public health strategies, aligning with broader goals of health equity and sustainability.
However, successful implementation of wearable sensors and IoT in community care requires careful consideration of ethical, technical, and social challenges.
Conclusion
Wearable sensors and IoT are not just futuristic gadgets—they are game-changing tools in the movement toward preventive, accessible, and community-centered healthcare. By extending health monitoring into the daily lives of patients, they empower individuals, support early intervention, and reduce system-wide strain. In the hands of skilled community nurses, these technologies become more than devices—they become lifelines, helping people manage health in the places where life truly happens: at home, in the community, and within the rhythms of everyday living.
References
- Belone L, Orosco A, Damon E, Smith-McNeal W, Rae R, et al. (2017) The piloting of a culturally centered American Indian family prevention program: a CBPR partnership between Mescal ero Apache and the University of New Mexico. Public Health Rev 55: 1–3.
Indexed at Google scholar Cross Ref
- Belone L, Tosa J, Shendo K, Toya A, Straits K, et al. (2016) Community-based participatory research for co-creating interventions with Native communities: a partnership between the University of New Mexico and the Pueblo of Jemez . Baltimore 1: 199–220
Indexed at Google scholar Cross Ref
- Blackshear E, Nelson C, Van Dyke E, Echo-Hawk A, Bassett D, et al. (2016) Conversations about Community-Based Participatory Research and Trust: “We are Explorers Together.” PCHP 10: 305–309.
Indexed at Google scholar Cross Ref
- Brandenburger SJ, Wells K, Stluka S (2016) Utilizing Talking Circles as a Means of Gathering American Indian Stories for Developing a Nutrition and Physical Activity Curriculum. Health Educ Behav 44: 448-453.
Indexed at Google scholar Cross Ref
- Cochran Patricia AL, Marshall Catherine A, Garcia-Downing C, Kendall Elizabeth, et al. (2008) “Indigenous Ways of Knowing: Implications for Participatory Research and Community”. Am J Public Health 98: 22–27.
Indexed at Google scholar Cross Ref
- Crump AD, Etz K, Arroyo JA, Hemberger N, Srinivasan S (2017) “Accelerating and strengthening Native American health research through a collaborative initiative”. Prev Sci 1: 1-4.
Indexed at Google scholar Cross Ref
- Fleischhacker S, Vu M, Ries A, McPhail A (2011) Engaging tribal leaders in an American Indian healthy eating project through modified talking circles. Fam Community Health 34: 202–210.
Indexed at Google scholar Cross Ref
- Gittelsohn J, Evans M, Story M, Davis SM, Metcalfe L, et al. (1999) Multi-site Formative Research to Prevent Obesity in American Indian School Children. Am J Clin Nutr AM 69: 767–772.
Indexed at Google scholar Cross Ref
- Gittelsohn J, Steckler A, Johnson CC, Pratt C, Grieser M, et al. (2006) Formative research in school and community-based health programs and studies: “State of the Art” and the TAAG approach. Health Education & Behavior, 33: 25–39.
Indexed at Google scholar Cross Ref
- Gittelsohn J, Roache C, Kratzmann M, Reid R, Ogina J, et al. (2010) Participatory research for chronic disease prevention in Inuit communities. Am J Health Behav 34: 453-464.
Citation: Loveness C (2025) Wearable Sensors and IoT in Community Care: Transforming Health Beyond Hospital Walls. J Comm Pub Health Nursing, 11: 642. DOI: 10.4172/2471-9846.1000642
Copyright: © 2025 Loveness C. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
Recommended Journals
Open Access Journals
Article Tools
Article Usage
- Total views: 251
- [From(publication date): 0-0 - Dec 10, 2025]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 191
- PDF downloads: 60
