Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals, South West Ethiopia
Received: 27-Aug-2018 / Accepted Date: 10-Sep-2018 / Published Date: 20-Sep-2018 DOI: 10.4172/2329-6879.1000279
Keywords: Work related musculoskeletal disorders; Predictors; Nurses; Jimma; Ethiopia
Background
Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs) refers to disorders of muscles, skeleton, and related tissues as a results of work related event or activities which characterized by muscles, joints, tendons and ligament pain weakness, swelling, burning worldwide [1-5], numbness, tingling or dull ache over affected area. The major body regions involved include lower back as well as upper and lower limb extremities [6-8]. According to Bureau of Labour Statistics, WMSDs are conditions in which the work environment and performance of work contribute significantly to the condition and/or the condition is made worse or persists longer due to bending, climbing, crawling, reaching, twisting, overexertion, or repetitive motion [9]. Commonly reported WMSDs are sprains, strains, and tears, back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, tendonitis, tenosynovitis and bursitis [9-11]. WMSDs can be prevented by one or a combination of having good physical appearance or proper posture, working only what they can work (optimal load), be technical when lifting and lowering objects, use appropriate equipment and strengthen muscles and connective tissues by regular physical activity and proper nutrition [12].
Work related musculoskeletal disorders likely be are a major causes of morbidity and mortality around the world. For instance including nurses there is estimated 2 million deaths, 160 million new cases, more than 4.2 million cases of nonfatal injuries/illnesses, 70 million physician consultations and 130 million hospitals outpatient and emergency room visit each year worldwide [1-5].
The risk of hospital based nurses for Musculo-Skeletal Disorders (MSD), such as lower back pain/injury, and neck or shoulder problems, is a global challenge [13-15]. The magnitude of WMSDs varies from region to region. According to Bureau of Labour Statistics report, annual prevalence of WMSDs at any of body region is between 40%-85% among both Asian populations and Western populations [16]. In Nigeria, 84.4% of the nurses have had WMSDs once or more in their lifework [17]. The consequences of MSD generate not only suffering and disability for workers and their families, but also result in high costs for society, considering losses in productivity and wages, benefits paid to workers and medical expenses [3]. In 2002, about 1.24 billion dollars paid out for work-related injuries, 40% of which were considered to be for MSDs [4]. It is the biggest cause of absence from work and Overexertion injuries might cause nurses to leave their profession [12,14].
Nurses in Africa are the health care workers available in most sub- Saharan nations’ health facilities, performing a broad range of tasks and working in settings where no other health workers, including physicians, are available [18]. Significant factors associated with WRMSD among nurses are frequent/repetitive works, working in awkward postures, lifting of heavy objects, daily exposure to whole body vibration, routine overhead work, work with the neck in chronic flexion position, performing repetitive forceful tasks, organizational factor, psychosocial factors (work pace, autonomy, monotony, work/ rest cycle, task demands, social support from colleagues and management and job uncertainty) and individual factors (age, gender, professional activities, alcohol/tobacco consumption) [8-10,19-21].
Work-related musculoskeletal injuries have negatively impact on nurses’ quality of life, health and patient care and also consequences of the problem include job change, job loss, and chronic pain; however, to our knowledge there is paucity of information on work related musculoskeletal disorder among nurses in Ethiopia. Thus, the findings of this study provide insight for nurses, nurse managers and health care industry administrators to work on the identified factors leading WMSDs which will improve productivity and efficiency of nurses. This in turn boosts the achievement of the hospital and also it helps nurse tutors to give pre service training on body mechanics and ergonomics. So the purpose of this study was therefore; to assess work related musculoskeletal disorders and associated factors among nurses working in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals.
Methods
Study area and period
The study was conducted in four public hospitals in Jimma Zone, from March, 12-27 (for two weeks), 2015. Jimma is one of the 18 zones of the Oromia Regional State in Ethiopia. Jimma city is the capital of Jimma zone located at 352 km to south west of Addis Ababa. Based on the information from Jimma Zone and town Health Bureau, the population projection of 2014/15 of the zone was 3090112 and Jimma town was 184,925 respectively. The zone has a total area of 119,316 km2. In this zone there are four public hospitals (Jimma University Teaching Hospital (JUTH), Shenen Gibe, Limu Genet and Agaro District Hospitals) and one defense hospital. From the four public hospitals, the first two are situated in Jimma town which is the capital city of the zone, whereas the latter two are at Limu town which is 72 km far from Jimma town and Agaro town which is 45 km far from Jimma town respectively. Except JUTH which is teaching Hospital, the three are district hospitals. In addition to this the zones has 112 health centers and Jimma town administrative has 4 health centers. There are 611 enrolled nurses in Jimma zone public hospitals among these 518 of them were in JUTH, 32 in Shenen gibe, 27 in Agaro hospital and 34 in Limmu District Hospital.
Study design
Institutional based cross sectional study using quantitative data collection methods was used.
Source and Study population of this study was all nurses who were working in Jimma Zone public Hospitals during data collection period. All nurses those had greater than12 months’ work experience were included in the study while nurses those were critically ill during data collection period, pregnant nurses and disabled were excluded from the study.
Sample size and sampling technique
The sample size was calculated using a single population proportion sample size calculation formula using the assumptions of margin of error of 4% with 95% confidence intervals, α=0.05 (level of significance), P=50% assumed the proportion of work related musculoskeletal disorders. After using correction formula and adding 10% non-response rate, the final sample size was 333.
Number of nurses obtained from respective hospital human resource department. Then proportional allocation to sample size was done to each hospital and sampling frame was developed based on lists obtained from Human Resource department and study unit was identified using systematic random sampling after calculating the kth value that was 2. The first nurse was selected based on lottery method and the subsequent study unit was selected with interval of two in the list of sampling frame. If a nurse was absent after two attempts and/or fulfilled inclusion or exclusion criteria, the nurse in the position immediately before or after were selected.
Data collection procedures and quality control
Data collection instrument was adapted from Dutch musculoskeletal questionnaire and after review of other relevant literatures [16,18,22-24]. Questionnaires were prepared in English and has semi- structured questionnaire. Face to face validity was checked by the experts to see the validity of the tools and it was adapted from the questionnaires with the sensitivity test greater than 85% .The questionnaire arranged according to particular objective it addresses. It has six parts: socio- demographic characteristics, work history and life style, prevalence of WMSDs, factors related to patient condition, factors related to organization and job risk factor. Data was collected using self-administered questionnaire. Questionnaires were distributed and collected back by data collection facilitators. A total of six Diploma Nurses were involved in data collection.
Data quality control
Prior to the actual data collection, pre-testing was done on 5% of the total study subjects (17 nurses) at Bedelle hospital, which is not included in analysis of the real study. Wording, organization and structuring of the questionnaire were checked and amended accordingly such as sequences, relevancy, clarity or repeated ideas. Data collection facilitator and supervisor were trained for one day intensively about questionnaires and data collection procedure that includes the relevance of the study, objective of the study, confidentiality of the information, and informed consent. Daily close supervision was done by supervisor and each filled questionnaire was checked daily for completeness. Finally, the data were carefully entered and cleaned before the beginning of the analysis.
Operational Definition
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders
In this study WMSD refers to self-reported pain or discomfort at least once in the last one year after work or following work by nurses in one or more of the following body regions : Low back, Neck, Knees, Upper back, Wrists/Hands, Shoulder, Ankles/Feet, Elbow and Hips/ Thighs.
Mal-positions
Inappropriate working postures like awkward and cramped position that nurses may use during work (nursing care).
Data entry and analysis procedures
The data were entered into Epi-Data version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS version 21.0 for analysis. Percentage, Frequency, mean and standard deviation were calculated. Binary logistic regression analysis was done to see the association between the predictor and the outcome variable (WMSD). Those variables with P-value <0.25 in bi-variable logistic regression analysis were included in multivariable logistic regression analysis. The P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. An odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals was used to examine associations between dependent and independent variables.
Ethical Consideration
Ethical clearance and approval letter to conduct study was obtained from Jimma University Collage of Health Sciences, Institutional Review Board to communicate with Hospitals administrative body in Jimma zone. Permission letter was obtained from administrative body of each hospital. The study has no risk and exceptional benefits. Finally after ensuring that the study has no risk and informing its benefit, verbal consent was obtained from the subjects included in the study immediately before the distribution of questionnaire. The research assistants were trained by the principal investigators on how to keep the confidentiality and anonymity of the responses of the respondents (nurses’ information) in all aspect. The right of the respondents to refuse answer for few or all of the questions was respected.
Results
Characteristics of the study participants
Three hundred thirty three questionnaires were distributed, and 301 nurses returned questionnaires which makes response rate of 90.4%. The reasons for non-response were refusal and heavy workloads. Among the participants, majority 253 (84.1%) were working at JUTH, 168 (89%) were in the age group between 20-29 years, 159 (52.8%) were males, and 180 (59.8%) were single. Regarding the educational status, 178 (59.1%) were Diploma Nurses and their mean salary was 2402.2 ± 871.7EB. Among the respondents, 277(92%) were non-obese (BMI<25 kg/m2), while only 24 (8%) were obese (BMI>25 kg/m2) (Table 1). Regarding the life style of respondents, 282(93.7%) were not smoker and 226 (75.1%) not drink alcohol. Out of 301 respondents, 137 (45.5%) were engaged in different type of physical exercises.
Frequency (n=301) | % | ||
---|---|---|---|
Sex | Male | 159 | 52.8 |
Female | 142 | 47.2 | |
Age | 20-29 | 268 | 89 |
30-39 | 16 | 5.3 | |
>40 | 17 | 5.6 | |
Marital status | Married | 119 | 39.5 |
Single | 180 | 59.8 | |
Divorced | 2 | 0.7 | |
Educational Qualification | Diploma in Nursing | 178 | 59.1 |
Bachelor degree in Nursing | 120 | 39.9 | |
Master’s degree in Nursing | 3 | 1 | |
Salary | <1800 EB | 79 | 26.2 |
1800-2350 EB | 78 | 25.9 | |
>2350 EB | 144 | 47.8 | |
Organization | JUSH | 253 | 84.1 |
Shenen Gibe | 16 | 5.3 | |
Limu Genet | 17 | 5.6 | |
Agaro | 15 | 5 | |
Body mass index | <25(non-obese) | 277 | 92 |
>=25(obese) | 24 | 8 |
Table 1: Socio-Demographic Characteristics of nurses working in Jimma Zone public Hospital, South West of Ethiopia March, 2015.
Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders
From the 301 respondents, 183 (60.8%) of them experienced WMSD at least in one body region during the last 12 months. The highest 12-months prevalence of WMSD was reported in the lower back (67.8%), followed by the neck (24.0%) and knees (23.6%), but least in the Elbow /forearm (2.7%) (Table 2).
Body region | Frequency(n=183) | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Lower back | 124 | 67.8 |
Neck | 44 | 24 |
Knees | 43 | 23.6 |
Ankles/Feet | 36 | 19.7 |
Hips/Thighs | 29 | 15.8 |
Upper back | 28 | 15.3 |
Shoulder | 26 | 14.1 |
Wrist/hand | 13 | 7.1 |
Elbow /forearm | 5 | 2.7 |
Table 2: Body region and work related musculoskeletal disorders among nursing professionals working in Jimma Zone public Hospitals, Murch, 2015.
Of all of the 183 respondents that indicated WMSDs, 76 (41.5%) reported that they had treated themselves or had sought treatment from other health practitioners for WMSDs and 26.2% of them reported that they have changed their working unit due to WMSD. Highest percentage of the respondents (67.4%) experienced their first episode of WMSDs in the first five years of clinical practice, and 14.9% during 5-15 years of nursing practice.
Work history
Concerning Working Unit, 21.9% of the respondents were working at the surgical ward, 11.3% at the OPD, 11.0% at OR, 10.6% at Medical and 10% at the Pediatrics ward. Majority (90%) of the respondents were staff nurses in position while 78.1% had 1-5 years of experience. Two hundred thirty two (77.1%) had no previous occupation and only 38 (12.6%) of them had part time job or they had done extra-shifts at another clinic/hospital outside their normal shift. The mean number of hours per week they had done was 52.29 ± 12.95. Majority 190 (63.1%) of the respondents worked in mixed (day and night) shift (Table 3).
Work related characteristics | Frequency (n=301) | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Working Unit | Medical ward | 32 | 10.6 |
Surgical Ward | 66 | 21.9 | |
Pediatrics ward | 30 | 10 | |
Neonatology ward | 9 | 3 | |
ICU | 16 | 5.3 | |
OR | 33 | 11 | |
Recovery room | 2 | 0.7 | |
OPD | 34 | 11.3 | |
Psychiatry | 9 | 3 | |
Ophthalmology | 6 | 2 | |
Obstetrics and gynecology ward | 15 | 5 | |
chronic illness | 5 | 1.7 | |
TB and ART clinic | 9 | 3 | |
MCH | 8 | 2.7 | |
Dental clinic | 10 | 3.3 | |
Other* | 16 | 5.3 | |
Work Experience in Nursing | 5-Jan | 235 | 78.1 |
10-Jun | 45 | 15 | |
15-Nov | 3 | 1 | |
>16 | 18 | 6 | |
Position | staff nurse | 271 | 90 |
Head nurse | 24 | 8 | |
Supervisor | 2 | 0.7 | |
Matron | 2 | 0.7 | |
previous occupation | No | 232 | 77.1 |
Yes | 69 | 22.9 | |
Part time job | No | 263 | 87.4 |
Yes | 38 | 12.6 | |
Work schedule (shift) | Day | 89 | 29.6 |
Night | 22 | 7.3 | |
Mixed | 190 | 63.1 | |
Work shift | Constant | 66 | 21.9 |
Rotational | 235 | 78.1 | |
*Other-admission office, supervision, nursing director office and matron, referral clinic |
Table 3: Work History of Nursing Professionals of Jimma zone public Hospitals, South West of Ethiopia, March, 2015.
Actual activities
With regard to daily actual nursing activities, majority 174 (57.8) of nurses reported that lifting or transferring dependent patients, 127 (42.2%) bed-making and 122 (40.5%) wound dressing related with WMSDs (Table 4).
Variables | Frequency | % |
---|---|---|
Lifting and transferring dependent patients | 174 | 57.8 |
Bed-making | 127 | 42.2 |
taking patients vital signs | 70 | 23.3 |
Wound dressing | 122 | 40.5 |
Administering medication | 62 | 20.6 |
Bed bath | 66 | 21.9 |
Performing manual orthopedic techniques | 40 | 13.3 |
Writing reports | 17 | 5.6 |
Table 4: Actual nursing activities at Jimma Zone Public Hospitals, South West of Ethiopia March, 2015.
Organizational related variables
Majority of the respondents 74.4% reported that no available materials especially for patient handling and 71.1% indicated that the working environment is not conducive. Majority (77.1%) of the respondents reported no training on manual handling or ergonomics (how to prevent occupational hazards).
Patient condition related variables
Majority of the respondents reported that they work all the time (each day): patients with disabilities (62.8%), patient with emergencies (54.5%), and work with disoriented patients (50.2%) (Table 5).
Patient condition | All the time In % | Most of the time In % | Some of the time In % | A little of the time In % | None of the time In % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient with disabilities | 62.8 | 27.2 | 6.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
patient with emergencies | 54.5 | 23.9 | 13.6 | 1.7 | 6.3 |
Disoriented patients | 50.2 | 27.2 | 17.6 | 3.7 | 1.3 |
Table 5: Patient condition of nursing professionals of Jimma Zone Public Hospitals, South West of Ethiopia, March, 2015.
Condition at work /respondents’ problem perception on Job risk
Table 6 shows the responses of the respondents, how much of problem job tasks/conditions were to the respondents. Majority of the respondents reported major problems in Carrying, lifting, and moving heavy materials or equipment (68.4%), working in the same positions for long period (44.9%), bending or twisting back in work place during work (63.5%) and Working in mal-positions (62.1%) (Table 5).
Job risk | No problem in % | Minimal to moderate problem in % | Major problems in % |
---|---|---|---|
Carrying, lifting, or moving heavy materials or equipment | 6.3 | 25.2 | 68.4 |
Working in the same positions for long period | 7.3 | 24.9 | 67.8 |
Working in mal-position | 12.3 | 26.2 | 61.5 |
Bending or twisting back | 12 | 24.6 | 63.5 |
Performing the same task over and over | 24.9 | 39.5 | 37.5 |
Reaching or working away from your body | 24.9 | 42.9 | 32.2 |
Continuing to work while injured or hurt | 22.9 | 39.2 | 37.9 |
Table 6: Condition at work (respondents’ problem perception on job risk) for nurses working in Jimma zone public hospitals, South West of Ethiopia March, 2015, N=301.
Factors associated with WMSD among nurses in Jimma zone public hospitals
Multi variable logistic regression analysis was done to identify predictors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Lifting or transferring dependent patients, giving wound care, working unit, working in the same positions for long period, working in malpositions, giving care for disoriented patients and bending or twisting back during work were factors significantly associated with WMSDs among nurses. Nurses those who left and moved patients in their daily activities were 2.1 times more likely to have WMSDs as compared to those who didn’t lift or move patients with 95% CI of 1.1-4.3.Nurses those who gave wound care in their daily activity were 4.2 times more likely to have WMSDs as compared to those who didn’t with 95% CI of 1.9-8.9. Nurses those worked in medical ward were 9.6 times and ICU 3.4 times more likely at risk for developing work related musculoskeletal disorders with 95% CI 2.4-38.3 and 1.2-9.7 as compared to those worked in outpatient departments respectively.
Nurses who perceived job risks like using mal- positions and working in the same position as a problem were 9.7 and 6.1 time more likely to have WMSDs as compared to those who didn’t perceived as a problem with 95% CI 2.2-42.6 and 1.3-28.7 respectively, while those perceived bending or twisting back as a problem during work 5.1 time more likely to have WMSDs as compared to those who didn’t perceived it with 95% CI 1.1-23.7.Nurses who worked all the times with disoriented patients were 2.6 times more likely at risk to develop WMSDs with 95% CI 1.1-5.7 than those worked sometimes with such patients (Table 7).
Variable | category | COR (95%CI) | AOR (95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Lifting or transferring dependent patients | Yes | 4.4 (2.6-7.4) | 2.1 (1.1-4.3) |
No | 1 | 1 | |
Wound dressing | Yes | 4.2 (2.5-7.1) | 4.2 (1.9-8.9) |
No | 1 | 1 | |
Working unit | Outpatient dep’t | 1 | 1 |
Medical | 3.3 (1.3-8.1) | 9.6 (2.4-38.3) | |
Surgical | 1.7 (0.9-3.3) | 1.1 (0.5-2.6) | |
Pediatrics | 1.5 (0.7-3.3) | 1.4 (0.5-4.1) | |
OR/ICU | 2.3 (1.1-4.8) | 3.4 (1.2-9.7) | |
Other inpatient dep’t | 1.8 (0.8-4.3) | 1.2 (0.4-3.6) | |
Working in the same positions for long period | Problem | 8.0 (2.6-24.5) | 6.1 (1.3-28.7) |
No problem | 1 | 1 | |
Working in mal- position | Problem | 6 (4.3-31.0) | 9.7 (2.2-42.6) |
No problem | 1 | 1 | |
Performing the same task over and over | Problem | 2.5 (1.5-4.3) | 1.5 (0.6-3.7) |
No problem | 1 | 1 | |
Working with disoriented patients | All the time | 3.9 (2.1-7.2) | 2.6 (1.1-5.7) |
Most of the time | 3.1 (1.6-6.1) | 2.3 (0.9-5.6) | |
Some or less time | 1 | 1 | |
Bending or twisting back | Problem | 9.3 (4.0-22.0) | 5.1 (1.1-23.7) |
No problem | 1 | 1 |
Table 7: A multivariable logistic regression analyses of the various risk factors for reported WMSD among Nurses Working in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals, South West Ethiopia, March, 2015.
Discussion
The prevalence of WMSDs at anybody region in this study was 60.8% which indicates that significant number of nurses working in Jimma zone public hospitals experienced work related musculoskeletal disorders in last one year. This might decreases nurses’ productivity, efficiency and effectiveness during their working hours as most nurses might spend on sick leave days in these public hospitals. If appropriate measures not taken, in long term time this might leads to severe threat to nurses’ work force in public hospitals as they might leave the job. The prevalence of WMSDs among nurses varied according to studies. For instance higher prevalence of WMSDs among nurses in mainland China 70% [25], rural Malaysia 73.24% [16], Nigeria 78% [17] and Uganda 80.8% [18]. This difference might be attributed to work setting organizational differences, differences in the perception on reporting of pain and discomfort, sample size difference, the study population is vary in sex (females are dominant in prior studies). However, the current flinging is relatively comparable with to report from Netherlands (57%) by Engels et al. [26].
The highest prevalence of 12 months period WMSDs in nurses according to body sites in this study was the lower back (67.8%), followed by the neck (24.0%) and then knees (23.6%). This pattern is consistent with literature. Many studies indicates that lower back pain is the most common MSD [13,17,18,20,22,25]. The LBP in this study (67.8%) is similar with the study conducted in Iran (66.1%) [13], but slightly higher than the study in Uganda (61.9%) [18] .The prevalence of neck and knee region in this study was comparable with the study in Nigeria [17].
Work-related musculoskeletal injuries have negatively impact on employees’ quality of life, health and patient care and also consequences of musculoskeletal injuries include job change, job loss, and chronic pain [27]. WMSDs are preventable by educating the staffs about the use of proper body mechanics and modifying the work environment. Adjust the height of working surfaces to reduce long reaches and awkward postures, reduce the weight and size of items that workers must lift and provide mechanical lifting equipment which are the recommendations made by OSHA (2000) to prevent MSDs [28].
In this study some risk factors of WMSDs were identified. Perceived job risk factors like working in mal-position, working in the same position for long time and bending or twisting the back during work were among the identified. This shows that the nurses used improper work posture during their nursing activities. This is similar with the study in Iran [20] and India [22]. The study conducted in Nigeria [17] also indicated that working in the same position for prolonged time is associated with WMSDs and the study in Brazil by Foncica [3] shows poor posture of the back during work is associated predictors for WMDs. The nursing activities like lifting and transferring dependent patients and giving wound care were also the identified risks. Similarly the study conducted in Nigeria [17] and India [22] indicated lifting and transferring dependent patients was significantly associated factor with WMSDs. This all are not surprising because of poorly equipped hospitals in the low income countries as they use patient manual handling and shortage of staffs; while in high income countries nurses use mechanical lifting equipment like sliding sheets, lifting hoists, and slings etc. for patient handling [28-31]. A reason for this was found in the response of the nurses when 74.4% of the nurses stated that there is not available material for patient handling and only (29.9%) of respondents had used work equipment always during their nursing activities. This means that they had been manually handling patients (e.g. lifting patients from and to bed, turning patients side to side, repositioning patients, etc.). Majority (71.1%) of respondents in this study also reported that their working environment is not conducive which can be the reason for affecting the working posture, working for long time in the same position. Giving care for patients with wound may also take long time and affects the work posture depending on condition of working environment and type of wounds that can put nurses on risk.
In this study the work unit was also identified as a risk for WMSDs; medical ward and theatre/ICU were significant adjusting with all other variables, which is similar with the study conducted on LBP in Nigeria [29] .This, is might be due to nursing activities, patient condition and the nature of works may vary in work units. Dependent patients (e.g. unconscious patients in coma, patients with neurologic disorders, patients on complete bed rest, etc.) who cannot assist or move themselves or require the nurses to care for them totally are admitted in the medical ward which put the nurses more at risk. Factors, like bending, lifting and transferring, bed bathing, bed-confined patients, etc. could be possible reasons why risk is high in the medical units. Also in theatre ward nurses may stand for long period and close monitoring and working with critically ill patients in Intensive care unit may put nurses on risk. Working with disoriented patient was also identified as a risk in this study. This is obvious that such patients are not co-operating with nurses during giving care. This is inconsistent with the study in Nigeria [17]. This is might be due to difference in sample size and number of staff nurses assigned working unit.
As any other cross-section study, this study has strength and limitation. It is the first of its kind to report self-reported WMSDs among nurses in Ethiopia. In addition to this the study was conducted in the zone which consists both teaching and district hospitals that may represents the real nursing activities that may impose nurses to the risk of WMSDs. However; as a weakness of the study, we consider that nurses may under report or may exaggerate the pain and discomfort following nursing activity. On the other hand, it is very difficult to know whether or not the reported MSD was totally following nursing actions.
Conclusion
The prevalence of WMSDs at anybody region in this study was 60.8% that indicates that significant number of nurses working in Jimma zone public hospitals experienced work related musculoskeletal disorders in last one year. Lifting or transferring dependent patients, giving wound care, working units, working in the same positions for long period, working in mal-positions, giving care for disoriented patients and bending or twisting back during work were factors that significantly associated with WMSDs among nurses. The findings suggested that nurses in Jimma zone public hospitals should follow the principles of body mechanics during lifting and transferring patients to prevent injuries.
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by Jimma University. We are extremely grateful to nurses involved in the study, and data collectors.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ Contributions
The authors’ responsibilities were as follows: TMR designed the study, did the analysis and drafted the manuscript. TBL supervised the study, ensured quality of the data and assisted in the analysis and interpretation of the data. GNG supervised the study, and assisted in the analysis of the study. The corresponding authors did the analysis and drafted the manuscript and had the responsibility to submit the manuscript for publication.
References
- Tadesse T, Admassu M (2006) Occupational Health and Safety lecture notes For Environmental and Occupational Health Students, In collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative: The Carter Center, University of Gondar the Ethiopia Ministry of Health and, the Ethiopia Ministry of Education.
- Suzanne C, Smeltzer. Brunner and Suddarth’s Textbook of Medical Surgical Nursing, (12th edn), Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins Company, Philadelphia, Baltimore. New York. London
- Fonseca R, Fernandes (2010) Factors related to musculoskeletal disorders in nursing workers. Rev Latino-Am Enferm 18: 1076-83.
- http://www.irsst.qc.ca/en/publications-tools/publication/i/100169/n/work-related-musculoskeletal-disorders-guide-and-tools-for-modified-work-omrt-en.
- https://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/health-strategies/musculoskeletal-disorders/index.html
- Salik Y, Özcan A (2004) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A survey of physical therapists in Izmir-Turkey. BMC Musc Disord 5: 27
- Nunes IL, McCauley, Bush P (2012) Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Assessment and Prevention. Ergo Syst Appro.
- European Agency for Safety and Health Work (2000) Preventing Work related Musculoskeletal Disorders, Magazine of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
- Kebrit D, Rani S. Assessment of work related musculoskeletal disorders: Causes and prevention. Abhinav National Monthly Refereed J Res Scie Techno 2:8.
- Pahlevan D, Azizzadeh M, Esmaili A, Ghorbani R, Mirmohammad KM, et al. (2014) Association of musculoskeletal complaints with psychosocial factors among nurses in Semnan hospitals, Middle East . J Rehabil Health 1: 20841
- Hinmikaiye CD, Bamis Haiye D (2012) The incidence of low back pain among theatre nurses: A case study of University of Ilorin and Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital. Int JÂ Nurs Sci 2: 23-28.
- Goswam S, Haldar P, Sahu S (2013) An ergonomic study of postural stress of nurses working in orthopaedic wards . Int J Occup SafeHeal 3: 26-31.
- Amin AN, Nordin R, Fatt QK, Noah RM, Oxley J, et al. (2014) Relationship between Psychosocial Risk Factors and Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Public Hospital Nurses in Malaysia. Annals of Occup Environ Med 26.
- Tinubu BM, Mbada CE, Oyeyemi AL, Fabunmi AA (2010) Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Nurses in Ibadan, South-west Nigeria: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:12.
- Munabi G, Buwembo W, Kitara DL, Ochieng J, Mwaka ES, et al. (2014) Musculoskeletal disorder risk factors among nursing professionals in low resource settings: across-sectional study in Uganda. BMC Nursing 13.
- Choobineh A, Rajaeefard A, Negha BM (2006) Association between perceived demands and musculoskeletal disorders among hospital nurses of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences: A Questionnaire Survey. Int JOSE 12: 409–416.
- Anap DB, Iyer C, Rao K (2013) Work related musculoskeletal disorders among hospital nurses in rural Maharashtra, India. Int J Res Med Sci 1:101-107.
- Ando S, Ono Y, Shimaoka M, Hiruta S, Hattori Y, et al. (2000) Associations of self-estimated workloads with musculoskeletal symptoms among hospital nurses. Occup Environ Med 57: 211–216.
- Hildebrandt VH, Bongers PM, Van Dijk FJ, Kemper HC, Dul J, et al. (2001) Dutch musculoskeletal questionnaire: Description and basic qualities. Ergonomics 44:1038–1055.
- Smith DR, Wei N, Kang L, Wang RS (2004) Musculoskeletal disorders among professional nurses in mainland China. J Prof Nurs 20: 390–395.
- Engels JA, van der Gulden JW, Senden TF, van't Hof B (1996) Work related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the nursing profession: Results of a questionnaire survey. Occup Environ Med 53: 636-641.
- Hart PD (2006) Research Associates: Safe patient handling: A report. Washington D.C: AFT Healthcare.
- De Laune SC, Ladner PK, Ladner. Fundamentals of nursing: Standards and practice, (2nd Edn) 976-977.
- Adeaga D (2010) The relationship between work-related physical factors and low back pain (lbp) among nurses in university college teaching hospital (uch), Ibadan, Oyo state, Nigeria.
- A guide to designing workplaces for safer handling of people (2007) For health, aged care, rehabilitation and disability facilities, (3rd edn).
- Menzel NN (2001) Manual handling workload and musculoskeletal discomfort in nursing personnel: Graduate Theses and Dissertations, University of South Florida.
Citation: Regassa TM, Lema TB, Garmomsa GN (2018) Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Jimma Zone Public Hospitals, South West Ethiopia. Occup Med Health Aff 6: 279. DOI: 10.4172/2329-6879.1000279
Copyright: © 2018 Regassa TM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Share This Article
Recommended Journals
Open Access Journals
Article Tools
Article Usage
- Total views: 3976
- [From(publication date): 0-2018 - Nov 06, 2024]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 3226
- PDF downloads: 750