alexa Mammographic Surveillance after Breast Reconstruction-is Imaging Necessary? | OMICS International| Abstract
ISSN: 2572-4118

Breast Cancer: Current Research
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Case Report   
  • Breast Can Curr Res, Vol 1(2): 106
  • DOI: 10.4172/2572-4118.1000106

Mammographic Surveillance after Breast Reconstruction-is Imaging Necessary?

Meredith I1*, Goh J2 and Gerred S1
1Department of General Surgery, North Shore Hospital, , 124 Shakespeare Rd, Westlake, Auckland 0622, New Zealand
2North Shore Hospital, , Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand
*Corresponding Author : Meredith I, Department of General Surgery, North Shore Hospital, 124 Shakespeare Rd, Westlake, Auckland 0622, New Zealand, Tel: +64211346568, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Apr 06, 2016 / Accepted Date: Apr 20, 2016 / Published Date: Apr 30, 2016

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus in regards to surveillance of women after mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer. Mammographic detection rates are low for surveillance after reconstruction and whilst there is insufficient evidence to support annual mammography in these women, there is widespread variation in its use. We aimed to investigate the mode of detection of recurrent disease and comment on the use of surveillance mammography in our population of women undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction.

Method: Data were retrieved from the Auckland Breast Cancer Registry (ABCR). All women with recurrence after mastectomy and reconstruction between 2000 and 2013 were identified from the database. Clinical records were reviewed for type of reconstruction, site of recurrence and mode of detection.

Results: 1565 women underwent mastectomy and reconstruction. There were 54 women (3.4%) with locoregional recurrence (LRR) and 134 with distant disease (8.5%). Of all women with LRR, 51 women (94%) presented with a palpable mass. The remaining 3 women had their recurrence detected on mammography and had DCIS in their original histology. Only 16 of the 54 women had at least one surveillance mammogram. 12 of 16 women had a normal mammogram less than 9 months prior to diagnosis of recurrent disease.

Conclusion: Regular mammographic surveillance after mastectomy and reconstruction was not performed in this group, and therefore we cannot evaluate the value of regular mammographic surveillance after mastectomy and reconstruction. However, in light of the existing body of literature, there is no evidence to support regular mammographic surveillance after mastectomy and reconstruction.

Keywords: Mammographic surveillance; Breast tumour; Locoregional recurrence

Citation: Meredith I, Goh J, Gerred S (2016) Mammographic Surveillance after Breast Reconstruction-Is Imaging Necessary?. Breast Can Curr Res 1: 106. Doi: 10.4172/2572-4118.1000106

Copyright: ©2016 Meredith I, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Article Usage
  • Total views: 10841
  • [From(publication date): 6-2016 - Aug 07, 2020]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 10706
  • PDF downloads: 135
Top