Mini Hydro Restoration, Case of Extraordinary Competition: Real Case Report | OMICS International| Abstract
ISSN: 2576-1463

Innovative Energy & Research
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Case Report   
  • Innov Ener Res,
  • DOI: 10.4172/2576-1463.1000242

Mini Hydro Restoration, Case of Extraordinary Competition: Real Case Report

Elena Carcano1* and Brian N Drelan2
1CNR Centre of Water Research of bari, Italy
2Department of Mechanical Engeneering, Unitech (PNG), Italy
*Corresponding Author : Elena Carcano, CNR centre of Water Research of bari, Italy, Tel: 3471469029, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Jul 27, 2021 / Accepted Date: Aug 11, 2021 / Published Date: Aug 18, 2021


This study deals with the task of restoring a small hydropower plant located in Italy next to the French coast. Two similar projects, belonging to two different companies, have been advanced. The local Authorities and law according to the Italian Royal Act dated 1933 allow two or more proposals to be in competition into 30 days, alternatively known as ordinary competition. But after this 30 days the latest proposal presented has to demonstrate and added value in order to be selected and win the competition. The bonus is generally referred to the better quality of water released to fulfil environmental flow assessment and protection of the river course in face of the given withdrawn. Another plus is represented by the agreement an areas where the plant should be placed, namely an agreement between and stakeholders.

The article under study according to the royal law (RD 1933), clearly states

❖ Among different and rival proposals the one selected is the one which presents the most rational use of hydric sources according to the given criteria

❖ Actual satisfaction level of the essential needs of the concurrent also considering water public services of acqueduct or irrigation purposes.

❖ Better possibilities of water respect the given usage

❖ Quantitative and qualitative safeguards of the river body

❖ The amount of released water should be more than the one withdrawn

Among all other criteria the selected proposal is the one which guarantees best economic and technical conditions to be built. For sure all the above mentioned criteria are very realistic and are completely shareable.

Citation: Carcano E, Drelan BN (2021) Mini Hydro Restoration, Case of Extraordinary Competition: Real Case. Innov Ener Res, 10: 242. Doi: 10.4172/2576-1463.1000242

Copyright: © 2021 Carcano E, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Article Usage
  • Total views: 311
  • [From(publication date): 0-0 - Dec 03, 2021]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 182
  • PDF downloads: 129