Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography
Open Access

Bioremediation; Environmental pollution; Human health

Introduction

Bioremediation is the use of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and algae to degrade, transform, or remove pollutants from contaminated environments. The microorganisms used in bioremediation are natural, and they occur naturally in the environment. Bioremediation can be carried out either in situ, where the contaminated soil or water is treated in place, or ex situ, where the contaminated material is removed and treated elsewhere.

Methods

There are several types of bioremediation, including natural attenuation, bioaugmentation, and phytoremediation.Natural attenuation is a type of bioremediation that involves the use of naturally occurring microorganisms to break down pollutants in the environment. This type of bioremediation is often used in cases where the pollutant concentrations are low, and the environment can support the growth of microorganisms.Bioaugmentation is a type of bioremediation that involves the introduction of microorganisms into the contaminated environment to increase the rate of pollutant degradation. This type of bioremediation is often used in cases where the pollutant concentrations are high, and the environment cannot support the growth of microorganisms.

Phytoremediation is a type of bioremediation that involves the use of plants to remove or transform pollutants from contaminated environments. Plants can absorb pollutants from the soil or water, and they can also break down pollutants through a process called phytodegradation [1, 2].

Benefits of bioremediation

Bioremediation is a cost-effective and eco-friendly solution for environmental pollution. It can be carried out using natural microorganisms, which are readily available in the environment, and it does not require the use of harsh chemicals or expensive equipment. Bioremediation can also be carried out in situ, which means that there is no need to transport the contaminated material to a different location for treatment. This reduces the cost of transportation and minimizes the risk of spreading the pollution to other areas.

Moreover, bioremediation is a sustainable solution that does not generate any harmful by-products. The microorganisms used in bioremediation break down pollutants into harmless substances, which can be reused by other organisms in the environment.Bioremediation has been used to clean up a variety of contaminated environments, including soil, groundwater, and surface water. It has been used to treat a wide range of pollutants, including heavy metals, organic compounds, and pesticides.One of the most significant applications of bioremediation is in the cleanup of oil spills [3, 4].

Microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi can break down the hydrocarbons in oil and convert them into harmless substances such as carbon dioxide and water.Bioremediation has also been used to treat contaminated soil at industrial sites. The microorganisms used in bioremediation can break down the organic compounds and other pollutants that are often found in contaminated soil [5, 6].

Discussion

Although bioremediation is an eco-friendly and cost-effective solution for environmental pollution, it does have some limitations. One of the most significant challenges of bioremediation is the difficulty in selecting the appropriate microorganisms for the specific pollutant and environment [7, 8].

Conclusion

Another challenge of bioremediation is the need to maintain optimal environmental conditions for the microorganisms to thrive. Factors such as temperature, pH, and nutrient availability can affect the growth [9, 10].

1. Egerton F N (2007) Understanding food chains and food webs, 1700-1970. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 88: 50-69.

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Zanden V, M J, Shuter B J, Lester N, Rasmussen J B (1999) Patterns of food chain length in lakes, A stable isotope study. The American Naturalist 154: 406-416.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Odum EP, Barrett GW (2005) Brooks/Cole, a part of Cengage Learning, Fundamentals of Ecology (5th Edn.)

Google Scholar

4. Shurin JB, Gruner DS, Hillebrand H (2005) All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs. Proc R Soc B 273: 1-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Nummi P, Kattainen S, Ulander P, Hahtola A (2011) Bats benefit from beavers: A facilitative link between aquatic and terrestrial food webs. Biodivers Conserv 20: 851-859.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Roth BM, Kaplan IC, Sass GG, Johnson PT, Marburg AE (2007) Linking terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: The role of woody habitat in lake food webs.  Ecological Modelling 203: 439-452.

Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Potapov AM, Brose U, Scheu S, Tiunov AV (2019) Trophic Position of Consumers and Size Structure of Food Webs across Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems.  The American Naturalist 194: 6.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Nakano S, Murakami M (2000) Reciprocal subsidies: Dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Center for Ecological Research 52-2113.

Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Nowlin WH, Vanni MJ, Yang H (2008) Comparing resource pulses in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology by the Ecological Society of America 89: 647-659.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Kautza A, Sullivan SMP (2016) The energetic contributions of aquatic primary producers to terrestrial food webs in a mid- size river system. Ecology by the Ecological Society of America 97: 694-705.

Google Scholar, Crossref