Oil & Gas Research
Open Access

Carbon Capture; Storage; Climate Change; Industrial Decarbonization; Geological Storage; Direct Air Capture; CO2 Utilization; BECCS; Economic Viability; Policy Frameworks

Introduction

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies are increasingly recognized as essential tools for mitigating the escalating threat of climate change by preventing the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere from various industrial sources. The field is characterized by rapid advancements, with ongoing research efforts concentrated on enhancing capture efficiency, minimizing energy penalties associated with the process, and exploring innovative storage methodologies. A significant area of investigation involves the seamless integration of CCS into existing industrial infrastructure, particularly within the oil and gas sector, with the overarching goal of decarbonizing operations and potentially achieving negative emissions through bioenergy with CCS (BECCS). The economic feasibility and societal acceptance of CCS are also identified as pivotal factors that will profoundly influence its widespread adoption and deployment across industries. [1] The efficacy and safety of geological storage for captured CO2 remain a central pillar of CCS research, necessitating a thorough understanding of reservoir characteristics, potential migration pathways, and the long-term integrity of containment to avert any leakage risks. Current research is actively examining a diverse array of geological formations, including deep saline aquifers and depleted oil and gas reservoirs, to rigorously assess their suitability and storage capacity for the secure sequestration of CO2. Furthermore, the development and deployment of advanced monitoring technologies are considered vital for ensuring the permanence of storage and for the early detection of any potential adverse environmental impacts. [2] Direct air capture (DAC) technologies are progressively gaining prominence as a complementary strategy to point-source capture, offering a means to actively remove legacy CO2 already present in the atmosphere. Key to improving the energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness of DAC systems are breakthroughs in sorbent materials and innovative process designs. Although DAC technologies are still in their nascent stages of deployment, they present a promising pathway toward achieving net-negative emissions, a critical objective for meeting ambitious global climate targets. [3] The broader economic and policy frameworks governing climate change mitigation play a significant role in shaping the trajectory of CCS deployment. Research in this domain meticulously examines the necessary incentives, effective carbon pricing mechanisms, and robust regulatory frameworks required to stimulate investment and drive down the overall cost of CCS technologies. A comprehensive understanding of the full lifecycle costs, encompassing capture, transportation, and storage phases, is paramount for the development of economically sound models and the fostering of a sustainable market for CCS solutions. [4] Carbon dioxide utilization (CCU), also frequently referred to as CO2 utilization, presents an alternative and potentially value-generating approach to CO2 management by converting captured CO2 into a range of valuable products. These applications span diverse sectors, including the production of chemicals, fuels, and construction materials. Research efforts are directed towards the development of highly efficient catalytic processes and ensuring the scalability of CCU technologies, with the dual aims of creating economic value from captured CO2 and significantly reducing its environmental footprint. [5] The crucial role of CCS in the decarbonization of challenging industrial sectors, such as cement, steel, and chemical production, is a focal point of considerable research attention. These industries are characterized by substantial process-related emissions that are inherently difficult to mitigate solely through electrification or by switching to alternative fuels. CCS technologies offer a direct and effective solution for capturing these persistent CO2 streams, thereby enabling these hard-to-abate sectors to make meaningful contributions towards achieving global climate goals. [6] The integration of CCS with bioenergy production, commonly known as BECCS, offers a compelling strategy for achieving net-negative emissions. By capturing the CO2 released during the combustion of biomass, which is generally considered carbon-neutral, BECCS processes can result in the net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. Current research is actively investigating the sustainability of biomass sourcing practices and optimizing the overall efficiency of BECCS systems to maximize their climate benefits. [7] Post-combustion capture technologies, designed to separate CO2 from flue gases after fuel combustion has occurred, represent a significant and actively developing area within the broader CCS landscape. Advances in areas such as solvent chemistry and membrane technologies are yielding improvements in both the energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness of these systems. This progress is making these technologies increasingly applicable to a wide spectrum of existing power plants and diverse industrial facilities. [8] Pre-combustion capture is a method that involves the conversion of a fuel into a synthesis gas mixture composed of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, from which CO2 is subsequently separated prior to the combustion stage. This approach proves particularly relevant for integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants and for the production of hydrogen. Ongoing research is focused on further enhancing the efficiency of both the gasification and the CO2 separation processes. [9] Oxy-fuel combustion represents another approach where fuel is combusted in pure oxygen rather than air, a process that yields a flue gas primarily consisting of CO2 and water vapor, thereby simplifying the subsequent separation of CO2. This technology is being explored for its potential to achieve high concentrations of CO2 with a reduced energy penalty compared to traditional post-combustion methods. However, challenges related to the efficient production of oxygen and the selection of suitable high-temperature materials still need to be addressed. [10]

Description

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies are indispensable for addressing climate change by preventing the emission of CO2 from industrial operations and the atmosphere. This domain is characterized by rapid evolution, with research extensively focused on improving capture efficiencies, mitigating energy demands, and pioneering novel storage solutions. A key area of ongoing investigation is the integration of CCS into existing industrial processes, particularly within the oil and gas sector, aiming to decarbonize operations and potentially facilitate negative emissions through bioenergy with CCS (BECCS). The economic viability and public perception are also critical elements influencing the widespread adoption of CCS. [1] A primary focus within CCS research is the effectiveness of geological storage for CO2. This entails a deep understanding of reservoir properties, migration routes, and the long-term integrity of containment to prevent any release. Research explores various geological formations, including saline aquifers and exhausted oil and gas reservoirs, to ascertain their suitability and capacity for secure CO2 sequestration. Crucial for ensuring storage permanence and detecting potential environmental impacts are the monitoring technologies being developed. [2] Direct air capture (DAC) technologies are emerging as a significant approach to remove historical CO2 from the atmosphere, serving as a complement to point-source capture methods. Advances in sorbent materials and the design of capture processes are central to enhancing the energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness of DAC. Despite being in the early stages of implementation, DAC offers a viable route to achieving net-negative emissions, a vital component for meeting ambitious climate objectives. [3] The economic and policy environment plays a crucial role in determining the deployment rate of CCS. Research endeavors are examining the necessary incentives, carbon pricing strategies, and regulatory frameworks essential for encouraging investment and reducing the overall cost of CCS technologies. Accurately assessing the full lifecycle costs, which include capture, transport, and storage, is fundamental for formulating effective economic models and promoting market growth. [4] CO2 utilization, often termed CCU, provides an alternative pathway for managing captured CO2 by transforming it into valuable products. Applications range from the synthesis of chemicals and fuels to the production of building materials. Research is dedicated to developing efficient catalytic conversion technologies and assessing the scalability of CCU processes, aiming to create economic value from captured CO2 and reduce its overall environmental impact. [5] The role of CCS in the decarbonization of industries that are difficult to abate, such as cement, steel, and chemical manufacturing, is a critical area of study. These sectors generate significant process emissions that are challenging to reduce through electrification or fuel switching alone. CCS offers a direct solution for capturing these CO2 streams, enabling these industries to contribute effectively to climate mitigation goals. [6] The combination of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) presents a pathway toward achieving negative emissions. By capturing the CO2 released from biomass combustion, which is considered carbon-neutral, BECCS can lead to a net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. Research is actively exploring the sustainability of biomass sourcing and the efficiency of BECCS systems. [7] Post-combustion capture technologies, which involve separating CO2 from flue gases after fuel combustion, are a major focus in CCS development. Improvements in solvent chemistry and membrane technologies are leading to enhanced energy efficiency and reduced costs for these systems, making them suitable for a wide range of existing power plants and industrial facilities. [8] Pre-combustion capture involves transforming fuel into a synthesis gas mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, followed by CO2 separation before combustion. This method is particularly relevant for integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants and for hydrogen production. Research efforts are concentrated on improving the efficiency of gasification and separation technologies. [9] Oxy-fuel combustion captures CO2 by burning fuel in pure oxygen instead of air, resulting in a flue gas predominantly composed of CO2 and water vapor, which simplifies CO2 separation. This technology is being investigated for its potential to achieve high CO2 concentrations with a lower energy penalty compared to post-combustion methods, although challenges related to oxygen production and high-temperature material resilience persist. [10]

Conclusion

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies are vital for climate change mitigation, focusing on preventing CO2 emissions from industrial sources and the atmosphere. Research encompasses improving capture efficiency, reducing energy penalties, and developing novel storage solutions, with a particular emphasis on integrating CCS into industrial processes like oil and gas to achieve decarbonization and potentially negative emissions via BECCS. Geological storage efficacy, direct air capture advancements, and CCU for valuable product creation are key research areas. Economic and policy factors significantly influence CCS deployment, while CCS also plays a crucial role in decarbonizing hard-to-abate industrial sectors. Different capture technologies, including post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion, are continuously being refined for greater efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Public acceptance and economic viability remain critical for widespread implementation.

References

1. Sami A, Ali A, Naser A. (2023) Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage: A Review of Recent Advances and Future Challenges.Energies 16:16(13):5026.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Sami A, Ali A, Naser A. (2022) Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide: A Review of the State of the Art.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 118:118:103689.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Guang-Yu H, Yan-Ming L, Jian-Wei Y. (2021) Direct Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide: A Review of Technologies and Challenges.Chemical Engineering Journal 412:412:128634.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Zhi-Qiang L, Hong-Wei Z, Jian-Jun Y. (2020) Economic and Policy Aspects of Carbon Capture and Storage: A Global Perspective.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 133:133:110224.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Ming-Lei W, Shu-Xing W, Bing-Bing L. (2024) Carbon Dioxide Utilization: A Review of Catalytic Conversion Technologies.ACS Catalysis 14:14(3):1941-1968.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Jian-Hua Z, Lei-Lei W, Qing-Chao L. (2023) Decarbonization of Industrial Sectors: The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage.Joule 7:7(5):995-1019.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Wen-Juan Z, Yu-Xia L, Ying-Bo S. (2022) Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): A Review of Technological and Environmental Aspects.Environmental Science & Technology 56:56(10):6265-6283.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Chao-Dong Y, Li-Qun L, Xin-Yu S. (2021) Post-Combustion Carbon Capture: A Review of Current Technologies and Future Prospects.Applied Energy 281:281:116079.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Jian-Ping C, Hao-Ran Z, Wei L. (2023) Pre-Combustion Carbon Capture Technologies for Power Generation: A Comprehensive Review.Energy & Fuels 37:37(15):7955-7979.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Xian-Bo J, Chun-Quan L, Bin L. (2022) Oxy-Fuel Combustion for Carbon Capture: Principles, Challenges, and Prospects.Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 88:88:101006.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref