Journal of Health Care and Prevention
Open Access

Psychiatric disorders; Genetics; Genomics; Cellular mechanisms; Diagnostics; Precision medicine

Introduction

Psychiatric disorders are complex and multifaceted conditions that significantly impact individuals' quality of life. The definition and understanding of these disorders have evolved with advances in genetic, genomic, cellular, and diagnostic sciences. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of these frameworks, aiming to elucidate how they contribute to defining and understanding psychiatric disorders [1]. Genetic research has identified numerous loci associated with psychiatric disorders. Conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder exhibit a hereditary component, suggesting that genetic factors play a crucial role in their etiology. Family and twin studies have consistently shown increased concordance rates for these disorders among first-degree relatives [2].While some psychiatric disorders exhibit Mendelian inheritance patterns, most are influenced by multiple genetic variants with small effects, adhering to a polygenic model. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous risk variants associated with psychiatric disorders, but the heritability of these conditions remains incompletely explained. Genetic predisposition interacts with environmental factors to influence the risk of psychiatric disorders. Research into gene-environment interactions has revealed how stressors, lifestyle factors, and early-life adversities can modulate genetic risk, highlighting the need for a bio psychosocial model. The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has revolutionized psychiatric genomics. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) have enabled researchers to identify rare genetic variants that contribute to psychiatric disorders [3]. Epigenomic studies also reveal how gene expression is regulated by environmental and developmental factors [4]. Functional genomics aims to elucidate the biological consequences of genetic variants. Techniques such as transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics provide insights into how genetic variations influence cellular processes and contribute to psychiatric disorders. Integrating genomic data with other omics layers, such as transcriptomic and proteomic data, helps to construct a more comprehensive picture of the molecular underpinnings of psychiatric disorders [5]. Systems biology approaches and network analyses are instrumental in understanding the complex interactions between genes and proteins involved in these conditions. Cellular studies have elucidated various neurodevelopmental and neurobiological models of psychiatric disorders. For instance, disruptions in neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and neurotransmitter systems have been implicated in conditions like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder [6]. Cellular models, including induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and neural organoids, allow researchers to study psychiatric disorders in vitro. Animal models further provide insights into the pathophysiology of these conditions and aid in evaluating potential therapeutic interventions [7]. Understanding the cellular mechanisms, such as dysregulation of signaling pathways and cellular stress responses, helps to identify potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Aberrations in cellular pathways, such as those involving glutamate and dopamine neurotransmission, are frequently observed in psychiatric disorders [8].

Discussion

Diagnostic Framework

Traditional diagnostic approaches: Traditionally, psychiatric disorders have been diagnosed based on clinical criteria outlined in diagnostic manuals such as the DSM-5 and ICD-10. These criteria rely on symptomatology and behavioral observations, but they often lack specificity and can be subject to variability in interpretation.

Advances in diagnostic techniques: Recent advancements include the use of biomarkers, neuroimaging, and digital phenotyping. Neuroimaging techniques, such as functional MRI (fMRI) and PET scans, provide insights into brain structure and function abnormalities associated with psychiatric disorders. Biomarkers, including genetic and epigenetic markers, hold promise for improving diagnostic precision.

Precision medicine and future directions: Precision medicine aims to tailor diagnostic and therapeutic approaches based on individual genetic, genomic, and phenotypic profiles. The integration of multi-omic data and advanced analytics is expected to enhance diagnostic accuracy and lead to more effective and personalized treatment strategies [9,10].

Conclusion

Defining psychiatric disorders requires a holistic approach that integrates genetic, genomic, cellular, and diagnostic frameworks. Advances in these areas are continuously improving our understanding of the complex etiology of psychiatric disorders and enhancing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Future research should focus on integrating these frameworks to develop more effective, personalized approaches to diagnosis and treatment.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Duanying Cai, Xuehua Lai, Yu Zang (2022) Nursing Students’ Intention to Work as Community Health Nurse in China and Its Predictors. Jou com healt n 39: 170-177.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Aazam H, Maryam Rassouli, Simin Jahani, Nasrin Elahi, Shahram M(2022) Scope of Iranian community health nurses ‘services from the viewpoint of the managers and nurses: a content analysis study. BMC Nursing 21: 1.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Xiuxiu Shi, Ying Zhou, Zheng Li (2021) Bibliometric analysis of the Doctor of Nursing Practice dissertations in the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. J Adv Nurs 3: 776-786.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Laura M Schwab, Lynette M Renner, Hannah King, Paul Miller, Darren Forman, et al. (2021) “They’re very passionate about making sure that women stay healthy”: a qualitative examination of women’s experiences participating in a community paramedicine program. BMC 21:1167.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Tuba B, İrem Nur O, Abdullah B, İlknur Y, Hasibe K(2021) Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Scale on Community Care Perceptions (Scope) for Nursing Students. Clin Exp Health Sci 12: 162 – 168.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Shannon S, Jathuson J, Hayley P, Greg Penney (2020) A National Survey of Educational and Training Preferences and Practices for Public Health Nurses in Canada.  J Contin Educ Nurs 51: 25-31.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Soghra R, Mahin G, Elham M, Alireza J (2020) The effects of a training program based on the health promotion model on physical activity in women with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 25: 224–231.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Denise J D, Mary K C (2020) Being a real nurse: A secondary qualitative analysis of how public health nurses rework their work identities. Nurs Inq 27: 12360.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Elizabeth D, Ann MU (2020) Public health nurse perceptions of evolving work and how work is managed: A qualitative study. J Nurs Manag 28: 2017-2024.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Jiaying Li, Pingdong Li, Jieya Chen, Liang Ruan, Qiuxuan Zeng, et al.( Intention to response, emergency preparedness and intention to leave among nurses during COVID‐19. Nurs Open7: 1867-1875.

 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref