Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Open Access

Eco-friendly pest control; Biological control; Integrated pest management; Botanical pesticides; Biopesticides; Natural enemies; Pheromone traps; Organic farming; Sustainable agriculture; Environmental protection

Introduction

The intensification of global agriculture has led to a heavy reliance on chemical pesticides to protect crops from pests and diseases [1]. While these substances have undeniably contributed to increased food production, their long-term use has raised serious concerns about environmental degradation, pesticide resistance, loss of biodiversity, and human health risks. As awareness grows around the harmful impacts of synthetic pesticides, the demand for sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives is gaining momentum [2].

Eco-friendly pest management aims to strike a balance between agricultural productivity and environmental responsibility. Rather than relying solely on chemical solutions, this approach incorporates a range of biological, physical, and cultural techniques that are safe, sustainable, and often more specific to target pests. These alternatives not only minimize ecological damage but also support the health of beneficial organisms and preserve ecosystem services crucial to farming systems [3].

Description

Eco-friendly pest control strategies encompass a wide array of techniques. Biological control is one of the most widely practiced approaches, involving the use of natural enemies predators, parasitoids, and pathogens to suppress pest populations. For instance, lady beetles and lacewings are effective in controlling aphid outbreaks, while parasitic wasps can reduce caterpillar populations in vegetable crops. Fungal biocontrol agents such as Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae target insect pests without harming non-target species [5].

Another promising area is the use of biopesticides, which are derived from natural materials like bacteria (Bacillus thuringiensis), plant extracts (e.g., neem oil), and minerals (e.g., diatomaceous earth). These substances degrade quickly in the environment, leaving no toxic residues. Unlike conventional pesticides, biopesticides often act through novel modes of action, which reduces the risk of pests developing resistance [6].

Pheromone-based pest control systems have also become an effective and eco-safe tool. Pheromone traps are used for monitoring pest populations or disrupting their mating cycles. In crops like cotton, maize, and rice, this method helps farmers detect early pest infestations and make informed intervention decisions, thereby minimizing unnecessary chemical usage [7].

Cultural practices such as crop rotation, intercropping, and planting pest-repellent species—further contribute to pest suppression. These methods enhance biodiversity within farming systems and disrupt pest lifecycles naturally. When used together in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) frameworks, these tools create a resilient, adaptive pest control strategy that aligns with sustainable agriculture principles [8].

Discussion

The benefits of eco-friendly pest management are multifold. From an environmental standpoint, these alternatives significantly reduce soil and water contamination, protect pollinators and beneficial insects, and maintain the ecological balance of farming ecosystems. Moreover, eco-friendly methods help mitigate the development of pesticide resistance an escalating problem that compromises the long-term effectiveness of chemical controls.

Economically, while the initial transition to sustainable pest control methods may involve additional training or investment, long-term gains can be substantial. Reduced reliance on expensive chemical inputs, improved soil and crop health, and better market access especially for organically produced food make eco-friendly pest management a financially viable option for farmers. Furthermore, growing consumer awareness and regulatory pressure are shifting market dynamics in favor of pesticide-free produce [9].

However, challenges remain in scaling these methods across diverse agricultural landscapes. Biopesticides, for example, may have shorter shelf lives, variable field efficacy, and may require more precise application timing compared to synthetic pesticides. Additionally, the adoption of biological control agents depends heavily on local ecological knowledge and support systems, such as extension services and farmer training programs. Research and development efforts are crucial to address these limitations. Innovations in microbial formulation, drone-assisted pest monitoring, and AI-based IPM decision tools are already enhancing the precision and reliability of eco-friendly pest control strategies. Policies that support farmer access to sustainable pest control inputs, as well as consumer education on the benefits of pesticide-free food, are also instrumental in driving broader adoption [10].

Conclusion

Eco-friendly pest management is not just an alternative—it is an essential evolution in modern agriculture. By leveraging nature-based solutions, biopesticides, and informed farming practices, this approach fosters crop protection methods that are safer for the environment, beneficial for long-term productivity, and more acceptable to increasingly health-conscious consumers.

Although obstacles such as cost, knowledge gaps, and infrastructure persist, advancements in technology and policy support are steadily addressing these barriers. The transition to sustainable pest control systems requires a collaborative effort involving researchers, farmers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers.

References

1. Ademe, Mehiretu (2016) Evaluation of insecticides for the management of tef shoot fly. Adv crop sci technol. 4(5):4-6.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Getaneh G, Ayalew G, Derso E (2016) Plant Protection Research in Ethiopia: Major Achievements, Challenges and Future Directions. 199-374.

Google Scholar

3. Case Study: Borana, Ethiopia, s.l.: ACSF-Oxfam Rural Resilience Project, Natural Resources, Cornell University; 2014.

Google Scholar

4. Sharma HC, Clement SL, Ra GVR (2008) Insect pest management in food legumes: The future strategies. Biology. 1:522-544.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

5. Rajin JC, Thangaraju D, David PMM (2000) Relative abundance of maize stems borer species in Tamil Nadu. Madras Agric J. 87(4-6):228-234.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Boku T, Sjaastad E (2008) Pastoral conceptions of poverty: An analysis of traditional and conventional indicators from Borana, Ethiopia. World Dev. 38(8): 1168-1178.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Strange RN, Scott PR (2005) Plant disease: A threat to global food security. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:83-116.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey 2020/21. Report on Area and Production of Major Crops. 2021.

Google Scholar

9. Oerke EC, Dehne HW, Schönbeck F, Weber A (1994) Crop production and crop protection. Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops.

Google Scholar

10. Mengistu D, Tefera S, Biru B (2021) Pastoral farming system and its temporal shift: A case of Borana zone. Oromia National Regional. 16(9):1233-1238.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref