Environment Pollution and Climate Change
Open Access

Sewage disposal has been a major environmental concern for centuries, especially as urbanization and industrialization continue to increase. Historically, untreated or poorly treated sewage has been released into rivers, lakes, and oceans, leading to severe water pollution, eutrophication, and a decline in aquatic biodiversity. Contaminants such as nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, and pathogens from untreated sewage can disrupt the balance of aquatic ecosystems, harming both plant and animal life.

However, the advent of more efficient sewage treatment technologies and improved disposal practices presents an opportunity to reverse some of these negative impacts. By modeling the effects of enhanced sewage disposal rates, we can better understand how such improvements influence the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems and the organisms that inhabit them. This article focuses on the ecological implications of improved sewage disposal, using modeling approaches to predict the outcomes of such improvements on aquatic health [1].

The Problem of Sewage Pollution in Aquatic Ecosystems

Sewage pollution in aquatic ecosystems is primarily driven by the release of untreated or partially treated wastewater into water bodies. The major contaminants in sewage include:

1. Nutrients: High concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus can lead to nutrient pollution, which fuels algal blooms. These blooms can create dead zones in aquatic ecosystems, depriving fish and other organisms of oxygen and disrupting the food web.
2. Pathogens: Sewage contains harmful microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites, which pose health risks to both humans and aquatic organisms.
3. Toxic Substances: Industrial and pharmaceutical chemicals, heavy metals, and plastics found in sewage can accumulate in the food chain, affecting aquatic organisms and potentially entering human food sources.
4. Oxygen Demand: Decomposing organic matter in sewage increases biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in water, reducing dissolved oxygen levels. This can lead to hypoxia or anoxia, conditions in which aquatic life cannot survive [2].

The impact of these pollutants on aquatic organisms can be severe, leading to reduced biodiversity, altered species composition, and the collapse of important ecological functions such as nutrient cycling and water purification.

Enhanced Sewage Disposal

Potential Ecological Benefits Enhanced sewage disposal refers to improved treatment technologies that reduce the amount of pollutants released into aquatic ecosystems. Advanced sewage treatment methods, such as tertiary treatment, can effectively remove excess nutrients, pathogens, and toxic substances, improving water quality and restoring ecological balance. These improvements can lead to several positive outcomes:

1. Reduction in Eutrophication: Enhanced sewage treatment reduces the levels of nitrogen and phosphorus entering water bodies, directly addressing one of the primary causes of eutrophication. Eutrophication leads to harmful algal blooms, which deplete oxygen levels and create dead zones. By reducing nutrient pollution, improved sewage disposal can restore oxygen levels, benefiting fish populations and other aquatic organisms [3].
2. Improved Water Quality and Habitat Restoration: Cleaner water improves the quality of aquatic habitats, supporting healthier ecosystems. With lower pathogen loads and reduced contamination from chemicals and heavy metals, aquatic organisms can thrive, leading to increased biodiversity and a more stable food web.
3. Enhanced Biodiversity: Reduced pollution allows for the recovery of aquatic species that have been harmed by poor water quality. Species diversity can increase as habitats become more conducive to life, with a greater variety of plants, fish, invertebrates, and microorganisms benefiting from improved conditions.
4. Sustained Ecosystem Services: Aquatic ecosystems provide numerous ecosystem services, including water purification, carbon sequestration, and habitat for wildlife. By improving sewage treatment and disposal practices, these ecosystem services can be restored or enhanced, contributing to the overall health of the environment and human well-being [4].

Modeling the Impact of Enhanced Sewage Disposal on Aquatic Ecosystems

Modeling provides a powerful tool for predicting the effects of improved sewage disposal on aquatic ecosystems. Various ecological models can simulate the response of water bodies to changes in pollutant loadings and treatment rates, offering valuable insights into the potential outcomes of enhanced sewage treatment.

1. Water Quality Models: Water quality models, such as the Streeter-Phelps model or more complex 3D hydrodynamic models, can simulate the impact of improved sewage disposal on key water quality parameters, including dissolved oxygen, nutrient concentrations, and pathogen levels. By inputting different treatment scenarios, these models can predict the reduction in eutrophication and the potential recovery of oxygen levels in affected water bodies [5].
2. Ecosystem Models: Ecosystem models, like the Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) model, can assess the broader ecological impacts of improved sewage disposal on biodiversity and species interactions. These models consider factors such as food web dynamics, species populations, and habitat quality. By simulating different levels of sewage treatment, these models can predict how aquatic ecosystems might recover and which species might benefit the most.
3. Hydrological Models: Hydrological models help predict how changes in sewage disposal impact water flow and sediment transport in rivers and lakes. Improved sewage disposal rates may alter flow patterns and sediment distribution, which in turn affects aquatic habitats and species. These models can simulate changes in habitat suitability for different organisms and help identify the most vulnerable species.
4. Groundwater Models: Enhanced sewage disposal can also impact groundwater quality, especially in areas where surface water and groundwater are interconnected. Groundwater models can simulate the movement of pollutants from treated sewage and their potential effects on groundwater-dependent ecosystems, providing insights into the long-term impacts of improved treatment practices on groundwater quality [6].

Case Studies: Impact of Enhanced Sewage Disposal

Several real-world case studies have demonstrated the positive effects of enhanced sewage disposal on aquatic ecosystems:

1. Chesapeake Bay, USA: Efforts to improve sewage treatment in the Chesapeake Bay watershed have resulted in a significant reduction in nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. As a result, water quality has improved, leading to the recovery of seagrass beds and the return of several fish species, including striped bass [7].
2. Lake Erie, USA/Canada: Enhanced sewage treatment in the Lake Erie basin has contributed to reductions in harmful algal blooms. Improved nutrient management and sewage treatment have led to clearer water and better conditions for aquatic organisms, including fish and benthic communities [8].
3. The Thames River, UK: The Thames River has benefited from significant improvements in sewage treatment, with advanced treatment technologies reducing contaminants and nutrient levels. The result has been a recovery of biodiversity, including an increase in fish populations and waterfowl.

Challenges and Limitations

While enhanced sewage disposal can have significant ecological benefits, challenges remain in implementing such systems on a global scale. Issues such as funding, infrastructure, and the need for ongoing maintenance and monitoring of sewage treatment plants can hinder progress. Additionally, improvements in sewage treatment must be accompanied by broader watershed management strategies to address non-point source pollution, such as agricultural runoff, which can still degrade water quality even with improved sewage disposal rates[9-10].

Conclusion

Improved sewage disposal has the potential to deliver significant ecological benefits for aquatic ecosystems, ranging from enhanced water quality to restored biodiversity and improved ecosystem services. Through modeling, we can predict the positive outcomes of these improvements and better understand the complex dynamics of aquatic ecosystems in response to sewage treatment upgrades. As the global population continues to grow and urbanize, enhanced sewage disposal will be crucial for maintaining the health of our aquatic ecosystems and ensuring the sustainability of water resources for future generations.

References

1. Biró B, Köves-Péchy K, Vörös I, Takács T, Eggenberger P, et al. (2000) Interrelations between Azospirillum and Rhizobium nitrogen-fixers and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere of alfalfa in sterile, AMF-free or normal soil conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 15:159-168.

               Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Chaney R, Angle JS, Mcintosh M, Reeves R, Li YM, et al. (2005) Using hyperaccumulator plants to phytoextract soil Ni and Cd. J Biosci 60: 190-198.

               Indexed at, Google Scholar

3. Faridul A, Tae YK, Song YK, Sadia SA, Prabhat P, et al.(2015)Effect of molybdenum on nodulation, plant yield and nitrogen uptake in hairy vetch. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61: 664-675.

              Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Begum N, Qin C, Ahanger MA, Raza S, Khan MI, et al. (2019) Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Plant Growth Regulation: Implications in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Front Plant Sci 10: 1-5.

              Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Bellenger J, Wichard T, Kustka A(2008) Uptake of molybdenum and vanadium byanitrogen-fixing soil bacterium usingsiderophores.Nature Geosci1: 243-246.

               Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Bhattacharjee RB, Singh A, Mukhopadhyay SN (2008) Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria as biofertiliser for non-legumes: prospects and challenges.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol80: 199-209.

               Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Albert KM (2015) Role of revegetation in restoring fertility of degraded mined soils in Ghana: A review Int J Biodivers Conserv 7: 57-80.

              Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Antosiewicz DM (1992) Adaptation of plants to an environment polluted with heavy metals. Byul Izobr 61: 281-299.

              Google Scholar

9. Baker AJM (1981) Accumulators and excluders ‐strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals. J Plant Nutr 3: 643-654.

              Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Wang X, Wang Q, Wang S, Li F, Guo G (2012) Effect of biostimulation on community level physiological profiles of microorganisms in field-scale biopiles composed of aged oil sludge. Bioresour Technol 111: 308-315.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref