Biopolymers Research
Open Access

Biodegradable polymers, biocompatibility, cell signaling pathways, regenerative medicine, integrins, MAPK pathway, PI3K-Akt pathway

Introduction

The quest for materials that can seamlessly integrate into biological systems has led to advances in the design of biodegradable polymer implants. These materials offer significant advantages over traditional permanent implants, including reduced long-term complications and the ability to support tissue repair and regeneration without necessitating surgical removal. The biocompatibility of these biodegradable implants is fundamental to their function, which involves an intricate interplay between the materials and surrounding cells, thereby facilitating optimal healing environments [1].

Biocompatibility encompasses not only the inertness of the material within the biological context but also its ability to stimulate appropriate cellular responses. The cellular interactions with implanted materials are coordinated through complex signaling pathways that dictate cellular fate decisions such as survival, migration, and differentiation. Hence, understanding these signaling cascades is crucial for the development of successful biodegradable polymer implants.

This article aims to elucidate the various cell signaling pathways that are involved in the biocompatibility of biodegradable polymer implants. In doing so, we can highlight how these signaling mechanisms can be exploited to enhance tissue response and improve clinical outcomes.

Discussion

1. Integrin-Mediated Signaling

Integrins are transmembrane receptors that play a crucial role in the cellular response to extracellular matrix (ECM) components and biomaterials. They facilitate cell adhesion and signaling by linking the ECM to the cytoskeleton, thus influencing cell behavior. Upon binding to specific ligands present on the surface of biodegradable polymer implants, integrins trigger a cascade of intracellular signaling events [2].

The activation of integrins leads to the recruitment of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which associates with paxillin and other signaling proteins to form focal adhesions. This assembly is critical for multiple downstream signaling pathways, including the MAPK pathway, which regulates cell proliferation and survival [3]. Integrin signaling can also affect intracellular calcium levels, influencing gene expression and migration dynamics that impact tissue integration.

2. The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Pathway

The MAPK signaling pathway is a key regulator of various cellular functions, including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. This pathway comprises three main components: extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs), and p38 MAPK, each of which responds to distinct extracellular signals.

Integrin engagement with biodegradable polymers can activate the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway, which is critical for the mediation of cell proliferation and matrix synthesis [4]. In particular, fibroblasts and stem cells responding to biodegradable polymers release growth factors such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), which in turn activates ERK signaling pathways, guiding tissue remodeling and repair [5].

Moreover, the p38 MAPK pathway is essential in orchestrating inflammatory responses and can modulate the expression of cytokines. This is especially relevant in biocompatibility since excessive inflammation can lead to device failure [6]. Therefore, the careful modulation of the MAPK pathway can significantly influence the biocompatibility of biodegradable implants by promoting favorable responses while limiting adverse inflammatory effects.

3. Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase (PI3K)-Akt Pathway

The PI3K-Akt pathway plays an integral role in regulating cellular survival, growth, and metabolism. When cells interact with biodegradable polymers, integrins stimulate the activation of PI3K, leading to the conversion of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) [7]. The accumulation of PIP3 subsequently activates Akt, a serine/threonine kinase that promotes cell survival and proliferation.

Akt signaling has been shown to inhibit pro-apoptotic factors while promoting survival signals in cells encountering biodegradable materials [8]. An optimal activation of the PI3K-Akt pathway not only promotes cell survival but also encourages matrix production and deposition, which is vital for tissue integration. Conversely, dysregulation of this pathway can lead to insufficient cell responses or excessive fibrosis, highlighting the need for careful consideration of the signaling outcomes during implant design.

4. Inflammatory Signaling Pathways

Tissue response to implants often includes an inflammatory component, which involves additional signaling pathways such as nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT). These pathways can significantly affect immune responses at the implantation site, influencing the biocompatibility of the material.

The NF-κB pathway is activated in response to inflammatory cytokines, playing a pivotal role in the transcriptional regulation of various inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Understanding how biodegradable polymers modulate these inflammatory pathways can guide the development of materials that elicit a more favorable acute inflammatory response, ensuring better integration and less chronic foreign body reaction [9].

5. Scaffold Mechanical Properties and Signaling

The mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers, such as stiffness and elasticity, can profoundly influence cellular behaviors and their signaling pathways. Cells often sense their environment through mechanotransduction; changes in substrate mechanics can activate specific signaling cascades like the RhoA/ROCK pathway, which affects cytoskeletal organization and gene expression related to cell adhesion and migration [10].

Materials designed with tunable mechanical properties can thus interact with cellular signaling pathways to favor specific cellular outcomes, enhancing overall biocompatibility. For instance, softer scaffolds may promote cell proliferation and migration, while stiffer materials might favor chondrogenic differentiation, facilitating targeted tissue engineering approaches.

Results

Integration of biodegradable polymers into biological systems is mediated by several signaling mechanisms discussed above. Research indicates that polymers that enhance the PI3K-Akt and MAPK signaling pathways yield better cellular responses in terms of proliferation and extracellular matrix synthesis. Surface modifications of these polymers have been shown to promote integrin binding, leading to improved signaling outcomes and favorable tissue responses. For instance, hydrophilic surface coatings have been found to increase initial cell adhesion rates, influencing downstream signaling and resulting in enhanced biocompatibility [1].

Animal studies corroborate these findings, demonstrating that implants that activate favorable cell signaling pathways lead to reduced inflammation and improved tissue integration over time. The composition and mechanical properties of these polymers also play a crucial role in governing cellular responses, further supporting the hypothesis that strategic design can significantly influence biocompatibility through cell signaling modulation.

Conclusion

The understanding of cell signaling pathways involved in the biocompatibility of biodegradable polymer implants offers valuable insights into optimizing these materials for clinical applications. Specific pathways, such as integrin-mediated signaling, MAPK, and PI3K-Akt, are central to modulating cellular responses and improving the integration of implants. Insights from the interplay between the mechanical properties of the materials and cellular signaling can lead to the design of next-generation biodegradable implants that better support tissue healing and enhance regenerative outcomes. Future research should focus on harnessing these signaling pathways to develop biomaterials that not only minimize adverse reactions but actively promote healing and tissue regeneration.

References

1. Jariyasakoolroj P, Leelaphiwat P, Harnkarnsujarit N (2020)Advances in research and development of bioplastic for food packaging. J Sci Food Agric 100: 5032-5045.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Taherimehr M, YousefniaPasha H, Tabatabaeekoloor R, Pesaranhajiabbas E (2021)Trends and challenges of biopolymer-based nanocomposites in food packaging. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 20: 5321-5344

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Charles APR, Jin TZ, Mu R, Wu Y (2021)Electrohydrodynamic processing of natural polymers for active food packaging: A comprehensive review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 20: 6027-6056.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Zubair M, Ullah A (2020)Recent advances in protein derived bio nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 60: 406-434.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Fu Y, Dudley EG (2021)Antimicrobial-coated films as food packaging: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 20: 3404-3437

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Thakur S, Chaudhary J, Singh P, Alsanie WF, Grammatikos SA, et al.(2022)Synthesis of Bio-based monomers and polymers using microbes for a sustainable bioeconomy. Bioresour Technol 344: 126-156.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Rydz J, Musioł M, Kowalczuk M (2019)Polymers Tailored for Controlled (Bio) degradation Through End-group and In-chain Functionalization. Curr Org Synth 16: 950-952.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Pellis A, Malinconico M, Guarneri A, Gardossi L (2021) Renewable polymers and plastics: Performance beyond the green. N Biotechnol 60: 146-158.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Rydz J, Sikorska W, Kyulavska M, Christova D (2014)Polyester-based (bio)degradable polymers as environmentally friendly materials for sustainable development. Int J Mol Sci 16: 564-596

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Sebe I, Szabo B, Zelko R (2012)Bio-based pharmaceutical polymers, possibility of their chemical modification and the applicability of modified polymers. Acta Pharm Hung 82: 138-154.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref