Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography
Open Access

Sustainability Assessment, Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), Circular Economy, Food-Energy-Water (FEW) Nexus, Social Enterprises, Blockchain Technology, Smart Grids, Agricultural Practices, Urban Green Infrastructure, Waste Management

Introduction

The urgent global imperative for sustainable development necessitates robust and comprehensive assessment methodologies. This body of research delves into various approaches for evaluating sustainability across a diverse range of sectors and applications, moving beyond traditional environmental impact studies to integrate economic and social dimensions. The goal is to provide frameworks that inform policy, guide decision-making, and foster more resilient systems worldwide. A significant focus lies on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), a methodology crucial for understanding complex systems. For instance, LCSA frameworks are systematically analyzed in the context of organic waste valorization. This involves scrutinizing current practices, identifying key metrics, and pinpointing gaps in environmental, economic, and social impact evaluations. The work highlights the critical need for standardized LCSA frameworks to guide sustainable waste management decisions, particularly in resource recovery and bioenergy production [1].

Extending LCSA's applicability, another study addresses the intricate transition from single-product to multi-product LCSA. This research outlines the key methodological challenges encountered, such as allocation issues and data aggregation complexities. It also proposes future research directions aimed at developing more robust and broadly applicable LCSA models for intricate industrial systems, thereby enhancing decision-making processes for sustainable production [4].

Beyond specific life cycle approaches, integrated assessment frameworks are increasingly vital for evaluating sustainability within highly interconnected systems. A systematic review explores current sustainable assessment approaches for the food-energy-water (FEW) nexus, identifying prevalent methodologies, tools, and indicators used to evaluate interdependencies and trade-offs. This work underscores the crucial need for integrated and holistic assessment frameworks to inform effective policy-making and ensure resource security in an ever-changing global environment [2].

Further demonstrating this need for integrated frameworks, a comprehensive approach is proposed for assessing the sustainability of social enterprises, specifically tailored for developing countries. This framework integrates essential dimensions including economic viability, social impact, environmental stewardship, and robust governance. It offers a structured methodology for evaluating and enhancing the long-term effectiveness and resilience of social enterprises within complex socio-economic contexts [3].

In the realm of emerging technologies, an integrated framework is put forth for conducting a comprehensive sustainability assessment of blockchain technology. This addresses its multi-faceted impacts, including energy consumption, governance structures, social implications, and economic benefits. The research stresses the necessity of a holistic evaluation to harness blockchain’s potential for sustainable development while proactively mitigating its inherent environmental and social challenges [7].

For critical infrastructure, a systematic approach is presented for assessing the sustainability of smart grid systems, with a particular focus on the unique challenges and opportunities prevalent in developing countries. This integrates various sustainability dimensions: economic feasibility, environmental impact, social acceptance, and technological robustness. The framework aims to guide effective smart grid implementation, contributing significantly to sustainable urban development [8].

The circular economy principles, crucial for resource optimization, are also a major area of assessment. Research investigates and proposes a set of indicators for assessing the sustainability of circular economy applications within the construction and demolition waste management sector. This highlights the importance of comprehensive metrics that effectively capture environmental, economic, and social dimensions to monitor progress towards circularity and optimize resource utilization in the building industry [5].

Building on this, a systematic literature review scrutinizes sustainability assessment methods applied to circular economy strategies within the textile industry. It identifies current trends, key indicators, and existing research gaps concerning the environmental, economic, and social impacts of circular initiatives. The study emphasizes the pressing need for standardized and holistic assessment tools to accelerate the transition towards a more sustainable and circular textile value chain [10].

Sector-specific applications further enrich the field. A review examines the application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for sustainability assessment in agricultural practices. It critically analyzes various LCA methodologies, their strengths, limitations, and the key environmental impacts evaluated across different agricultural systems. The article advocates for more harmonized and context-specific LCA studies to support sustainable agricultural development and inform policy formulation [6].

Lastly, urban sustainability is addressed through a multi-criteria decision-making approach applied to assess urban green infrastructure systems. This evaluates diverse environmental, social, and economic benefits, such as biodiversity enhancement, air quality improvement, and recreational value. This research provides a valuable tool for urban planners to prioritize and implement green infrastructure projects effectively, fostering sustainable urban environments [9].

Collectively, these studies demonstrate a concerted effort to develop sophisticated and context-sensitive sustainability assessment tools, essential for navigating complex environmental and socio-economic challenges and fostering a sustainable future.

Description

The collection of studies highlights the critical role of sustainability assessment across a wide array of domains, emphasizing the need for robust and comprehensive methodologies. Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) emerges as a significant approach, particularly in the context of organic waste valorization. This methodology systematically analyzes current practices, identifies essential metrics, and uncovers gaps across environmental, economic, and social impact evaluations. It points to a clear demand for standardized LCSA frameworks to guide decisions in waste management, resource recovery, and bioenergy production [1]. The complexities of LCSA are further explored in transitioning from single-product to multi-product assessments, where methodological challenges like allocation issues and data aggregation are prominent. Addressing these is key to developing more applicable LCSA models for complex industrial systems, ultimately improving sustainable production decision-making [4].

Beyond life cycle approaches, integrated frameworks are crucial for evaluating sustainability in interconnected systems. A systematic review on the food-energy-water (FEW) nexus identifies prevalent methodologies, tools, and indicators, underscoring the urgent need for holistic assessment frameworks to inform policy and ensure resource security in an evolving global environment [2]. Similarly, specific frameworks are proposed for assessing the sustainability of social enterprises, especially in developing countries. These frameworks integrate economic viability, social impact, environmental stewardship, and governance, offering a structured method to enhance the long-term effectiveness and resilience of these organizations in complex socio-economic settings [3]. The advent of new technologies also necessitates tailored assessment. For blockchain technology, an integrated framework is proposed to conduct comprehensive sustainability evaluations, considering energy consumption, governance, social implications, and economic benefits. This approach is vital for leveraging blockchain's potential for sustainable development while proactively addressing its inherent environmental and social challenges [7]. In a similar vein, smart grid systems, particularly in developing countries, benefit from a systematic assessment approach. This method integrates economic feasibility, environmental impact, social acceptance, and technological robustness, aiming to guide effective smart grid implementation towards sustainable urban development [8].

The principles of circular economy are gaining prominence, and their sustainability assessment is a focal point of several studies. Research investigates and proposes indicators specifically for assessing circular economy principles within the construction and demolition waste management sector. This work stresses the importance of comprehensive metrics that effectively capture environmental, economic, and social dimensions to monitor progress towards circularity and optimize resource utilization within the building industry [5]. Extending this to manufacturing, a systematic literature review examines sustainability assessment methods for circular economy strategies in the textile industry. This review identifies current trends, key indicators, and existing research gaps regarding the environmental, economic, and social impacts of circular initiatives. It highlights a pressing need for standardized and holistic assessment tools to accelerate the transition towards a more sustainable and circular textile value chain [10].

The application of sustainability assessment extends to traditional and modern sectors. In agriculture, a review focuses on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for evaluating agricultural practices. It thoroughly examines various LCA methodologies, their strengths, limitations, and the primary environmental impacts across different agricultural systems. The article advocates for more harmonized and context-specific LCA studies to support sustainable agricultural development and inform policy formulation effectively [6]. Urban planning also leverages these assessments. A multi-criteria decision-making approach is applied to assess the sustainability of urban green infrastructure systems. This method evaluates diverse environmental, social, and economic benefits, such as biodiversity enhancement, air quality improvement, and recreational value. This research provides a valuable tool for urban planners to prioritize and implement green infrastructure projects, thereby fostering sustainable urban environments [9].

Overall, these studies collectively showcase the breadth and depth of sustainability assessment research, emphasizing tailored approaches for diverse contexts, from waste management and industrial systems to social enterprises and emerging technologies. A recurring theme is the necessity for comprehensive, integrated, and often standardized frameworks that account for environmental, economic, and social dimensions. This holistic perspective is crucial for effective policy-making, resource security, and the overarching goal of fostering truly sustainable development across various sectors globally.

Conclusion

This collection of research underscores the evolving landscape of sustainability assessment, covering a wide range of methodologies and applications across various sectors. Key themes include the refinement of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) frameworks for organic waste valorization and complex industrial systems, highlighting the transition from single-product to multi-product assessments. The studies emphasize the critical need for integrated and holistic assessment approaches, particularly for interlinked challenges such as the food-energy-water (FEW) nexus. Comprehensive frameworks are proposed for evaluating the sustainability of social enterprises, especially in developing countries, integrating economic, social, environmental, and governance dimensions. Similarly, specific frameworks address the unique challenges of assessing novel technologies like blockchain and critical infrastructures like smart grids in developing contexts. The circular economy is a prominent focus, with research exploring indicators for construction and demolition waste management and reviewing assessment methods for textile industry strategies. Other applications include the review of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approaches for agricultural practices and the use of multi-criteria decision-making for urban green infrastructure. Collectively, these studies advocate for standardized metrics, integrated frameworks, and context-specific approaches to effectively monitor progress, inform policy, and drive sustainable development across environmental, economic, and social fronts.

References

• Maryam SA, Arshid P, Marwan JA (2023) Life cycle sustainability assessment of organic waste valorization technologies: A systematic review.Sci Total Environ 905:167389.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Ahmad E, Mohamed AE, Mohamed AS (2023) Sustainable assessment of the food–energy–water nexus: A systematic review of current practices and future trends.J Clean Prod 414:137604.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Shruthi M, J. RM, Sudheer B (2022) A comprehensive framework for sustainability assessment of social enterprises in developing countries.J Clean Prod 377:134440.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Alessandra Z, Manuele M, Anne-Marie B (2021) From single-product to multi-product life cycle sustainability assessment: Challenges and future perspectives.Sci Total Environ 795:148858.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Laura I, Juan JG, Rafael EB (2023) Exploring indicators for sustainability assessment of circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector.J Clean Prod 407:137119.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Chiara C, Fabio F, Marco V (2022) Sustainability assessment of agricultural practices: A review of life cycle assessment approaches.J Environ Manage 324:116450.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Mehedi H, Farzana R, Md. RI (2023) Towards a comprehensive sustainability assessment of blockchain technology: An integrated framework approach.J Clean Prod 419:138133.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Mohamed AE, A. E, M. AS (2021) A systematic approach for sustainability assessment of smart grid systems in developing countries.Sustain Cities Soc 75:103328.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Mahnaz M, Mohammad JK, Behrooz V (2020) Sustainability assessment of urban green infrastructure systems: A multi-criteria decision-making approach.Sci Total Environ 718:137351.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Maria-Laura P, Sara PG, Pedro PG (2022) Sustainability assessment of circular economy strategies in the textile industry: A systematic literature review.J Clean Prod 376:134185.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref