Environment Pollution and Climate Change
Open Access

The global trend of urbanization is accelerating, with millions of people moving to cities each year. While urban development can stimulate economic growth and improve living standards, it also brings significant environmental challenges. One of the most critical issues associated with urban growth is the alteration of natural hydrological systems, leading to an increased risk of flooding. Urban development changes the landscape, increases impervious surfaces, reduces natural water infiltration, and alters runoff patterns. As a result, urban areas, particularly newly developed or rapidly growing cities, are more vulnerable to intense rainfall events and subsequent flooding.

Traditional flood management strategies often fail to fully account for the complexities of urban rainfall-runoff dynamics. A more integrated and comprehensive approach is needed, one that considers the interactions between land use, urban infrastructure, and natural water flow. This article explores a novel distributed coupled model that addresses these complexities, providing a powerful tool for assessing and managing flood risks in emerging cities.

The Need for Advanced Flood Modeling in Urban Environments

Flooding in urban areas can have severe social, economic, and environmental impacts. The loss of life, damage to infrastructure, and economic disruption caused by floods are compounded by the ongoing expansion of urban areas. In newly urbanized regions, inadequate drainage systems, poor land-use planning, and insufficient stormwater management often exacerbate flood risks. These challenges are further intensified by climate change, which increases the frequency and intensity of rainfall events.

To effectively manage flooding in emerging urban areas, a comprehensive understanding of rainfall-runoff dynamics is required. Traditional flood modeling methods, such as lumped or empirical models, are often inadequate in capturing the spatial and temporal variability of runoff in complex urban environments. Distributed models, on the other hand, offer a more detailed and realistic representation of flood dynamics by accounting for the variability in land use, surface characteristics, and hydrological processes across the urban landscape.

Distributed Coupled Model: A Novel Approach to Flood Prediction

The novel distributed coupled model presented in this study integrates both hydrological and hydraulic components to simulate rainfall-runoff response in urban environments. The model incorporates real-time data on rainfall, land use, terrain, and infrastructure to provide accurate predictions of flood behavior in newly developed urban areas.

1. Hydrological Component: The hydrological component of the model simulates the rainfall-runoff process by accounting for the interactions between precipitation, land surface characteristics, and infiltration. Key factors such as impervious surface coverage, soil type, and vegetation are integrated to simulate runoff from different land surfaces. The model also incorporates the effects of urban drainage systems, such as stormwater drains and retention basins, which influence runoff rates and flood peak timings.
2. Hydraulic Component: The hydraulic component models the flow of water through the urban drainage network and surface water bodies. This part of the model simulates the movement of runoff through streets, culverts, and open channels, considering factors like channel capacity, flow resistance, and storage. The hydraulic component also accounts for the potential impacts of infrastructure, such as bridges or dams, on flood dynamics. By coupling hydrological and hydraulic processes, the model can predict flooding not only in natural areas but also in developed regions with complex drainage systems.
3. Spatial and Temporal Resolution: One of the key innovations of the coupled model is its ability to handle both spatial and temporal variability. The model operates at a high spatial resolution, allowing for the analysis of flood risks at a granular level. This means that the model can simulate flooding at specific locations within a city, such as neighborhoods, streets, or intersections. Additionally, the temporal resolution of the model allows it to capture the dynamic nature of rainfall events and their immediate impact on runoff and flooding.

Case Study: Application to an Emerging Urban Area To demonstrate the effectiveness of the novel coupled model, we applied it to a rapidly urbanizing city in a temperate climate zone. The city has experienced significant growth over the past decade, with large-scale residential, commercial, and industrial developments transforming previously undeveloped land. The study area includes both newly developed neighborhoods with extensive impervious surfaces and older areas with more natural land cover.

1. Data Collection and Model Calibration: The model was calibrated using a combination of historical rainfall data, satellite imagery, and detailed topographic maps. High-resolution data on land use, road networks, and drainage infrastructure were incorporated to accurately reflect the urban landscape. Rainfall data from a series of extreme weather events were used to simulate flood response under various scenarios.
2. Flood Simulation and Results: The coupled model was run under several rainfall scenarios, including typical seasonal storms and extreme events with high-intensity rainfall. The results revealed several key findings:
   • Increased Flood Vulnerability in Urbanized Areas: Newly developed regions with extensive impervious surfaces showed significantly higher runoff volumes and faster flood propagation compared to older, more permeable areas.
   • Flood Risk Hotspots: Specific neighborhoods located in low-lying areas or near under-capacity drainage systems were identified as flood risk hotspots. These areas experienced rapid accumulation of runoff and frequent surface flooding during extreme rainfall events.
   • Impact of Drainage Systems: The model highlighted the importance of urban drainage systems in mitigating flood risk. Areas with well-designed, efficient drainage systems were less prone to flooding, even under heavy rainfall, while areas with outdated or undersized infrastructure were more vulnerable.

Implications for Urban Planning and Flood Management

The results from the coupled model offer valuable insights for urban planners and policymakers. The ability to simulate flooding at a granular level allows for targeted flood risk mitigation measures, such as improving drainage infrastructure, implementing green infrastructure solutions, and revising land-use plans to reduce impervious surface coverage.

Key recommendations include:

• Upgrading Urban Drainage Infrastructure: Identifying and reinforcing areas with outdated or inadequate drainage systems can help reduce flood risk and improve the city’s resilience to extreme weather events.
• Implementing Green Infrastructure: Incorporating permeable surfaces, green roofs, and rainwater harvesting systems can help reduce runoff and enhance natural infiltration, mitigating the effects of urbanization on flood dynamics.
• Zoning and Land Use Planning: Avoiding high-density development in flood-prone areas and promoting sustainable urban growth practices can minimize the risk of flooding in newly urbanized regions.

Conclusion

The novel distributed coupled model provides a powerful tool for assessing the impact of urban development on flooding in emerging cities. By integrating hydrological and hydraulic processes, the model offers a detailed and accurate simulation of rainfall-runoff dynamics, allowing urban planners and policymakers to make informed decisions about flood risk management. As urbanization continues to accelerate worldwide, this modeling approach can play a critical role in ensuring that cities grow in a way that is both resilient to flooding and sustainable for future generations.

References

1. Sanjeev L (2004) Study on an arsenic level in groundwater of Delhi. J Clin Biochem 19: 135-140.

Google Scholar

2. Silvia SF (2003) Natural contamination with Arsenic and other trace elementsin groundwater of Argentina Pampean plains. Sci 309: 187-199.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Roychowdhury T (2004) Effect of Arsenic contaminated irrigation water on agricultural land soil and plants in West Bengal, India. Chemosphere 58: 799-810.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Yokota H (2001) Arsenic contaminated ground and pond water and water purification system using pond water in Bangladesh. Eng Geol 60: 323-331.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Taha H (2001) Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol Ener 70: 295-310.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Armson D, Stringer P, Ennos AR (2012) The effect of tree shade and grass on surface and globe temperatures in an urban area. Urb Forest Urb Green 11: 245-255.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Arnberger A, Eder R (2012) Exploring coping behaviours of Sunday and work day visitors due to dense use conditions in an urban forest. Urb Forest Urb Green 11: 439-449.

Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Astbury B, Rogers P (2004) Evaluation of the stronger families and communities strategy: Gilles Plains community garden case study. RMIT Univer Collabor Instit Research.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

9. Heidt V, Neef M (2008) Benefits of urban green space for improving urban climate. Eco, plan, manage urb forest: Internat perspect, Springer: New York 23: 84-96.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Duryea ML, Blakeslee GM, Hubbard WG, Vasquez RA (1996) Wind and trees: A survey of homeowners after hurricane Andrew. J Arboricul 22: 44-50.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref