Influence of Lime and Phosphorus Fertilizer on the Acid Properties of Soils and Soybean (Glycine max L.) Crops Grown in Benshangul-Gumuze Regional State Assosa Area
Received Date: Nov 17, 2017 / Accepted Date: Nov 24, 2017 / Published Date: Nov 30, 2017
Soil acidity is one of the major soil chemical constraints which limit agricultural productivity in the mid and highlands of Ethiopia. Especially in the western part of the country such as Assosa and Wellega, soil acidity is a well-known problem limiting crop productivity. The study was conducted to evaluate the influence of lime and Phosphorus fertilizer on yield and yield attributes of soybean in acid soil at Assosa north western Ethiopia during June 2012 to March of 2015. The crop was evaluated in terms of pod per plant, seed per pod, grain yield, hundred seed weight and straw yield. But it had neither interaction with lime and Phosphorus fertilizer nor its effect on yield attribute was significant. Even though lime level at 1.5* Exchangeable acidity (5.652 tone) and phosphorus at 46% shows good yield and had consistency across the year, hence it was best to use such combination of Lime and P. Maintaining soil fertility is possible for the area because simultaneous and minimum use of lime and Phosphorus fertilizer give similar seed yield with maximum use of lime and Phosphorus on the study area though much better than the control. Phosphorus fixation, which is responsible for low availability of P, is one of the major problems of crop growth in acidic soils such Nitisols of Assosa area.
Keywords: Lime; Phosphorus; Acidic soil; Soybean crop
Soybean (Glycine max L.) is one of grain legumes that is grown in tropical, subtropical and temperate climates. Globally, soybean production has increased by a factor of eight in the last half century to reach its present level, about 100 million metric tons per year . Consideration of the economic advantages of soybeans has led many countries to start large scale production of this crop. Soybean is an important source of inexpensive and high quality protein and oil. With an average protein content of 40% and oil content of 20%, soybean has the highest protein content of all food crops and it is the second to groundnut in terms of oil content among food legumes crops .
Soybean is one of the most important feed stuffs for livestock either in form of forage (as hay and silage) or soybean meal . Because of its high quality protein content, soybean can also compensate the expensive animal proteins to overcome malnutrition. Since its oil content is high (20% and above), soybean is also used for edible oil production in Ethiopia. In Ethiopia, particularly in the capital city, Addis Ababa, Faffa food Share Company, East African Flour Factory, and Health care food manufacturing private limited companies etc are using local and imported soybeans in the preparation of enriched food products for children and adults . Soybean is known for its wide adaptability coupled with its higher productivity per unit area compared to other grain legumes . However, it has long been recognized that soil acidity is one of the most serious challenges to agricultural production worldwide in general  and Ethiopia in particular. All over the world, poor growth and low productivity of soybean has been mainly attributed to soil acidity among other factors .
Soil acidity is one of the most important soil factors which affect plant growth and ultimately limit crop production and profitability  and its problems are common in all regions where precipitation is high enough to leach appreciable amounts of exchangeable bases from the soil surface . Soil acidity is one of the most prevalent problems in the production of food and fiber because about 40% of the world’s arable land is affected by this problem . The amount of readily available phosphorus (P) in the soil is very low compared with the total amount of P. In soil fertility, P fixation is the process in which easily soluble fertilizer phosphates are transformed into such insoluble forms that their uptake by plants is hindered . Soil acidity mainly at soil pH<5.5 affects the growth of crops due to high concentration of aluminum (Al) and manganese (Mn), and deficiency of P, nitrogen (N), sulfur (S) and other nutrients .
Although P is known as the master key to agriculture, lack of available P in the soil limits the growth of both cultivated and uncultivated plants . Tropical and subtropical soils are predominantly acidic with high P fixation capacities and often are extremely P deficient. In acidic soils there are very high contents of iron (Fe) and Al bonded P fractions compared to the other fractions which could be due to the high content of Fe/Al-oxides, low pH and advanced stage of weathering of the soils that control the plant available P, and the high content of Al and Fe oxides and hydroxides are the main factors for the strong P fixation in acidic soils . Most soils of the highlands are characterized by soil acidity and high P fixation due to intensive weathering and leaching attributed to high rainfall. In the past, soil acidification affected large areas of Ethiopian highlands and this situation now has the potential to worsen in the country.
Soil acidity is becoming a serious threat to crop production mainly in the areas of the western, southern and central highlands of Ethiopia . This low availability of P under most soils of Ethiopia is due to the impacts of P fixation by acidic cations, abundant loss of P by crop harvest and erosion and the inherent P deficiency of the soils by little or no P sourced fertilizers application .
Therefore, soil P deficiency is mainly due to low organic matter (OM) content, low P fertilizer application, P loss by soil erosion, and P fixation by Al, Mn and Fe, miss management of soil and the like. However, application of P sourced fertilizers and lime rate is does not optimized for Assosa area (Figure 1). Therefore, this activity was designed to evaluate the Influence of lime rate and P fertilizer on the change of acid properties of the soil and soybean growth at Assosa soils.
Methodology and Materials
Description of the study area
This experiment was conducted at Assosa Zone, Megele-33 kebele of Northwestern Ethiopia in the main rainy season of 2012 to 2015.The research sites are found in the altitude ranging between 1300-1470 m.a.s.l. with the minimum and maximum temperatures of 14.38 and 28.55°C, respectively and an average annual rainfall of 1291.15 mm of which 1041.65 mm were received between May and October during the cropping season (Table 1).
|Month||Effective Rainfall (mm)||Mean Temp. (C°)|
Table 1: Metrological conditions of the cropping seasons. Source: National Metrological Service Agency, Assosa Office.
Treatments and experimental design
Factorial experiment was laid out in randomised complete block design (RCBD) with five levels of lime (0 X EA, 0.5 X EA., 1 X EA., 1.5 X EA. and 2 X EA., or 0, 1.875, 3.75, 5.652 and 7.5 t ha-1) and four levels of P (0, 23, 46 and 69 kg ha-1) applications replicated three times during the 2012-2015 growing season around Assosa at Megele 33 kebele. The site’s exchangeable acidity was 2.36 which were above the critical level. The amount of lime is determined by the basis of the mass of soil per 20 cm hectare-furrow-slice soil sample density, and exchangeable Al+3 and H+ as described in Eq. 1 below. Assuming that one mole of exchangeable acidity is neutralized by equivalent mole of CaCO3. The full dose of lime was applied at once in the first year according to the rate. The recommended rate of N was applied uniformly to all treatments. Lime was broadcasted uniformly by hand and incorporated into the soil a month before planting. Urea and triple super phosphate was used as the source of N and P, respectively. Application of urea was in two split, while the entire rate of phosphorus was applied at sowing in band. The plots were kept permanent for the duration of the experiments to observe the carryover effects of the lime.
Results and Discussion
Selected physico-chemical properties of the soil for the experimental sit before planting
Initially on composite soil sample from the experimental site was collected before lime application and subjected to analyses of soil acidity attributes and other soil physic-chemical properties. Samples were randomly collected from surface layer of the experimental field (i.e. 0-20 cm soil depth) to form composite and analyzed for the soil pH and for the parameters to be found in the Table 2.
|pH(1:1H2O)||Cent mole/kg soil)|
|EX.A||EX. Al||Ca||Mg||K||Na||ECEC||% AS (Acid saturation)||BD(g cm-3)|
Table 2: Selected physic-chemical properties before planting. EX.A:- Exchangeable acidity, Ex.Al:- Exchangeable Aluminium (Centi mole kg-1) & BD: - bulk density.
Soil of experimental field was sandy clay loam in texture and 1.06 g/cm3 bulk density which is low according to Baruah et al. . Strongly acid (PH (H2O)=5.02) according to Bruce and Rayment  available Ca2+, Mg2+, K+ and Na+ analysis results were (2.63=Low, 0.78=Low, 0.06 very low and 0.08 very Low) according to Metson (1961); also 8.25 CEC(Cmolkg-1)which is Low according to Metson.
Some selected soil physic-chemical properties after harvesting
Results of soil analysis before planting, the Soil of experimental field was sandy clay loam in texture and 1.06 g cm3 bulk density which is low according to Baruah et al.  strongly acid (PH (H2O)=5.02) according to Bruce and Rayment available Ca2+, Mg2+, K+ and Na+ analysis results were (2.63=Low, 0.78=Low, 0.06 very low and 0.08 very Low) according to Metson; also 8.25 CEC (Cmol kg-1) which is Low according to Metson. Soils of study area were strongly acidic with low available P and available Ca, Mg and K as shown on the analysis result.
At that sites, addition of lime had significant influence (p=0.05) on the soil pH value over the control treatment with the application of lime at 1.5 X EA.( 5.652 CaCO3 t ha-1). This was because lime likely increased the Ca2+ ions, which it contains, displaced the Al3+, H+ and, Fe3+, ions, prevalent in acid soils such as described by Calba. Lime application at 5.652, 3.75 t ha-1 CaCO3 led to the highest soil pH (5.69) followed by 7.5t ha-1 of CaCO3 which were increases soil PH to (5.67).
The soil analysis result of available P taken after harvesting of experimental sites was affected by the applied lime for the soybean as shown in the table below. The data were analyzed across experimental years and their interaction effect. Among the applied lime rates, the highest available P was observed at the rate of lime 1.5 X EA. (3.75 CaCO3 t/ha) with values of 3.49 meq/kg of soil. The observed increment in available P was probably related to the decrease in reactive Al+3 and also to an increase in surface negative charge resulting from the increased soil pH . The soil available P at sites was lower in the control treatment when compared to all levels of lime additions. However, no significant (P<0.05) differences were observed among applied lime treatments.
Exchangeable acidity and Al contents of the soil were significantly (P=0.05) decreased with increasing rates of lime. Liming with the highest rate (5.7 t CaCO3 ha-1) significantly reduced soil exchangeable acidity to 0.50. As the lime rate increases soil exchangeable acidity comes decreased. Similar results were also observed by many researchers [18,19]. This is explained by the increased replacement of Al by Ca in the exchange site and by the subsequent precipitation of Al as Al(OH)3, as the soil was limed (Table 3).
|Treatments||Soil chemical properties|
Table 3: Selected-chemical properties after harvesting.
Results showed that grain yield of soybean were increased by the application of different rate of lime and P fertilizers. The highest grain yield of soybean (760.48 kg ha-1) were obtained by the application of (1.5*EA or 5.625 t h-1) lime alone, followed by (1*EA, 0.5EA) of lime level which were (744.08, 734.51 kg ha-1) respectively (Table 4). Minimum grain yield were observed not on the control rather on the maximum level of lime (2*EA or 7.5 t ha-1) which were 576.92 kg ha-1(Table 4). Soil chemical property improved by the applied lime and hence phosphorus fertilizer contributes its own positive impact on grain yield improvement by availing itself to the crop. From the result conclude that the highest grain yield were obtained from the application of Phosphorus at (46% P) which were around (794.13 kg ha-1) followed by 726.46 kg ha-1 due to the application of 23% P and minimum grain yield were (524.12 kg ha-1) recorded on the control treatment.
|Grain yield(kg ha-1)||524.12||726.46||794.13||698.55||685.815||138.53||**|
Table 4: Effect of P rate on grain yield of soybean (kg ha-1).
Lime by P interaction effects was non-significant on grain yield of soybean (Tables 5 and 6). Regarding to the interaction effect of lime by phosphorous the highest mean yield of soybean (925.76kg ha-1) was obtained by 1.5*exchangeable acidity (5.652 t ha-1) of caco3 and 46 P.
|Treatments||Lime rate( t ha-1)|
( kg ha-1)
Table 5: Effect of lime levels on grain yields of soybean. EA: exchangeable acidity.
Table 6: Interaction Effect of lime and P rate on grain yield of soybean.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Soil chemical properties such as pH, base saturation and Ca and Mg contents were increased, which may be responsible for higher soybean yields. The results of the effects of agricultural limes on soil showed that all plots receiving lime recorded an increase in soil pH. However, lime rate of 1.5*E.A t ha-1 of agricultural limes had increased the soil pH by 5.76. Exchangeable Al was also affected by the applied lime rates. On the other hand, from the P rates of 46 kg ha-1 had gives a higher soybean grain yield. Significant increases in mean values of available P were obtained at the 1.5*EA. (5.652 CaCO3 t ha-1) amended plots. These lime treatment that increased soil pH to 5.76 also showed in increments of plant height, head weight, grain yield of sorghum and some other chemical properties of the soil. Regarding to lime by P interaction, good mean yield of soybean was obtained by interaction effect of 46 kg ha-1 phosphorous and at 1.5*E.A level of lime gives the highest (925.755 kg ha-1) grain yield of soybean. Hence a combined application of phosphorous level at 46 kg/ha and lime at 1.5*E.A had good response in reclaiming the soil and in increasing crop productivity.
Furthermore the soil chemical and physical improvement is not that much adequate and the soybean yield obtained is not as high as the yield potential of the variety. These may be due the occurrence of sub soil acidity which should need an attention in the future.
- Masuda T, Goldsmith PD (2009) World soybean production: area harvested yield, and long-term projections. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 12: 143-162.
- Collombet RN (2013) Investigating soybean market situation in Western Kenya: constraints and opportunities for smallholder producers. Wageningen University, pp: 1-43.
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1990) Research Highlights for 1989. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibaban, Nigeria.
- World Health Organization (2003) Technical Report Series 916. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation.
- Boyer JS (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443-448.
- Sumner ME, Noble AD (2003) Soil acidification: the world story. In: Rengel Z (ed.). Handbook of soil acidity, pp: 1-28.
- Maddox JS, Soileux JM (1991) Effects of phosphate fertilizer, lime amendment and inoculation with VA-mychorrhizal fungi on soybean in an acid soil. In: Wright et al. (Ed.), Plant and Soil interaction at low pH, pp: 215-225.
- Fageria NK (2009) The Use of Nutrients in Crop Plants. CRC Press, New York.
- Chimdi A, Gebrekidan H, Kibret K, Tadesse A (2012) Response of barley to liming of acid soils collected from different land use systems of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 2: 1-13.
- Zdenko (2003) Hand Book of Soil Acidity. University of Western Australia Perth, Western Australia.
- Wang J, Raman H, Zhang G, Mendham N, Zou M (2006) Aluminum tolerance in barely (Horidium vulgarie L.): Physiological mechanisms, genetics and screening methods. Journal of Zhejiang University Science 7: 769-787.
- Kidanemariam A, Gebrekidan H, Mamo T, Kibret K (2012) Impact of altitude and land use type on some physical and chemical properties of acidic soils in Tsegede Highland, North Ethiopia. Open Journal of soil Science 2: 223-233.
- Foth HD, Ellis BG (1997) Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. In: Soil Fertility. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton FL.
- Melese A (2014) Soils of farta district, northwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Phd dissertation. Haramaya university, Ethiopia.
- Haile W, Boke S (2011) On-Farm Verification of Lime and NPK Fertilizers Effects on the Tuber Yield of Irish Potato (Solanum Tuberosum) on Some Acidic Soils of Southern Ethiopia. Journal of the Drylands 4: 283-288.
- Baruah A, Nath SC, Hazarika AK, Sarma TC (1997) Essential oils of leaf, stem bark and panicle of Cinnamomum begolghota (Buch-Ham) Sweet. J Essent Oil Res 9: 243-245.
- Bruce RC, Rayment CE (1982) Analytical methods and interpretations used by the Agricultural Chemistry Branch for soil and land use surveys. Queensland Department of Primary Industries. Bulletin QB82004.
- Adetunji MT, Bamiro FO (1994) Effect of lime addition on soil properties, nitrogen nutrition and nutrient uptake in some Nigerian soils. African Crop Science Journal 2: 183-187.
- Haynes RJ, Mokolobate MS (2001) Amelioration of Al toxicity and P deficiency in acid soils by additions of organic residues: A critical review of the phenomenon and the mechanisms involved. Nutrient Cycling in Agro ecosystems 59: 47-63.
Citation: Tamene D, Anbessa B, Adisu T (2017) Influence of Lime and Phosphorus Fertilizer on the Acid Properties of Soils and Soybean (Glycine max L.) Crops Grown in Benshangul-Gumuze Regional State Assosa Area. Adv Crop Sci Tech 5: 323. DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000323
Copyright: © 2017 Tamene D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
Open Access Journals
- Total views: 2586
- [From(publication date): 0-2017 - Jan 18, 2022]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 2132
- PDF downloads: 454