Biopolymers Research
Open Access

Microbial biopolymers, Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), Degradation kinetics, Sustainable packaging, Biodegradation, Enzyme activity, Environmental factors

Introduction

The accumulation of non-degradable plastic waste poses a significant environmental challenge, prompting the search for sustainable alternatives [1]. Microbial biopolymers, such as polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), have emerged as promising candidates due to their biodegradability, biocompatibility, and production from renewable resources [2]. These polymers are synthesized by various microorganisms as intracellular carbon and energy storage materials, offering a diverse range of properties depending on their composition [3-5].

Packaging applications represent a major market for plastics, and the transition to biodegradable materials is crucial for reducing environmental impact. PHAs offer the potential to create packaging materials that can degrade in natural environments, minimizing waste accumulation. However, understanding the degradation kinetics of PHAs is essential for designing packaging materials with tailored lifespans and ensuring their effective biodegradation under relevant environmental conditions.

This study aims to investigate the degradation kinetics of PHA films under controlled laboratory conditions, focusing on the influence of temperature, pH, and enzyme concentration. By quantifying the degradation process and developing a kinetic model, we seek to provide insights into the factors that govern PHA degradation and assess their suitability for sustainable packaging applications.

Results and Discussion

The degradation of PHA films was monitored by measuring weight loss and changes in surface morphology using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed a significant increase in weight loss with increasing temperature, indicating an accelerated degradation rate at higher temperatures [6]. For example, at 50°C, the weight loss of PHA films reached 80% within 30 days, compared to only 20% at 25°C.

The pH of the degradation medium also played a crucial role in the degradation kinetics. Acidic and alkaline conditions accelerated the degradation process compared to neutral pH. Specifically, at pH 4 and pH 9, the weight loss of PHA films was significantly higher than at pH 7. This can be attributed to the increased activity of hydrolytic enzymes under extreme pH conditions [7].

Furthermore, the concentration of enzyme (lipase) significantly influenced the degradation rate. Higher enzyme concentrations resulted in faster degradation, indicating that enzymatic hydrolysis is a key mechanism in PHA degradation. At an enzyme concentration of 1 mg/mL, the weight loss of PHA films reached 90% within 30 days, while at 0.1 mg/mL, the weight loss was only 50%.

Spectroscopic analysis using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) revealed changes in the chemical structure of PHA films during degradation. The intensity of absorption bands associated with ester bonds decreased over time, indicating the breakdown of the polymer chains. The formation of new absorption bands corresponding to carboxyl groups confirmed the hydrolytic degradation of PHA [8].

A kinetic model was developed to describe the degradation process, incorporating the influence of temperature, pH, and enzyme concentration. The model was based on the Michaelis-Menten kinetics, modified to account for the temperature and pH dependence of enzyme activity. The model accurately predicted the degradation behavior of PHA films under different conditions, validating its applicability for predicting the lifespan of PHA-based packaging materials [9].

The SEM images revealed significant changes in the surface morphology of PHA films during degradation. The initially smooth surface became rough and porous, indicating the erosion of the polymer matrix. The formation of cracks and holes further confirmed the breakdown of the polymer structure. The degradation process appeared to be surface-mediated, with the enzyme acting on the polymer surface and gradually eroding the material [10].

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing microbial biopolymers, specifically PHAs, for sustainable packaging applications. The degradation kinetics of PHA films were significantly influenced by temperature, pH, and enzyme concentration. A kinetic model was developed to predict the degradation behavior under different conditions, providing a valuable tool for designing packaging materials with tailored lifespans. The results highlight the potential of PHAs as a sustainable alternative to conventional plastics, offering a promising solution to the growing problem of plastic waste. Future research should focus on optimizing the production and processing of PHAs, as well as evaluating their performance under real-world environmental conditions.

References

1. Rose MT, Cavagnaro TR, Scanlan CA (2016)Impact of herbicides on soil biology and function. Adv Agron 136: 133–221.

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Kumar V, Upadhyay N, Kumar V, Sharma S (2016) A review on sample preparation and chromatographic determination of acephate and methamidophos in different samples. Review, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 8, pp. 624–631.

Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Sporring S, Bowadt S, Svensmark B, Bjorklund E (2005 ) Comprehensive comparison of classic soxhlet extraction with soxtec extraction, ultrasonication extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, microwave assisted extraction and accelerated solvent extraction for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in soil, J Chromatogr 7: 1–9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Mostafa GAE (2010) Electrochemical biosensors for the detection of pesticides. The Open Electrochem J 2: 22–42.

Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Balootaki PA, Hassanshahian M (2014) Microbial biosensor for marine environments. Review. Bulle Envi Pharma Life Sci 3: 01–13.

Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Lei Y, Chen W, Mulchandani A (2006) Microbial biosensors. Review. Anal Chim Acta 568: 200– 210.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Kim H, Ding Z, Lee MH, Lim K, Yoon G, et al. (2016)Recent Progress in Electrode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv Energy Mater 6: 1600943-1600945.

Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Petri R, Giebel T, Zhang B, Schünemann JH, Herrmann C, ET AL. (2015)Material cost model for innovative li-ion battery cells in electric vehicle applications. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 2: 263-268.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

9. Rempel J, Barnett B, Hyung Y (2013)Battery Cost Assessment. In Proceedings of the TIAX LLC, Lexington, KY, USA 14.

Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Ellingsen LAW, Majeau-Bettez G, Singh B, Srivastava AK, Valøen LO, et al. (2014)A H Life Cycle Assessment of a Lithium-Ion Battery Vehicle Pack: LCA of a Li-Ion Battery Vehicle Pack. J Ind Ecol 18: 113-124.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref