ISSN: 2157-7617

Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Research   
  • J Earth Sci Clim Change, Vol 13(2): 607
  • DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000607

Landslide hazard assessment using UAV imagery and GIS for road planning and development in Chure area: Sindhuli-Hetauda Section

Bishnu Prasad Pandey1* and Dr. Kumud Raj Kafle2
1Kantipur Engineering College, Dhapakhel, Lalitpur, Nepal
2Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal
*Corresponding Author: Bishnu Prasad Pandey, Kantipur Engineering College, Dhapakhel, Lalitpur, Nepal, Tel: 9851224734, Email: bishnupandey@kec.edu.np

Received: 07-Feb-2022 / Manuscript No. jescc-22-54223 / Editor assigned: 09-Feb-2022 / PreQC No. jescc-22-54223(PQ) / Reviewed: 23-Feb-2022 / QC No. jescc-22-54223 / Revised: 28-Feb-2022 / Manuscript No. jescc-22-54223(R) / Accepted Date: 28-Feb-2022 / Published Date: 04-Mar-2022 DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000607

Abstract

Chure hills are formed with the highly fragile, weak young sedimentary rocks and are environmentally sensitive. Road construction in this region is a big challenge to conserve the Chure from landslide. Occurrence of landslide hazard along the highway is the threat to the objective of timely, efficient and qualitative construction of highway. Landslide hazard map can greatly help in fixing and shifting of the alignment to reduce the loss of life and property.

This study “Landslide hazard assessment using UAV imagery and GIS for road planning and development in Chure area: Sindhuli-Hetauda section” aims at creating the hazard map, landslide inventory map and designation of hazard levels in one of the sensitive areas: Chure section. With the use of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as the primary means of carrying out the topographical surveying, the study used the Digital Surface Model (DSM) and the orthomosaic map produced from the UAV survey in acquiring the relevant results for fulfilling the study objectives. The survey area being ~100Km in length along the road alignment, four of the most crucial sites on the basis of existing landslide area and impact of those landslide in road, cultivation and settlement in the study area were selected for surveying. The study concluded that use of UAV for hazard mapping has good, accuracies and high resolution data. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the survey for the individual sites was found to be 0.001m, 0.045 m, 0.044 m and 0.804 m, respectively. A detailed topographical map of the area was created, along with the hazard map, including the factors such as slope, aspect, curvature, elevation, lithology, distance to road, distance to river and soil type. Furthermore, the hazard levels for the surveyed area were also obtained: the largest area being medium 60.68%, 57.45%, 71.21% and 71.16%, respectively, followed by high 32.59%, 18.91%, 17.03% and 11.54% respectively and low 6.73%, 23.64%, 11.76% and 17.30%, respectively in Chattiwan, Bhawanchuli, Gurji and Hakpara. It was also concluded that the forest area is at high risk followed by the bush and the settlement area in the Chattiwan, Bhawanchuli and Hakpara site and the cultivable land followed by the bush and the settlement area were found to be in high risks in the fourth site (Gurji).

Keywords

UAV; DEM; Chure, Landslide hazard, Risk assessment

Introduction

Background

Landslides are gravity- dominated mass movement that transports soils, rock, and dumped waste material and artificial fills from elevated position to the down slope. Landslide generally occurs when extreme events like heavy rainfall, seismic activity, movement of mass of ground which is marginally stable take place. Landslides are common natural hazards in mountain region which are accelerated by the development processes.

Landslide hazard mapping is a basic tool which can be used to represent the hazard area with the magnitude of hazard (High, Moderate, and Low). It is important to assess and ensure the year round functioning of the mountainous road for a country like Nepal where most of the terrain is occupied by hills and mountain [1]. Landslide hazard map indicate the areas susceptible to landslide which requires careful evaluation of hazard condition and its possible impact before road alignment is finalized. During construction of highway, alignment fixation plays important role. Occurrence of landslide hazard along the highway is the threat to the objective of timely, efficient and qualitative construction of highway [2]. Landslide also increases the maintenance and operation cost of highway. The ultimate aim of any road construction is to avoid landslide prone area for which landslide hazard map of that area is absolutely necessary.

Chure region is environmentally sensitive due to its loose structural nature of stone, gravel, coarse sands, mudstone and sandstones [3]. Recently, Nepal Government announced to develop the alternative highway to connect east and west which passes through the Chure region, named Madan Bhandari Highway. This project will drastically change the area to urbanization which might lead to increase in pressure on the available resources in the Chure region. Land use pattern will be changed that may cause negative impact on the land. The improper land management along the Chure might aggravate the chances of landslide in already fragile landscape. The president of Chure- Terai Madhesh Conservation Development Board, which was formed in 2016, takes the highway construction as a challenge to conserve Chure from the aforementioned disasters (PCTMCD/GoN, 2018).

Statement of the Problem

Chure hills are formed with the highly fragile, weak and young sedimentary rocks which are highly weathered and deformed, and inter-bedding of soft mudstone and hard sandstone beds provide differential weathering providing plenty of options for slope instabilities and occurrence of different types of landslides [4]. Landslides in Chure are caused by both natural and human interferences. Change of land use system and land cover due to deforestation, haphazard road construction and over exploitation of raw materials have triggered landslide in Chure area. Madan Bhandari Highway, a new road project from east to west is proposed for construction in Chure area, having length of 1200km, connecting Jhapa of eastern Nepal to Dadeldhura of western Nepal [5]. The new highway proposed on geologically fragile Chure area will create adverse impact on the environment [6]. Sindhuli- Hetauda section is one section of Madan Bhandari Highway which is under construction without hazard mapping and risk assessment. Road contributes to the largest surface erosion and landslide losses (per unit area disturbed) compared to other land use [7]. Land use has direct impact on the soil erosion and slope stability in Tropical Mountain including timber harvesting, road trails, various agro-forestry practices, and conversion of forest to agricultural land and to grazing land.

There is lack of detail study of landslides and related phenomena in Chure area that creates dilemma about the landslide hazard, its distribution, and possibility of future occurrences, landslide risks and mitigation measures. Occurrence of landslide hazard along the highway is the threat to the objective of timely, efficient and qualitative construction of highway. Landslide also increases the maintenance and operation cost of highway. The ultimate aim of any road construction is to avoid landslide prone area for which landslide hazard map of that area is absolutely necessary.

Significance of the study

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) was used to collect high resolution aerial images, which portray the features that can be obtained from the satellite imagery but with higher detail of data, to produce highly accurate Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and Orthophoto maps. The Ortho-photo map can be used for inventory mapping of landslide and the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for landslide hazard map. Use of UAV for collection of aerial imagery to produce DEM is cost-effective as well as time efficient. Landslide hazard is a map that includes topographic and geographic information that can be used to compare against the inventory. This can greatly help in fixing and shifting of the alignment to reduce the loss of life and property. Landslide risk analysis has been used to quantify landslide risk along the road surrounding areas. As a final output, direct risk can be quantified for properties (alignments, vehicles, buildings, and plantations) and people (commuters and residents) [8-24].

Scope of the Study

Landslide hazard map along Sindhuli- Hetauda road section of the Chure Area (Sindhuli-Hetauda Section) has been prepared using GIS. Weight of Evidence Model has been used during preparation of landslide hazard map with different parameters such as: Lithology, Land Use, Topography, Drainage, and Road Construction. UAV and SfM technology have been used to get the efficient DEM of the study area along with the ortho-photo map which is useful to identify the actual condition of road construction of the area. Landslide hazard map, together with information on existing or expected vulnerability, have been used to estimate the risk associated with the road networks.

Results and Discussion

Landslide Inventory in the study area

Landslide inventory map along the Hetauda - Sindhuli Road section contains the information about landslides occurred in that study area, such as landslide phenomena locations, type, volume and damages. Landslides are presented as area coverage by landslide. 100km of the Hetauda- Sidhuli road section was visited during site visit. Road alignment passes through plain as well as hill side. Mainly road contains the cut area at one side, left side as well as right side as shown in Figure 2.1. Length of road containing cut at right side was 15.1km and at left side was 40.78km. Road has box cutting in some point. In cut slope along the road alignment, there are landslides visible in slope which exhibit both shallow as well as deep slide.

During the field visit, SW Map was used to track the alignment which was also helpful to mark the cut slope in different location. Cut slope was separated by marking start and end of the cut slope for the remarks to know the point of change in cut and fill. During the field visit, major landslides were marked by GPS in which some were active. The main reason of those slides was construction of new road alignment in fragile geology.

The major landslides available in the study area are shown in Table 2.1. In preparing this Table, a deliberate effort has been made to set it up according to features that are observed at the time of site visit. Mainly location, soil type, type of landslide, state of activity etc. was tabulated to provide the information of landslides which were caused by the road construction (Sidhuli-Hetauda Road Section).

ID Rural Municipality/ Municipality Ward No. Tole Name Soil Type Type of Landslide State of Activity Distance from Road (m) Distance from Drainage (m) Land Use Remarks
LS-1 Bakaiya Rural Municipality 3 Syaulebazar GC Debris Slide Active 10 Forest/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-2 Bakaiya Rural Municipality 3 Chhatiwan GC Debris Fall Active 40 Forest/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-3 Bakaiya Rural Municipality 4 Pandure GC Rotetional Dorment 30 5 Forest/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-4 Bakaiya Rural Municipality 4 Aajingare GC Debris Slide Active 20 Forest/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-5 Bakaiya Rural Municipality 5 Bhawanchuli GC Fall Active 20 50 Forest/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-6 Bagmati Rural Municipality 7 Lamitar GC Fall Active 10 20 Forest/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-7 Bagmati Rural Municipality 7 Lamitar (Near Bagamti) GC Slide Active 40 50 Cultivation/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-8 Hariharpurgadi Rural Municipality 2 Dande GC Fall Active 20 Cultivation/Building/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-9 Hariharpurgadi Rural Municipality 3 Banauli OH Fall Active 20 Cultivation/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-10 Hariharpurgadi Rural Municipality 3 Sakun OH Fall Active 10 Seepage at point Cultivation/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-11 Hariharpurgadi Rural Municipality 3 Sakun GP Fall Active 10 Seepage
at point
Forest/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-12 Hariharpurgadi Rural Municipality 4 Hakpara GC Fall Active 10 Seepage
at point
Forest/Road Road Construction is cause
LS-13 Hariharpurgadi Rural Municipality 2 Gurji/Pipalmadi GC Slide/ Fall Active 20 50 Cultivation/Building/Road Road Construction is cause

Table 2.1: Landslide Information.

Major Divisions Group Symbols Typical Names
Coarse grained soils, more than 50% retained on 0.075 mm seive and passing 75 mm sieve Gravels 50% or more of coarse fraction retained on 4.75 sieve Clean Gravel GW Well-graded gravel, fine to coarse gravel
GP Poorly graded gravel
Gravels with fines GM Silty gravel
GC Clayey Gravel
Sands more than 50% of coarse traction passes 4.75 mm sieve Clean sands SW Well-graded sand, fine to coarse sand
SP Poorly graded sand
Sands with fines SM Silty sand
SC Clayey sand
Fine grained soils 50%  or more passes 0.075 mm Silts and clays liquid limit 50% or less ML Silt
CL Clay of low plasticity, lean clay
OL Organic silt, organic clay
Silts and clays liquid limit Greater than50% MH Silt of high plasticity, elastic silt
CH Clay of high plasticity, fat clay
OH Organic clay, organic silt
Highly organic soils PT Peat

Table 2.2: The Unified Soil Classification System. Source (Dahal, 2006)

Types of landslides observed at study area were classified on the basis of type of landslide proposed by Varnes (1978). The type of landslides was determined by a short period of observation or by the shape of the slide and arrangement of debris. Landslide types are shown in Figure 2.1.

earth-science-climatic-change-slope

Figure 2-1: Cut slope zone along the Study area.

The states of activity of landslides in the study area were classified on the basis of moving nature observed. An active landslide is the one which currently moving whereas dormant landslides are inactive landslide which can be reactivated by its original causes or other causes. In study area, major landslides observed were active in state due to the higher cut slope of road in hill side and lack of protective measures in those areas.

The locations of the landslides in the study area were surveyed with GPS which is presented in Table 2.3. In Table 2.3, landslide status has been categorized into small and big on the basis of area covered by landslide on that location. Big landslide has two or more than two landslides near about the point Land use available near those existing landslides in road alignment has been presented as the vulnerable land use.

ID GPS Point Landslide Status Vulnerable Remarks
Easting Northing Height Building Road Cultivation
LS-1 319795 3026905 490 Small        
LS-2 319951 3026690 444 Big        
LS-3 324241 302588 280 Small        
LS-4 325222 3026472 288 Small        
LS-5 330456 3026852 356 Small        
LS-6 340977 3024517 257 Small        
LS-7 345351 3020108 211 Small        
LS-8 348273 3018875 199 Small        
LS-9 350898 3016058 199 Small        
LS-10 352559 3013661 208 Small        
LS-11 352552 3015993 212 Big        
LS-12 359813 3016981 234 Small        
LS-13 343599 3020573 217 Small        

Table 2.3: Vulnerable Information.

The thirteen landslides areas are shown along the proposed highway in Figure 2.2.

earth-science-climatic-change-Landslide

Figure 2-2: Landslide inventory map.

Considering the size, type and impact of the landslide in the study area, four sites were selected as the critical section for the study in which UAV was used to survey the area. The orthomosaic, output of the UAV survey, was used to identify the existing landslide in the selected specific study area of the road section. Major land use of area was also digitized to identify the impact of landslide in those areas. (Table 2.4) shows the detail information about the selected site of study area for hazard map. All data of Table 2.4 are collected through field visit.

Site-1 (CHATTIWAN) Site-2 (BHAWANCHULI)
Land Use:
  • Forest
  • Road
Feature Damage:
  • Road
  • Natural Channel in valley Side of the road
  • Forest
Kind of Damage:
Partially Collapse
Length of study Section: 2 Km Major point having landslide are as below:
  • GPS Point:
E:       319319 m
N:      3027124 m
Z:       532 m
Right Side from road
Soil Depth: 50 cm
Below soil: PattreChattan
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type: Debris Slide
  • GPS Point:
E:       319424 m
N:      3026998 m
Z:       549 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 40 cm
Below soil: Rock
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type:  Soil and Rock Fall
  • GPS Point:
E:       319755 m
N:      3026939 m
Z:       522 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 50 cm
Below soil: Rock
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type: Soil and Rock Fall
  • GPS Point:
E:       320222 m
N:      3026622 m
Z:       445 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 50 cm
Below soil: Rock
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type: Debris Fall
Land Use:
  • Forest
  • Road
  • Cultivation
  • Building
Feature Damage:
  • Road
  • Natural Channel
  • Forest
  • Cultivation
  • Electric Pole: Three Phase
Kind of Damage:
Partially Collapse
Length of study Section: 2 Km Major point having landslide are as below:
  • GPS Point:
E:       330444.71 m
N:      3026845.34 m
Z:       399 m
Right Side from road
Soil Depth: 60 cm
Below soil: PattreChattan
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type: Debris Slide
  • GPS Point:
E:       330613.06 m
N:      3026887.73 m
Z:       433 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 40 cm
Below soil: Rock
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type:  Soil and Rock Fall
  • GPS Point:
E:       330696.72 m
N:      3026818.64 m
Z:       458 m
Right as well as Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 20 cm
Below soil: Soil Type: Boulder Mix Soil
Landslide Type: Soil and Boulder Fall
Site-3 (GURJI) Site-4 (HAKPARA)
  Land Use:
  • Forest
  • Road
  • Building
  • Cultivation
Feature Damage:
  • Road
  • Natural Channel (Bagmati River) in valley Side of the road
  • Forest
  • Cultivation
  • Building
Protection:
Gabion wall at site 3(b) but not sufficient height to protect the landslide Kind of Damage:
Partially Collapse
Length of study Section: 1.5 Km Major point having landslide are as below:
  • GPS Point:
E:       345304.13 m
N:      3020179.94 m
Z:       243 m
left Side from road
Soil Depth: 45 cm
Below soil:
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type: Soil and Rock fall
  • GPS Point:
E:       345565.14 m
N:      3020477.30 m
Z:       238 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 40 cm
Below soil: Rock
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type:  soil slide
  Land Use:
  • Forest
  • Road
  • Barren Land
Feature Damage:
  • Road
  • Natural Channel in valley Side of the road
  • Forest
Kind of Damage:
Partially Collapse
Length of study Section: 2 Km Major point having landslide are as below:
  • GPS Point:
E:       356258 m
N:      30169663 m
Z:       224 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 30 cm
Below soil: PattreChattan
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type: Soil and Rock Slide
  • GPS Point:
E:       356211 m
N:      3016879 m
Z:       206 m Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 35 cm
Below soil: Rock
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type:  Soil and Rock Fall
  • GPS Point:
E:       356152 m
N:      3016830 m
Z:       206 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 20 cm
Below soil: PatreeChattan
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type: Soil and Rock Fall
  • GPS Point:
E:       356005 m
N:      3016748 m
Z:       206 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 50 cm
Below soil: Patree Chattan
Soil Type: GC
Landslide Type: Debris Fall
  • GPS Point:
E:       355886 m
N:      3016621 m
Z:       211 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 30 cm
Below soil: Boulder Mix Soil
Soil Type: GC
  • GPS Point:
E:       355474.95 m
N:      3015943.73 m
Z:       230 m
Left Side from road
Soil Depth: 25 cm
Below soil: Patree Chattan
Soil Type: GC

Table 2.4: Details of each site in the study area.

Chattiwan site

Chattiwan site was selected on the basis of existing landslide area along the road alignment and junction of the two major roads (Proposed Madan Bhandari Highway and Fast Track). The study mainly focused on the Madan Bhandari highway section but newly cut area of fast track also has seen impact on the section. Orthomosaic in (Figure 2.3) provides the picture of the site at the time of survey. Land use of that area was obtained by digitizing the orthomosaic presented in (Figure 2.4). The major land use has been found to be forest which covers the 0.725 sq. km. Other land use on Chattiwan site were cultivation, settlement, stream, wall, landslide, fill, road etc. The land use, landslide indicates the existing landslide in the study area which covers the 0.883 sq.km. (Table 2.5) provided information of land use with area cover by individual land use in the study area.

earth-science-climatic-change-Orthophoto

Figure 2-3: Orthophoto of Chattiwan.

earth-science-climatic-change-Landuse

Figure 2-4: Landuse map of Chattiwan.

SN Land Use Area (sq. m)
1 Cultivation 45078.14
2 Fill 100792.46
3 Forest 725266.03
4 Landslide 88282.85
5 Road 28300.07
6 Settlement 3481.67
7 Stream 18207.69
8 Wall 64.59

Table 2.5: Area of land use in Chattiwan.

Bhawanchuli site

Bhuwnchuli site was selected on the basis of existing landslide area along the road alignment and impact of landslide on settlement and cultivable land. Orthomosaic in Figure 2.5 provides the picture of the site at the time of survey. By using orthomosaic, land use of the study area was digitized which is presented in Figure 2.6. The major land use was found out to be forest which covers the 0.298 sq. km. Other land use on Bhawanchuli site were cultivation, settlement, stream, bagar, Barren land, river, landslide, fill, road etc. The parameter landslide indicates the existing landslide in the study area which covers the 0.229 sq.km. (Table 2.6) provides the area covered by the land use pattern in surveyed area.

earth-science-climatic-change-Orthophoto

Figure 2-5: Orthophoto of Bhawanchuli.

earth-science-climatic-change-map

Figure 2-6: Land use map of Bawanchuli.

SN Land use Area (Sq.m)
1 Bagar 1119.99
2 Barren land 17016.96
3 Bush 79750.55
4 Cultivation 533023.08
5 Fill 9457.93
6 Forest 298053.21
7 Landslide 22943.37
8 River 39350.43
9 Road 64304.66
10 Settlement 19168.77
11 Stream 14883.21

Table 2.6: Area of land use in Bhawanchuli.

SN Land use Area (sq.m)
1 Bagar 95465.08
2 Barren land 84159.07
3 Bush 334112.92
4 Cultivation 519529.53
5 Fill 32460.09
6 Landslide 6605.13
7 River 36547.21
8 Road 25726.34
9 Settlement 29055.56
10 Stream 27133.43

Table 2.7: Area of different land use in Gurji.

Gurji site

Gurji site was selected on the basis of existing landslide area along the road alignment and impact of landslide on settlement and cultivable land. Orthomosaic in Figure 2.7 provides the picture of the site at the time of survey. By using orthomosaic, land use of the study area was digitized which is presented in Figure 2.8. The major land use was cultivation which covers the 0.520 sq. km. Other land use on Gurji site were cultivation, settlement, stream, bagar, Barren land, river, landslide, fill, road etc.

earth-science-climatic-change-Orthophoto

Figure 2-7: Orthophoto of Gurji.

earth-science-climatic-change-Land

Figure 2-8: Land use map of Gurji.

The parameter landslide indicates the existing landslide in the study area which covers the 0.066 sq.km. The Table 2.8 provides the area covered by the land use pattern in surveyed area.

Hakpara site

Hakpara site was selected on the basis of existing landslide area along the road alignment and impact of landslide on road. Orthomosaic in (Figure 2.9) provides the picture of the site at the time of survey.

earth-science-climatic-change-Hakpara

Figure 2-9: Orthophoto of Hakpara.

By using orthomosaic, land use of the study area was digitized which is presented in (Figure 2.10). The major land use was forest which covers the 0.452 sq. km. Other land use on Gurji site were cultivation, settlement, stream, bagar, Barren land, river, landslide, fill, road, pond etc. The parameter landslide indicates the existing landslide in the study area which covers the 0.451 sq.km. (Table 2.8) provides the area covered by the different land use pattern in surveyed section i.e. site IV.

earth-science-climatic-change-use

Figure 2-10: Land use of Hakpara.

SN Land Use Area (sq.m)
1 Barren land 413774.04
2 Cultivation 213809.20
3 Fill 30891.62
4 Forest 513887.96
5 Landslide 45172.42
6 Pond 1776.37
7 River 51673.84
8 Road 22391.05
9 Settlement 16497.36
10 Stream 4639.13

Table 2.8: Area of different land use in Hakpara.

Topographical map preparation for hazard mapping

For topographic map preparation, GIS based technique was used to process the DEM generated by the PixdD mapper. PixdD Mapper uses Structure from Motion algorithm (SFM) to reconstruct the actual surface from a large number of overlapping photos. The software locates matching features on each image and uses iterative bundle block adjustment to estimate image orientation, exterior orientation parameters and building model geometry. The GCPs are entered to aero triangulation which enables precise calculation of the exterior orientation parameters and improves spatial geo-referencing accuracy. The final step generates the digital surface model (DSM) by building the model texture and exporting a 3D model (mesh) or orthomosaic.

Photogrammetry produces only a surface envelope and cannot capture terrain under vegetation cover. So, UAV point cloud data were manually classified in different classes for filtering vegetation cover and buildings. The elevation model generated from all point cloud data was labelled the digital surface model (DSM) and the model from ground point cloud data was termed the digital terrain model (DTM).

From the finding, it can be observed that the accuracy of the topographical survey is formidable, with the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the survey for the individual sites as 0.001m, 0.045 m, 0.044 m and 0.408 m respectively. Meanwhile, the errors in the X, Y and Z of the sites are good enough, and the survey conducted can hence be said to be of the survey-grade accuracy. For the absolute accuracy of the survey, the Differential GPS (DGPS) played the vital role. (Table 2.9) shows the co-ordinate of ground control point used during process of UAV imagery. After completion of processing of image PixdD mapper provided the mean root mean square error (RMS) of the geo-referencing as presented in Figure 2.11 and error calculation also presented in Figure 2.12.

earth-science-climatic-change-Mean

Figure 2-11: Mean RMS error.

earth-science-climatic-change-Calculation

Figure 2-12: Calculation of RMS error.

Pont Easting Northing Z Remarks Sitei
2015 320267.2631 3026996.484 402.5869 GCP-1 Chattiwan
2016 319406.3871 3026951.777 467.9689 GCP-2 Chattiwan
2017 319869.7026 3026401.22 415.0704 GCP-3 Chattiwan
2020 330379.9078 3026877.302 312.1119 GCP-4 Bhawanchuli
2021 330623.4246 3027002.017 353.7346 GCP-5 Bhawanchuli
2022 330721.9609 3026695.83 385.9781 GCP-6 Bhawanchuli
2025 345648.568 3020631.688 165.5747 GCP-7 Gurji
2026 345588.3088 3020318.824 169.1284 GCP-8 Gurji
2027 345587.9736 3020318.376 167.0681 GCP-9 Gurji
2030 355626.2952 3016145.932 154.7943 GCP-11 Hakpara
2031 355514.7932 3015838.767 150.4054 GCP-12 Hakpara
2032 355763.8028 3016396.631 161.8068 GCP-13 Hakpara
2033 356252.32 3016952.48 155.8397 GCP-14 Hakpara

Table 2.9: Co-ordinate of ground control point.

Elevation

Topographic relief of the study area divided into different classes is often used to describe and reflect the macroscopic features of the terrain surface, which is of great significance for landslide sensitivity analysis. Elevation model is one of the major outputs of this study. Whole study area can be generalized with reference of the elevation model. The study area lies in the range of 95-533 m from the mean sea level.

Four different sites have different elevation range. The elevation difference of first selected site (Chattiwan) is 268.15 m starting from 264.52 m to 532.87 m. Similarly, second, third and fourth site have the elevation difference of 213.07 m, 137.872 m, 296.56 m. Fourth surveyed area lies in the lowest elevation range where first site lies on the highest elevation range. Four different sites have different elevation difference values which directly impact the accuracy and final output of the result as well as the details that are visible in the final Orthomosaic. The resolution of output is based on the ground sampling distance (GSD). In this study resolution of the orthomosaic is one times of GSD and DTM/DEM is three times of GSD. Because of the unequal elevation difference in four different sites, they have different GSD as well as resolution of output. GSD of first, second, third and fourth site is 6.08 cm/pixel, 5.6 cm/pixel, 4.42 cm/pixel, 7.25 cm/pixel respectively (Figure 2.13(a-d)) (Table 2.10-2.13).

earth-science-climatic-change-Elevation

Figure 2-13: Elevation class of (a) Chattiwan (b) Bhawanchuli (c) Gurji (d) Hakpara.

OID Class Count Area Lanslide Count Landslide Area % of Landslide
1 264.52-300 3006237 100104.54 0 0.00 0.00
2 300-350 8835361 294208.25 141 2468.60 4.87
3 350-400 9450595 314694.89 662 11590.18 22.84
4 400-450 8318476 276996.52 1574 27557.32 54.31
5 450-500 5496379 183023.65 521 9121.58 17.98
6 500-532.87 3477220 115787.78 0 0.00 0.00
Total 1284815.63   50737.67 100.00

Table 2.10: Occurrence of landslide with elevation in Chattiwan site.

OID Class Count Area Landslide Count Landslide Area % of Landslide
1 205.726-250 10648623 300940.44 0 0.00 0.00
2 250-300 14169477 400443.19 136 3068.25 10.56
3 300-350 6272317 177261.78 402 9069.40 31.21
4 450-500 5746558 162403.32 750 16920.52 58.23
5 500-418.803 660594 18669.03 0 0.00 0.00
Total 1059717.75   29058.17 100.00

Table 2.11: Occurrence of landslide with elevation in Bhawanchuli site.

OID Class Count Area Landslide Count Landslide Area % of Landslide
1 146.29-150 21437 376.13 0 0.00 0.00
2 150-200 47255212 829123.49 823 21526.44 82.38
3 200-250 22447863 393862.38 83 2170.95 8.31
4 250-284.14 3180753 55808.38 93 2432.51 9.31
    Total 1279170.38   26129.91 100.00

Table 2.12: Occurrence of landslide with elevation in Gurji site.

OID Class Count Aera Landslide Count Landslide Area % of landslide
1 97.89-150 11737564 555311.20 0 0.00 0.00
2 150-200 5764728 272732.74 800 27846.08 61.44
3 200-250 6758379 319742.97 282 9815.74 21.66
4 250-300 3409414 161301.42 171 5952.10 13.13
5 300-394.437 3510992 166107.14 49 1705.57 3.76
Total 1475195.46   45319.50 100.00

Table 2.13: Occurrence of landslide with elevation in Hapkara site.

Slope

In our study area, slope was classified in six categories as very gentle, gentle, moderate, moderately steep, steep, and very steep are shown in Figure 2.14(a)-2.14(d) respectively, for site Chattiwan, Bhawanchuli, Gurji and Hakpara respectively. Due to the steep road side slope, there were many landslides active in the study area. In Chattiwan site around 2 km of road section has the steep roadside slope and Bhawanchuli, Gurji and Hakpara also have steep slope. The slope angle map was extracted from the DEM.

earth-science-climatic-change-class

Figure 2-14: Elevation class of (a) Chattiwdan (b) Bhawanchuli (c) Gurji (d) Hakpara.

The slope map was re-classified into six classes: (1)0◦–5◦ (Very gentle), (2)5◦–10◦ (Gentle), (3)10◦–15◦, (Moderate) (4) 15◦–25◦ (Moderate Steep), (5) 25◦–35◦ (Steep), and (6) > 35◦ (Very steep). The maximum slope gradient is 86.56 in Hakpara. The result shows that maximum percentage of landslides occurred when the slope is between greater than 35◦ (Very Steep). In Chattiwan 45.96 % of existing landslide lied in steep slope and in Bhawanchuli, Gurji and Hakpara, 37.73 %, 37.14%, 68.51% of landslide lies in steep slope as shown in Table 2.14- 2.17 respectively. Moreover, in Tables aforementioned (Table 2.14- 2.17), area of individual class of slope were calculated on the basis of number of cell (Count) and existing landslide area in respective class which were calculated on the basis of number of cells (Landslide count) of landslide present in the individual class.

OID Class Count Area Landslide Count Landslide Area % of Landslide
1 Very gentle 1851187 61642.58 165 2888.79 5.69
2 Gentle 2192795 73017.77 285 4989.73 9.83
3 Moderate 2151681 71648.72 184 3221.44 6.35
4 Moderate Steep 6414175 213585.30 379 6635.47 13.08
5 Steep 9281175 309053.39 553 9681.83 19.08
6 Very Steep 8424394 280523.48 1332 23320.42 45.96
Total 1009471.23   50737.67 100.00

Table 2.14: Occurrence of landslide with slope class.

OID Class Count Area Landslide Count Landslide Area % of Landslide
1 Very gentle 10877641 307412.71 51 1150.60 3.96
2 Gentle 6097483 172320.80 91 2053.02 7.07
3 Moderate 3744409 105820.64 109 2459.12 8.46
4 Moderate Steep 6069614 171533.19 249 5617.61 19.33
5 Steep 5782191 163410.34 302 6813.33 23.45
6 Very Steep 4926231 139220.08 486 10964.50 37.73
Total 1059717.75 29058.17 100.00

Table 2.15: Occurrence of landslide with slope class.

OID Class Count Area Landslide Count Landslide Area % of Landslide
1 Very gentle 27300304 479001.62 58 1517.05 5.81
2 Gentle 9368153 164370.35 57 1490.90 5.71
3 Moderate 6253277 109717.82 69 1804.77 6.91
4 Moderate Steep 11629539 204047.84 171 4472.69 17.12
5 Steep 10757931 188754.91 273 7140.61 27.33
6 Very Steep 7596061 133277.84 371 9703.90 37.14
Total 1279170.38 26129.91 100

Table 2.16: Occurrence of landslide with slope class.

OID Class Count Area Landslide Count Landslide Area % of Landslide
1 Very gentle 2967808 140408.78 3 104.42 0.23
2 Gentle 8963870 424086.07 21 730.96 1.61
3 Moderate 4599666 217612.96 55 1914.42 4.22
4 Moderate Steep 5210155 246495.56 121 4211.72 9.29
5 Steep 4624231 218775.14 210 7309.60 16.13
6 Very Steep 4815343 227816.77 892 31048.38 68.51
Total 1475195.28

Conclusion

This study “Landslide hazard assessment using UAV imagery and GIS in the Sindhuli-Hetauda section of Chure Area” mainly aimed at finding the risk area in the Hetauda- Sindhuli road section of proposed Madan Bhandari Highway acts as one of the baselines in disaster management. Acting as a preventive medium to minimize landslide risks in the affected area, these processes could facilitate other steps in disaster management such as landslide risk mapping (which involves the assessment of loss of lives and property) and its integration with road planning and development. This study used Weight of Evidence (WOE) method to prepare landslide hazard map, and led to the following conclusions:

• Relating to the accuracy of the topographical survey, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the survey for the individual sites was found to be 0.001m, 0.045 m, 0.044 m and 0.804 m respectively. Meanwhile, the errors in the X, Y and Z of the sites were found to be 0.001172 m, 0.000677 m and 0.002081 m in the first site, 0.052234 m, 0.037494 m and 0.052226 m in the second site, 0.031062 m, 0.094952 m and 0.012200 m in the third site, and 0.239665 m, 0.939586 m and 1.321983 m in the fourth site. The Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) for the respective sites is 6.08 cm/pixel, 5.6 cm/pixel, 4.42 cm/pixel, 7.25 cm/pixel. Since the RMSE is very less and resolution of the data is very high, the use of UAV was found to be fruitful in preparing the topographic map.

• Majority of landslide along the road in the study area were found to be active, with only one being dormant. The active landslides were mainly of the type fall owing to the steep road cut slope while small number of the landslide was slide and rotational.

• The study area (consisting of four individual sites within the area) was categorized into three landslide hazard levels as low, medium and high. In all the four sites, the obtained hazard levels are unique, owing to the uniqueness in the influencing factors. As per the results obtained from hazard map, the largest area being medium 46.39%, 57.45%, 71.21% and 71.16% respectively, followed by high 28.47%, 18.91%, 17.03% and 11.54% respectively and low 25.14%, 23.64%, 11.76% and 17.30% respectively in Chattiwan, Bhawanchuli, Gurji and Hakpara.

• The land use map is combined with landslide hazard map to prepare inventory of the elements at risk. In all three sites Chattiwan, Bhawanchuli and Hakpara, forest is at high risk followed by cultivation and settlement, while in Gurji, mainly cultivable land is in risk followed by bush and settlement.

In order to maintain the balance between the development and the its impact in environment in Chure area of Nepal, in which land degradation is primarily contributed by different types of landslides and mass wasting phenomena which are collectively controlled by the lithospheric plate dynamics, geology, topography, intense precipitation and human interference, hazard assessment and proper planning before road construction is absolutely necessary.

Methodology

Research Design

This study utilized the quantitative methodology. High resolution imagery were used to get topographic data, landslide data and land use data by using UAV and SfM software and some other data such as geological, rainfall, land use data were obtained from the Department of Mines and Geology(DMG), Department of Hydrology and Meteorology(DHM), SOTER. For landslide hazard assessment weight of evidence method (Statistical method) was used. In this method, each factor maps (slope, geology, land use etc.) was combined with the landslide distribution map, and weight values, based on landslide densities, was calculated for each parameter class (slope class, lithological unit, land use type, etc.). For risk assessment quantitative method was used. Risk area of the land use was quantified by combining hazard map with land use map. Risk over the settlement, forest, cultivation, road and other natural resources near the road have been identified with spatial analysis tool in GIS. Overall research design to obtain the research objective is shown in Figure 4.1.

earth-science-climatic-change-Research

Figure 4-1: Research Design.

Hazard map preparation

In this study WoE method is used to prepare the landslide hazard map. The method was originally developed for mineral potential mapping but recently the method has been used in landslide susceptibility analysis by several researchers in which evidence maps are generally converted to binary predictor maps in order to apply the model (Mezughi, et al., 2011). Weights were calculated for the initial categorization of the parameters derived from DEM (Slope, Aspect, Curvature, Elevation) and for other parameter such as distance from road, distance from stream, geology, soil. As per following equation, positive weight (W+) as well as negative weights (W-) were calculated (Barbieri & Cambuli, 2009).

image

Where,

Wi + = Positive weight

Wi - = Negative weight

Lpixi = Number of landslide pixel in i class

TLpix = Total number of landslide pixel (according to each factor)

NLpixi = Number of non-landslide pixel in i class

TNLpix = Total number of non-landslide pixel (according to each factor)

Lpixothers = Number of landslide pixel in the other classes

NLpixothers = Number of non-landslide pixel in the other classes

The contrast (C) is calculated as the difference between the two weights (C = W+ - W-) where C is positive for a positive spatial association indicating the factor is favorable for the landslides, but C is negative if the spatial association is negative indicating that the factor is unfavorable. The magnitude of the contrast indicates an overall of spatial association between the causative factor and landslides whereas C equal to zero when a class has no spatial relationship with landslides occurrence. The weights and contrast value of all influencing factor is shown in Table below. In GIS, the calculated weights and contrast have been assigned with join and relate in the existing thematic layer to produce multi-class weighted maps for all evidences. Then, raster map of all influencing factor named as contrast class raster were generated with the lookup tools in spatial analysis tool. For the final hazard map raster calculator was used to combine all contrast class raster map. (Figure 4.2) shows the flowchart of hazard.

earth-science-climatic-change-Preparation

Figure 4-2: Hazard Map Preparation Flowchart.

Risk assessment

(Figure 4.3) shows the risk assessment process used in this study. The landslide hazard map and land use map were combined to get the area of different hazard level on the individual land use. In all four sites Chattiwan, Bhawanchuli, Gurji and Hakpara, area of land use on high risk, medium risk and low risk is calculate

earth-science-climatic-change-Assessment

Figure 4-3: Risk Assessment Flowchart.

Abbreviations and Acronyms

DEM                             : Digital Elevation Model

DGPS                           : Differential Global Positioning System

DHM                            : Department of Hydrology and Meteorology

DMG                            : Department of Mine and Geology

DSM                             : Digital Surface Model

DTM                             : Digital Terrain Model

GC                                : Clayey Gravel

GCP                              : Ground Control Point

GIS                                : Geographic Information System

GoN                              : Government of Nepal

GP                                 : Poorly Graded Gravel

GPS                              : Global Positioning System

IDF                               : Intensity Duration Curve

NDVI                           : Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

OH                               : Organic Clay, Organic Silt

PCTMCD                    : President Chure Terai Madesh Conservation Development Board

SfM                               : Structure from Motion

Sq.km                            : Square kilometer

Sq.m                              : Square meter

SRTM                           : Shutter Radar Topography Mission

SW                                 : SoftWel

UTM                               : Universal Transverse Mercator

WGS                               : World Geodetic System

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because the data are collected by author solely for this research but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interest

Financial competing interest:

• This research was carried out by author to complete the master level in which no one funded to complete the task.

Non- Financial Competing interest:

• Authors assured that there are no any non-financial competing interests include such as political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, and intellectual competing interests

Declaration

The authors declare that they have no competing interests”

Funding

This research was carried by authors to complete the master degree (Thesis) without any fund for any source to study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.

Acknowledgment

This study entitled “Landslide Hazard Assessment Using UAV Imagery and GIS for Road Planning and Development in Chure Area: Sindhuli-Hetauda Section” has come to this form with support of many people and organizations, to whom I am forever indebted.

I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to Associate Professor Dr. Kumud Raj Kafle, supervisor of this thesis, for his valuable guidance, motivation, innovative suggestions and support in completing this thesis. I would also like to pay my profound gratitude to Assoc. Prof. Robert Dongol, Program Coordinator - iWRM at nec-CPS, and Asst. Prof. Dr. Anish Ghimire, nec-CPS Research Management Cell, for their valuable guidance, suggestions, knowledge and supervision as well as hearty cooperation. I would also like to express hearty thanks to Prof. Dr. Khem Raj Sharma, Director of nec-CPS, for his valuable suggestions and comments for improvising this thesis.

I would also like to offer my gratitude to DroNepal, Nepal’s first dedicated private research and Development Company specializing in drones and GIS, for their immense support throughout this study. I also would like to thank my peer Lokendra Bahadur Khadka for his support in the field, respected Bishnu Attreya Sir for his support with the DGPS equipment, and peers Bibhusan Khadka, Sadikshya Chauhan and Darpan Pudasaini for their support throughout this thesis through suggestions as well as motivation.

My immense gratitude goes to my parents to whom I owe my everything, and Ms. Shristi Pathak for her constant motivation throughout this thesis and beyond. Lastly, I would like to express my gratitude and cordial thanks to all those people who directly or indirectly contributed their parts in completing this thesis.

References

  1. Acharya P. R (2018) Experts question the logic behind one more highway in Chure area, Kathmandu The Himalayan Times.
  2. Google Scholar,   

  3. Aleotti P, Chowdhury B (1999) Landslide Hazard assessment: Summary review and perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 21-44.
  4. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  5. Al-Rawabdeh A (2017) Time Series UAV image-Based Point Clounds for Landslide Progression Evaluation Application. Sensors 22.
  6. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  7. Barbieri G, Cambuli P (2009) The weight of evidence statistical method in landslide susceptibility mapping of the Rio Pardu Valley (Sardinia, Italy). MODSIM Cong 2658-2664.
  8. Indexed atGoolge Scholar,   

  9. Bonnard C (2014) Landslide hazard and risk zoning for urban planning and development. Earth Sciences 199-235.
  10. Indexed atGoogle Scholar,   

  11. Car M, Kacunic D.J, Kavacevic M.S (2016) Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Landslide Mapping. Appl. Sci pp. 549-560.
  12. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  13. Chau K (2004) Landslide Hazard analysis for Hong Kong Using Landslide inventory and GIS. Comput Geosci 429-443.
  14. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  15. Chung C.J.F, Febbri A.G (2003) Validation of Spatial Prediction Models for Landslide Hazard Mapping. Natural Hazards 451-472.
  16. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  17. Dahal R. K (2008) Regional scale landslide hazard mapping in the Lesser Himalayan terrain of Nepal. Sendai,  Japan Landslide Society.
  18. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  19. Dahal R. K (2006) Geology for Technical Students: A Text Book for Bachelor Level Students : Environmental Science, Civil Engineering, Forestry and Earth Hazard. Bhrikuti Academic Publications.
  20. Google Books                     

  21. Dangol V (2006) Status of Landslide Hazard Mapping in Nepal. Universal Academy Pres 815-819.
  22. Indexed atGoogle Scholar,   

  23. Dhakal, S (2016) Landslide inventory, characterization and engineering design for mitigation works of chure area in ten districts. Kathmandu: President Chure-Tarai Madhesh Conservation Development Board.
  24. Google ScholarCrossref

  25. Dijkshoorn K, Huting J (2009) Soil and Terrain database for Nepal. Geology 1-21.
  26. Indexed atGoogle Scholar,   

  27. Driessen P, Dudal R (1989) Lecture Notes on the Geography, Formation, Properties and Use of the Major Soils of the World. Agricultural University Wageningen 1-296.
  28. Indexed at,           Google Scholar,   

  29. Galli M, Ardizzone F, Guzzetlti F, Reichenball P (2008) Comparing landslide inventory maps. Geomorphology 268-289.
  30. Indexed atScience DirectCrossref

  31. Greenwood W, Lynch J.P, Zekkos D, Clark M. K (2016) UAV-Based-3-D Characterization of Rock Masses and Rock Slides in Nepal. Geomechanics Texas 1-10.
  32. Indexed atGoogle Scholar,                   

  33. Guzzelti F (2012) Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem. Earth-Science reviews 42-66.
  34. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  35. Guzzetti  F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in amulti-scale study,Central Italy. Geomorphol 31(1997), pp. 181-216.
  36. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  37. Jaiswal P (2011) Landslide Risk Quantification along Transportation Corridors Based on Historical Information, Economics.
  38. Indexed atGoogle Scholar,   

  39. Jaiswal P, Westen C.J.V (2012) Use of quantitative landslide hazard and risk information for local disaster risk reduction along a transportation corridor: a case study from Nilgiri district, India. Nat Hazards 1-27.
  40. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  41. Jebur M (2015) An interated user-friendly ArcMAP tools for bivariate statistical modelling in geoscience applications. Geosci Model Dev 881-891.
  42. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  43. Khampilang N (2015) Landslide Assessment in a Remote Mountain Region: a Case Study from the Toktogul Region of Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia. Environ Sci 1-290.
  44. Indexed atGoogle Scholar,   

  45. Mandal C. K (2018) Green activists slam Chure road plan, Kathmandu: The Kathmandu Post.
  46. Indexed atGoogle Scholar

  47. Marsh S.H (2000). Landslide hazard mapping: Summary Report, Nottingham: British Geological Survey.
  48. Indexed atGoogle Scholar

  49. Meten M,  Bhandary P. N (2015) Effect of Landslide Factor Combinations on the Prediction Accuracy of Landslide Susceptibility Maps in the Blue Nile Gorge of Central Ethiopia. Geoenviron Dis 015-016.
  50. Google ScholarCrossref

  51. Mezughi T.H, Rafek A.G, Akhir J.M,  Abdullah I (2011) A Multi-class Weight of Evidence Approach for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Applied to an Area Along the E-W Highway (Gerik – Jeli), Malaysia. EJJE 1259-1273.
  52. Google Scholar,  

  53. Pandey, A.R, Shahbodaghlou F (2014) Landslide Hazard Mapping of Nagdhunga-Naubise Section of the Tribhuvan Highway in Nepal with GIS Application. J Geogr Inf Syst 723-732.
  54. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  55. Pardeshi S.D, Autade S.E, Pardeshi S.S (2013) Landslide Hazard assessment: Resent trends and techniques. SpringPlus pp. 1-11.
  56. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  57. Pathak D (2015) Use and Limitation of Landslide Hazard Map in Road Alignment Planning: Case Study of Wamitaksar- Rudarbeni Road Secion, Gulmi District, West Nepal. Disaster Review pp. 20-24.
  58. Google Scholar,  

  59. Santosh R (2018). An Assessment of the President Chure-Tarai Madhesh Conservation Development Program. J For Res 101-110
  60. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  61. Pellicani R, Argentiero I, Spilotro G (2017) GIS- based predictive models for regional-scale landslide susceptibility assessment and risk mapping along road corridors. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk pp. 1012-1033.
  62. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  63. Pirasteh S, Li  J (2017)  Landslides investigations from geoinformatics perspective: quality, challenges, and recommendations. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk pp. 448-465.
  64. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  65. Poudel U (2018) Highway named after late communist leader, Kathmandu: The Himalayan Times.
  66. Google ScholarCrossref

  67. Rusnák M, Sládek J, Buša J, Greif  V (2016) Suitability of Digital Elevation Models Generatednerated by UAV Photogrammetry for Slope Stability Assessment (Case Study of Landslide in Svätý Anton, Slovakia). Acta Sci. Pol pp. 439-450.
  68. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  69. Schicker R.D (2010) Quantitative Landslide Susceptibility Assessment of the Waikato Region using GIS. The University of Waikato New Zealand.
  70. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  71. Sidle R.C (2006) Erosion Process in steep terrain-Truths, Myths, and uncertainties related to forest management in southeast Asia. For Ecol Manag pp. 199-225.
  72. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  73. Sikdar P, Chakrabarti S, Adhya E, Paul P. K (2004) Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Groundwater Potential Zoning in and around Raniganj coal mining area, Bardhaman District, West Bengal – A GIS and Remote Sensing Approach. J Spat Hydrol p. 24.
  74. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  75. Singh B. K (2017) Land Tenure and Conservation in Chure. For Trees Livelihoods pp. 1-15.
  76. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  77. Sterlacchini S, Frigerio S, Giacomelli P, Brambilla M (2007) Landslide risk analysis: a multi-disciplinary methodological approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst p. 657–675.
  78. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  79. Varnes D (2004) Landslide Types and Processes. Colorado.
  80. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  81. Wang F, Xu P, Wang C, Wang NN (2017) Application of a GIS-Based Slope Unit Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping along the Longzi River, Southeastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Geo-Information p. 20.
  82. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

  83. Westen C.V (2002) Use of weights of evidence modeling for landslide suceptibility mapping, ILWIS.
  84. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCrossref

Citation: Pandey BP, Kafle KR (2022) Landslide hazard assessment using UAV imagery and GIS for road planning and development in Chure area: Sindhuli- Hetauda Section. J Earth Sci Clim Change, 13: 607. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000607

Copyright: © 2022 Pandey BP, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Article Usage
  • Total views: 3758
  • [From(publication date): 0-2022 - Oct 15, 2025]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 3118
  • PDF downloads: 640
Top Connection closed successfully.