Environment Pollution and Climate Change
Open Access

Urban planning; Climate-smart development; Climate risk; Urban resilience; Social equity; Sustainable cities; Green infrastructure; Climate adaptation; Low-carbon development; Urban heat islands; Inclusive planning; Public participation; Climate justice; Urban sustainability; Risk-informed development; Nature-based solutions; Smart city design; Policy integration; Urban governance; Community resilience.

Introduction

As cities around the world grapple with the growing impacts of climate change, there is an urgent need to transform how they are planned, built, and governed. Urban areas are home to over half of the global population and are responsible for more than 70% of greenhouse gas emissions. They also face significant exposure to climate risks, including rising temperatures, flooding, sea-level rise, and extreme weather events [1-5].

Against this backdrop, mainstreaming climate-smart development in urban planning has become a critical priority. This means going beyond siloed climate initiatives and embedding climate risk, equity, and sustainability considerations into the core frameworks that shape urban development. It requires planners, policymakers, and communities to rethink land use, infrastructure, housing, and transportation through a climate-resilient and inclusive lens. This paper examines how cities can integrate climate-smart principles into urban planning to build resilient, low-carbon, and equitable urban systems that serve both people and the planet [6-10].

Discussion

The increasing frequency and intensity of climate hazards are exposing the vulnerability of urban systems, particularly in low-lying and rapidly growing cities. Many urban areas suffer from urban heat islands, inadequate drainage, and overburdened infrastructure, making them hotspots for climate-related disasters. These challenges disproportionately affect marginalized populations who often live in high-risk areas, lack access to essential services, and have limited adaptive capacity. Therefore, a climate-smart approach to urban planning must begin with climate risk assessment, using tools such as hazard mapping, vulnerability indices, and climate models to guide zoning decisions, building codes, and development strategies.

Climate-smart urban planning also involves a shift toward low-carbon and resilient infrastructure. This includes expanding green infrastructure like parks, green roofs, and urban forests that cool cities and manage stormwater while enhancing biodiversity. Designing compact, mixed-use neighborhoods with access to sustainable transport options—such as cycling lanes, pedestrian pathways, and electric public transit—reduces emissions and improves quality of life. Nature-based solutions offer cost-effective and multi-functional approaches to climate adaptation, providing both environmental and social co-benefits. They also serve as buffers against hazards such as floods and heatwaves while enhancing urban aesthetics and health outcomes.

Central to mainstreaming climate-smart development is the integration of social equity. Climate change exacerbates existing urban inequalities, and without deliberate attention, climate actions can widen disparities. Inclusive planning practices ensure that vulnerable groups—such as low-income communities, women, elderly populations, and informal settlers—are involved in decision-making and benefit from urban improvements. Climate justice frameworks emphasize the fair distribution of risks and benefits, advocating for policies that prioritize the needs of the most affected. Equitable access to climate-resilient housing, reliable energy, and green spaces must be a cornerstone of any sustainable city agenda.

Urban governance plays a pivotal role in enabling or hindering climate-smart development. Effective governance requires coordination across sectors and levels of government, as well as partnerships with civil society and the private sector. Embedding climate priorities into urban master plans, development regulations, and budgeting processes institutionalizes long-term commitment. Policy integration across climate, housing, transport, and disaster management helps align objectives and avoid conflicting outcomes. Local governments, as the front line of urban planning, need adequate authority, technical capacity, and financial resources to implement and scale sustainable solutions.

Smart city technologies can support climate-smart urban planning through data-driven insights and real-time monitoring. Sensors and geospatial tools can track urban temperature, air quality, water usage, and energy consumption, informing responsive planning and adaptive management. However, the deployment of technology must be inclusive and accessible to all communities, avoiding the digital divide and ensuring that tech solutions are people-centered.

Public engagement is another vital component. Cities that involve citizens in planning decisions—from neighborhood design to infrastructure priorities—are more likely to create trusted, locally relevant, and sustainable outcomes. Participatory planning processes build community resilience by fostering ownership, awareness, and social cohesion. They also enable innovative local solutions that might not emerge through top-down approaches.

To finance climate-smart urban development, cities must mobilize diverse funding streams. National grants, green bonds, climate adaptation funds, and private investments can support infrastructure retrofits, renewable energy projects, and resilient housing. Financial tools should be aligned with long-term sustainability goals and designed to support both large-scale infrastructure and community-level initiatives. Establishing urban resilience funds can help cities prepare for and recover from climate impacts while maintaining economic and social stability.

Educational and capacity-building programs for planners, architects, engineers, and local officials are crucial to developing climate-informed urban professionals. Research institutions and universities can contribute by developing context-specific tools, evaluating project impacts, and training future urban leaders in climate-smart planning principles.

Conclusion

Mainstreaming climate-smart development in urban planning is essential for building cities that can thrive in the face of climate change. By embedding climate risk, social equity, and sustainability into planning frameworks, cities can evolve into inclusive, adaptive, and environmentally responsible hubs. This transformation requires an integrated approach that combines resilient design, participatory governance, smart technologies, and innovative finance. Urban areas that embrace these principles will not only reduce emissions and climate vulnerabilities but also enhance quality of life and economic opportunity for all residents. As the climate crisis deepens, the future of sustainable urbanization hinges on our ability to plan smart, build green, and govern fairly.

References

1. Longe EO, Enekwechi LO (2007) Investigation on potential groundwater impacts and influence of local hydrogeology on natural attenuation of leachate at a municipal landfill. IJEST 4: 133-140.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Rapti-Caputo D, Vaccaro C (2006) Geochemical Evidences of Landfill Leachate in Groundwater. Eng Geol 85: 101-121.

   Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Liu H, Liang Y, Zhang D, Wang C, Liang HC, et al. (2010) Impact of MSW landfill on the environmental contamination of phthalate esters. Waste Manag 30: 1569-1576.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Han DM, Tong XX, Currell MJ, Cao G, Jin M, Tong C (2014) Evaluation of the impact of an uncontrolled landfill on surrounding groundwater quality, Zhoukou, China. J Geochem Explor 136: 24-39.

   Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Ameloko AA, Ayolabi EA (2018) Geophysical assessment for vertical leachate migration profile and physicochemical study of groundwater around the Ojota dumpsite Lagos, south-west Nigeria. Appl Water Sci 8: 142.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Palmer T, Akanmu J, Alamirew T, Bamutaze Y, Banadda N, et al. (2020) The Adaptive Systemic Approach: research that enables just and sustainable natural resources development.
7. Ige OO, Adewoye FO, Obasaju DO (2021) Hydrochemical evaluation of groundwater quality - a case study from parts of North-Central, Nigeria. SWAM 7: 101.

   Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Shiru MS, Shahid, D, Shiru S, Chung ES, Alias N, et al. (2020) Challenges in water resources of Lagos mega city of Nigeria in the context of climate change. J Water Clim Chang 11: 1067-1083.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Longe EO (2011) Groundwater Resources Potential in the Coastal Plain Sands Aquifers, Lagos, Nigeria. EESRJ 3: 1-7.

   Google Scholar, Indexed at

10. Yusuf MA, Abiye TA, Ibrahim KO, Ojulari BA (2021) Assessment of saltwater–freshwater interactions using water samples and borehole logging information in the Lagos coastal region, Nigeria. Environ Earth Sci 80: 679.

    Google Scholar, Crossref