Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Open Access

Nanotechnology; Sustainable agriculture; Nano-fertilizers; Nano-pesticides; Crop enhancement; Smart delivery systems; Plant growth regulators; Nano-sensors; nutrient efficiency; Precision farming; Environmental safety; Controlled release; Nano-formulations; Agri-nanotechnology.

Description

Nanotechnology is ushering in a transformative era in sustainable agriculture, offering innovative tools for enhancing crop productivity and resilience. Nano-enabled solutions such as nano-fertilizers, nano-pesticides, and nanosensors are being developed to improve nutrient delivery, reduce agrochemical use, and increase plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses [1]. These advancements not only contribute to higher crop yields but also address environmental concerns by promoting efficient resource use and reducing harmful residues. As agriculture faces mounting pressure from climate change, population growth, and depleting natural resources, nanotechnology offers a promising path toward more precise, sustainable, and productive farming systems [2].

Discussion

Nano-enabled agricultural technologies are based on materials engineered at the nanoscale—typically between 1 and 100 nanometers—which possess unique physical, chemical, and biological properties. In the context of crop enhancement, nanomaterials are being used to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of agrochemicals and to enable real-time monitoring of plant and soil health [3]. One of the most impactful applications is the use of nano-fertilizers, which allow for controlled and targeted release of essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Unlike conventional fertilizers, nano-formulations reduce leaching and volatilization losses, enhancing nutrient uptake and minimizing environmental pollution [4].

Similarly, nano-pesticides provide a safer and more efficient means of pest control by delivering active ingredients directly to the target pest or pathogen. This targeted approach reduces the quantity of chemicals required, thereby lowering toxicity risks to non-target organisms and reducing chemical residues in crops and soils. In addition to pest management, nanoparticles are also used to deliver plant growth regulators and stress-relieving agents, helping crops withstand drought, salinity, and temperature fluctuations—factors that are increasingly common under climate change scenarios [5].

Another vital area is the use of nanosensors and nano-biosensors for precision farming. These sensors can detect changes in soil moisture, nutrient levels, pest presence, and plant health in real time, enabling farmers to make data-driven decisions. Integrated with IoT systems and mobile platforms, nanosensors contribute to smart farming practices by optimizing input use and improving yield forecasting. Moreover, green nanomaterials, derived from plant or microbial sources, are gaining popularity due to their biodegradability and eco-compatibility, aligning with the principles of sustainable agriculture [6].

Research has shown promising results in various crops, including rice, wheat, maize, and vegetables, with nano-enabled inputs enhancing germination, root development, and overall plant vigor. Furthermore, nano-formulations can be designed for controlled release, ensuring that nutrients and agrochemicals are available at critical growth stages, thus maximizing their impact while minimizing waste. This is particularly useful in regions facing water scarcity or poor soil fertility, where efficient resource use is crucial for productivity [7].

Despite these benefits, the adoption of nanotechnology in agriculture is still in its early stages and faces challenges. There are concerns about the long-term environmental impact of engineered nanoparticles, their potential accumulation in the food chain, and regulatory uncertainty [8]. More research is needed to evaluate nanoparticle behavior in different ecosystems and to establish safe usage guidelines. Additionally, the high cost of production and lack of awareness among farmers pose barriers to widespread implementation [9].

Nonetheless, initiatives by research institutions, governments, and agritech companies are steadily addressing these issues. Investment in education, field trials, and regulatory frameworks is essential to promote responsible and effective use of nanotechnology in agriculture. Interdisciplinary collaboration among chemists, agronomists, toxicologists, and policymakers will be key to ensuring that nano-enabled solutions are safe, scalable, and beneficial to both farmers and the environment [10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, nano-enabled solutions hold great promise in redefining crop enhancement strategies and advancing sustainable agriculture. With applications ranging from nutrient management and pest control to stress mitigation and real-time monitoring, nanotechnology offers precision, efficiency, and environmental benefits that align with modern agricultural needs. While challenges related to safety, regulation, and accessibility remain, ongoing research and innovation are paving the way for broader adoption. Embracing nanotechnology in agriculture could be a critical step toward achieving food security, environmental protection, and sustainable farming in the 21st century.

References

1. Ashby JA (2009) The impact of participatory plant breeding.Plant breeding and farmer participation 649-671.

Google Scholar

2. Bellon MR (1991) The ethno-ecology of maize variety management: a case study from Mexico.Human Ecology 19: 389-418.

Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Qazi HA, Rao PS, Kashikar A, Suprasanna P, Bhargava S (2014) Alterations in stem sugar content and metabolism in sorghum genotypes subjected to drought stress. Funct Plant Biol 41: 954-962.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Biggs S (2008) The lost 1990s? Personal reflections on a history of participatory technology development.Development in Practice 18: 489-505.

Crossref

5. Ceccarelli S, Grando S (2019) From participatory to evolutionary plant breeding. InFarmers and Plant Breeding231-244.

Google Scholar

6. Ceccarelli S (2012) Landraces: importance and use in breeding and environmentally friendly agronomic systems.Agrobiodiversity conservation: securing the diversity of crop wild relatives and landraces. CAB International 103-117.

Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Tutwiler R, Baha J, Martini AM, et al. (2000) A methodological study on participatory barley breeding I. Selection phase.Euphytica111: 91-104.

Google Scholar

8. Ceccarelli S, Guimarães EP, Weltzien E (2009)Plant breeding and farmer participation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Google Scholar

9. Chiffoleau Y, Desclaux D (2006) Participatory plant breeding: the best way to breed for sustainable agriculture?Int J Agric Sustain 4: 119-130.

Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Cleveland DA, Daniela S, Smith SE (2000) A biological framework for understanding farmers’ plant breeding.Economic Botany54: 377-394.

Google Scholar