Next-Generation Spine Surgery Implants: A Breakthrough in Patient Care
Received: 01-Jan-2025 / Manuscript No. jmis-25-162026 / Editor assigned: 03-Jan-2025 / PreQC No. jmis-25-162026 (PQ) / Reviewed: 18-Jan-2025 / QC No. jmis-25-162026 / Revised: 25-Jan-2025 / Manuscript No. jmis-25-162026 (R) / Published Date: 30-Jan-2025
Abstract
Spine surgery has witnessed significant advancements in recent years, particularly with the development of next generation implants. These innovative spinal devices are designed to enhance surgical outcomes, improve patient recovery times, and restore mobility. With advances in biomaterials, 3D printing, and minimally invasive techniques, modern spine implants offer higher precision, durability, and adaptability. This breakthrough in implant technology not only optimizes surgical success but also reduces complications and improves long-term patient care. This paper explores the evolution of spine surgery implants, the latest technological developments, and their transformative impact e on patient outcomes in spine surgery.
Keywords
References
- Jones J, Antony AK (2019)direct to implant pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. Gland surg 8: 53-60.
- Sinnott J, Persing S, Pronovost M (2018)Impact of Post mastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Ann Surg Oncol 25: 2899-2908.
- Potter S, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI (2019)Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA). Lancet Oncol 20: 254-266.
- Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP (2014)Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England. Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67: 1333-1344.
- Casella D, Calabrese C, Bianchi S (2015)Subcutaneous Tissue Expander Placement with Synthetic Titanium-Coated Mesh in Breast Reconstruction.Plast Recontr Surg Glob Open 3: 577.
- Vidya R, Masila J, Cawthorn S (2017)Evaluation of the effectiveness of the prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon dermal matrix: First multicenter European report on 100 cases. Breast J 23: 670-676.
- Hansson E, Edvinsson Ach, Elander A (2021)First-year complications after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh in the same patient. J Surg Oncol 123: 80-88.
- Thorarinson A, Frojd V, Kolby L (2017)Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.Gland Surg 6: 355-367.
- Srinivasa D, Holland M, Sbitany H (2019)Optimizing perioperative strategies to maximize success with prepectoral breast reconstruction.Gland Surg 8: 19-26.
- Chatterjee A, Nahabedian MY, Gabriel A (2018)Early assessment of post-surgical outcomes with prepectoral breast reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 117: 1119-1130.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Citation: Henry M (2025) Next-Generation Spine Surgery Implants: A Breakthroughin Patient Care. J Med Imp Surg 10: 267.
Copyright: © 2025 Henry M. This is an open-access article distributed under theterms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricteduse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author andsource are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
Recommended Journals
Open Access Journals
Article Usage
- Total views: 229
- [From(publication date): 0-0 - Dec 23, 2025]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 73
- PDF downloads: 156
