On Frontiers of Natural Environments
Received Date: Oct 18, 2015 / Accepted Date: Oct 26, 2015 / Published Date: Oct 29, 2015
Carson  sounded the alarm, people took notice, and a movement was born. In the half-century since Silent Spring, societies have become much more acutely aware of a chronic problem; there are so many of us, approximately 7.2 billion , and our numbers will continue to grow to an estimated 9.6 billion by 2050 . In order to survive, we push relentlessly against the boundaries between consumption (or, depending on who you are, overconsumption) and conservation; clearly, one of the biggest challenges humanity faces, one that may mean the difference between our species survival and extinction, is how to best manage the remaining resources available to us. We face challenges concerning ecosystem services, biodiversity, and the production and consumption of energy. It is simple hedonistic calculus, action and reaction with a philosopher’s twist: As demand for ecosystem services grows, something has to be taken to satisfy those demands. Curbing demand would seem the most logical choice, but so far, that has proven easier said than done. The pleasure of utilizing those resources often masks the pain of the harvest, in many cases, because the consumer is so far removed from the source – what happens in one place can affect another, far-removed place . Yet as Garrett Hardin  opined, and many have echoed, we are often blind to the ultimate destruction we are bringing upon ourselves by what at first appears to be the optimal solution given a set of circumstances. Through the continued destruction of wetlands, tropical and temperate rainforests, deciduous forests, as well as gross mismanagement of farmland and its life-giving skin of the Earth, arable soil , we lose much more than geographic area classified as a particular biome, we lose biodiversity, the necessary richness of species spread across the planet. It then stands to reason that destroying those areas, thus reducing biodiversity, is a monumentally important consideration as well . Yet, we do not possess adequate measures to even understand how much we are affecting the diversity of life on Earth , and as argued by Ferrer-Paris et al. , even knowing where groups of organisms are and in what concentration – the distribution of species – can prove challenging! We must strive to better understand the natural world, its infinite complexity, and our place in that scheme. Many summits, conferences, and symposiums have convened in order to identify the grandest challenges before humankind today. While the results may vary in their carefully detailed and purposefully chosen words, common themes emerge; one of the most important today is the concept of sustainability. We may be able to agree that “sustainability” means the ability of a given system to continue ad infinitum, but in the context of environmental management, as Brown et al.  point out, neither global nor operational definitions present themselves with quite as much simplicity. Temporal and spatial considerations and context become vital as the problem shifts from global to regional to local, and back again (the modifiable aerial unit problem, or MAUP, as described by geographers ). Within the framework of sustainability science, we will continue to be challenged to better incorporate renewable energy sources and natural resources into viable and realistic solutions at all scales. We must find ways to live within the means the planet can realistically continue to provide, so that humanity may continue to exist. According to the United Nations Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, our current technologies may be well-suited to assist us in addressing the host of environmental problems we face, but we have yet to address, in earnest, a problem of perception. The flawed hope (and for decades, continuing even today, the flawed practice) of simply assuming there is no price tag on the ecosystem services we are consuming will be an enormous barrier to real and permanent change. True, we have come a long way from the days of men like William Gilpin (the first territorial governor of Colorado and a staunch advocate of “conquering” nature and Western Frontier), but as though we have a long way to go. We must find the strength to abandon the notion that natural resources are unlimited. We are also seeing the emerging BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China, and to an extent, South Africa) ramping up their hunger for cheap energy and durable goods without looking to the lessons already available from the emergence of past giants on the global stage; the result: steadily increasing Carbon dioxide emissions [12,13]. While the notion of perception may be the purview of the intangible, the results of our actions within the world around us cut very visible scars into the Earth through the thoughtless large-scale removal of materials. It is this mass exodus of the planet’s tangible offerings that carries a price tag far greater than we may realize, and it is this price tag which we must discover [4,14]. How much of the physical Earth can be mined before we gush past the threshold at which we can extract no more ceiling fans, running shoes, and ski trips to Vail? Where does the boundary between sustainability and continued (and comfortable) existence, lie? Managing the triple bottom line, the intersection of environment, economic, and social concerns is highly sought after and inherently difficult . In fact, this consideration is central to the key findings of the MAE, where it is stated, “Better protection of natural assets will require coordinated efforts across all sections of governments, businesses, and international institutions”. As more of us appear, more stresses on our already strained resources tell us it has become more important than ever to understand this complex threefold dynamic, as any major perturbation in one area inevitably will lead to disruption in another. Human and natural systems are inextricably linked and fantastically difficult to unravel or in many cases, even understand . But we desperately need to strive to do so, for it is the extent of the human influence on natural systems that provides us with our most formidable challenges.
- Carson R (1962) Silent Spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- United States Census Bureau (2014) U.S. and World Population Clock.
- National Research Council (2014) Can Earth's and Society's Systems Meet the Needs of 10 Billion People?: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Lovelock J (2006) The Revenge of Gaia. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Garrett H (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162: 1243-1248.
- White PJ, Crawford JW, Alvarez MCD, Moreno RG (2014) Soil Management for Sustainable Agriculture 2013. Applied and Environmental Soils Science 2014.
- Weinzettel J, Hertwich EG, Peters GP, Steen-Olsen S, Galli A (2013) Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Global Environmental Change 23: 433-438.
- Pereira HM, Navarro LM, Martins IS (2012) Global Biodiversity Change: The Bad, The Good, and the Unknown. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37: 25-50.
- Ferrer-Paris JR, Sanchez-Mercado A, Rodriguez-Clark KM, Rodriguez, JP, Rodriguez GA (2014) Using Limited Data to Detect Changes in Species Distributions: Insights from Amazon Parrots in Venezuela. Biological Conservation 173: 133-143.
- Brown BJ, Hanson ME, Liverman DM, Meredith RW (1987)Global Sustainability: Toward Definition. Environmental Management 11: 713-719.
- Dark SJ, BramD (2007)The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) in Physical Geography.Progress in Physical Geography31: 471-479.
- Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does Higher Economic and Financial Development Lead to Environmental Degradation: Evidence from BRIC Countries. Energy Policy 37: 246-253.
- Pao AT, Tsai CM (2010) CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in BRIC Countries. Energy Policy 38: 7850-7860.
- McKibben B (2011) Eaarth: Making of Life on a Tough New Planet. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
- Halpren BS, Klein CJ, Brown CJ, Meger B, Grantham HS (2013) Achieving the Triple Bottom Line in the Face of Inherent Trade-offs Among Social Equity, Economic Return, and Conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 6229-6234.
- Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C (2007) Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems. Science 314: 1513-1516.
Citation: Stimers M (2015) On Frontiers of Natural Environments. J Earth Sci Clim Change. 6: 301. Doi: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000301
Copyright: © 2015 Stimers M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
- Total views: 12063
- [From(publication date): 10-2015 - Sep 18, 2019]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 8261
- PDF downloads: 3802