ISSN: 2167-065X

Clinical Pharmacology & Biopharmaceutics
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Editorial   
  • Clin Pharmacol Biopharm 2025, Vol 14(3): 3.551

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Advanced Computational Approaches for Drug Design

Deepa Lulu Sudhakaran*
Department of Biotechnology, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, India
*Corresponding Author: Deepa Lulu Sudhakaran, Department of Biotechnology, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, India, Email: sudhakaranlulu22deepa@gmail.com

Abstract

  

Keywords

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD); Computational drug design; AI in pharmacokinetics modeling; Machine learning in drug development; PK/PD simulation and modeling; Systems pharmacology; Drug absorption and metabolism prediction; Precision medicine and PK/PD; Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling; Dose optimization through computational approaches

Description

Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) play a fundamental role in drug development, determining how drugs interact with the body and produce therapeutic effects. PK focuses on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of drugs, while PD studies their biochemical and physiological effects. Traditional experimental methods for PK/PD evaluation are often time-consuming, costly, and limited in predictive accuracy.

Advanced computational approaches, such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and mechanistic modeling, have transformed PK/PD analysis by enabling high-throughput simulations and data-driven predictions. Computational models like physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP), and population PK/PD modeling allow for more precise drug dosing, improved bioavailability assessments, and better identification of drug-drug interactions. These innovations enhance drug design efficiency, reduce preclinical testing reliance, and contribute to the development of safer and more effective therapeutics.

Discussion

The integration of computational approaches into PK/PD modeling has significantly improved drug discovery and development processes.AI-driven algorithms analyze vast datasets to predict drug behavior, optimizing dose selection and reducing trial-and-error experiments.ML techniques refine PK/PD models by identifying key variables affecting drug absorption and metabolism, leading to more precise therapeutic outcomes.

PBPK models incorporate biological and physiological parameters to predict how drugs behave in different patient populations.These models help in assessing drug-drug interactions and individual variability, improving personalized medicine approaches.

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) integrates computational models with experimental data to simulate drug effects on complex biological systems.Multi-scale modeling bridges molecular, cellular, and systemic levels, enhancing understanding of drug efficacy and toxicity.

Computational PK/PD models are increasingly used in regulatory decision-making, supporting drug approvals and clinical trial design.Regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EMA, are adopting model-informed drug development (MIDD) strategies to streamline drug evaluation processes.

Despite the advancements, computational PK/PD modeling faces challenges such as:Data Quality and Availability: Model accuracy depends on high-quality experimental data, which may be scarce or inconsistent.Complexity of Biological Systems: While models simplify real-world physiology, they may not fully capture inter-individual variability.Computational Power Requirements: Advanced simulations require significant computational resources, posing challenges for widespread adoption.

Conclusion

Advanced computational approaches have revolutionized PK/PD modeling, providing more accurate and efficient drug design methodologies. AI, ML, PBPK, and QSP modeling have enhanced predictive accuracy, optimizing drug dosing, efficacy, and safety. These advancements not only accelerate drug development but also contribute to precision medicine by tailoring treatments to individual patients. While challenges remain, continued improvements in computational power, data integration, and regulatory acceptance will further establish computational PK/PD approaches as essential tools in modern pharmaceutical research. Moving forward, interdisciplinary collaboration between computational scientists, pharmacologists, and regulatory agencies will be crucial in fully harnessing these technologies for future drug development.

References

  1.  
  2. Kumar A, Kini SG, Rathi E (2021) A recent appraisal of artificial intelligence and in silico ADMET prediction in the early stages of drug discovery. Mini Rev Med Chem 21: 2788-2800.  

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3.  
  4. Norrby PO (2019) Holistic models of reaction selectivity. Nature 571: 332-333.  

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5.  
  6. Cramer RD, Bunce JD, Patterson DE, Frank IE (1988) Crossvalidation, bootstrapping, and partial least squares compared with multiple regression in conventional QSAR studies. Mol Inform 7: 18-25.  

    Google Scholar, Crossref

  7.  
  8. Li Y, Zhang L, Wang Y (2022) Generative deep learning enables the discovery of a potent and selective RIPK1 inhibitor. Nat Commun 13  

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9.  
  10. Zhang D, Luo G, Ding X, Lu C (2012) Preclinical experimental models of drug metabolism and disposition in drug discovery and development. Acta Pharm Sin B 2: 549-561.  

    Google Scholar

  11.  
  12. Skalic M, Jiménez J, Sabbadin D, De Fabritiis G (2019) Shape-based generative modeling for de novo drug design. J Chem Inf Model 59: 1205-1214.  

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13.  
  14. T, Correia J, Pereira V, Rocha M (2021) Generative deep learning for targeted compound design. Sousa J Chem Inf Model 61: 5343-5361.  

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15.  
  16. Tran TT, Tayara H, Chong KT (2023) Artificial intelligence in drug metabolism and excretion prediction: recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Pharmaceutics 15  

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17.  
  18. Dara S, Dhamercherla S, Jadav SS, Babu CM, Ahsan MJ (2022) Machine learning in drug discovery: a review. Artif Intell Rev 55: 1947-1999.  

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19.  
  20. Sahu A, Mishra J, Kushwaha N. (2022) Artificial intelligence (AI) in drugs and pharmaceuticals. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 25: 1818-1837.  

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation:   

Copyright:

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Article Usage
  • Total views: 70
  • [From(publication date): 0-0 - Dec 21, 2025]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 50
  • PDF downloads: 20
Top Connection closed successfully.