Biopolymers Research
Open Access

Transcriptional regulation, Organic plastic degradation products, Cellular response, Gene expression, Transcription factors, Signaling pathways

Introduction

Plastic pollution is one of the most pressing environmental challenges of the 21st century. With millions of tons of plastic waste entering ecosystems annually, the degradation of these materials generates a myriad of organic compounds, collectively referred to as organic plastic degradation products (OPDPs) [1]. These compounds, which include phthalates, bisphenols, and other monomers, have been shown to exert toxic effects on living organisms, disrupting cellular functions and inducing stress responses [2].

The cellular response to OPDPs involves a complex network of molecular events aimed at mitigating the harmful effects of these compounds. Central to this response is the transcriptional regulation of genes that encode proteins involved in detoxification, stress response, and metabolic adaptation. Transcription factors (TFs), signaling pathways, and epigenetic modifications play pivotal roles in modulating gene expression in response to OPDPs [3-5].

This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in the cellular response to OPDPs. We will discuss the molecular mechanisms underlying this regulation, the key players involved, and the implications for biotechnological applications in plastic waste management.

Discussion

Transcription Factors and Their Role in Gene Regulation

Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that bind to specific DNA sequences to regulate the transcription of target genes. In the context of the cellular response to OPDPs, several TFs have been identified as key regulators of gene expression. For example, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is known to mediate the response to various environmental pollutants, including OPDPs [6]. Upon binding to OPDPs, AhR translocates to the nucleus, where it dimerizes with the AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT) and activates the transcription of genes involved in detoxification, such as cytochrome P450 enzymes [7].

Another important TF is the nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2), which regulates the expression of antioxidant and phase II detoxification enzymes. Nrf2 is activated in response to oxidative stress induced by OPDPs and promotes the transcription of genes encoding glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) [8]. These enzymes play crucial roles in neutralizing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and conjugating OPDPs for excretion.

Signaling Pathways Involved in the Cellular Response to OPDPs

The cellular response to OPDPs is also mediated by various signaling pathways that converge on the regulation of gene expression. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, for instance, is activated in response to OPDP-induced stress and leads to the phosphorylation and activation of TFs such as c-Jun and ATF2 [9]. These TFs, in turn, regulate the expression of genes involved in stress response and cell survival.

The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway is another critical signaling cascade that modulates the cellular response to OPDPs. Activation of this pathway promotes cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis and enhancing the expression of genes involved in detoxification and metabolic adaptation [10]. The interplay between these signaling pathways and TFs ensures a coordinated cellular response to OPDPs, enabling cells to cope with the toxic effects of these compounds.

Epigenetic Modifications and Gene Expression

In addition to TFs and signaling pathways, epigenetic modifications play a significant role in the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in the cellular response to OPDPs. DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs are key epigenetic mechanisms that modulate gene expression in response to environmental stimuli [11].

DNA methylation, the addition of a methyl group to cytosine residues in DNA, typically results in gene silencing. Exposure to OPDPs has been shown to alter DNA methylation patterns, leading to the repression of genes involved in detoxification and stress response [12]. Conversely, histone modifications, such as acetylation and methylation, can either activate or repress gene expression depending on the specific histone residues involved. For example, histone acetylation is generally associated with gene activation, while histone methylation can have either activating or repressive effects [13].

Non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), also play a role in the regulation of gene expression in response to OPDPs. miRNAs are small RNA molecules that bind to complementary sequences in target mRNAs, leading to their degradation or translational repression. Several miRNAs have been implicated in the regulation of genes involved in the cellular response to OPDPs, including those encoding detoxification enzymes and stress response proteins [14]. lncRNAs, on the other hand, can modulate gene expression by interacting with chromatin-modifying complexes or by acting as decoys for TFs and miRNAs [15].

Implications for Biotechnological Applications

Understanding the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in the cellular response to OPDPs has important implications for biotechnological applications in plastic waste management. By manipulating the expression of key genes, it may be possible to enhance the ability of microorganisms to degrade plastic waste and detoxify OPDPs. For example, genetic engineering approaches could be used to overexpress TFs such as AhR and Nrf2, thereby increasing the expression of detoxification enzymes and improving the efficiency of plastic degradation [16].

In addition, epigenetic modifications could be targeted to enhance the cellular response to OPDPs. For instance, the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDAC inhibitors) could promote the acetylation of histones and activate the expression of genes involved in detoxification and stress response [17]. Similarly, the manipulation of miRNA expression could be used to fine-tune the cellular response to OPDPs, potentially leading to more effective strategies for plastic waste management.

Results

Recent studies have provided valuable insights into the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in the cellular response to OPDPs. For example, research has shown that exposure to OPDPs leads to the activation of AhR and Nrf2, resulting in the upregulation of detoxification enzymes such as cytochrome P450 and GSTs [18]. Additionally, the MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways have been shown to play critical roles in mediating the cellular response to OPDPs, with activation of these pathways leading to the expression of genes involved in stress response and cell survival [19].

Epigenetic studies have also revealed that exposure to OPDPs alters DNA methylation patterns and histone modifications, leading to changes in gene expression. For instance, OPDP exposure has been associated with the repression of genes involved in detoxification through increased DNA methylation, while histone acetylation has been shown to activate the expression of stress response genes [20]. Furthermore, the role of non-coding RNAs in the regulation of gene expression in response to OPDPs has been increasingly recognized, with several miRNAs and lncRNAs implicated in the modulation of detoxification and stress response pathways [21].

Conclusion

The transcriptional regulation of genes involved in the cellular response to OPDPs is a complex and multifaceted process that involves the interplay of transcription factors, signaling pathways, and epigenetic modifications. Understanding these regulatory mechanisms is crucial for developing effective strategies to mitigate the impact of plastic pollution on ecosystems and human health. The insights gained from this research have important implications for biotechnological applications, including the development of genetically engineered microorganisms for plastic degradation and the use of epigenetic modulators to enhance the cellular response to OPDPs. As the global plastic waste crisis continues to escalate, further research in this area will be essential for identifying novel targets and approaches for plastic waste management.

References

1. Taylor G (2003)The phase problemActa Cryst D 59: 1881-1890.

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Bedouelle H (2016)Principles and equations for measuring and interpreting protein stability: From monomer to tetramer.Biochimie 121: 29-37.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Monsellier E, Bedouelle H (2005) Quantitative measurement of protein stability from unfolding equilibria monitored with the fluorescence maximum wavelength. Protein Eng Des Sel 18: 445-456.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Park YC, Bedouelle H (1998).Dimeric tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from Bacillus stearothermophilus unfolds through a monomeric intermediate. A quantitative analysis under equilibrium conditions. The J Biol Chem 273: 18052-18059.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Ould-Abeih MB, Petit-Topin I, Zidane N, Baron B, Bedouelle H, et al. (2012)Multiple folding states and disorder of ribosomal protein SA, a membrane receptor for laminin, anticarcinogens, and pathogens.Biochemistry.51: 4807-4821.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Agmas B, Adugna M (2020)Attitudes and practices of farmers with regard to pesticide use in North West Ethiopia. Cogent Environ Sci 6: 1–16.

Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Tadesse A (2008)Increasing crop production through improved plant protection. Plant Protection Society of Ethiopia (PPSE) 2: 542–568.

Google Scholar

8. Negatu B, Kromhout H, Mekonnen Y, Vermeulen R (2016)Use of chemical pesticides in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional comparative study on knowledge, attitude and practice of farmers and farm workers in three farming systems. Occup Hyg 60: 551–566.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Asghar U, Malik MF, Javed A (2016)Pesticide exposure and human health: review. J Ecosys Ecograp 5: 1-2.

Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Liu S, Zheng Z, Li X (2013)Advances in pesticide biosensors: current status, challenges, and future perspectives. Anal Bioanal Chem 405: 63–90.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref