alexa Two-hit Reprograming of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2329-6879
Occupational Medicine & Health Affairs
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Two-hit Reprograming of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Kazunari K Yokoyama*

Graduate Institute of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Road, San-Ming District, 807 Kaohsiung, Taiwan

*Corresponding Author:
Kazunari K Yokoyama
Graduate Institute of Medicine
Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Road
San-Ming District, 807 Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Tel: +886-7-312-1101
Fax: +886-7-313-3849
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: May 09, 2014; Accepted date: June 24, 2014; Published date: June 27, 2014

Citation: Yokoyama KK (2014) Two-hit Reprograming of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Occup Med Health Aff 2:168. doi: 10.4172/2329-6879.1000168

Copyright: © 2014 Yokoyama KK. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Occupational Medicine & Health Affairs

Abstract

Endogenous and exogenous stresses produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells, and these can cause DNA damage, apoptosis, autophagy, and senescence. The reprogramming of somatic cells to produce induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) initially requires ROS production and then represses the endogenous expression of tumor suppressor factors such as p53, p21Cip1, and p16Ink4a. This article discusses a two-hit model of stress-induced reprogramming for generating iPSCs and suggests new clinical tools for stem cell therapy.

Keywords

Environmental stress; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Stem cells; Stress; Reactive oxygen species; Reprograming

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

The aging of many modern societies is associated with increases in the rates of cancers, heart diseases, and chronic and age-related brain and mental diseases. The availability of adequate cell sources to repopulate injured or degenerated tissues is a central priority in regenerative medicine, and stem cells are invaluable candidates because of their capacity for self-renewal and ability to differentiate into several cell types [1]. Various stem cell types, including embryonic, fetal, perinatal, and adult stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), have been investigated as sources for regenerative therapies [2,3]. Although the extensive studies of iPSCs under laboratory conditions have been done, several problems should be solved for clinical setting of stem cells and iPSCs. However, the generation of iPSCs by reprogramming technology has provided the regenerative medicine field with new tools for cell replacement strategies and the modeling of human diseases. It has also stimulated the development of new drugs and enabled the screening of environmental disruptors and natural compounds that are potentially hazardous to human health. The delivery and expression of genetic reprogramming factors, the genomic instability and epigenetic memory if iPSCs, the impact of cell propagation in culture, the development of new drugs for disease, and the impact of environmental toxicants are only some of the concerns surrounding this technology.

Environmental Stress Factors

Many risk factors, such as air pollution, fuel exhaust emissions, tabacco smoking, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic chemicals, environmentally disruptive chemicals (EDCs), and mental stresses, have been suggested as culprits in triggering or exacerbating human diseases [4]. This has been exemplified clearly by a recent meta-analysis of the impact of residential environmental chemicals on the occurrence primarily of allergic and immunological diseases [5]. Establishing the extent to which particular EDCs might influence genomic function is an essential first step in defining their potential effects on the long-term viability of the target organism [6]. If an environmental disruptor can induce an epigenetic change that is heritable through mitosis, there is a potential for significant phenotypic effects long after the initiating factor has disappeared. Furthermore, if such mitotically heritable changes are induced in germ cells, then the transmission through meiosis to succeeding generations might be possible. Thus, the studies to examine the effects of EDCs on stem cells are crucial for understanding heritable risk factors.

Pre-iPSCs and Full-iPSCs

Reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide and hydroxyl radicals, are highly reactive and can damage mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, as well as proteins and lipids, by modifying them via oxidative reactions. Stem cells appear to be particularly sensitive to elevated ROS levels. Increased levels of ROS induced by metabolic changes in iPSCs might hinder the survival of reprogrammed cells [7]. In addition, mitochondrial functions are also repressed in iPSCs or human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) [8], suggesting that ROS generation by reprograming factors is unfavorable to the generation of iPSCs. In addition, it was reported that cell senescence impairs reprograming to iPSCs, and that reprograming triggers a stress response to senescence at the initial stage [9]. In fact, senescence is the irreversible arrest during the G1 phase of the cell cycle that is elicited by replicative exhaustion or in response to stresses such as DNA damage, drugs, or oncogenes. Moreover, oxidative stress also induces cellular apoptosis and autophagy. These effects occur primarily through activation of the tumor suppressor factor p53 and upregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors p16Ink4a and p21Cip1 [10]. The introduction of Yamanaka factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc) initially triggers stress responses with characteristics of oxidative-stress-like increases in the levels of oxidized 8-oxoguanine and in reprograming-induced senescence (RIS) by upregulating p53, p16Ink4a, and p21Cip1 at the initial stage leading to pre-induced pluripotent stem cells (Pre-iPSCs). This upregulation of p16Ink4a and p21Cip1 was observed during heterokaryon-based reprograming, suggesting the existence of an inherent link between senescence and reprograming. Subsequently, the elevated levels of p16Ink4a and p21Cip1 that could be detected in Pre-iPSCs were decreased at a later stage in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) [9,11]. The inhibition of senescence using gene knockdown constructs of p53, p21Cip1, and p16Ink4a at a late stage finally improved the efficiency of reprograming of somatic cells or primary cancer cells, and the resulting iPSCs displayed characteristics of fully pluripotent stem cells (Full-iPSCs) [12]. Pre-iPSCs that failed to reprogram fully were trapped in a late step of reprograming [9,11]. Inhibition of DNA methylation, knockdown of lineage-specific genes, or treatment with two inhibitors [13] could either convert some of these Pre-iPSCs to Full-iPSCs or increase the proportion of fully reprogrammed iPSCs vs. Pre-iPSCs. The inhibition or alleviation of senescence can increase the number of cells that surpass the early barrier imposed by RIS, resulting in a higher number of both Pre-iPSCs and fully reprogrammed iPSCs. This RIS and probably also reprograming-induced apoptosis (RIA) act as initial barrier, limiting the efficiency of reprograming and making it slower and intermittent. To increase the efficiency of reprograming, the repression of RIS or RIA is definitely required at the late stage, followed by a decrease in the expression of p16Ink4a, p21Cip1, and p53 by the hypoxia condition or other conditions, which are necessary for full reprograming [14]. Thus, reprograming requires two stages. The initial stage includes ROS production induced by reprograming factors, which leads to the reprograming changes or DNA damage that in turn induce the expression of p16Ink4a, p21Cip1, and p53. At this late stage, these alterations should be shut down by a reduction of the expression of p53, p21Cip1, and p16Ink4a by hypoxic conditions or the expression of stemness genes such as Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Esrrb, Tfcp2l1 or other genes enhancing pluripotency. Of cause, we cannot rule out other hypotheses such as stochastic mechanism [15], link with innate immunity [16] and so on.

Two-hit Theory for Reprogramming of iPSC

To test this hypothesis, I propose forcing the expression of the AhR gene, encoding the arylhydrocarbon receptor, at the initial stage of reprograming. Subsequently, reduced ROS production and enhanced expression of the Nrf2 gene, encoding nuclear factor (erythroid-derived )-like 2 (Nrf2), should be combined in cells using conditional knockout and conditional forced expression systems at the second stage. The target-gene family of Nrf2 is probably overlapped and compensate with tumor suppressor gene products such as p53, p21Cip1, and p16Ink4a for each other. The generation of iPSCs will be examined based on the expression of stemness marker genes and enzyme activity, as well as teratoma formation. DNA repair plays a critical role in the maintenance of genome stability. It senses any tiny or global genomic abnormality and quickly launches signaling to recruit DNA repair factors to the lesions, arrest cell cycle progression, or induce apoptosis. These diverse cellular responses are collectively called the DNA damage response (DDR) [17]. In addition to DNA repair, the spindle assembly checkpoint prevents errors in mitosis and contributes to genome stability. Because DNA repair prevents chromatin change, which occurs during reprograming, it also suppresses the generation of iPSC. We plan to investigate the roles of AhR and Nrf2 in reprograming, including the modulation of reprograming by intervening with DNA repair and DDR to improve success rates in iPSC generation. However, Shigeta et al. reported that the requirement of Trp53 in mice for inducing and maintaining the pluripotency of ESCs in-vivo is not absolute [18]. Thus, this indicates that another mechanism besides p53 and p21Cip1 might perform a compensatory function during reprograming.

Environmental risks and stem cells therapies

Drug discovery and development as well as drug screening to date have relied on animal models, which are useful but are often fail to mimic human physiology. The discovery of human iPSCs has led to the emergence of a new paradigm for drug screening using human-organ-like and disease-specific cultures in-vitro. Organ-like structures cultured in advanced microfluidic systems can simulate tissue structure and function at a microscope level and can enable high-throughput testing of different compounds for therapeutic and diagnostic application. The preliminary use of testicular iPSCs for testing the effect of environmental hormones such as phthalate derivatives has been reported [19]. We will utilize these technologies for the screening and development of medical drugs and natural compounds as well as novel small molecules for the future development of stem cell therapy.

Conclusion

The generation of iPSCs obtained by genomic reprograming technology has provided regenerative medicine with new tools for cell replacement strategies, the modeling of human diseases, development of new drugs, and screening of EDCs. The advantages of these pluripotent cells compared with other sources of stem cells include the generation of patient-derived cells and the lack of embryonic tissues by maintaining a versatile differentiation potential. Many challenges are yet to be circumvented before this technology can be translated widely to clinical settings. A large-scale screening of chemical libraries with patient-specific iPSCs or disease-specific iPSCs is currently underway, and is expected to lead to new drug discoveries. The effects of EDCs on stem cells are also being investigated using these strategies. Patient- or disease-specific iPSCs could be generated by ROS regulation via AhR, and by using the Nrf2 cascade system for antioxidation. Theses should prove useful for preclinical studies of stem cell therapy.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  •  46th Global Nursing and Healthcare Conference
    Dec 06-07, 2017 Sao Paulo, Brazil

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11729
  • [From(publication date):
    July-2014 - Nov 21, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7933
  • PDF downloads : 3796
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords