alexa Geoengineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? | OMICS International| Abstract
ISSN: 2157-7617

Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change
Open Access

Like us on:

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Review Article   
  • J Earth Sci Climat Change 2013, Vol 4(2)
  • DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617.S1-001

Geoengineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?

David B. Resnik1* and Daniel A. Vallero2
1National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Box 12233, Mail Drop CU-03, Research Triangle Park, , NC, 27709, USA
2Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, USA
*Corresponding Author : David B. Resnik, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Box 12233, Mail Drop CU-03, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA, Tel: (919) 541-5658 Exn. (919) 541-9854, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Nov 19, 2011 / Accepted Date: Dec 15, 2011 / Published Date: Dec 17, 2011

Abstract

Some engineers and scientists recently have suggested that it would be prudent to consider engaging in geoengineering to mitigate global warming. Geoengineering differs from other methods for mitigating global warming because it involves a deliberate effort to affect the climate at a global scale. Although geoengineering is not a new idea, it has taken on added significance as a result of difficulties with implementing other proposals to mitigate climate change. While proponents of geoengineering admit that it can have significant risks for the environment and public health, many maintain that it is worth pursuing, given the failure of other means of mitigating global warming. Some environmental groups have voiced strong opposition to all forms of geoengineering. In this article, we examine arguments for and against geoengineering and discuss some policy options. We argue that specific geoengineering proposals should not be implemented until there is good evidence concerning their safety, efficacy, and feasibility, as well as a plan for oversight. International cooperation and public input should also be sought. Other methods for mitigating global warming should be aggressively pursued while geoengineering is under consideration. The promise of an engineering solution to global warming should not be used as an excuse to abandon or cut back current, climate mitigation efforts.

Keywords: Global warming; Geoengineering; Climate mitigation; Ethics; Policy; Risk

Citation: Resnik DB, Vallero DA (2011) Geoengineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? J Earth Sci Climat Change S1: 001. Doi: 10.4172/2157-7617.S1-001

Copyright: ©2011 Resnik DB, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Recommended Conferences

9th World Climate Congress & Expo

Bangkok, Thailand

9th World Conference on Earth Science

Beijing, China

2nd Global Summit on Earth Science and Climate Change

Prague, Czech Republic
Article Usage
  • Total views: 12565
  • [From(publication date): 5-2013 - Feb 20, 2020]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 8736
  • PDF downloads: 3829
Top