Quantifying Uncertainty in Forecasting
ISSN: 2157-7617
Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
  • Opinion Article   
  • J Earth Sci Clim Change 2014, Vol 5(1): 172
  • DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000172

Quantifying Uncertainty in Forecasting

Jon Flatley*
Department of Earth Sciences, Millersville University, USA
*Corresponding Author: Jon Flatley, Department of Earth Sciences, Millersville University, USA, Tel: 717-872-3289, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Nov 25, 2013 / Accepted Date: Nov 26, 2013 / Published Date: Dec 03, 2013

Remember the snowstorm forecast bust in Washington, D.C. last winter? Forecasts were calling for up to a foot of snow and what fell was a cold rain with a few wet snow flakes mixed in. Businesses and government shut down, people’s lives were inconvenienced, and untold money was lost due to the anticipation of this major “snowstorm”. Then some weather companies, such as “The Weather Channel” had to change their focus for viewers that, yes, big snows hit the higher elevations of Virginia north and west of town. To give some credit, there were some forecasting companies that gave explanations for the bad prediction, such as “lack of cold air”, “weak vertical motion”, etc.

This event led to a discussion between my buddy and I about what could be done to better prepare the public for uncertainties in a forecast. As a meteorologist I was interested in the complaints from a layperson about what could be improved in our predictions so as to give a better handle on how certain we are about the future weather. This got me to thinking that if we could have some index to quantify uncertainty that this might be of help, to those who are more “weather-wise” and are interested. A few companies employ uncertainty with their predictions already, such as the Capital Weather Gang in D.C., I understand. Also my old Alma Mater, Millersville University, has an index of sorts. I’m sure there are others that I don’t know about. I’d just like to see more widespread use of some system in our day-to-day weather broadcasts, at least in the private sector.

We could possibly have an index system like below:

Index Confidence
5 Sure bet
4 Confident
3 Avg confidence
2 Low confidence
1 Our best shot

And for a case like the D.C. forecast there could be a narrative talking about the uncertainties, the borderline temperatures, etc. and then an index number above the forecast. In this case – if we were being honest – it might have warranted a number 1 or 2. I would be curious to hear what others might suggest to better communicate uncertainties in weather forecasts (especially snowfall) to the general public.

Citation: Flatley J (2013) Quantifying Uncertainty in Forecasting. J Earth Sci Clim Change 5: 172. Doi: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000172

Copyright: ©2013 Flatley J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Recommended Conferences
Article Usage
  • Total views: 12463
  • [From(publication date): 1-2014 - Jan 23, 2022]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 8403
  • PDF downloads: 4060
Share This Article