Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft
Received Date: Mar 04, 2013 / Accepted Date: Mar 18, 2013 / Published Date: May 25, 2013
The congenital midline cervical cleft is a rare developmental abnormality of the anterior part of the neck Luschka in 1848 and noted in the English literature by Bailey in 1924 [1,2]. The lesion is often initially evaluated by a pediatrician or primary care physician who may misinterpret the anomaly as a branchial cleft deformity or thyroglossal duct cyst. Although developmentally related to these disorders, the congenital midline cervical cleft represents a distinct anomaly that should be recognized at initial examination. The parents can then be appropriately counseled about the implications and further management decisions that are peculiar to this disorder.
The embryologic mechanism that accounts for the congenital midline cervical cleft is not firmly established; however, most investigators believe that it involves a failure of the branchial arches to fuse in the midline [3,4]. In normal embryology, the branchial arches grow medially and merge in a cephalad to caudal direction with the first (mandibular) arch closing before the second (hyoid) arch, and the lower arches following sequentially. Prior to fusing, mesodermal tissue migrates between the arches, pushing ectoderm outward to flatten the ventral furrow.
A number of hypotheses have been set forth to explain the faulty closure of the branchial arches. For instance, mechanical factors and vascular anomalies with secondary ischemia and necrosis have been postulated in the mechanism . Failure of the mesenchyme to penetrate the midline, with subsequent poor interaction between the mesoderm and ectoderm, has also been suggested as a means of preventing fusion [2,6-9]. This mechanism could also explain the absence of normal adnexal structures that is observed in involved skin .
Finally, a few investigators postulate that pressure on the cervical area by the pericardial roof could prevent fusion and another takes the debate to a microscopic level with proposed roles for hyaluronate and collagen [3,9-11].
The incidence of congenital midline cervical cleft is difficult to evaluate. In 1985, Gargan et al. reported 12 cases of midline cervical clefts as part of their 30-year series of 612 thyroglossal and other branchial cleft sinuses . This represented an incidence of 1.7% in this family of disorders. In a similar series of 198 cases by Gross and Connerly in 1940, only two defects were identified as being midline clefts . In a more recent series of 191 congenital cervical malformations by Nicollas and Guelfucci in 2000, an incidence of 2% midline cervical clefts was reported.
Mortality and Morbidity
Many congenital midline cervical clefts are asymptomatic. There always exists a subcutaneous cord-like, fibrous thickening cephalad to the defect, which may cause webbing. In severe cases this fibroid cord may form a cervical contracture of the anterior neck that becomes more pronounced as the patient matures [13,14].
• Race: Unknown.
• Sex: Unknown.
• Age: Midline cervical clefts are rare anomalies that are present at birth but may be overlooked or misdiagnosed. It usually becomes more obvious with time.
Congenital midline cervical cleft is clinically typical and diagnosed at birth. Length and width can differ from one child to another but clinically cleft presents as linear vertical areas of thin erythematous skin. Sometimes mistaken by the patient’s family as a “birthmark,” some patients may also present with a working diagnosis consisting of thyroglossal duct, dermoid, or branchial cleft cyst.
The lesion presents at birth with a ventral midline defect of the skin of the neck. A reddened weeping strip of atrophic skin approximately 5mm in width may occur at any level between the chin and sternal notch. Often there is a nipple-like projection at the upper end of the fissure and an associated sinus tract at the caudal aspect, which may discharge mucoid material. There always exists a subcutaneous cord-like, fibrous thickening cephalad to the defect which may cause webbing, also known as pterygium colli medianum. In severe cases this fibroid cord may form a cervical contracture of the anterior neck that becomes more striking as the patient grows .
In addition to its central features, congenital midline cervical cleft may be associated with other anomalies of the head and neck, including clefts of the lower lip, mandible, chin, and tongue, an underdeveloped mandible, and hypoplasia/absence of supporting structures of the neck, such as the hyoid bone. It has occurred in the presence of, and may even be related to, both bronchogenic cysts and thyroglossal duct abnormalities. Furthermore, congenital midline cervical cleft has been associated with defects in other parts of the body, including cleft sternum, midline abdominal web or scar-like raphe, and midline hemangioma, as well as congenital heart lesions such as ectopia and intracardiac anomalies.
Developmental anomalies of branchial arches can provoke several malformations. The main theory hypothesized that midline clefts are the consequence of an anterior fusion defect of the two first pairs of branchial arches during the third and fourth weeks of intrauterine life .
No specific laboratory studies need to be obtained in the workup of a congenital midline cervical cleft.
A sinogram may be obtained. If a sinus tract exists, radiopaque dye can be injected to delineate the course and to examine the size of the cyst.
Ultrasonography can be helpful especially if a thyroglossal duct cyst is suspected. Thyroid aspect and position are also specified .
A contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scan is not contributive.
No other investigations are needed beyond routine preoperative workup.
Fine-needle aspiration has been reported to be helpful in distinguishing branchial cleft cysts from malignant neck masses. Fineneedle aspiration and culture may help guide antibiotic therapy for infected cysts.
The histology of the congenital midline cervical cleft usually consists of parakeratotic stratified squamous epithelium without normal skin appendages [10,15,17]. The underlying dermis may or may not show areas of alternating hypertrophy and atrophy, and the subcutis may contain dense fibrous connective tissue and a mild inflammatory infiltrate of primarily lymphocytes, plasma cells, and neutrophils . The skin tag generally consists of normal overlying skin, but can contain cartilage and irregular skeletal muscle . The sinus tract associated with the congenital midline cervical cleft usually consists of pseudostratified columnar or cylindrical epithelium and often demonstrates adjacent seromucinous glands [10,18]. In some cases, however, the histology of this fistula resembles bronchogenic epithelium or contains part of the thyroglossal duct or its remnants [2,7,19]. Finally, the fibrous cord that overlies the cervical midline cleft has its own distinct microscopic structure, and may include interfasciculated bundles of skeletal muscle that resemble torticollis histologically .
Antibiotics are required to treat infections or abscesses related to congenital midline cervical clefts.
The recognition and early surgical intervention of congenital midline cervical clefts have important functional and cosmetic implications . Failure to recognize the stigmata of this abnormality and delay of surgical treatment can lead to cicatricial contracture and potentially mandibular hypoplasia. No general consensus exists as to an appropriate age for elective surgical resection of midline cervical clefts.
Several methods of surgical correction of have been described, yet most authors would recommend Z-plasty technique to correct anterior cervical contracture and obtain optimum cosmetic result [9-12]. However, the cases reported in the literature generally represent the most florid examples of midline cleft. If the defect is small and adjacent tissues are lax and the fibrous cord is completely excised, the defect can be closed primarily .
Z-plasty is a common technique and a versatile surgical maneuver. Z-plasty allows the surgeon to (1) lengthen a contracted scar; (2) reorient the direction of a scar or defect; (3) break up a straight line; and (4) shift soft tissue contour [20,21]. The Z-plasty technique involves creating two opposing triangular transposition flaps that are rotated synchronously to close a central defect by redistribution and rearrangement of tissue . The Z-plasty is symmetrically designed so that the lateral limbs are equal in length to the tissue defect (central limb) and that the angles between the lateral limbs and the central limb are 60 degrees. Re-approximation of the central defect at the skin level prior to designing the Z-plasty flaps has been noted to aid in constructing a more precise Z-plasty [23,24].
The angle of the Z-plasty flaps may vary, and the gain in length varies directly with the angle of the Z-plasty. The optimal angle has been determined to be 60 degrees, which has a theoretical gain in length of 75%. The angle may be greater than 60 degrees, but the tension required to transpose skin flaps increases as the angle of the Z-plasty increases such that angles greater than 75 degrees cause tissue distortion and dog-ear deformities. Angles less than 20 degrees present problems with flap viability secondary to compromised blood flow at the flap tips .
Long-term functional results of the congenital midline cervical cleft Z-plasty closure have been reported to be satisfactory with improvement in vertical neck movement. However, cosmetic results are more variable. Horizontal scars often remain thin but widening of the oblique limbs of the Z-plasty scar has been described [9,10].
Referral to an Otolaryngologist for surgical excision is indicated.
Further outpatient care
Postoperatively, patients should be monitored for appropriate healing after excision.
Untreated congenital midline cervical clefts cause cicatrical contracture and changes in the mandible, which include submental bony prominence, micrognathia, mandibular hypoplasia and mild cleft mandible all thought to be secondary to traction on growing mandibular bone.
Complications of surgical excision of congenital midline cervical clefts result from inadequate removal, damage to surrounding blood vessels and nerves, and inadequate closure leading to scar formation.
Following surgical excision of congenital midline cervical clefts, recurrence is uncommon.
Patients should be reassured that congenital midline cervical clefts are benign.
- Luschka H (1848) Veber fistula colli congenital. Arch. Physiol. Heil 7: 25.
- Bailey H (1924) Thyroglossal cysts and fistulae. Br J Surg 12: 579-589.
- Morton CB, Jordan HD (1935) Median cleft of lower lip and mandible, cleft sternum and absence of basihyoid. Arch Surg 30: 647-656
- Cosman B, Crikelair GF (1969) Midline branchiogenic syndromes. Plast Reconstr Surg 44: 41-48.
- Braithwaite F, Watson J (1949) A report on three unusual cleft lips. Br J Plast Surg 2: 38-49.
- Eastlack JP, Howard RM, Frieden IJ (2000) Congenital midline cervical cleft: Case report and review of the English language literature. Ped Derm17: 118-122.
- Gross RE (1953) Cysts, sinuses, and other anomalies of the branchial apparatus. In: Gross RE, ed. The surgery of infancy and childhood. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 947-959.
- Van Duyn J (1963) Congenital midline cervical cord with report of a case and a note on the etiology of congenital torticollis. Plast Reconstr Surg 31: 576-586.
- Gottleib E, Lewin ML (1966) Congenital midline cervical clefts of the neck. N Y State Med J 66: 712-718.
- van der Staak FH, Pruszczynski M, Severijnen RS, van de Kaa CA, Festen C (1991) The midline cervical cleft. J Pediatr Surg 26: 1391-1393.
- Gargan TJ, McKinnon M, Mulliken JB (1985) Midline cervical cleft. Plast Reconstr Surg 76: 225-229.
- Gross RE, Connerly ML (1940) Thyroglossal cysts and sinuses. N Engl J Med 223: 616-624.
- French WE, Bale GF (1973) Midline cervical cleft of the neck with associated branchial cyst. Am J Surg 125: 376-381.
- Wynn-Williams D (1952) Congenital midline cervical cleft and web. Br J Plast Surg 5: 87-93.
- Maddalozzo J, Frankel A, Holinger LD (1993) Midline cervical cleft. Pediatrics 92: 286-287.
- Derbez R, Nicollas R, Roman S, EstÃ¨ve A, Triglia JM (2004) Congenital midline cervical cleft of the neck: a series of five cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68: 1215-1219.
- Ikuzawa M, Matsumoto K, Amino K, Sakuda M (1992) Midline cervical cleft. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21: 258-259.
- Fincher SG, Fincher GG (1989) Congenital midline cervical cleft with subcutaneous fibrous cord. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101: 399-401.
- Andersen BL, Svendsen EP (1978) Midline cervical clefts. Case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 12: 169-170.
- ErÃ§Ã¶Ã§en AR, Yilmaz S, Aker H (2002) Congenital midline cervical cleft: case report and review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60: 580-585.
- Hudson DA (2000) Some thoughts on choosing a Z-plasty: the Z made simple. Plast Reconstr Surg 106: 665-671.
- Rohrich RJ, Zbar RI (1999) A simplified algorithm for the use of Z-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 103: 1513-1517.
- Daw JL Jr, Patel PK (2003) Double-opposing Z-plasty for correction of midline cervical web. J Craniofac Surg 14: 774-778.
- Bajaj Y, Dunaway D, Hartley BE (2004) Surgical approach for congenital midline cervical cleft. J Laryngol Otol 118: 566-569.
- Davis WE, Schrick RE, Templer J (1981) An introduction to Z-plasty. Ear Nose Throat J 60: 29-34.
Citation: Kakodkar K, Patel S, Maddalozzo J (2013) Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft. Otolaryngology 3:132. Doi: 10.4172/2161-119X.1000132
Copyright: © 2013 Kakodkar K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
Open Access Journals
- Total views: 12924
- [From(publication date): 6-2013 - Jan 22, 2022]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 8844
- PDF downloads: 4080