alexa Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Parkinsons Disease | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0460
Journal of Alzheimers Disease & Parkinsonism
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Parkinsons Disease

Paul J Tuite1*, Silvia Mangia2 and Shalom Michaeli2

1Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

2Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA

Corresponding Author:
Paul J Tuite, MD
Associate Professor, Director of Movement Disorders
Department of Neurology, MMC 295 420 Delaware ST SE
Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA
Tel: 612-625-9662
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: February 14, 2013; Accepted date: March 15, 2013; Published date: March 25, 2013

Citation: Tuite PJ, Mangia S, Michaeli S (2013) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Parkinson’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis S1:001. doi:10.4172/2161-0460.S1-001

Copyright: © 2013 Tuite PJ, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Alzheimers Disease & Parkinsonism

Abstract

Recent developments in brain imaging methods are on the verge of changing the evaluation of people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). This includes an assortment of techniques ranging from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to iron-sensitive methods such as T2 *, as well as adiabatic methods R1ρ and R2ρ, resting-state functional MRI, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Using a multi-modality approach that ascertains different aspects of the pathophysiology or pathology of PD, it may be possible to better characterize disease phenotypes as well as provide a surrogate of disease and a potential means to track disease progression.

Keywords

Adiabatic methods R and R; Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI); Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS); Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI); Relaxations along a Fictitious Field (RAFF); Resting-state MRI; Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI); T2*; Voxelbased morphometry (VBM)

Introduction

This brief review focuses on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of Parkinson’s disease (PD), which is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Approximately 1% of those over 65 years of age have PD [1]. While MRI is presently not able to directly image dopaminergic neuronal loss that underlies PD, it can provide complementary data to that obtained with nuclear tracer imaging. This article will review commonly available and research MRI methods that may provide an imaging measure of disease.

T2 and T2* Imaging

In the 1980s MRI imaging was first applied in PD, when several groups focused on demonstrating the presence of increased iron in the substantia nigra of individuals with PD [2]. This was followed by Gorell et al. in 1995 who utilized T2 and T2* imaging of the substantia nigra and showed a separation between those with PD from control participants by using a change in relaxation time constants as a surrogate for increased iron in PD [3]. The focus on T2*, or its reciprocal R2*, has remained an important aspect of nigral imaging protocols, and an excellent demonstration of macroscopic nigral changes attributable to iron was shown by Cho et al. in their 7 Tesla (T) imaging study [4]. One crucial assumption about “iron” based imaging is that the methods reflect upon non-heme iron as opposed to heme-iron, and that while the small pool of free labile iron may be pathogenic - imaging methods are presently sensitive to the more prevalent bound iron that is stored as ferritin or neuromelanin [5]. Today MRI cannot determine if these iron changes arise from neuromelanin in dopaminergic neurons or ferritin in glia or neurons [6]. It is thought that the increased stores of bound-iron in PD as compared to iron accumulation with “normal” aging, may represent a source of additional free and pathogenic iron [5]. Other important issues to consider in iron imaging studies are dietary, environmental and gender factors, and some propose using serum ceruloplasmin along with brain imaging to address some of these confounds [7]. Finally, while iron changes are present in PD, validation of iron-based imaging as a surrogate of disease remains to be determined. Meanwhile iron-sensitive methods other than T2* have been developed, and remain to be validated and employed on a larger scale, and include adiabatic T and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) [8-14].

Susceptibility-weighted Imaging (SWI)

SWI methods exploit the differences in magnetic susceptibility between tissues, and are available on clinical MRI platforms. Using gradient echo (GRE) pulse sequences with long echo time (TE), SWI provides enhanced image contrast for detecting susceptibility variations when combining magnitude and phase data. Specifically, the local field variations are the source of local phase differences in the MRI signal. Phase variations contain both microscopic and macroscopic effects. The phase variations due to microscopic effects mainly originate from local iron deposits whereas the macroscopic effects can be attributed to geometry effects or air/tissue interfaces. Complicated tissue geometries such as capillary beds, interstitial spaces, large and small vessels, etc., distort the local field homogeneity and thus induce signal variations. In fact, induced susceptibility differences depend not only on the geometry of such structures, but also on their orientations with respect to the external magnetic field.

SWI is also sensitive to the presence of deoxygenated blood, ferritin, calcium, iron as well as transition metals such as Mn2+ or Cu2+. However, due to the low concentrations of most of the aforementioned substances, disruption of magnetic field homogeneity and the resultant signal loss can be attributed mainly to iron. Accordingly, quantification of SWI measures can be used as a marker for iron content. The information on the presence of iron in tissue has a tremendous importance for neurological disorders, especially PD. Notably, SWI has exquisite capability to highlight anatomical structures which contain iron [15]. As depicted in figures 1 and 2, SWI imaging at 7T shows excellent visualization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgical targets and thereby may aid in lead placement for patients undergoing DBS surgery [10-14].

Figure

Figure 1: Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) acquired at a high-field (7T) MRI. Image resolutions 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.8 mm3. The axial image at the levels of the substantia nigra (SN) level. Images courtesy of Dr. Noam Harel, University of Minnesota.

Figure

Figure 2: Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) acquired at a high-field (7T) MRI. Image resolutions 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.8 mm3. Coronal view shows a clear delineation between the subthalamic nucleus (STN) (higher arrow) and the substantia nigra (lower arrow). Images courtesy of Dr. Noam Harel, University of Minnesota.

Magnetization Transfer Imaging (MTI)

Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) utilizes the transfer of magnetization between free water protons and protons associated with macromolecules which provides information about tissue integrity [16]. The detection of the magnetization transfer (MT) effect in clinical practice is usually limited to the measurement of MT ratios (MTRs), i.e. ratios of signal intensity measured with and without the off resonance saturation pulse [16]. One group has shown the utility of MTR in PD while others have shown its value in atypical parkinsonian conditions [17-21]. In contrast to MTR we have developed an easy-to-implement quantitative magnetization transfer (MT) method to estimate magnetization transfer parameters, which relies on an inversionprepared MT protocol [22]. Using the inversion-prepared MT protocol together with adiabatic T we evaluated the integrity of the brainstem structures of PD [23]. Results from this study will be discussed in the

Adiabatic Rotating Frame Relaxation Methods

Conventionally, MRI contrast is generated by the tissue variation of longitudinal (time constant, T1) and/or transverse (time constant, T2) relaxation of the 1H2O MR signals. These time constants are measured in the laboratory frame, in which the direction of the main magnetic field defines the longitudinal or Z axis. The free precession relaxation rate constant (R1≡1/T1) is sensitive to magnetic fluctuations that occur as a result of molecular motion near the Larmor precession frequency (ω0) which falls in the MHz range. However, there is reason to also probe lower frequencies of the non-homogeneously broadened line of tissue (i.e., in the kHz range) in order to evaluate for pathology. Rotating frame relaxation rate constants, R and R, characterize relaxation during radiofrequency (RF) irradiation when the magnetization vector is aligned along or perpendicular to the direction of the effective magnetic field (ωeff), respectively.

Rotating frame relaxation constants can be measured during the application of adiabatic pulses [24]. In this case, the adiabatic R(t) and R(t) are time-dependent longitudinal and transverse relaxation rate constants, which characterize decay of magnetization during application of RF pulses operating in the adiabatic regime. As a result, adiabatic R (≡1/ T) and R (≡1/ T) provide novel tissue MRI contrast. The R and R measured during adiabatic pulses were demonstrated to be sensitive to neural integrity and iron accumulation, respectively [8,9,25,26]. In a validation study of a aphakia mouse model, T separated aphakia versus wild-type mice in the substantia nigra compacta (SNc) where there is a congenital absence of dopaminergic neurons [25]. In studies of PD patients and healthy controls, adiabatic methods are able to detect midbrain changes in PD [8,9]. Additional work has shown that adiabatic methods demonstrate midbrain and medullary changes in PD as compared to controls [23]. In Figure 3, the representative R and R1sat maps from contrzol (top) and PD (bottom) subjects are shown. The differences between the R values measured from a rostral region used as internal control per each subject (here identified by region of interest, ROI-1) minus the R values measured from medullary nuclei (i.e., ROI-5 and ROI-1 vs. ROI-6) were altered in patients relative to control subjects (p=0.004 and p=0.033, respectively). Differences in R values were 6 and 8 times larger in patients than in controls when comparing ROI-1 vs. ROI-5 and ROI-1 vs. ROI-6, respectively. Since R values in ROI-1 were not different between patients and controls (p=0.25), these findings represent a change in imaging parameters from areas that contain medullary nuclei that are known to be affected in PD. Interestingly, no statistical differences were observed between patients and controls when considering R1sat. This was attributed to differential sensitivity to the exchange regime between T and T1sat [22]. Together, the findings of this study might indicate changes in fundamental tissue MR parameters that occur prior to neuronal death within the medullary nuclei.

Figure

Figure 3: Rotating frame R1ρ maps (middle column), MT rate maps (R1sat) (right column), with relative T2-weighted (T2w) images (left column) from representative control subject (top row) and PD patient (bottom row). Regions of interest (ROIs) – as depicted on T2w images – were obtained in maps from six areas: (1) medial raphe nucleus; (2) dorsal raphe nucleus; (3) nucleus raphe pontis; (4) nucleus raphe magnus; (5) nucleus raphe pallidus; (6) nucleus raphe obscuris [23].

Relaxations along a Fictitious Field (RAFF)

A potential limitation to the widespread exploitation of rotating frame relaxation in PD is the required RF power delivered to the sample (i.e., specific absorption rate- SAR), which can result in tissue heating. However, RF power can sometimes be reduced by using off-resonance irradiation to create the locking field, Beff [27,28]. Recently colleagues at the Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR) have developed a novel rotating frame relaxation experiment called Relaxation along a Fictitious Field (RAFF), which comprises T and T mechanisms by exploiting relaxation in a second rotating frame. RAFF was able to provide a greater contrast in tissues of the SN as compared to T and T, and specifically it was better than all other methods in separating the SN into its various subregions, i.e. the pars compacta from pars reticulata [29]. Additional studies are warranted to sort out its utility.

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides structural data based on directionally restrained diffusion of water (anisotropy) within fiber tracts. Pathology disturbs the natural state of anisotropy and this can be exploited with DTI imaging. Specifically, the loss of restriction of water movement within damaged fiber bundles results in reduced anisotropy, which is characterized as a reduction in fractional anisotropy (FA). One group has shown changes in mean diffusivity in a cohort of individuals with RBD, a possible precursor to PD [30]. DTI has its limitations in determining directional and spatial anisotropy; hence some researchers have used probabilistic and streamline tractography that address these challenges.

Resting-state MRI

The focus of resting-state MRI is on brain activity that occurs in the absence of externally triggered activity. Even in a “resting state” there are physiological variations in brain activity and accompanying blood flow alterations that manifest as fluctuations in the MRI blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal. Spontaneous correlations in BOLD signal can be utilized to determine the “functional connectivity” between different regions. There have been a number of studies in PD that have shown alterations in sensorimotor circuitry and integration that accompanies motor and non-motor symptoms [31-36]. Measurement of fluctuation can be done using methods such as the amplitude of low frequency fluctuation or ALFF to assess for an index of resting-state brain activity based on the blood flow variability [35]. Resting-state methods allow for the determination of spontaneously occurring brain networks, which may distinguish PD from controls; however, in one study 1/3 of those with PD and 1/5 of controls had unusable data due to motion artifact, which may be partially due for the need to assess subjects when they had been off medications for at least 12 hours [35]. Hence while resting-state fMRI methods are able to provide a rapid and whole brain view of PD additional studies are needed to determine its role in understanding clinical subtypes and features of PD.

In vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)

MRS has been limited due to low sensitivity of methods and the low concentrations of metabolites of interest. High field MRS (Figure 4) with its greater sensitivity has overcome some limitations as shown by Emir et al. who demonstrated the ability to measure absolute concentrations of neurochemicals within the substantia nigra and other brainstem regions [37].

Figure

Figure 4: GABA concentrations in pons and putamen in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and controls; together with means (boxes) and standard deviations (error bars) [37].

Meanwhile, MRS imaging (MRSI) can measure cerebral metabolic rates of oxygen (CMRO2) and ATP (CMRATP) and to correlate neuroenergetics with specific brain functions. CMRO2 measurements are achieved using inhaled 17O2 gas which is ultimately incorporated into labeled water (H217O) in brain tissue, which is detectable by in vivo 17O MRS [38,39]. This method allows the determination of the role of oxygen metabolism in normal brain function and disease to complement functional MRI studies that utilize the BOLD contrast and are sensitive to cerebral blood flow.

Another important development includes in vivo 31P MRSI which generates measurements of intracellular pH, metabolites of ATP, ADP and phosphocreatine (PCr), among others [39]. The combination of MRSI and magnetization transfer imaging allows for the measurement of ATP metabolic rate (CMRATP), and hence oxidative phosphorylation, a measure of cerebral mitochondrial function. This may prove useful in PD, in which mitochondrial dysfunction is thought to play a key role.

Detection of Structural Changes

Starting from in the early 1990s, researchers have attempted at evaluating structural changes in brain regions critical to PD as revealed by various MRI anatomical methods. For instance, based on T2-weighted images, nigral ROIs of PD were compared with those of control subjects, and reduction of the size of nigral regions was observed in PD patients [40]. More recently “un-biased” methods such as voxel-based morphometry (VBM) have been used that don’t focus on a specific ROI. With VBM there is standardization of data and then voxel-by-voxel comparison between group data to evaluate for differences in signal intensity. VBM methods usually utilize 1.5 or 3T T1 anatomical data, which may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect structural changes in PD until there is substantial disease progression and the presence of accompanying dementia [41,42]. However, one group has shown that VBM may be able to detect brainstem changes in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavioral (iRBD) – suggesting its use early in the disease process as RBD may represent a precursor to PD [43].

Clinical Applications

MRI methods are making their way into the clinic by aiding the neurosurgeon in planning deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery [43]. Secondly, multi-modality approaches may increase sensitivity to disease states, as shown for example in the combination of structural and iron sensitive imaging [44,45]. It is hoped that cross-sectional and longitudinal studies will provide insights about the ability of such methods to provide a correlate to disease severity and progression.

Acknowledgements

NIH grant R01NS061866 (Dr. Michaeli), R21NS059813 (Dr. Michaeli), NIH grant KL2 RR033182 to the University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Dr. Mangia). Additional CMRR funding is from P41 RR008079, P41 EB015894, P30 NS057091, S10 RR023730 and S10 RR027290, and from Minnesota Medical Foundation (Dr. Tuite).

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12169
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2013 - Dec 14, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8344
  • PDF downloads : 3825
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

agriaq[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version