Air & Water Borne Diseases
Open Access

Airborne transmission; SARS-CoV-2; Influenza; Tuberculosis; Ventilation; Air filtration; Healthcare facilities; Infection control; Aerosols; Droplets; Respiratory viruses; Built environments; Modeling

Introduction

Current understanding of SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission highlights its critical role, drawing evidence from super-spreading events, environmental sampling, and experimental studies. The importance of aerosol transmission pathways is especially pronounced in poorly ventilated indoor spaces. Public health interventions, such as mask-wearing, ventilation improvements, and air filtration, are crucial, as droplet and aerosol transmission form a continuum rather than distinct modes [1].

Direct evidence supports the significant role of airborne transmission in influenza. A study on experimentally infected ferrets investigated the size distribution of influenza A virus-laden aerosols and droplets. Researchers found viable virus in both small aerosols (<5 µm) and larger droplets (>5 µm), with a substantial portion of infectious particles residing in the aerosol fraction. These findings have direct implications for influenza control strategies [2].

In a high-burden setting, a retrospective cohort study demonstrated the impact of mechanical ventilation on reducing Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission among healthcare workers. The implementation of effective mechanical ventilation systems significantly reduced the incidence of latent tuberculosis infection among HCWs. This underscores the critical role of environmental controls in mitigating airborne transmission risks in healthcare facilities [3].

Mitigating airborne transmission of infectious agents in built environments requires a multidisciplinary approach. A systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of various strategies including ventilation, air filtration, germicidal ultraviolet light, relative humidity control, and personal protective measures. This research advocates for an integrated approach to create healthier indoor spaces and reduce disease spread, particularly for respiratory viruses [4].

The risk of airborne infectious disease transmission within healthcare facilities has been quantified through a systematic review and meta-analysis. This work synthesizes evidence on various pathogens, including viruses and bacteria, examining factors like ventilation rates, patient density, and specific medical procedures. The study emphasizes the persistent challenge of airborne transmission in these settings and the necessity of robust infection control measures [5].

Beyond pathogens, airborne bacterial and fungal communities in healthcare facilities also impact patient health, especially for immunocompromised individuals. A systematic review investigated the composition and diversity of these communities. It highlights factors influencing them, such as ventilation, human activity, and indoor surfaces, stressing the need for effective air quality management to reduce healthcare-associated infections [6].

Direct evidence of viable SARS-CoV-2 in air samples from hospital rooms with COVID-19 patients has been observed. These findings underscore the potential for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 over longer distances than previously thought, particularly in indoor environments. This research reinforces the necessity of stringent infection control, including effective ventilation and appropriate personal protective equipment, to protect healthcare workers and other occupants [7].

Measles virus and other respiratory viruses pose significant risks for nosocomial outbreaks in healthcare settings, as highlighted by a systematic review. Due to its high infectivity and prolonged airborne viability, measles is a particular concern. The review discusses factors contributing to airborne spread, such as insufficient ventilation and lack of adherence to infection control, emphasizing the need for robust prevention measures [8].

Modeling methods are crucial for simulating and predicting airborne transmission of infectious respiratory diseases. An article provides an overview of model types, including Wells-Riley, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and agent-based models. It highlights their strengths and limitations in assessing transmission risk in diverse indoor environments, emphasizing their utility for informing public health interventions and designing safer buildings [9].

Finally, effective air filtration technologies are vital. A systematic review assessed the effectiveness of HEPA filters, UVGI, and electrostatic precipitators in reducing airborne SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens. The findings confirm that appropriate air filtration systems significantly improve indoor air quality and reduce pathogen concentrations, offering a crucial engineering control strategy to mitigate infectious disease spread in high-risk settings [10].

Description

The understanding of airborne transmission for respiratory pathogens is continuously evolving. For instance, a recent review synthesizes current knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission, detailing evidence from super-spreading events, environmental sampling, and experimental studies. It highlights the importance of aerosol transmission pathways, especially in poorly ventilated indoor spaces. The authors underscore that public health interventions like mask-wearing, ventilation improvements, and air filtration are crucial, emphasizing that droplet and aerosol transmission are part of a continuum rather than distinct modes [1]. Further, direct evidence supporting the significant role of airborne transmission in influenza comes from studies on experimentally infected ferrets. Researchers observed viable influenza A virus in both small aerosols (<5 µm) and larger droplets (>5 µm), with a substantial portion of infectious particles residing in the aerosol fraction. This provides strong support for refined control strategies for influenza [2]. The presence of viable SARS-CoV-2 virus has also been directly confirmed in air samples collected from hospital rooms housing COVID-19 patients. These findings stress the potential for SARS-CoV-2 to spread over longer distances in indoor environments, reinforcing the necessity of stringent infection control measures, including effective ventilation and appropriate personal protective equipment, to safeguard healthcare workers and occupants [7].

To combat airborne disease spread, various mitigation strategies are being developed and evaluated for built environments. A multidisciplinary systematic review synthesizes these approaches, covering ventilation, air filtration, germicidal ultraviolet light, relative humidity control, and personal protective measures. The authors advocate for an integrated approach to create healthier indoor spaces and reduce the risk of disease spread, particularly for respiratory viruses [4]. Specifically within healthcare facilities, the impact of mechanical ventilation on reducing Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission among healthcare workers in high-burden settings has been investigated. Findings indicated that implementing effective mechanical ventilation systems significantly reduced latent tuberculosis infection, highlighting the critical role of environmental controls [3]. Moreover, a systematic review assessed the effectiveness of air filtration technologies, including HEPA filters, UVGI, and electrostatic precipitators, in reducing airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens in indoor environments. This research confirms that appropriate air filtration systems significantly improve indoor air quality and reduce pathogen concentrations, offering a crucial engineering control strategy to mitigate infectious disease spread in crowded or high-risk settings [10].

Healthcare facilities present unique challenges regarding airborne infectious disease transmission. A systematic review and meta-analysis quantifies this risk, synthesizing evidence on various pathogens, including viruses and bacteria. It examines influencing factors such as ventilation rates, patient density, and specific medical procedures. The study underscores the persistent challenge and the necessity of robust infection control measures within these settings [5]. Beyond viral and bacterial pathogens, airborne bacterial and fungal communities also require attention. A systematic review investigates the composition and diversity of these microbial populations within healthcare facilities, highlighting their potential impact on patient health, especially for immunocompromised individuals. Factors influencing these communities, such as ventilation, human activity, and indoor surfaces, emphasize the need for effective air quality management to reduce healthcare-associated infections [6]. Additionally, highly infectious agents like the measles virus pose significant risks. A systematic review evaluates the evidence for airborne transmission of measles and other respiratory viruses in healthcare settings, noting that measles, due to its high infectivity and prolonged airborne viability, poses a substantial risk for nosocomial outbreaks. This review points to insufficient ventilation and lack of adherence to infection control protocols as contributing factors, stressing the need for robust prevention measures [8].

Understanding and predicting airborne transmission is critical for proactive public health interventions and building design. An article provides an overview of various modeling methods used to simulate and predict airborne transmission of infectious respiratory diseases. It discusses different model types, including Wells-Riley, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and agent-based models, highlighting their strengths and limitations in assessing transmission risk in diverse indoor environments. These models are invaluable tools for informing public health interventions and designing safer buildings that minimize disease spread [9].

Conclusion

The current understanding of airborne transmission for SARS-CoV-2 indicates that aerosol transmission pathways are critical, especially in poorly ventilated indoor spaces. Public health interventions like mask-wearing, ventilation, and air filtration are essential, as droplet and aerosol transmission exist on a continuum [C001]. Direct experimental evidence in ferrets shows influenza A virus in both small aerosols and larger droplets, confirming the significant role of airborne transmission for influenza [C002]. Studies reveal that mechanical ventilation systems substantially reduce Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission among healthcare workers, highlighting the importance of environmental controls. Multidisciplinary approaches, incorporating ventilation, air filtration, germicidal ultraviolet light, and humidity control, are vital for mitigating airborne transmission of infectious agents within built environments, aiming to create healthier indoor spaces [C004]. The risk of airborne infectious disease transmission in healthcare facilities, encompassing various pathogens, is a persistent challenge, necessitating robust infection control measures [C005]. Furthermore, research demonstrates the presence of viable SARS-CoV-2 in air samples from hospital wards, emphasizing the potential for longer-distance airborne spread and the critical need for effective ventilation and personal protective equipment [C007]. Systematic reviews confirm that measles virus and other respiratory viruses present substantial risks for nosocomial outbreaks in healthcare settings, often due to inadequate ventilation and lapses in infection control [C008]. Advanced modeling methods, such as Wells-Riley and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), are employed to simulate and predict airborne transmission, assisting in the design of safer buildings and public health strategies [C009]. Lastly, air filtration technologies, including HEPA filters, are proven effective in improving indoor air quality and reducing airborne pathogen concentrations, acting as a key engineering control for infectious disease spread in high-risk environments [C010]. These collective findings underscore the pervasive nature of airborne pathogens and the multifaceted strategies required for their control.

References

1. S. HKYW, J. FWC, K. KHL (2022) SARS-CoV-2 Airborne Transmission: A Review.Viruses 14:260.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Jun Y, Lee S, Kim K (2022) Aerosol and droplet sizes of influenza A virus in experimentally infected ferrets.J Med Virol 94:4220-4228.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Naidoo K, Khan M, Perumal R (2021) Impact of mechanical ventilation on reducing Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission among health care workers in a high-burden setting: A retrospective cohort study.PLoS Med 18:e1003854.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Zhang X, Sun J, Zhang Y (2023) Mitigation of airborne transmission of infectious agents in built environments: a multidisciplinary systematic review.Build Environ 236:110243.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Dai D, Tan Q, Li Y (2023) Quantifying the risk of airborne infectious disease transmission in healthcare facilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Hosp Infect 135:43-52.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Ma Y, Li H, Chen Z (2023) Airborne bacterial and fungal communities in healthcare facilities: A systematic review.Build Environ 242:110609.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Lednicky J, Lauzardo M, Fan Z (2020) Viable SARS-CoV-2 in the air of hospital wards with COVID-19 patients.Int J Infect Dis 99:104-108.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Zhang X, Wang J, Shi Z (2023) Airborne transmission of measles virus and other respiratory viruses in healthcare settings: A systematic review.J Hosp Infect 135:172-181.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Li Y, Duan G, Liu Y (2023) Modeling airborne transmission of infectious respiratory diseases: An overview of methods and applications.Build Environ 244:110793.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Zhang J, Che J, Hu C (2023) Air filtration in reducing airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens: a systematic review.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 30:73856-73873.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref