alexa Can We Balance Profit, Production and Pollution when Feeding Livestock? | OMICS International
Archives of Science
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Can We Balance Profit, Production and Pollution when Feeding Livestock?

Bell M*

School of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, UK

Corresponding Author:
Matt bell
School of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham
Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK
Tel: 0115 951 6056
Fax: 0115 951 6060
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: October 10, 2016; Accepted Date: October 31, 2016; Published Date: November 07, 2016

Citation: Bell M (2016) Can We Balance Profit, Production and Pollution when Feeding Livestock? Arch Sci 1:e101.

Copyright: © 2016 Bell M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Archives of Science

Editorial

Livestock systems are typically managed to provide a least-cost ration balancing energy, protein, minerals, and vitamins in the diet according to the estimated requirements of the average animal. Optimizing the utilization of available food and its quality is important to the profitability of any production system, as well as helping to minimize the proportion of nutrients consumed by the animal that are lost to the environment. For a dairy cow, 35% of energy consumed in the diet can be lost in the form of enteric methane, faeces or urine and 77% of nitrogen consumed can be excreted in faeces or urine. Furthermore, poor quality food can impair the production and wellbeing of the animal which leads to an inability to achieve desired intakes of food, therefore resulting in increased land required and reduced nutrient efficiency.

While large areas of grassland worldwide offer an affordable and appropriate food source for ruminant livestock, pasture-based livestock systems are more vulnerable to variable forage quality due to changes in biotic and abiotic factors than those using blended concentrate feed, or even conserved forages such as grass silage. High input livestock systems have increasingly become reliant on high energy dense diets that include concentrates to allow high genetic merit animals to reach their production potential. Concentrate feeds typically have a more reliable content than forage, but are more costly and vulnerable to changes in market price (depending on ingredients used such as wheat, soya and barley). Also, bought-in concentrate feed has a higher carbon footprint than home-grown forage, which can also be said for commodities such as purchased synthetic fertilizer and dietary additives. Given that feed costs associated with a production system can be as much as 70% of variable costs, particularly if reliant on high inputs of concentrates, matching the amount and quality of home-grown feeds and bought-in feeds with an animal’s production requirements is important to the viability of the farm business. Market forces influence the characterization of livestock systems and feed use, which impact on land use requirements for animal food. Changes in the market also contribute to a conflict between humans and animals for cereal products, which with an ever-increasing global demand for both human edible cereal products and animal feed the allocation of resources becomes more paramount. It makes sense that it is more efficient to utilize crops that are suitable for human consumption directly rather than as a livestock product. Gill et al. found that high inputs of cereals in US monogastric and dairy systems had brought high and efficient production, but these systems were not net contributors of food for human consumption. In the case of sheep and cattle fed predominantly forage or by-products, these systems can be more, or as efficient, as monogastric systems in terms of converting non-human-edible food into products, particularly when comparing systems on energy and protein utilization.

Therefore, the challenge to society, scientists and farmers is to improve efficiency of plant and animal production by better matching available and appropriate resources to requirements, to optimize profit, production and minimize pollution (from waste) and reliance on human-edible foods in livestock diets.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Journals

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 254
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2017 - Dec 18, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 197
  • PDF downloads : 57
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version