alexa
Reach Us +3228082557
Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate Interaction and Chitosan Coating for Enhanced UV Detection Sensitivity of Colloidal Nanoparticles in Capillary Electrophoresis Analysis
ISSN: 2155-9872
Journal of Analytical & Bioanalytical Techniques

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate Interaction and Chitosan Coating for Enhanced UV Detection Sensitivity of Colloidal Nanoparticles in Capillary Electrophoresis Analysis

Samar Alsudir and Edward PC Lai*

Department of Chemistry, Ottawa-Carleton Chemistry Institute,Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada

*Corresponding Author:
Edward PC Lai
Ottawa-Carleton Chemistry Institute,Carleton University, Ottawa
ON K1S 5B6, Canada
Tel: +613-520-2600
Fax: +613-520-3749
Email: [email protected]

Received date: April 08, 2015; Accepted date: April 28, 2015; Published date: May 05, 2015

Citation: Alsudir S, Lai EPC (2015) Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate Interaction and Chitosan Coating for Enhanced UV Detection Sensitivity of Colloidal Nanoparticles in Capillary Electrophoresis Analysis. J Anal Bioanal Tech 6:242. doi: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000242

Copyright: © 2015 Alsudir S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Analytical & Bioanalytical Techniques

Abstract

The binding interactions between silica (SiO2), titania (TiO2) or polymeric nanoparticles with hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA) were investigated for enhancing the ultraviolet (UV) detection sensitivity of these nanoparticles in capillary electrophoresis (CE) analysis. HPMA interacted with colloidal SiO2 nanoparticles, producing a larger CE-UV peak at a slightly shorter migration time. An increase in particle size with HPMA binding was validated using dynamic light scattering. The interaction was selective as HPMA did not interact with TiO2 nanoparticles in aqueous suspension. Chitosan coating of SiO2 or TiO2 nanoparticles produced significantly larger hydrodynamic diameters to further enhance the sensitivity of their UV detection. The analytical technique, which involves coating SiO2 nanoparticles with chitosan first and binding with HPMA next, is novel. It has allowed us to achieve a significant enhancement of 50 folds in detection sensitivity.

Keywords

Capillary electrophoresis; Chitosan; Colloid; Dynamic light scattering; Hydroxypropyl methacrylate; Nanoparticles; Polymer; Silica; Titania

Introduction

The growing use of inorganic oxide nanoparticles (NPs) [1-3], due to their novel properties and high biochemical reactivity [4], has led to unintended release of significant amounts of these NPs into the water cycle through industrial and household wastewater effluents [5-7]. The removal of NPs from water effluents varies in efficiency from 70% to 94% [8]. Their toxicity, especially to humans [9-11], arises from a number of biophysicochemical factors including their aggregation, chemical composition, concentration, dissolution, exposure routes, particle size, nanostructure, quantum effects, and self-assembly [12,13]. Uncertainties on their persistence in the water cycle have raised many concerns and provide the impetus to develop analytical techniques with high sensitivity to detect and quantify these NPs. Contemporary NPs quantification methods (such as laser induced break down detection [14], small angle neutron scattering [15], and fluorescent correlation spectroscopy [16] rely upon sophisticated instrumentation and a skilled analyst, making such approaches impractical for regular environmental monitoring.

Different chemistry-based encapsulation processes have been developed and showed promising results [17]. The growth of NPs in solution is complicated by several factors including changes in pH as well as interactions with ions and surfactants [18]. Either covalent attachment of end-functionalized polymers to the surface or in situ polymerization of monomers using immobilized initiator seems to be versatile [19] and [20]. Our novel approach is based on the controlled coating of NPs with a thick layer of polymer to grow them into a larger size for strong UV light absorption. The polymer coating also helps with the stabilization of NPs in aqueous suspension. These grown NPs can be separated by capillary electrophoresis (CE) due to differences in electrophoretic mobility, depending on their electronic charge, size, and surface functionality. A first coating of silica (SiO2) NPs with polyhydroxypropyl methacrylate (PHPMA) was successfully developed in our laboratory to enhance the ultraviolet (UV) detection sensitivity by 6 folds during CE analysis [21]. A second coating with polydopamine (PDA) produced an extra 2-fold increase of the UV detection sensitivity to attain a total enhancement of 12 folds in detection sensitivity.

The goal of this study was to explore other coating materials that could further improve the CE-UV detection sensitivity for inorganic oxide nanoparticles (SiO2 and TiO2) in aqueous suspension. Investigation started with the binding interaction between these nanoparticles and HPMA, followed by coating with chitosan to produce larger diameters for enhanced UV detection sensitivities. Their hydrodynamic diameters were measured by dynamic light scattering and their ionic charge states were determined by capillary electrophoresis.

Materials and Methods

Instrumentation

CE-UV analyses were performed on a laboratory built system, which includes a Spellman CZE1000R high-voltage power supply (Hauppauge, New York, USA). Fused-silica capillary (51 mm i.d., 356 mm o.d.) was obtained from Polymicro Technologies (Phoenix, AZ, USA). The background electrolyte (BGE) was composed of 10 mM Na2HPO4 in deionized distilled water (DDW) to attain pH 7.5 ± 0.2. Electrokinetic injection at 17 kV for 1.2 s, 3 s or 12 s was employed to load the sample into the capillary for CE analysis. All CE analyses were run at an applied voltage of 20 kV. A Bischoff Lambda 1010 (Leonberg, Germany) UV detector was set at a wavelength of 190 nm to determine the migration times of nanoparticles. A Peak Simple chromatography data system (SRI model 203, Torrance, CA, USA) was used to acquire the detector output signal. The separated chemical compounds and/ or nanoparticles were recorded in the electropherogram as peaks (represented by a blue line) with different migration times. Their peak areas above the baseline (represented by a pink line) were determined using a numerical integration algorithm.

The average diameters of SiO2, TiO2 and polymeric nanoparticles, before and after HPMA-binding or chitosan-coating, were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Brookhaven Instruments nanoDLS particle size analyzer (Holtsville, NY, USA). Ten replicate measurements of 10 s each were performed to ensure high accuracy.

Reagents and materials

Chitosan (medium molecular weight of 190,000-310,000, deacetylation degree of 75-85%), 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA, 97%), mesityl oxide (MO, ≥ 90%), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, ≥ 99%), LUDOX® colloidal silica (SiO2, 30% wt suspension in H2O, with a surface area of 198-250 m2/g) and titanium oxide nanopowder (TiO2, 21 nm) were all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). 2,2′-azobis-2-isobutyronitrile (AIBN) was bought from Pfaltz & Bauer (Waterbury, CT, USA).

HPMA binding interaction with colloidal SiO2 or TiO2 nanoparticles

To investigate the binding interaction between HPMA and colloidal SiO2 or TiO2 nanoparticles, HPMA (3 ml) was first dissolved in DDW (25 ml) containing colloidal SiO2 or TiO2 nanoparticles (20 mg/ml). Next, SDS (1.7 wt% of HPMA) was added and then the mixture was sonicated for 5 min to ensure homogeneity. Finally, the vial was placed in a 60C thermostatted water bath for 22 h to facilitate the binding interaction between HPMA and colloidal SiO2 or TiO2 nanoparticles. Percent binding of HPMA to SiO2 or TiO2 NPs was calculated as [(HPMA peak area before binding – HPMA peak area after binding)/ HPMA peak area before binding] × 100% [22].

HPMA binding interaction with polymeric nanoparticles

A suspension of chitosan (1 wt%) in 1% acetic acid was prepared following a procedure reported by Shuai et al. [23]. The mixture was stirred magnetically for 3 h to obtain a homogeneous suspension. Then the chitosan suspension (1 ml) was added to 10 mM Na2HPO4 BGE (30 ml) containing colloidal SiO2 or TiO2 nanoparticles at varying concentrations (0-20 g/L), followed by magnetic stirring for 22 h. Addition of SDS (0.06 g) helped disperse the chitosan-coated particles to prevent precipitation. After addition of HPMA (0.03%, 0.05% or 0.1% v/v) to the chitosan-coated particles, the vial was placed in a 60°C thermostatted water bath for 22 h under continuous magnetic stirring.

Results and Discussion

CE-UV characterization of silica and titania nanoparticles

Growing interest in the development of nanocomposites consisting of TiO2 and SiO2 NPs has led to the release of these NPs in significant amounts to the water cycle, threating both humans and aquatic ecosystems. Cytotoxicity arises from the oxidative damage of these NPs owing to the production of reactive oxygen species. Moreover, TiO2 NPs can further damage cells due to photocatalysis-enhanced oxidation upon exposure to light or UV radiation. Wastewater treatment plants and filters are often poorly suited to efficiently remove these NPs [24]. LUDOX® AM colloidal SiO2 nanoparticles [25] do not settle and cannot be separated out by ordinary filtering or centrifuging like those in a suspension. In our work, an aliquot was spiked into the BGE that was loaded into the capillary by electrokinetic injection for CE-UV analysis. As shown in Figure 1a, 20 g/L of SiO2 NPs exhibited low UV absorbance at the detection wavelength of 190 nm, producing a small peak at the migration time of 8.7 ± 0.1 min. The SiO2 NPs appeared after the neutral marker, indicating their negative ionic charges (probably as SiO42-) in the BGE and hence yielding a negative electrophoretic mobility value.

analytical-bioanalytical-techniques-characterization-nanoparticles-SDS

Figure 1: CE-UV characterization of (a) SiO2 (20 g/L) and (b) TiO2 (20 g/L) nanoparticles. SDS was present at a concentration of 2 mg/ml.

On the contrary, 20 g/L of TiO2 NPs showed high UV absorbance at 190 nm, producing a large peak at the migration time of 8.4 ± 0.1 min, as shown in Figure 1b. Similar to SiO2, TiO2 NPs migrated after the neutral marker, which indicates their negative ionic charges in the BGE and therefore yielding a negative electrophoretic mobility value.

HPMA binding interaction with silica and titania nanoparticles

Binding interaction of HPMA with SiO2 NPs was conducted at 60°C for 22 hours. The resultant SiO2-HPMA particles were analyzed by CE-UV to determine their electrophoretic mobility. As shown in Figure 2, a new peak for HPMA-bound SiO2 particles was detected at a migration time of 8.2 ± 0.1 min. These particles exhibited larger peak height and peak area than the original SiO2 NPs (Figure 1a). Apparently, the SiO2 NPs bound to HPMA to have their Si-O- groups buried under the surface, thus resulting in faster migration than SiO2 NPs (at 8.7 ± 0.1 min) with good separation from HPMA (at 4.0 ± 0.1 min). HPMA binding to SiO2 NPs was determined to be 19 ± 3%. Binding interaction of HPMA with TiO2 NPs was next conducted at 60°C for 22 hours. CE-UV analysis of the mixture showed no sign of interaction between HPMA and TiO2 NPs as no significant change was observed for the TiO2 peak shape or its migration time. Correspondingly, HPMA binding to TiO2 NPs was determined to be 0 ± 5 %. The oxygen atom of HPMA carbonyl group could interact with the Si atom of SiO2 but not with the Ti atom of TiO2. The difference between their interactions was likely due to the chemical properties of SiO2 and TiO2 NPs. Inorganic chemistry is highly dependent on the element; Si is a semiconductor and Ti is a metal.

analytical-bioanalytical-techniques-CE-UV-characterization-nanoparticles

Figure 2: CE-UV characterization of SiO2 (20 g/L) nanoparticles with 3.0 ml of HPMA. SDS was present at a concentration of 2 mg/ml.

Dynamic light scattering analysis of silica and titania nanoparticles

SiO2 and TiO2 NPs in aqueous suspension, as well as their mixtures with HPMA, were analyzed by DLS to determine their hydrodynamic diameters. In DLS analysis, multiple scattering (where light scattered from one particle is scattered from a second particle before reaching the detector) occurs to give the size distribution as particles undergo Brownian motion caused by thermally induced collisions between the suspended particles and solvent molecules. As shown in Figures 3a and 3b, the mean diameters of 53 ± 3 nm and 83 ± 13 nm were obtained for SiO2 NPs and HPMA-bound SiO2 particles, respectively. These results provide strong evidence that SiO2 NPs became larger in size after interaction with HPMA under very simple experimental conditions. The interaction offers more sensitive detection of SiO2 NPs (now in the form of HPMA-bound SiO2 particles) by CE-UV, with optional electrophoretic separation from organic compounds possibly found in water. Mean diameters of 155 ± 6 nm and 154 ± 5 nm were obtained for TiO2 NPs and their mixture with HPMA, respectively. DLS analysis confirmed that no interaction between TiO2 NPs and HPMA took place as no significant change in the hydrodynamic diameter was observed.

analytical-bioanalytical-techniques-Dynamic-scattering-lognormal

Figure 3: Dynamic light scattering measurements to determine the lognormal distribution of (a) SiO2 nanoparticles and (b) HPMA-bound SiO2 nanoparticles.

Selectivity of HPMA binding with SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles

HPMA selectively interacted with colloidal SiO2 NPs to produce a larger CE-UV peak at a slightly shorter migration time. It did not interact with TiO2 NPs in aqueous suspension, resulting in no change of CE-UV peak area or migration time. This chemical method could allow us to analyze an aqueous sample containing the two kinds of nanoparticles, simply by adding HPMA and repeating the CE-UV analysis to observe any peak changes. A sample injection time of 3 s was used to maximize the resolution between different kinds of nanoparticles. Initially, SiO2 NPs (20 g/L) produced a small peak (at 9.4 ± 0.1 min) with substantial overlap with the TiO2 NPs (1 g/L) peak (at 8.6 ± 0.1 min). After 3 ml of HPMA were added, the HPMA-bound SiO2 NPs moved ahead to appear as a sharp peak (at 8.4 ± 0.1 min) that could be readily quantified on top of the TiO2 NPs peak (still at 8.6 ± 0.1 min). Thus the chemical method was proven to be capable of identifying SiO2 NPs and quantifying them with enhanced sensitivity.

Coating of silica and titania nanoparticles with chitosan

Coating of SiO2 NPs with chitosan was next investigated. A significant increase in hydrodynamic diameter, from 53 ± 3 nm for SiO2 particles to 513 ± 30 nm for chitosan-coated SiO2 particles (at 20 g/L) was observed, as shown in table 1. Electrostatic and hydrogen bonding interactions between chitosan amide groups and silanol groups enabled the encapsulation process [26]. The uniform suspension of chitosan-coated SiO2 particles did not precipitate upon dilution with a 10 mM KNO3 solution in water during the sample preparation for DLS analysis [27]. Analysis of chitosan-coated SiO2 particles by CE-UV failed badly because chitosan interacted with the capillary inner wall via electrostatic attraction, reducing the electroosmotic flow (EOF) down to zero. Similarly, coating of TiO2 NPs with chitosan produced chitosan-coated TiO2 NPs with a hydrodynamic diameter of 477 ± 11 nm, which is significantly larger than the 155 ± 6 nm for TiO2 NPs.

Particles Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm) HPMA Thickness (nm) Coating Thickness (nm) Polydispersity Index (PDI)
SiO2 53 ± 3 --- --- 0.357
HPMA-bound SiO2 83±13 30 --- 0.356
TiO2 155±6 --- --- 0.319
HPMA – TiO2mixture 154±5 0 --- 0.323
Chitosan-coated SiO2 513 ± 30 --- 460 0.343
HPMA-bound chitosan-coated SiO2 (HPMA at 0.05% to 0.1% v/v) 417 ± 17 to 440 ± 12 -96 to -73 --- 0.322-0.338
Chitosan-coated TiO2 (SDS) 477 ± 11 --- 322 0.300
HPMA-bound chitosan-coated TiO2 (HPMA at 0.05% to 0.1% v/v) 416 ± 11 to 514 ± 8 -61 to +37 --- 0.122-0.288

Table 1: DLS analysis to determine the hydrodynamic diameters of different particles, followed by calculation of the HPMA thickness.

HPMA binding with chitosan-coated nanoparticles

Afterwards, the interaction of HPMA with chitosan-coated SiO2 particles was investigated. Initially the hydrodynamic diameter of the chitosan-coated SiO2 particles decreased to 417 ± 17 nm. One plausible reason for the reduction in the hydrodynamic diameter of chitosancoated SiO2 particles upon HPMA binding is that HPMA disturbed the natural agglomeration tendency of chitosan [28]. The hypothesis is that chitosan initially formed a loose coating (by surface adsorption onto SiO2 or TiO2) that condensed upon addition of HPMA. Further addition of HPMA, however, changed the hydrodynamic diameter to 440 ± 12 nm. Similarly, HPMA (at 0.05% v/v) interacted with chitosancoated TiO2 NPs decreasing their hydrodynamic diameter from 477 ± 11 nm to 416 ± 11 nm. However, further addition of HPMA (at 0.1% v/v) increased their hydrodynamic diameter to 514 ± 8 nm.

A significant increase in peak area was observed after HPMA (0.03% v/v) bound to chitosan-coated SiO2 particles. More importantly, after HPMA binding, CE-UV analysis could be performed with no disturbance of the EOF. Figure 4 shows the improved detection of HPMA-bound chitosan-coated SiO2 particles. Upon varying the SiO2 concentration in chitosan suspension, the resultant HPMA-bound chitosan-coated SiO2 peak area changed accordingly as shown in Figure 5. A significant total enhancement of 50 folds in detection sensitivity was attained by coating SiO2 NPs with chitosan followed by HPMA binding. This result is better than the enhancement of 10-14 folds previously attained by using both PHPMA and PDA coatings. In addition, no chemical initiator is needed for this novel technique which does not involve in-situ polymerization.

analytical-bioanalytical-techniques-characterization-bound-chitosan

Figure 4: CE-UV characterization of HPMA-bound chitosan-coated SiO2 particles.

analytical-bioanalytical-techniques-HPMA-bound-chitosan

Figure 5: HPMA-bound chitosan-coated SiO2 peak areas obtained for different SiO2 concentrations.

Similarly, HPMA-bound chitosan-coated TiO2 NPs were easily analyzed by CE-UV in conjunction with improvement of the CE-UV detection of chitosan-coated TiO2 NPs as shown. All these results provide clear and convincing proof that SiO2 NPs can be made larger in size by interaction with HPMA alone and even larger after coating with chitosan under very simple experimental conditions. The larger sizes offer more sensitive detection of SiO2 NPs in a water sample by CE-UV analysis.

Conclusions

A simple and inexpensive method for the detection of nanoparticles, which are a burden in aquatic ecosystem, has been successfully developed. Hydroxypropyl methacrylate interacted with colloidal SiO2 nanoparticles to produce a larger size for more sensitive detection by CE-UV. It did not interact with TiO2 nanoparticles in aqueous suspension, resulting in no change of CE-UV detection sensitivity. It interacted with chitosan-coated SiO2 or TiO2 nanoparticles, resulting in a significant enhancement of their CE-UV detection. This chemical technique allows us to analyze an aqueous sample containing different kinds of nanoparticles, both qualitatively and quantitatively, simply by adding hydroxypropyl methacrylate to observe any CE-UV peak enhancements. HPMA interaction is time-saving as less than 22 hours can be used to reach a binding equilibrium with the nanoparticles. Coating of SiO2 and TiO2 NPs with chitosan produced a significant increase in hydrodynamic diameter to 513 ± 30 nm for chitosan-coated SiO2 particles and 477 ± 11 nm for chitosan-coated TiO2 nanoparticles. Subsequent HPMA binding facilitated CE-UV analysis without causing disturbance of the EOF. A total enhancement of 50 folds in detection sensitivity was attained by coating SiO2 nanoparticles with chitosan followed by HPMA binding. The new detection limit is estimated at 0.06 g/L of SiO2. Only nanoparticles, but not organic compounds, would change in area and migration time after binding to HPMA or coating with chitosan. No chemical initiator is required, unlike what we reported previously using in-situ polymerization to attain coating with PHPMA. In our future work, the ligand-directed formation of colloidal polymers through chemical interactions of surface ligands between adjacent nanoparticles [29] can further enhance the CE-UV detection sensitivity of SiO2, TiO2, and other kinds of NPs.

Acknowledgements

Financial support from NSERC Canada is gratefully acknowledged. S. Alsudir thanks the Saudi Ministry of Higher Education for her scholarship.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12564
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2015 - Sep 20, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8727
  • PDF downloads : 3837
Top