alexa Impact of 2015 Korean Cigarette Tax Increase on Lower Income People | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2155-6105
Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Impact of 2015 Korean Cigarette Tax Increase on Lower Income People

Seng Eun Choi*

Department of Government Expenditure, Korea Institute for Public Finance, Korea

Corresponding Author:
Seng Eun Choi
Research Fellow
Department of Government Expenditure
Korea Institute for Public Finance, Korea
Tel: +82-44-414-2288
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: January 28, 2017; Accepted date: February 20, 2017; Published date: February 27, 2017

Citation: Choi SE (2017) Impact of 2015 Korean Cigarette Tax Increase on Lower Income People. J Addict Res Ther 8:306. doi:10.4172/2155-6105.1000306

Copyright: © 2017 Choi SE. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy


Korea’s cigarette tax increase in 2015 was quite conspicuous. The price of cigarette per pack has increased by 80%, from 2,500 won to 4,500 won, the biggest jump in Korean history, in light of the cigarette tax that had not been changed for the past 10 years. As a result, adult smoking prevalence in 2015 was reduced by 1.7% point to 21.6% and male smoking prevalence was reduced by 4.0% point to 38.3% compared to the previous year (Korean Statistical Information Service, KOSIS). At the same time, consumption of cigarette was reduced 33.6% in 2015 (Korean Statistical Information Service, KOSIS).

In terms of smoking prevalence by income group, lower income group has greater smoking prevalence in Korea. Adult smoking prevalence as of 2015 is 23.8% in the lowest income group, 22.2% in the lower-middle-income group, 21.6% in the upper-middle-income group, and is 18.5% in the highest income group. Bobak et al. find reasons of higher smoking prevalence among lower income people in awareness of health consequences of smoking, ways for releasing stress, and opportunity cost of smoking [1]. The poor tends to be careless for smoking caused diseases than the rich, and smoking may play important role for releasing stress than the rich who may have many other alternative ways of releasing stress. Most of all, opportunity cost of smoking caused diseases may be lower for the poor for whom wage forgone may not be great. In fact, numerous literature surveys that smoking prevalence is higher for lower income group in many countries, especially in developing countries [2-8].

This implies that the lower income people bear more of cigarette tax burden. Cigarette taxes are regressive since the tax burden for one pack of cigarette relative to income is greater for lower income people. In addition to that, lower income people smoke more than the higher income people. In fact, the regressive nature of cigarette tax had been a stumbling block on 2 raising cigarette tax in Korea. However, actual burden of cigarette tax surge may have been borne by higher income people, if lower income people are more sensitive to cigarette price changes. Previous researches show that the responsiveness of cigarette consumption and smoking prevalence with respect to price changes are greater for lower income people than for higher income people [9-16]. If lower income people reduce smoking more, cigarette tax may not be regressive in terms of additional tax revenue.

After Korean cigarette price surge in 2015, adult smoking prevalence of the lowest income group in Korea was reduced by 12% from the previous year, while that of the highest income group was reduced by 3% only. During the same period, male smoking prevalence of the lowest income group was reduced by 14%, while that of the highest income group was reduced by 7%. These results confirm that the poorest are more responsive to cigarette price changes, more of the poorest actually quit smoking since the price surge in 2015. Therefore, additional tax revenue collected from cigarette tax increase may have come from higher income group.

It is still arguable that cigarette tax surge may deprive lower income people of a pleasure from smoking, may drive them toward consuming more of other cheaper addictive goods which may be more harmful for health or may enhance health by helping them to quit smoking and preventing from smoke caused diseases. Some literature examines cigarette tax may affect life styles; alcohol consumption, appetites and weight, and illicit drug use [17-21]. Although these studies show mixed result on the indirect impact of cigarette tax on alcohol consumption and weight gains, etc., cigarette tax may be related to unhealthy life style, and may offset health benefit of cigarette tax increases. In spite of all those arguments, however, public 3 misunderstanding that the additional tax revenues come from the poor may be corrected from Korean experience.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 509
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2017 - Sep 23, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 447
  • PDF downloads :62

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version