alexa Practice and Attitude towards Orthodontic Services by Pedodontists and General Practitioners | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2376-032X
JBR Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine and Dental Science
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Practice and Attitude towards Orthodontic Services by Pedodontists and General Practitioners

Akshay G1, Anur G1, Singh K2* and Singh T3

1Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Government Dental College and Hospital, Jammu, India

2Department of Public Health Dentistry, Luxmi Bai Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Patiala, India

3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Luxmi Bai Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Patiala, India

*Corresponding Author:
Dr. Karanprakash Singh
Reader, Department of Public Health Dentistry
Luxmi Bai Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital
Patiala, India
Tel: +918437112344
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: April 26, 2017; Accepted Date: April 26, 2017; Published Date: April 30, 2017

Citation: Akshay G, Anur G, Singh K, Singh T (2017) Practice and Attitude towards Orthodontic Services by Pedodontists and General Practitioners. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci 5: 211. doi:10.4172/2376-032X.1000211

Copyright: © 2017 Akshay G, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at JBR Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine and Dental Science

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the provision of orthodontic skills among general and pediatric dentists. Methods: The study included 344 subjects, who were given a questionnaire that included information like experience of practice, type of orthodontic appliances used, frequency of orthodontic patients treated yearly, etc. Mean scores of all the questions were calculated using student’s t test and one-way ANOVA test at p value <0.05. Results: In general, percentage of participants practicing orthodontics was 22.1%. It was observed that more number of pedodontists were involved in orthodontic treatment than general dentists. Removable appliances were frequently used for patients. The prevalence of practicing orthodontic treatment was mostly observed in more experienced practitioners. Conclusion: The frequency of providing orthodontic treatment was significantly higher amongst pediatric dentists. However, orthodontic courses should be made available for the dental practitioners for further excellence.

Keywords

General dentists; Orthodontics; Pediatric dentists

Introduction

Malocclusion is the second most commonly detected dental diseases among children and young adults, next to dental caries [1]. The prevalence of malocclusion differs from place to place and among different ages, gender and location. Its incidence has been reported to vary from 11% to 93% [2-4].

Malocclusion has shown its role in affecting periodontal health, dental caries and temperomandibular joint (TMJ) problems [5]. Hence, the orthodontic treatment is necessary for correction of malocclusion in the population. Also the demand for orthodontic therapy is increasing [6], yet the basic orthodontic services provided by the dentists are not fulfilling the requirements; mainly in the rural areas [7].

On the other hand, the number of general and pediatric dentists who afford orthodontic services is increasing. This is perhaps due to the increase in the need of orthodontics among the children [8]. Orthodontic procedure done by pedodontics and general dentists has been reported in many studies, but the results are contradictory [9,10].

Further, there are also cases of referrals to orthodontic clinics from pediatric and general dentists [11]. General dental practitioners are in fact considered to be gatekeepers for specialist orthodontic care [12]. Unfortunately, very few studies have mentioned about the orthodontic treatment provided by them. Hence, the present study was carried out to assess the practice and attitude of general and pediatric dentists for orthodontic services.

Methodology

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in January 2015 among 344 dentists in Jammu, located in the Northern India. The study included 44 pedodontists and 300 general dental practitioners.

A well structured questionnaire was prepared that included information like demographics, experience of practice, type of orthodontic appliances used, frequency of orthodontics patient treated yearly, source of learning orthodontic treatment. Questions that discern the positive effects of orthodontic treatment were also included such as whether it reduces the risk of caries, periodontal diseases and TMJ problems, whether the treatment will improve esthetics.

A pre tested pilot study was done to validate the questionnaire. Before commencement of this survey, ethical approval was obtained from the Institute and a written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants. The questionnaires were then administered to all the participants personally and were asked to provide a response to all the items.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Frequency and percentage distributions were calculated. Mean scores of all the questions were calculated using student’s t test and one-way ANOVA test at p value <0.05.

Results

Out of 344 participants (44 pedodontists, 300 general dental practitioners), only 76 (22.1%) were practicing orthodontics, of which 65 were general dental practitioners and 11 were pedodontists. It was observed that pediatric dentists were more involved in orthodontic practice compared to general dentists as mentioned in (Table 1). The results also revealed that the frequency of providing orthodontic treatment was higher among experienced study subjects (Table 2).

Participants No Mean SD F Sig.
Pediatric dentists 11 3.71 0.798 18.746 0.000
General dentists 65 3.14 1.544

Table 1: Attitude towards orthodontic treatment by pedodontists and general dentists.

Experience No Mean SD F Sig.
0-2 years 17 2.55 1.302 26.443 0.000
2-4 years 11 2.45 1.724 47.240 0.000
4-6 years 20 3.55 0.408 41.798 0.000
6 years and above 28 4.21 1.351 18.765 0.000
Total 76 3.25 1.449    

Table 2: Attitude towards orthodontic treatment according to experience.

Table 3 showed that pediatric dentists were mostly treating cases like Angle’s Class I molar relationship, deep bite, open bite, spacing and habit breaking. While general dentists were usually dealing with the cases of Angle’s Class II and III molar relationship and crowding.

Conditions General dentists Pediatric dentists
Angle’s Class I molar relationship 66% 74%
Deep bite 37% 41%
Open bite 23% 26%
Spacing 48% 52%
Angle’s Class II molar relationship 42% 33%
Angle’s Class III molar relationship 22% 16%
Habits breakage appliance 6% 32%
Crowding 51% 49%

Table 3: Showing comparison of conditions treated by pedodontists andgeneral dentists.

Removable appliances were the most frequently used appliance by 43.5% of general dentists and 34.7% of pedodontists. Around 31% general dentists were practicing fixed orthodontics and only 22% pedodontists were using fixed orthodontic appliances. 42% pedodontists and 24% general dentists were using both removable as well as fixed appliances as illustrated in (Figure 1).

interdisciplinary-medicine-dental-science-examination

Figure 1: Type of orthodontic appliances used by pedodontists and general dentists.

Most of the study participants were treating around 20-40 patients yearly (Figure 2). General dentists gained knowledge about orthodontics generally from senior dentists (57.2%) followed by orthodontists (23.1%). Whereas most of the pedodontists learned it from their study curriculum (45.7%) followed by diploma courses (26.1%) as mentioned in Figure 3.

interdisciplinary-medicine-dental-science-view

Figure 2: Annual frequency of orthodontics patients treated by pedodontists and general dentists.

interdisciplinary-medicine-dental-science-labial

Figure 3: Different sources of gaining orthodontic knowledge.

Discussion

Orthodontic treatment practiced by dentists has been a subject of concern in dental profession. The present survey observed that the participant’s i.e., general dentists and pediatric dentists provide a considerable amount of orthodontic services to their patients.

The frequency of practicing orthodontics was 22.1% in our study. Wolsky et al. in their study in 1996 observed that 76.3% of general dentists provided orthodontic appliances to their patients [10]. Similarly Foley [9] and Koroluk et al. [13] in a nationwide survey mentioned that 38% of general practitioners perform orthodontic procedures.

We observed that the overall provision of orthodontic appliances was higher by pedodontists compared to general practitioners. Galbreath et al. found that about 1/3rd of the pediatric dentists and fewer than 10% of the general dental practitioners were providing orthodontic treatment in their study [14]. Koroluk et al. also showed that 62% of pediatric dentists and 17.9% of general dentists offer complete orthodontic treatment [9]. Similarly, Gorczyca et al. observed that pedodontists were significantly more involved in serving the patients with braces than general practitioners [15].

The present data mentioned that general dental practitioner and pedodontists provide more removable appliances to their patients as compared to the fixed appliances. Removable orthodontic appliances were reasonably accepted appliances to the patients as well. On the contrary, Purmal et al. showed in his study that general dentists were issuing more than 50% of fixed and 23.5% removable appliances to their patients. It could be due to the fact fixed orthodontic appliances provided more tooth movement as compared to simple tipping by removable appliances [12]. Lawrence et al. also stated that the percentage of the dentists issuing fixed appliance was slightly higher in his study [16].

The present study revealed that the pediatric dentists were frequently dealing with the cases like Angle’s Class I molar relationship, deep bite, open bite, spacing and habit breaking. Jacobs also showed that 99.5% of general dentists treat Angle’s class I malocclusions, 97.7% do class II, and 61.9% treat class III malocclusions [17]. However, Hilgers et al. mentioned that general dentists were more involved with the cases of Angle’s Class II and III molar relationship [18].

The provision of offering orthodontic services was concurrently increasing with the experience of the study participants. This could be due to the gradually increasing number of patients with years of practice and more practical knowledge with time.

Conclusion

The present study showed that 22.1% of study participants were confident in providing orthodontic services to their patients and the frequency was slightly higher in pediatric dentists. The provision of removable orthodontics was mostly seen and the overall application of orthodontic braces was increasing with experience. Still, there is a massive requirement of orthodontic courses for the dental practitioners as most of them were not dealing with the fixed appliances.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 381
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2017 - Oct 20, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 320
  • PDF downloads :61
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords