Abstract

Cryoablation has emerged as an effective alternative to traditional surgical resection for treating early-stage cancers. Cryoablation utilizes extreme cold to induce necrosis in tumor tissues, offering a minimally invasive approach with fewer complications and faster recovery times. This article compares cryoablation and traditional surgical resection in the context of early-stage cancers, including the advantages, limitations, and clinical indications for each technique. We also examine the potential for integrating cryoablation into current treatment protocols and its role in personalized cancer care, particularly for patients who are not ideal candidates for surgery.

Keywords: Cryoablation; Traditional resection; Early-stage cancer; Tumor ablation, Minimally invasive surgery