alexa Quality of Life Measures Provided by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory among Cochlear Implant Users: Is this Quality of Evidence Adequate to Assess Outcomes?| Abstract
ISSN: 2161-119X

Otolaryngology: Open Access
Open Access

Like us on:

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
  • Review Article   
  • Otolaryngol (Sunnyvale),

Quality of Life Measures Provided by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory among Cochlear Implant Users: Is this Quality of Evidence Adequate to Assess Outcomes?

Raghu Nandhan Sampath Kumar* and Mohan Kameswaran
Department of Neuro-otology, Implants & Skullbase Surgery, Madras ENT Research Foundation, Chennai, India
*Corresponding Author : Raghu Nandhan Sampath Kumar, Senior Consultant ENT Surgeon, Department of Neuro-otology, Implants & Skullbase Surgery, Madras ENT Research Foundation, Chennai, India, Tel: + 919840972900, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Aug 26, 2019 / Accepted Date: Sep 05, 2019 / Published Date: Sep 12, 2019

Abstract

The quality of evidence presently available for assessing the Quality of life (QoL) outcomes in Cochlear implant (CI) users, is not of high level and is variable between cohorts and across centres of the world. There are many generic hearing-related quality of life measures available for assessment of the outcomes with the Glasgow benefit inventory (GBI) being the most popular, but these do not address in particular the diverse cultural, ethnic, cognitive, behavioural and socio-economic spectrum among the implantees. Since such confounders may influence the scoring system of these validated QoL tools, it is imperative to systematically analyze the existent literature to understand the quality of evidence available currently, how they may be upgraded or downgraded and to decipher the positives and negatives of the common GBI scoring system, to conclude upon the final level of evidence. Future directions for developing a systematic and universal guideline to asses QoL outcomes among cochlear implantees, can be inferred from such a critical appraisal.

Keywords: Cochlear implant; Technology; Quality of life; Hearing; Auditory performance

Citation: Kumar RNS, Kameswaran M (2019) Quality of Life Measures Provided by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory among Cochlear Implant Users: Is this Quality of Evidence Adequate to Assess Outcomes? Otolaryngol (Sunnyvale) 9:380.

Copyright: © 2019 Kumar RNS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Article Usage
  • Total views: 56
  • [From(publication date): 0-0 - Nov 22, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 39
  • PDF downloads: 17
Top