Assessment of Hand Washing Practice and its Associated Factors among First Cycle Primary School Children in Arba Minch Town, Ethiopia, 2015
Received: 04-May-2016 / Accepted Date: 24-May-2016 / Published Date: 30-May-2016 DOI: 10.4172/2161-1165.1000247
Introduction: Proper hand washing is one of the simplest, most affordable and effective means of stopping the spread of infection via feces, body fluids, and inanimate objects. Hand washing is especially important for children and adolescents, as these age groups are the most susceptible to infections gained from unwashed hands. In addition to this due to the close proximity of children in schools and child care settings, there is a high risk for the spread of infectious disease. Proper hand washing also improves learning and teaching processes by reducing absenteeism.
Objective: To assess hand washing practice and associated factors in primary school children in Arba Minch town, 2015.
Method and materials: Institutional based cross sectional study design was employed on primary school children. Data were collected using interview questionnaires. School hand washing facilities inspection was also done using observation checklist. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 software.
Result: One-fifth (22.23%) of participants had proper hand washing practice. Two hundred fifty four (72.57%) of 1st cycle primary school children had sufficient knowledge. Similarly, 254(78.28%) children had positive attitude towards hand washing practice. Only two schools were fulfilling criteria of medium hygiene facility. From all predictors, residency, availability and accessibility of water, and soap, and referent pressure were strongly associated with hand washing practice as it was statistically evidenced by (AOR: 1.37, 95% CI: (1.07, 20.11)), (AOR: 0.25, 95% CI: (0.02, 0.87)) and (AOR: 1.65, 95% CI: (1.03, 7.98)), respectively.
Conclusion: This study revealed that only small proportion of study participant practiced proper hand washing behavior. Place of residency, availability and accessibility of water, and soap, and pressure from important referents were significantly associated with hand washing practice.
Keywords: Hand washing practice, Predisposing, Enabling, Reinforcing, Factors
HEWs: Health Extension Workers; SD: Standard Deviation; UNICEF: United Nations Children’s Fund; WASH: Water, Sanitation and Hygiene; and WHO: World Health organization
Proper hand washing is one of the simplest, most affordable and effective means of stopping the spread of infection via feces, body fluids, and inanimate objects .
Hand washing is especially important for children and adolescents, as these age groups are the most susceptible to infections gained from unwashed hands . In addition to this due to the close proximity of children in schools and child care settings, there is a high risk for the spread of infectious disease.
Proper hand washing also improves learning and teaching processes by reducing absenteeism. Hand washing reduces absenteeism as evidenced by study conducted around the world like 54% (China), 40% (Egypt), 35% (Kenya), 27% (Philippines) and 20% in (Colombia) .
Half of hospital visit and 12% of all admission among children aged from 0 to 14 years are due to infections . Among these, respiratory infections and infectious intestinal disease are responsible for 48% and 29% of children visit to health facility respectively .
In developing countries, 80% of the diseases are associated with poor domestic and personal hygiene and about 2.2 million people die; mostly children die annually due to diarrhea; the same number again die from acute respiratory infections .
Furthermore, worldwide about 400 million children are infected with worms due to poor hand washing practices. These worms consume nutrients from children, therefore causing abdominal pain and malfunction, impair their learning capacity and thus reduce school attendance .
In Ethiopia more than 250,000 children die every year from sanitation and hygiene related diseases. Some 60 percent of the disease burden is related to poor sanitation and hygiene .
Even though the above problems are visible, proper hand washing is not as widespread as desired worldwide. It has been reported that the frequency of hand washing with soap before handling food or after using a toilet was observed in only between 0% and 34.0% cases .
Center for Disease Control and Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology have created guidelines for hand washing . In order to emphasize the importance of hand washing, October 15 has been declared as the Global Hand Washing Day by UNICEF since 2008 .
Ethiopia and foreign global public health agencies have been taking steps towards enhancing access to resources and to increase health literacy particularly concerning sanitation and hygiene. In 2007, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) launched the Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) program to promote hand-washing and sanitation practices in low income countries including Ethiopia .
In this regard, Ethiopia has made considerable progress to encourage increased access to and use of improved hygiene and sanitation through HEWs using house to house methods.
But developing countries [16,17], have drawn attention to the lack of rigorously conducted studies to evaluate the effectiveness of hand washing interventions in preventing the spread of respiratory and gastrointestinal infections.
In Ethiopia a study conducted by UNICEF and Ministry of health found that study participants had poor status regarding knowledge, attitudes, and practices of hygiene , but still there are no enough evidences for hand washing practice, and its contributing factors in Ethiopia in general in Arba Minch town in particular.
Therefore, the aim of this study was the assessment of hand washing practice and its associated factors among first cycle primary school children.
Methods and Methods
Study setting and period
This study was conducted from November 2015 to February 2016 in Arbaminch 1st cycle primary school, Arbaminch town, Southern Ethiopia province.
The town is located 505 km from Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia, and 276 km from Hawassa, the capital city of Southern Ethiopia province. Administratively it is divided into 14 kebeles.
Estimated populations of the town were 150,000. In this area, there were seventeen public primary schools. From this school, fifteen of them had first cycle primary school children. The town also had one general hospital, two health centers, and eleven health posts.
Study design and population
A school based cross-sectional study involving quantitative method was undertaken among randomly selected students who were attending 1st cycle primary schools during the time of data collection. The study populations of this study were students in grades 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Arbaminch 1st cycle primary school during the 2015 academic year.
Students with learning disability and students attending evening classes were excluded. In Ethiopian context, students attending evening classes have different social characteristics from those who regularly attend. Thus, they were excluded from the study to avoid over or under estimation of the study findings.
Sample size determination and sampling procedure
Single population proportion formula was used to calculate the required sample size. Proportion of hand washing practice, margin of error, confidence interval, design effect and non-response rate were assumed to be 11.7% (12), 5%, 95%, 2 and 5%, respectively.
Finally, adding 10% none response rate, the sample size was determined to be 350.Multistage sampling technique was used to select the study subjects. First stratification was made in to grades 1, 2, 3, and 4. Then, grades were further stratified by section.
Calculated sample size was proportionally allocated to each grade and section according to their number of students. Then, frames of students were developed from student roster of each grade in collaboration with instructors of respective classes.
Eligible students were selected using simple random sampling technique from the existing sampling frame (student’s roster). In every step of selection, simple random sampling technique was used.
Data quality management
Data quality was ensured during collection, coding, entry and analysis. Before the actual data collection, pretest was done to check the validity of the instrument.
During data collection, one bachelor degree nurse supervisor and six nurse data collectors with previous experience were recruited and adequate training and follow up was provided. Codes were given to the questionnaires during data collection so that errors could be timely addressed.
The filled questionnaires were checked for completeness and consistency by the data collectors, supervisor and principal investigator on a daily basis. The data were further cleaned by visualizing and calculating frequencies using SPSS version16 statistical software. Corrections were made according to the original data.
Data processing and analysis
Data were checked manually for completeness, then coded and entered into SPSS version16 and analysed with this software. Descriptive analyses were executed for each of the variables. Bivariate analysis was performed to see the crude association of the independent variables with the outcome variable.
Finally, variables which showed significant association with the dependent variable on the bivariate analysis were entered to multivariate logistic regression model to identify their independent effects. P-value and 95% confidence interval (CI) for odds ratio (OR) were used in judging the significance of the associations. P-value less than 0.05 were taken as significant association.
The instrument used to assess hand washing practice was designed by all authors in consultation with senior research experts. The English version questionnaire was translated to Amharic and to check its consistency it was again translated back to English by experts of both languages.
Before the actual data collection, the questionnaire was pre-tested on 10% of the study subjects in the neighboring Lante district school on a total of 35 students. Based on the findings of the pretest, the tool was modified and finally, the Amharic version questionnaire was administered.
Hand washing practice was assessed based on two criteria i.e. hand washing with soap after using toilet and hand washing with soap before eating. Items measuring each criterion on 5 point frequency scale ranging from 1=always to 5=never.
The 5 frequency table was dichotomized where by those who answered 1=always to 2=very often were classified as washers (scale 0) and 3=often to 5=never were classified as non-washers (scale 1).
The dichotomized items were added up to create summative index point. Students who reported 1=always to 2=very often for both criterion were classified as proper hand washing category.Attitude or belief about soap and water in relation to hand washing practice and degree to which hand washing is positively or negatively valued by an individual.
Attitudes towards hand washing was be assessed based on criteria using the 5 point Likert scale related to belief about hand washing with soap. (E.g. If you wash your hands many times with water you do not need to use soap).
The scale ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree was dichotomized. The dichotomized item was added up to create summative index. Then students who answered 1=strongly disagree or 2=disagree for all questions were classified as having positive attitude towards hand washing practice while those who will score 3=neutral to 5=strongly agree to all criteria were be classified as having negative attitudes towards hand-washing practice.
Knowledge on hand washing was assessed based on eight questions related to infectious diseases transmission; critical times of hand washing and health outcome associated with hand washing (e.g. hand should be washed even after touching someone’s hand).
In each item those who answered correctly scored 1 and those who answered wrongly will score 0. Those who scored 4 and more were be classified as having sufficient knowledge and those who scored 3 and less will be classified as having insufficient knowledge.
Reinforcing factors were assessed using 4 important referents (parents, friends, teachers, and health professionals) based on the 5 point frequency scale 1=always to 5=never. The 5 point frequency scale was dichotomized whereby those who scored 1=always to 2=very often were classified as perceiving high pressure from important referents (score 0) and those who scored 3=often to 5=never will be classified as perceiving less pressure from important referents (score 1).
The dichotomized items were be added up to create summative index. Those who scored 1=always or 2=very often were regarded as perceiving high pressure from important referents on washing hand with soap.
Hygiene index was computed using a combination of four hygiene facilities in school (running water+soap+washing station+toilet). Those schools with 3 facilities were regarded as having medium amount of hygiene facilities while those with 2 and less than 2 have low amount of hygiene facilities and the schools with supplied with all hygiene facility were be considered as having high amount of hygiene facility.
Ethical clearance was obtained from Arbaminch University, department of nursing institutional review board (IRB).
The letter of collaboration was written from department of Nursing to Arbaminch School for the main study and to Lante School for the pretest. The school director was briefed on the objectives of the study.
Each study participant was adequately informed about the purpose, benefits and risks of the study and their right to discontinue or refuse to participate in the study. Finally, written informed assent was obtained from their parents/guardians.
Socio-demographic characteristics of participants
A total of 350 children were invited and all of them participated in the study making a response rate of 100%. Two hundred forty nine (71.10%) of the respondents were found to be in the age range of 9-11 years with mean of 10 (SD=0.483) years.
Regarding their educational status, 95 (26.29%) of children were grade four. From total participants, 203(58%) were males and 332 (94.9%) were from urban areas. Majority of the study children’s family occupation was civil servant 160 (45.7%).
Regarding their family educational status, 60 (17.14%), and 65(18.57%) of the participant’s mothers and fathers were non-educated. Only 130 (34.14%) of respondents earned a monthly income of above 1500 Ethiopian birr (Table 1).
|Grade of students||Grade one||84||24|
|Family Occupation||Civil Servant||160||45.7|
|Maternal educational status||Non Educated||60||17.14|
|Read and write||57||16.29|
|Fathers educational status||Non Educated||65||18.57|
|Read and write||97||27.71|
|Monthly income||Below 1000EBR||80||28.86|
|Above 15000 EBR||130||37.14|
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants among primary school students in Arba Minch town, 2016.
Hand washing practice
From all children, 278 (79.4%), and 277 (79.1%) of them washed their hands with soap after visiting toilet and before meal respectively.
According to criteria defined in the method, 78 (22.3%) of children performed proper hand washing practice (Table 2).
|Washing hand with soap after visiting toilet||Yes||278||79.4|
|Washed their hands using soap before meal||Yes||277||79.1|
|Hand washing practice||Proper||78||22.3|
Table 2: Hand washing practice of primary school students in Arbaminch town, 2016.
Predisposing factors (knowledge and attitude) for children’s hand washing practice
From all childrens, 100 (28.57%) of them said that human feces does not contains germs.
Similarly, 95 (27.14%) of children said that human urine does not contains germs. Ninety seven (27.71%) of children said that all objects are not free from germs.
From involved children, 252 (72%) of them said poor hand washing cause disease.
According to the measurements criteria for knowledge of hand washing practice, 254 (72.57%) were found to have sufficient knowledge while rest had insufficient knowledge.
Similarly, 254 (78.28%) children had positive attitude towards hand washing practice whereas 96 (21.72%) had negative attitude (Table 3).
|Do human’s feces contain germs?||Yes||250||71.43|
|Are all clean objects are not free from||Yes||97||27.71|
|Does human’s urine contain germs?||Yes||255||72.86|
|Can germs be acquired when desks,||Yes||280||80|
|Door, books and animals are touched?||No||70||20|
|Do poor hand washing cause disease?||Yes||252||72|
|Is water only enough for hand washing?||Yes||257||73.43|
|Is hand washing with soap needed after coughing or sneezing?||Yes||269||76.86|
|Is failure to wash hand transmitting infectious disease?||Yes||261||74.57|
|If you wash your hands really well with water you don’t need to use soap?||Yes||271||77.43|
|You only need to wash your hands with soap if they look dirty or smell bad?||Yes||289||82.57|
|Is washing your hands with soap is important before feeding?||Yes||250||71.43|
Table 3: Predisposing factors for children’s hand washing practice in Arbaminch town, 2016.
From the total participants, 46.28% of participated children had got high pressure to wash their hands from important referents. From the six schools included in the survey only two schools has sanitation and hygiene club.
All schools claimed hand washing day celebration, but among the participated children only 41% of children actually celebrated so far (Table 4).
|From which media have you heard about hand washing?||Television||164||46.9|
|Referents for hand washing practice||Parents||296||84.85|
|Pressure from parents||High||296||84.85|
|Pressure from Friends||High||61||17.42|
|Pressure from Teachers||High||196||56.28|
|Pressure from Health professionals||High||26||26|
|Important referent pressure||High pressurized||162||46.28|
|Is there any hygiene and sanitation club in your school?||Yes||208||59.42|
|Does your school celebrate Hand||Yes||117||33.42|
|If yes, have you ever participated?||Yes||117||33.42|
Table 4: Reinforcing factors for children’s hand washing practices in Arbaminch town, 2016.
Reinforcing factors for children’s hand washing practices
The sources of information about children hand washing practice were television (46.9%), radio (16.9%), leaflets (0.3%) and newspaper (36%).
Children hand washing practice was pressured by parents 296 (84.85%), teachers 196 (56.28%), health Professional’s 91 (26%), and friends 61 (17.42%).
Enabling factors for children hand washing practice
In the observed school there were forty toilets. The toilet student ratios were 1:73 and 1:67 for male and female students respectively. From this toilets, 25 (62.5%) of them had hand washing station which was installed outside the latrines rooms. All the station had water but not soap supply at the time of observation. In relation to hygiene facility, only two school fulfilled criteria of medium hygiene facility, but none of them fulfilled criteria of high hygiene facility.
About 52.6% and 80.6% of students reported that there was regular access to water, and water, and soap at home respectively (Table 5).
|Presence of hand washing station||Present||25||62.5|
|Place of hand washing station||Within latrine room||0||0|
|Outside latrine room||25||100|
|Presence of water supply within washing installation?||Yes||25||100|
|Presence of soap for hand washing?||Yes||0||0|
|Ratio of toilet to male student||Within standard||0||0|
|Ratio of toilet to male student||Within standard||0||0|
|Presence of only water for hand washing at home?||Yes||282||80.6|
|Presence of soap and water for hand washing at home?||Yes||184||52.6|
|School hand washing facility||Medium||2||33.33|
Table 5: Enabling factors for children hand washing practice in Arba Minch town, 2016.
Factors affecting hand washing practice in primary school children
In multivariate logistic regression analysis, residency, presence of water and soap, and referent pressure were significantly associated with hand washing practice in 1st cycle primary school children.
From all socio demographic profiles of children, only residency was significantly associated with hand washing practice, In this aspect, urban children more likely performed proper hand washing practice (AOR: 1.37, 95% CI: (1.07, 20.11)) than rural children.
Concerning to enabling factors for children hand washing practice, presence of water and soap showed strong statistical association with hand washing practice.
In this regard, absence of water and soap was protective for proper hand washing practice (AOR: 0.25, 95% CI: (0.02, 0.87)) as compared with presence of water and soap for hand washing practice.
Regarding to reinforcing factors for children’s hand washing practices, pressure from important referents was independent predictor for hand washing practice in children.
In this, case, the odds of high pressure from important referents brought high chance for proper hand washing practice in primary school children (AOR: 1.65, 95% CI: [1.03, 7.98]) than low pressure from important referents ( Table 6).
|Variables||Hand washing practice||COR(95%CI)||AOR(95%CI)|
|Improper n (%)||Proper n (%)|
|Age||11-Sep||53(74.6)||196(72.59)||1.19(1.02, 24.00)||0.23(0.15, 3.15)|
|Sex||Male||38(52.05)||165(59.56)||0.74(0.51, 2.75)||0.25(0.04, 4.18)|
|Residence||Urban||69(94.52)||163(92.09)||1.48(1.01, 11.61)*||1.37(1.07, 9.11)*|
|Knowledge||Sufficient||64(87.68)||246(88.8)||0.90(0.45, 11.12)||0.37(0.54, 11.22)|
|Attitude||Positive||29(39.73)||138(49.82)||0.66(0.32, 5.38)||0.10(0.05, 1.22)|
|School hygiene facility||Medium||2(2.74)||66(23.83)||0.09(0.01, 2.01)||0.20(0.10, 11.10)|
|Presence of soap and water for hand washing at home?||No||13(17.8)||55(19.55)||0.87(0.05, 0.98)*||0.25(0.02, 0.87)*|
|Important Referents||High pressured||32(43.84)||113 (40.79)||1.13(1.01, 5.15)*||1.65(1.03, 7.98)*|
|Less pressured||41(56.16)||164 (59.21)||1||1|
Table 6: Factors influencing hand washing practice among primary school students in Arba Minch town, 2016.
This school based cross-sectional study with the objective of the assessment of hand washing practice, and its associated factors in primary school children was conducted in Arbaminch town, Gamo Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia.
The results from this study revealed relatively small (22.3%) proportions of primary school children practice proper hand washing behavior and the rest 77.7% of children practice improper (poor) hand washing behavior. A poor rate of hand washing in this study was lower than other previous studies in Tanzania and Colombia [13,14].
This difference can be due to the time gap of in this research and the previous research works. In the present time in all parts of Ethiopia, the health extension workers designed schedule and give health education about hand washing practice for different segment of populations. On the other hand, poor rate of hand washing practice in this study was higher than the study conducted in Oromia Ethiopia .
This disproportion can be due to residency. All the participants in Oromia were from urban but in this study some participants came from rural area. Thus being urban expose the children to different health extension packages via different communication mechanisms. Generally, global figures indicate hand washing is still practiced to a low extent .
In this study, there were different factors affecting hand washing practices of school children. Among these factors, the key predictor of hand washing practice of 1st cycle primary school children was residency. In this regard, urban children more likely practice proper hand washing behavior than rural children. This finding was in agreement with the study conducted in Oromia Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Colombia [12-14]. Similarly, another study showed hand washing behavior difference by rural and urban setting where urban dwellers practice hand washing than their rural counter parts. This can be due to the high level acceptance national initiatives like Hand Washing Day by urban 1st cycle primary school children, and further interventions by health extension workers can increase student’s frequency and compliance to hand washing practice in urban residency than rural residency.
The other factor for hand washing practice in children was accessibility of water and soap for hand washing purpose at home. In this study unavailability of hand washing water and soap was found to be preventive factors for hand washing practices in the schools children. This is in line with the study conducted in Oromia Ethiopia, Tanzania and Colombia [13,19,20]. Since hands are the primary vehicle of transmission of many infectious diseases, providing accessible water and soap in toilet area can be an effective program for potentially reducing this problem by properly practicing hand washing in the school children. In this regard, WHO recommended that hand washing with soap is one of the most important hygiene behaviors which should be promoted among school children since it beaks dirt and grease that carries most of the germs which cannot be removed by water alone .
The last but not the least determinants of hand washing practice among reinforcing factors was important referent pressures. In this, case, the odds of high pressure from important referents brought high chance for proper hand washing practice in primary school children. This finding is coincided with the study conducted in Oromia Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Colombia [13,19,20]. The referents pressure influences the way in which children approach personal hygiene, which will stay with them for life. Educating children on good hygiene is the best way to avoid the spread of infection and disorders and not just for childhood complaints; teaching the principles of correct hygiene at an early age can help keep individuals healthy in later life, and be taught to future generations. Principles of hygiene should be made part of everyday life and the best way for referents to teach their children about good hygiene is to lead by example.
The main decisive factors for hand washing practice for children in different part of the world can be predisposing factors like knowledge and attitude of children. Even though, knowledge status was not associated with hand washing practice, findings of this study indicated that one thirds of children had insufficient knowledge about important aspects of hand washing. In this regard, similar studies were obtained from the study done in Tanzania and Colombia [13,20]. Likewise, low knowledge about hand washing practice was founded in many parts of the word . In the same fashion, attitudes, which reflect the degree to which performance of a behavior is positively or negatively valued by an individual , were not found to be statically important in predicting hand-washing practice in this study? Attitudes are shaped by salient beliefs, perception of the expected outcomes, and subjective value of the expected outcomes, and intern it affects hand washing practices .
According to national guideline, for an effective school WASH, one toilet per 25 girls and one toilet plus one urinal per 50 boys is required. Toilets should be hygienic to use and easy to clean and should have convenient hand washing facilities [23,24]. But in this study student toilet ratio (i.e. 1:67 for male and 1:73 for females) was not consistent with national standard. Therefore to meet the recommended standard a considerable number of additional toilet and units are required with necessary levels of, privacy, safety and cleanliness.
In this study, hygiene index was computed using a combination of four hygiene facilities in school (running water+soap+washing station +toilet), but there were no schools fulfilling high hygiene facilities. Among all schools, two and four of them had medium and low hygiene facilities respectively. Therefore, special attention should be taken into consideration in provision of adequate water supply, hand washing stations and sanitation facilities in schools.
The findings of this study indicated that small number of participated children had proper hand washing practice behavior in the selected primary school. The independent predictors of hand washing practices were residency, presence of water and soaps, and pressure from referents. It is recommended that fulfilling of water and soap for hand washing practices, and strictly follows up of children hand washing process should be given more emphasis to minimize improper hand washing practice in these settings. Therefore, information has to be disseminated via community health agents, health development army and mass media to alleviate these problems.
Due to financial limitation, the study could not cover private schools. As result of this, the finding is not generalized to all schools in the study area. The study does not indicate cause-effect relationship since cross sectional study was used.
Benefit and Beneficiaries of the Study
The findings of this study enable the health services planners to design strategies for enhancing proper hand washing practice and also provide baseline data for health policy makers, health planners and different researchers to carry out further large longitudinal scale studies separately in each determinant. Finally, the findings should help and guide the development of focused behavior change strategies for hand washing practice, and provide information to health care practitioners regarding the predictors of hand washing practice in Arbaminch town, Gamo Gofa zone.
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
All the authors participated in all steps of the study starting from development of the proposal till the writing of the manuscript and approval of the final version of the manuscript.
The authors are gratefully indebted to the children interviewed and teachers who participated in and supported the study interviews. In addition, the authors would like to thank the head masters of each selected school for allowed us to preceed the research work. Last but not the least we deeply acknowledge Arba Minch University for the financial support.
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) Department of Human and Services.
- Ryan MA, Christian RS,Wohlrabe J(2001)Hand-washing and respiratory illness among young adults in military training. Am J Prev Med 21:79-83.
- Monse B,Benzian H, Naliponguit E, Belizario V, Schratz A, et al. (2013)The Fit for School Health Outcome Study: A longitudinal survey to assess health impacts of an integrated school health programme in the Philippines. BMC Public Health 13: 1-10.
- Water and Sanitation Programme (2012) The Report on the Formative and Baseline Survey on hand washing with soap in Uganda: Are Ugadans' hands clean enough?pp: 82-86.
- Health Promotion Agency (2005) Health protection in 21st century: Understanding the burden of disease; preparing for the future.
- WHO (2006) Burden of Disease and Cost effectiveness estimates.
- Beth S, Curtis V, Rabie T, Garbrah-Aidoo N(2007) Health in our hands, but not in our heads: understanding hygiene motivation. Health Policy Plan22: 225-330.
- Nandrup-bus I (2009) Mandatory hand washing in schools reduces absenteeism due to infectious illness among pupils: a pilot intervention study. Am J Infect Control 37: 820-826.
- Ministry Of Education (2005) Education Sector Development Program III. Program Action Plan. Addis Ababa.
- WHO (2008) Global Hand washing Day, Public -private partnership to promote hand washing in Ghana.
- Boyce JM, Pittet D (2002) Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- Global Handwashing Day (2010) Health in your hands: a public-private partnership.
- Kumie A, Ali A (2005) A literature survey: An overview of environmental health status in Ethiopia with particular emphasi to its organization, drinking water and sanitation. Ethiop J Health Dev19: 89-103
- Baxter A, Cleary V(2002) Hand hygiene in local primary school children—an infection control and health promotion initiative. Br J Infect Cont 3: 14-17.
- Early E, Battle K, Cantwell E, English J, Lavin JE,et al. (1998) Effect of several interventions on the frequency of handwashing among elementary public school children. Am J Infect Control 26: 263-269.
- Rabie T, Curtis V(2006)Handwashing and risk of respiratory infections: a quantitative systematic review. Trop Med Int Health 11: 258-267.
- Curtis V, Cairncross S (2003) Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 3: 275-281.
- (2005-2009) United Nations International Children Emergency Fund/ Water Aid Ethiopia WASH Project Tennaworeda, Oromia.
- Rita M (2010) Factors that influence hand washing practice among primary school children.
- Lopez-Quintero C, Freeman P,NeumarkY(2009)Handwashig among school children in Bogota, Colombia. Am J Public Health99: 94-101.
- Ebong RD (1994) Environmental Health Knowledge and practice survey among secondary school children Zaire Nigeria. Environ Health Perspect 102: 310-312
- Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding the Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
- WHO-UNICEF (2012) Joint MonitaringProgramme for water supply and Sanitation Report.
- Habtamu A (2010) Effectiveness of School Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene Program: In the case of AssossaWoreda Primary Schools, BGRS, Ethiopia.
Citation: Besha B, Guche H, Chare D, Amare A, Kassahun A, et al. (2016) Assessment of Hand Washing Practice and it’s Associated Factors among First Cycle Primary School Children in Arba Minch Town, Ethiopia, 2015. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6:247. Doi: 10.4172/2161-1165.1000247
Copyright: © 2016 Besha B, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
Open Access Journals
- Total views: 22448
- [From(publication date): 6-2016 - Jun 25, 2022]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 20057
- PDF downloads: 2391