alexa Comparative Evaluation between the New BD FACS Count System and Standard BD FACS Count System by Enumeration of Absolute TCD4 Lymphocytes in Adults: Preliminary Results
ISSN: 2376-0311
JBR Journal of Clinical Diagnosis and Research
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Comparative Evaluation between the New BD FACS Count System and Standard BD FACS Count System by Enumeration of Absolute TCD4 Lymphocytes in Adults: Preliminary Results

Zingue D1*, Hien H1,2, Drabo A1, Nouctara M1, Kabore A1, Ouedraogo O1 and Meda N1,3

1 Centre Muraz, Ministry of Health/Burkina Faso, West Africa

2 Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/DRO)/Burkina Faso, West Africa

3 UFR Sciences de la Santé, Université de Ouagadougou/Burkina Faso, West Africa

Corresponding Author:
Zingue D
Centre Muraz
Ministry of Health/Burkina Faso
PO Box 390, Burkina Faso, West Africa
Tel: 22620970102
Fax: 22620970457
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: December 13, 2013; Accepted date: February 04, 2014; Published date: February 10, 2014

Citation: Zingue D, Hien H, Drabo A, Nouctara M, Kabore A, et al. (2014) Comparative Evaluation between the New BD FACS Count System and Standard BD FACS Count System by Enumeration of Absolute TCD4 Lymphocytes in Adults: Preliminary Results. J Clin Diagn Res 2:103. doi:10.4172/jcdr.1000103

Copyright: © 2014 Zingue D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at JBR Journal of Clinical Diagnosis and Research

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the new BD FACS Count System compared to the standard BD FACS Count system for count of lymphocytes TCD4.
Methods: It was a comparative study conducted in Centre MURAZ research institute. The New BD FACS Count System dedicated to enumerate absolute and percentage of TCD4+ was compared to the standard BD FACS Count System dedicated to enumerate only absolute number of TCD4+, TCD8+, TCD3+ and the CD4/CD8 ratio. Results were analyzed by Meth Val software.
Results: The New BD FACS Count System compared favorably with the BD FACS Count System for absolute TCD4+, resulting in an overall correlation coefficient of 0.99 for the patients evaluated.
Conclusion: The New BD FACS Count System is simple to perform as the old system and was an excellent alternative method to manage adults HIV in resource limited settings.

Keywords

BD FACS count system; TCD4+ absolute; HIV; Adults; Resource limited settings; Burkina Faso

Introduction

TCD4+ cells are the target cells for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Patients TCD4+ levels is the most important parameter for assessing HIV progression, help to determine risk for opportunistic infections, evaluate if the patient should be placed on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and indicate also if the therapy provided is efficacy [1]. WHO/UNAIDS recommended since 2010 the use of ART treatment cut-off of less than 350 TCD4+/μl for adults and adolescents then since 2013, the limit of TCD4+ to treat has been update at ≤ 500/μl [2,3]. However, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has established a treatment cut-off TCD4+ percentage of <25% for infants under 11 months of age, <20% for children up to 3 years of age, and <15% for children between 3 and 5 years of age [4]. Conventional flow cytometry is the most accepted gold standard to enumerate absolute and percentage of TCD4+ for adults and infants HIV infection management. But, they are very expensive and complex for resource limited settings. The standard BD FACSCount™ System was developed as an alternative method and dedicated for absolute counting of TCD4+, TCD8+, TCD3+, CD4/CD8 ratio and without simultaneous percentage of lymphocyte. The new BD FACSCount™ system is dedicated to provide simultaneously absolute and percentage results of TCD4+ for adults and infants HIV management. The main study conducted by Pattanapanyasat et al. with the new BD FACS Count was observed good performance with this device in comparison with the gold standard flow cytometry [5].

Before using the new BD FACS Count System for routine TCD4+ management in Burkina Faso, preliminary study was conducted at Centre MURAZ research institute with a few samples of specimen. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of the new BD FACS Count System in comparison with the standard BD FACS Count system for absolute TCD4+ counting as a tool for adults TCD4+ management.

Materials and Methods

Design

A small comparative study was conducted in 2010 at Centre MURAZ to compare the standard and the new software of BD FACS Count System for their capacity to deliver the same results of absolute TCD4+ using adult’s blood. It was a study to perform an in house comparative evaluation prior to switching the new reagents and the new software of BD FACS Count System before using for routine TCD4+ counting.

Adult’s HIV-1, negative and unknown serology participants were included in the study to carry out for absolute TCD4+ and TCD4+ percentage by both two systems of BD FACSCount.

Subjects

K3EDTA venous whole blood sample were collected from 3 HIV- 1 seropositive, 6 HIV seronegative and 1 unknown HIV statuses, and then processed for lymphocytes enumeration within 6 hours. Participant’s age was between 22 and 40 years.

Procedures

BD FACS Count System (V1.4, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA): standard/reference: Standard BD FACS Count System with software V1.4 was used as reference method for the determination of absolute TCD4+cell counts according to the manufacturer’s operating procedure. Its reagent kit is provided in a two-tube format containing the antibodies tube of CD4/CD3 reagents with reference beads and tube of CD8/CD3 reagents with reference beads. In standard FACSCount method, 50μl of EDTA uncoagulated whole blood was added to the two-tubes (CD4/CD3 reagent tube, CD8/CD3 reagent tube) using a pipette. They were vortexed for 5 seconds and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 60 minutes. Then, 50 μl of a fixative solution was added to the tubes. The tubes were vortexed, and the non lysed stained sample was analyzed in FACSCount using the standard software.

BD FACS count system (V1.3, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA): new/field: The new version of BD FACS Count is the same device than the standard one but rune with new software and new reagents for simultaneous counting of absolute and percentage of TCD4+. The reagent kit is provided in a one-tube format containing a mixture of three monoclonal antibodies (CD4/CD14/CD15 conjugated respectively with PE/PE-Cy5/PECy5), a nuclear DNA fluorescent dye, and a known number of fluorescent micro beads. Staining with the new FACSCount, CD4 reagent was performed by adding 50 μl of EDTAuncoagulated whole blood to the CD4 reagent tube using a pipette. The mixture was vortexed for 5 seconds and incubated in the dark for 30 minutes at room temperature. Then 50 μl of the fixative solution was added to the tube. The tube was vortexed, and the non lysed stained sample was analyzed in FACSCount using the new software [5].

Statistical Analysis

Meth Val software (Method Validator Software 1.1.9.0, Philippe Marquis, Metz, France) was used to analyze data. Absolute TCD4+ counts obtained by the new FACSCount system were compared to the standard one by linear regression analysis and coefficient of variation. Bland–Altman statistical bias method was used to determine the level of agreement between the results obtained by the new and the standard systems. For the precision, 5 replicates of whole blood from an individual were pipette and analyzed by the new system. Coefficient of variation (CV%) was calculated for absolute TCD4+.

Results

As it is shown in table1 and figure1, a high and significant overall correlation (r=0, 99, slope of the best linear fit=1,107) was observed between absolute TCD4+ count obtained with the standard software and the new one using the same device of BD FACS Count System. A negative intercept (Y-intercept= -36) was detected. Bland–Altman plots of the comparison between the new and the standard software gave a bias of 39 TCD4+/μl (LOA from -21, 7 TCD4+/μl to 99, 7 TCD4+/μl). For the intra-lab reproducibility of the new system, coefficient of variation obtained was 1, 24% for absolute TCD4+ using the new software.

Discussion

The new software BD FACS Count Systems is saved time, easy to use and have the same performance as the standard software for absolute TCD4 enumeration. The original software includes CD4 and CD8 T-cell absolute value with the automated reports. The new software eliminates CD8 T-cell counts but includes CD4 T-cell percentage in addition to absolute count in the automated reports. To accommodate for the percentage values of CD4 T-cells, the reagent configuration is different and more expensive with the second option.

With the new software, the detectable range for absolute TCD4+ is 50 to 5000 /μl and the percentage of TCD4+ range is 5% to 65%. The results of the absolute TCD4+ compared favorably with standard FACSCount with an overall correlation coefficient of 0.99. Correlation was done with nine results because one result of TCD4+ obtained by the standard method was superior by 2000TCD4+/μl. The CV was under 2% for TCD4+ obtained with the new system. But, unfortunately the limit of this study was the small number of participants (10) and we think that, the fact that CD4 T-cell absolute values were similar is obvious when using the same instrument with two reagents and the two softwares. For adults HIV infected individuals, percentage of CD4 T-cells is not a requirement. So, it’s necessary to perform the new system with children participants under five years for TCD4+ percentage value in resource limited settings.

Conclusion

The new BD FACS Count system is reliable for adults HIV management in resource limited settings. But, to be performed at best because the evaluation is incomplete, the reliability and the reproducibility of the New BD FACS Count system require further evaluation in larger longitudinal studies in resource limited context based on specimens from children under the age of 5 years.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank National AIDS/STD Program for their technical assistance and implementation of the new BD FACS Count system in Burkina Faso and to make accessible the new reagents and new software of BD FACS Count System.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11879
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2014 - Apr 27, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8051
  • PDF downloads : 3828
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version