DNA Fingerprinting: The New Trend in Fighting the Adulteration of Commercialized and Cultivated Medicinal Plants | OMICS International
ISSN: 2329-8863
Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

DNA Fingerprinting: The New Trend in Fighting the Adulteration of Commercialized and Cultivated Medicinal Plants

Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of the Holy Spirit of Kaslik, B.P. 446 Jounieh, Lebanon Marc El Beyrouthy* and Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of the Holy Spirit of Kaslik, B.P. 446 Jounieh, Lebanon Alain Abi-Rizk
Corresponding Author : Marc El Beyrouthy
Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences
University of the Holy Spirit of Kaslik
B.P. 446 Jounieh, Lebanon
Tel: +961 9 600878
Fax: +961 9 600871
E-mail: [email protected]
Received September 19, 2013; Accepted September 23, 2013; Published September 25, 2013
Citation: El Beyrouthy M, Abi-Rizk A (2013) DNA Fingerprinting: The New Trend in Fighting the Adulteration of Commercialized and Cultivated Medicinal Plants. Adv Crop Sci Tech 1:e107. doi: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000e107
Copyright: © 2013 El Beyrouthy M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google

Visit for more related articles at Advances in Crop Science and Technology

Herbal medicine refers to the long historical use of medicinal plants, which is well established and widely known to be safe and effective [1]. Moreover, and nowadays, approximately 70% of “synthetic” medicines are derived from medical plants [2]. But, with no doubt, the adulteration and/or substitution of medicinal plants remain the main problem treating the drug industry worldwide [2]. Adulteration is defined as an intentional substitution or addition of another plant species or foreign substance, in order to increase the weight, potency of the product, and/or to decrease its cost [3].
In general, adulteration is considered as an intentional practice. However, unintentional adulterations also exist in herbal raw material trade, most probably due to the confusion in vernacular names between indigenous systems of medicine and local dialects, the lack of knowledge about the authentic plant, the non-availability of the authentic plant, the similarity in morphology and or aroma, the careless in collecting and some other unknown reasons [2,3].
For many decades, many methods were elaborated for the differentiation of the spurious and authentic plants. Most of these methods were based on plant morphological observations, microscopy and chemical markers. The limitations of these methods generated a need for newer and supportive techniques [4-6].
Based on the concept of the DNA fingerprinting applied in the determination of the ancestry of plants, animals and other microorganisms, the genotypic characterization of medicinal plants became a strong method that genetically detects adulterations or substitutions by searching for specific genes [1,3,6].
In a recent study, samples of Rheum ribes L. (Lebanese Rhubarb) roots commonly used and sold in the Lebanese market were collected in order to determine their chemical composition, compare them to a genuine one, and to check if they’re falsified or not. The chemical composition was identified and compared with different samples bought from various herbalist shops scattered across the Lebanese regions. Interestingly, some morphological and microscopic differences were observed between few of the samples. Yet, the authors mentioned that these methods weren’t reproducible because no clear conclusion could be drawn. For further confirmation, DNA analysis was used to show that three out of thirteen analyzed samples were not Rheum ribes [7].
In another example, Macroscopic and microscopic description of samples claimed as Viola odorata L. from several herbalist shops in Lebanon, have shown that these samples refer to Cercis siliquastrum L. After many tests of specificity of the designed primers for each plant, the PCR analysis reveals that 20% of the collected samples contained the DNA of both Viola and Cercis, and 80% showed negative results with the primers of Viola and positive results with the primers specific to Cercis. These results clearly describe a good example of a fraudulent adulteration of Viola with Cercis [1].
DNA fingerprinting of medicinal plants using PCR techniques has become an invaluable tool to detect adulteration. DNA sequencing also start increasing in this specific domain, either in combination with, or as a replacement for traditional DNA fingerprinting techniques. A major example is the use of short, standardized regions of the genome as taxon barcodes for biological identification of plants [8-10].
Because of the increase in the rate of dependence on herbal medicine, and the gap in supply and demands, the falsifications will continue to grow, and the hazardous effects of such actions will directly affect human health. The cultivation of authentic medical crops remains the best way to fight falsification, and the ideal way to detect adulteration actions is by developing new techniques that are very specific and relatively fast and low cost. Till today, DNA fingerprinting remains the most reliable technique in the modern pharmacological research worldwide.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 14089
  • [From(publication date):
    November-2013 - Jan 21, 2022]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 9792
  • PDF downloads : 4297