alexa Electrochemical Nanobiosensors for Cancer Diagnosis | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-9872
Journal of Analytical & Bioanalytical Techniques

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Electrochemical Nanobiosensors for Cancer Diagnosis

Pranjal Chandra*

Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, India

*Corresponding Author:
Pranjal Chandra
Amity Institute of Biotechnology
Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Tel: +91-120-4392644
Fax: +91-120-4392295
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: March 06, 2015, Accepted March 07, 2015, Published Date: March 24, 2015

Citation: Chandra p (2015) Electrochemical Nanobiosensors for Cancer Diagnosis . J Anal Bioanal Tech 6:e119. doi: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000e119

Copyright: © 2015 Chandra P. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Analytical & Bioanalytical Techniques

Editorial

Cancer is one of the most leading cause of death worldwide and can take over 200 diverse forms, including lung, prostate, breast, cervical, ovarian, hematologic, colon cancer, and leukemia. It has been found that environmental factors (eg, alcohol, radiation, smoke, and carcinogenic chemical compounds) as well as genetic factors (eg, autoimmune dysfunction and hereditary mutations) are linked with an increased threat in the development and progression of cancer [1]. In addition microorganisms are also reported to be associated with some types of cancer (eg, stomach cancer and cervical cancer etc) [2]. In view of such an important medical condition, several methods have already been discovered to diagnose cancer and many more methods are in the process of development [3]. Conventional clinical approaches to detect cancers are based on biopsy followed by histopathology [4], biomarkers using protein levels or nucleic acid content and its expression in the cancer suspects [5]. Biopsy is the most widely used technique, however, it is an invasive technique and cannot always be used. Furthermore, it cannot be applied when cancer biomarkers are present in an extremely low concentrations in the body fluids and in malignant tissues. Thus, the development of highly sensitive and new techniques of cancer diagnosis is extremely interesting and significant in medical science. Due to high interest in interdisciplinary research in the last decade several nanobiosensors based on spectrophotometric or optical methods, fluorescence immunoassay, chemiluminescence analysis, electrochemistry, radioimmunoassay, capillary electrophoresis and chromatographic analysis have been developed to detect cancer biomarkers (proteomic and genetic markers) and cells [6,7]. The major issues in cancer diagnosis are sensitivity and to develop a miniaturized platforms that can be used as point-of-care medical device and can be applied in the remote areas. The development of electrochemical nanobiosensors composed of nanomaterials and biological receptors (antibody, aptamer, peptide etc) are likely the most encouraging approach to solve the problems related to sensitivity, rapidity, selectivity, and low cost [8-12]. This approach is expected to be very effective for cancer diagnosis due to the combination of conventional bioassay (antibody, aptamer, peptide etc) coupled with nanomaterials and electrochemical measurement. Another advantage of the electrochemical biosensor include its ability to be miniaturized as an onsite medical device, low cost, small, and handy size [13-17]. These features of electrochemical nanobiosensors may serve as a smart alternative to support fast cancer diagnosis, thereby designing better therapeutic strategies which will be extremely helpful in decreasing patient stress.

Usually, an electrochemical nanobiosensor is developed for either cancer biomarkers detection such as; embryonic antigen biomarkers, carbohydrate antigens biomarkers, enzyme and isozyme biomarkers, protein biomarkers, hormone biomarkers etc. or for the direct detection of whole cancer cells. The real implication of all these studies are to develop at first a sensor prototype and then translate it into a genuine and real biomedical device for cancer suspects and patients. A recent electrochemical nanobiosensor for breast cancer diagnosis has been developed in Yoon-Bo Shim laboratory, Pusan National University, South Korea, where in a single prototype human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein and HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells have been detected by an electrochemical nanobiosensor directly in body fluids [16]. The sensor probe was fabricated by covalently immobilizing anti-HER2 onto a nanoconducting film and the signal was obtained by a novel bioconjugate composed of hydrazine−gold nanoparticle−aptamer, where the hydrazine acted as an electrocatalyst and aptamer worked as a reporter molecule. The developed sensor was capable of differentiating between HER2-positive breast cancer cells and HER2-negative cells. This method exhibited an excellent diagnosis method for the ultrasensitive detection of SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells in real samples. The interesting feature of this method is that, it is a generic method and can be applied for any type of cancer biomarkers and cells simply by changing the detector and reporter probe. In another study, a voltammeric and impidimetric detection of microRNA-21 and mir-21 from cell lysates was investigated for the detection of breast cancer cell line and hepatoma cell line [18]. The developed biosensor showed detection limit of 2.09 µg/mL and was successfully applied in real sample analysis. Apart of cancer diagnosis based on singly analyte detection, multiplex detection strategies have also been attempted by various research groups. In this regard, an electrochemical detector has been integrated with the microfluidic system for the simultaneous detection of cancer protein markers. For instance, Fragoso et al., reported an integrated microfluidic system for the electrochemical detection of breast cancer markers directly in patient serum samples [19]. The results obtained in this particular case were in excellent correlation with the conventionally used ELISA method indicating the promise of microfluidic integrated electrochemical sensor for multiplex detection of cancer biomarkers. In another work Chikkaveeraiah et al., reported a microfluidic electrochemical immunoassay system for simultaneous detection of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) using a molded polydimethylsiloxane channel interfaced with a pump and test sample injector [20]. Using off-line recognition of target compounds by enzyme-labeled superparamagnetic particle-antibody bioconjugates and capture antibodies attached to an eight-electrode measuring chip. The developed system was very efficient and was able to detect the cancer biomarkers with the detection limit in picogram/mL. The biomedical application of these markers were demonstrated by using serum samples. Apart of these few examples several studies have been conducted to develop electrochemical nanobiosensors for highly sensitive cancer diagnosis.

Through the studies mentioned above clearly indicate that electrochemical nanobiosensors could be very effective diagnostic tool for cancer diagnosis and can be applied for clinical purposes and especially if it can be realized for high-throughput and onsite detection. Future study should be directed towards designing new simple electrochemical sensor platforms with high sensitivity and selectivity.

Acknowledgement

Dr. Pranjal Chandra thanks to Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, India for providing the research facility.

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69-90.
  2. Cummins J, Tangney M (2013) Bacteria and tumours: causative agents or opportunistic inhabitants? Infect Agent Cancer 8: 11.
  3. Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, Cokkinides V, Doroshenk M, et al. (2014) Cancer screening in the United States, 2014: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 64: 30-51.
  4. Sausville E A and Longo DL (2005) Principles of Cancer Treatment. (18th Edition) Harrisons Principles of Internal Medicine.
  5. Fredriksson S, Dixon W, Ji H, Koong AC, Mindrinos M, et al. (2007) Multiplexed protein detection by proximity ligation for cancer biomarker validation. Nat Methods 4: 327-329.
  6. Bohunicky B, Mousa SA (2010) Biosensors: the new wave in cancer diagnosis. NanotechnolSciAppl 4: 1-10.
  7. Tothill IE1 (2009) Biosensors for cancer markers diagnosis. Semin Cell DevBiol 20: 55-62.
  8. Koh WC, Chandra P, Kim DM, Shim YB (2011) Electropolymerized self-assembled layer on gold nanoparticles: detection of inducible nitric oxide synthase in neuronal cell culture. Anal Chem 83: 6177-6183.
  9. Chandra P, Noh HB, Won MS, Shim YB (2011) Detection of daunomycin using phosphatidylserine and aptamer co-immobilized on Au nanoparticles deposited conducting polymer. BiosensBioelectron 26: 4442-4449.
  10. Chandra P, Zaidi SA, Noh HB, Shim YB (2011) Separation and simultaneous detection of anticancer drugs in a microfluidic device with an amperometric biosensor. BiosensBioelectron 28: 326-332.
  11. Zhu Y, Chandra P, Song KM, Ban C, Shim YB (2012) Label-free detection of kanamycin based on the aptamer-functionalized conducting polymer/gold nanocomposite. BiosensBioelectron 36: 29-34.
  12. Noh HB, Chandra P, Moon JO, Shim YB (2012) In vivo detection of glutathione disulfide and oxidative stress monitoring using a biosensor. Biomaterials 33: 2600-2607.
  13. Chandra P, Koh WC, Noh HB, Shim YB (2012) In vitro monitoring of i-NOS concentrations with an immunosensor: the inhibitory effect of endocrine disruptors on i-NOS release. BiosensBioelectron 32: 278-282.
  14. Chandra P, Son NX, Noh HB, Goyal RN, Shim YB (2013) Investigation on the downregulation of dopamine by acetaminophen administration based on their simultaneous determination in urine. BiosensBioelectron 39: 139-144.
  15. Chandra P, Noh HB, Shim YB (2013) Cancer cell detection based on the interaction between an anticancer drug and cell membrane components. ChemCommun (Camb) 49: 1900-1902.
  16. Zhu Y, Chandra P, Shim YB (2013) Ultrasensitive and selective electrochemical diagnosis of breast cancer based on a hydrazine-Au nanoparticle-aptamerbioconjugate. Anal Chem 85: 1058-1064.
  17. Yadav SK, Agrawal B, Chandra P, Goyal RN (2014) In vitro chloramphenicol detection in a Haemophilus influenza model using an aptamer-polymer based electrochemical biosensor. BiosensBioelectron 55: 337-342.
  18. Kilic T, Erdem A, Erac Y, Seydibeyoglu MO, Okur S, et al. (2014) Electrochemical Detection of a Cancer Biomarker mir-21 in Cell Lysates Using Graphene Modified Sensors. Electroanalysis 27: 317-326.
  19. Fragoso A, Latta D, Laboria N, von Germar F, Hansen-Hagge TE, et al. (2011) Integrated microfluidic platform for the electrochemical detection of breast cancer markers in patient serum samples. Lab Chip 11: 625-631.
  20. Chikkaveeraiah BV, Mani V, Patel V, Gutkind JS, Rusling JF (2011) Microfluidic electrochemical immunoarray for ultrasensitive detection of two cancer biomarker proteins in serum. BiosensBioelectron 26: 4477-4483.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12624
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2015 - Jun 23, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8648
  • PDF downloads : 3976
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7