Dersleri yüzünden oldukça stresli bir ruh haline sikiş hikayeleri bürünüp özel matematik dersinden önce rahatlayabilmek için amatör pornolar kendisini yatak odasına kapatan genç adam telefonundan porno resimleri açtığı porno filmini keyifle seyir ederek yatağını mobil porno okşar ruh dinlendirici olduğunu iddia ettikleri özel sex resim bir masaj salonunda çalışan genç masör hem sağlık hem de huzur sikiş için gelip masaj yaptıracak olan kadını gördüğünde porn nutku tutulur tüm gün boyu seksi lezbiyenleri sikiş dikizleyerek onları en savunmasız anlarında fotoğraflayan azılı erkek lavaboya geçerek fotoğraflara bakıp koca yarağını keyifle okşamaya başlar
Reach Us +44 3308186230

GET THE APP

Neonatal and Pediatric Medicine - Pediatric Migraine Treatment: An Updated Review
ISSN: 2572-4983

Neonatal and Pediatric Medicine
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Review Article   
  • Neonat Pediatr Med 2018, Vol 5(1): 178
  • DOI: 10.4172/2572-4983.1000178

Pediatric Migraine Treatment: An Updated Review

Marcello Pasculli1*, Pasquale Striano2 and Maria Giuseppina Ledda3
1Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, Department of Biomedical Science, University of Cagliari, “A. Cao” Microcitemico Pediatric Hospital - G. Brotzu Hospital Trust, Cagliari, Italy
2Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseas Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, “G. Gaslini” Institute, Genova, Italy
3“A. Cao” Microcitemico Pediatric Hospital - G. Brotzu Hospital Trust, Cagliari, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Marcello Pasculli, Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, Department of Biomedical Science, University of Cagliari, “A. Cao” Microcitemico Pediatric Hospital - G. Brotzu Hospital Trust, Cagliari, Italy, Tel: +393271797162, Email: marcellopasculli@tiscali.it

Received: 23-Jan-2019 / Accepted Date: 04-Feb-2019 / Published Date: 13-Feb-2019 DOI: 10.4172/2572-4983.1000178

Abstract

Introduction: Migraine is the most important cause of pediatric consultations due to headaches, because of significant distress and disability for child and their family. For this reason, a correct and timely treatment is very important.

Objectives and methodology: This article reviews the current knowledge about migraine treatments in children and adolescents. With the term “migraine” we refer to all migraine subtypes. Literature search was carried out in PubMed for all studies and reviews published until December 31st, 2018.

Results: The treatment of pediatric migraine is multidisciplinary. It is based on an integrated biobehavioral approach and a pharmacological intervention with use of symptomatic and/or prophylactic drugs.

Discussion: In the literature, data on the current clinical practice on treatment of pediatric migraine are very limited. We evaluated the use of acute and preventive drugs, nutraceuticals and non-pharmacological treatments.

Acute or symptomatic treatment is always more effective when given early during the attack. NSAIDs, especially ibuprofen, should be preferred to acetaminophen for treating acute attacks of migraine, because they were usually more effective and well tolerated. If NSAID are not effective, triptans could be used more frequently as first for treating migraine attack in adolescents.

Migraine prophylaxis includes a large number of drugs but relatively few rigorous, randomized controlled studies have been carried out in children and adolescents. According to the main guidelines or systematic reviews for preventive treatment of paediatric migraine flunarizine is recognized as the first choice drug for prophylaxis, followed by propanolol, amitryptiline, pizotifen, cyproheptadine and antiepileptic drugs (topiramate and valproate).

Therefore, the use of non-pharmacological treatments should be implemented in clinical practice, especially in cases with contraindications or poor tolerability or efficacy to preventive drugs.

Conclusions: Pediatric RCTs, based on larger samples sizes and innovative study protocols, involving multicenter studies and primary care services (to reduce selection bias), are needed to better understand the most effective and safe treatment strategies for pediatric migraine patients and define “responders” profile.

Keywords: Migraine; Treatment; Children; Adolescents; Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment migraine and children; Pediatric treatment; Drugs for acute and chronic migraine treatment in children

Introduction

Migraine is the most important cause of pediatric consultations due to headaches [1-3] because of significant distress and disability for child and their family [4]. For this reason, a correct and timely treatment is very important.

Epidemiology

More than half of migraineurs have their attack before they’re 15 years of age [5]. The mean age of onset of migraine is 7 years in boys and 11 years in girls [6]. The overall mean prevalence of migraine in the pediatric population is 9.1% (95% CI 7.1-11.1) [1]. According an extensive review of 64 cross-sectional studies, published in 32 different countries, including a total of 227,249 subjects, the prevalence of migraine steadily increases through childhood. The male:female ratio shifts during adolescence according to the age (increases with age) and the gender [7] (Table 1).

By ages Preschool Elementary school High school
Prevalence (%) 1.2-3.2 4-11 8-23
Gender ratio boys>girls boys=girls girls>boys

Table 1: Prevalence of migraine headache through childhood [1].

Classification

Formal diagnostic criteria for primary and secondary headaches have been revised and published in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) classified migraine into different subtypes: a) migraine without aura, b) migraine with aura, c) chronic migraine, d) complications of migraine, e) probable migraine, and f) multiple episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine [8].

Diagnostic evaluation

The diagnosis is based on clinical criteria established by the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) [7]. Detailed clinical history and general neurologic examination [9,10] are very important to distinguish between primary and secondary headache and to make the correct diagnosis and to choose the appropriate therapies (Tables 2 and 3).

Cause Result
Elevated ICP Hydrocephalus, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, medications, exogenous hormones, tumor, vascular malformation, large cyst, cerebral edema
Low ICP CSF leak, consider with trauma or connective tissue disorder
Infection Viral illness, systemic infection, sinusitis, strep pharyngitis, meningitis/encephalitis, fungal meningitis may be indolent
Cerebrovascular disease Hemorrhage, vascular dissection, venous thrombosis, ischemic stroke, vascular malformation, vasculitis
Trauma Posttraumatic headache, intracranial hemorrhage, whiplash/cervicogenic headache, vascular dissection
Medications Antihypertensives, amphetamines, stimulants, nitrates, some antibiotics, IVIG, steroids, exogenous hormones, vitamin A, retinoic acid, caffeine, opioids, cannabis, NSAIDs, metronidazole
Metabolic disease Endocrine disorder, hypercapnia/sleep apnea, mitochondrial disease, eating disorder/fasting, celiac disease
Toxic exposure Alcohol, drugs, inhalants, lead
Epilepsy Post- or preictal headaches
Rheumatological disease Aseptic meningitis, intracranial hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, immunosuppressive agents, and NSAIDs
Dental disease TMJ, dental caries, abscesses

Table 2: Potential causes of secondary headache [4].

Family history of migraine
Childhood migraine proxy symptoms: carsickness, gastrointestinal complaints
Age of onset
Frequency, severity and changes over time
Triggering, aggravating or alleviating features
Autonomic features
Aura features
Current and prior treatments
Lifestyle features
Comorbid conditions

Table 3: Essential elements of the headache history [11].

It is not supported by laboratory or other specific examinations. Neuroimaging should be considered when various “red flags”, warning symptoms and signs suggestive of a secondary headache, are present (Table 4) [12]. Electroencephalography (EEG) is recommended only in case of an underlying seizure disorder [13]. Lumbar puncture, in the same way, should be performed only in a suspicion of subarachnoid hemorrhage or neurological infections.

New headache type or progressive increase in severity and frequency of headache
Sudden onset of severe headache (<6 months in duration)
Changing of quality of headache (exacerbation of headache with straining, sneezing or coughing)
Symptoms of systemic disease which may include weight loss, night sweats, fever, joint pains, rash, stiff neck…
Known systemic disorder, including neurocutaneous syndrorme, hypercoagulopathy, genetic disorder, malignancy with possible metastases, rheumatological disorder, immunosuppression
Abnormal neurological examination, including focal neurologic or symptoms (other than typical aura), ataxia, cranial nerve deficit, head-tilt, papilledema, visual impairment, altered mental status (decreased consciousness level) or other abnormalities
Young age of child (<6 years old)
Headaches suggesting raised intracranial pressure (early morning headache, vomiting in morning, pain disturbing sleep, headache worse cough or valsava)
Signs of head trauma
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Table 4: Red flags for secondary headache [4,5].

Objectives And Methodology

This article reviews the current knowledge about treatment of migraine in children and adolescents. With the term “migraine” we refers to all the above indicates subtypes.

Literature search was carried out in PubMed for all studies and reviews published until August 31st, 2018. The keywords searched for were “treatment migraine and children”, “pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment migraine and children”, “prophylactic/ preventive treatment migraine and children” and “drugs for the acute treatment of migraine in children”. Studies were included if they focused on the pediatric population, if they were published in peer reviewed journals and written in English.

Results

The treatment of pediatric migraine is multidisciplinary and includes pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions [14].

Approximately 60% of children and adolescents with migraine will improve with a three-pronged treatment approach that includes general measures, acute and preventive pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments [15]. Therapeutic strategies should be based not only on the characteristics of the migraine episodes, the daily migraine disability and the impact on quality of life [8], measured by PedMIDAS and PedsQL 4.0 Course Scale [16,17], but especially on the biological (patient’s age), socio-family (family structure, culture, beliefs) and psychological aspects of patients [17,18].

For the remaining 40% of children and adolescents having continuous headache or medication-overuse headache, the clinician’s judgment remains the best guide to preventive therapy selection.

General Measures

The first step in avoiding migraine attack is to recognize and to eliminate triggering factors such as: poor sleep habits, dietary (irregular meals, alcoholic beverages, caffeine excess, nitrates and nitrites, foods with tyramine), environmental (media abuse, odors), medication (estrogen, histamine, nifedipine, ranitidine, reserpine…), psychological (stress, anxiety, worry, depression) and physical triggers (fever, fatigue, hypoglycemia, dehydration) [10]. Any trigger factors should be addressed and modified when possible, to promote general health (SMART, Sleep, Meals, Activity, Relaxation Trigger avoidance) (Table 5) [19].

Sleep Regular and sufficient sleep
Meals Regular and sufficient meals, including breakfast and good hydration
Activity Regular (but not excessive) aerobic exercise
Relaxation Relaxation, stress reduction and management
Trigger avoidance Avoid triggers such as stress, sleep deprivation or other identified triggers
Table 5: SMART: Lifestyle changes to promote general health [19].

Acute Treatment

Acute treatment includes abortive (or rescue) medications that are taken during acute migraine attack to provide quick relief from headache.

Drug used in symptomatic treatment are chosen according to the headache type and frequency, type of symptoms associated, their adverse-effect profile and comorbidities.

The common goals of acute treatment are: reduction or removal of pain and associated symptoms, recover of the global functioning, reduction or removal of side effects, improvement of the quality of life and reduction or removal headache recurrences. Their use should be limited to no more than two to three times per week to avoid Medication Overuse Headache (MOH).

The main indications are: migraine attacks with limited frequency (≤4 episodes/month), contraindications to prophylaxis therapies and poor compliance to prophylaxis therapy.

Lastly we remind you that in pediatric age the share of placebo-responders to symptomatic migraine therapy is even higher (40-70%) than the adult (30-45%), so that the results in the controlled trials are less comprehensible and more difficult [8].

Analgesics And NSAIDs

 Paracetamol (or acetaminophen) and ibuprofen are the most commonly used over-the counter (OTC) drugs. Few and limited controlled studies have been performed on the use of analgesics in the pediatric migraine.

Regarding acetaminophen, there isn’t sufficient evidence for the acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study acetaminophen (15 mg/kg) was not superior to placebo or ibuprofen (7.5-10 mg/kg), while ibuprofen was significantly more effective than placebo and in reducing pain intensity [9,13,20,21].

The rare adverse effects of acetaminophen are skin rash, erythema, urticaria, while gastralgia, nausea and vomiting for ibuprofen. At the moment, acetaminophen is not contraindicated as an analgesic since the first years of life. Contraindications are drug hypersensitivity, liver failure and haemolytic anemia [22].

Ibuprofen is another NSAID (Non-Steroidal anti-Inflammatory Drug) used in the acute treatment of migraine in children [23]. Treatment should be initiated at the onset of pain or aura, if present, even before the head pain begins. The initial dose could be repeated once in 4-6 h for the same headache, if needed.

Ketorolac is used mostly in the emergency department. It is used an intravenous formula, starting from 0.5 mg/kg. It is effective in 55.2% of the patients in one hour. When combined with prochlorperazine, the response rate improves to 93% [24]. According a randomized, doubleblind trial of prochlorperazine versus ketorolac, recurrence rate within 24 h with ketorolac alone is 30% [25].

Indomethacin is another NSAID used in a heterogeneous group of headache such as Valsalva-induced headaches (cough, exercise or sex headache), primary stabbing headache, hypnic headache and the trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) [a group of primary headache disorders that includes cluster headache (CH), paroxysmal hemicrania (PH), hemicrania continua (HC) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing/cranial autonomic features (SUNCT/SUNA)] [26].

Its mechanisms are not clear. It is a reversible inhibitor of prostaglandins, blocking both COX-1 and COX-2 synthesis.

Treatment usually starts with a dose of 25 mg three times daily with meals, and a response is usually fast. Otherwise after 48 hours the dosage can be increased to 50 mg three times daily. The most important side effects are vomiting, upset stomach, heartburn, diarrhea, a feeling of bowel fullness, constipation, bloating, gas, rectal irritation, dizziness, drowsiness, nervousness, headache, skin rash, itching or blurred vision.

Alternative over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medications, including naproxen sodium and aspirin. Naproxen is a different NSAID that, when given in combination with sumatriptan, is FDA approved for use in pediatric migraineurs. Aspirin should be avoided in children under the age of 16 years to avoid the risk of Reye syndrome [13].

In the current body of literature, there is no evidence for use of diclofenac in children with migraine.

Table 6 summarizes the most common analgesics and NSAIDs, their doses, adverse effects and contraindications.

Drug (type of drug) Dose (maximum/dose) Adverse effects Contraindication/cautions
Paracetamol or acetaminophen* 15 mg/kg/dose PO (1000 mg) or PR q 4 h Skin rash, erythema, urticaria Drug hypersensitivity, liver failure, severe hemolytic anemia
Ibuprofen* (NSAID) 10 mg/kg/dose PO, q 6 h (800 mg) Gastralgia, gastric burning, nausea, vomiting, rarely gastric and duodenal ulcer, rash and urticarial reactions, asthmatic crises, anaphylaxis Liver failure, glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, hemorrhagic diseases,
Ketoprofen (NSAID) 1-2 mg/kg PO Ulcers and gastric bleeding, constipation, diarrhea, sores in the mouth, dizziness, nervousness, drowsiness, insomnia, tinnitus, Drug hypersensitivity, asthma,
Ketorolac (NSAID) 30 mg initial dose, then 15-30 mg/dose (0.5 mg/kg) IV or IM 10 mg/dose PO, q 4-6 h Gastralgia, gastric burning, nausea, vomiting, rarely gastric and duodenal ulcer, rash and urticarial reactions, asthmatic crises, anaphylaxis Gastro pain, nasty taste, flushing, confusion
Diclofenac (NSAID) 0.5-1 mg/kg PO (150 mg) 0.5-1 mg/kg IV/IM (150 mg) Gastralgia, gastric burning, nausea, vomiting, rarely gastric and duodenal ulcer, rash and urticarial reactions, asthmatic crises, anaphylaxis Gastro pain, bleeding, ulceration, allergic reactions,
Piroxicam (NSAID) 10-20 mg/kg Gastralgia, gastric burning, nausea, vomiting, rarely gastric and duodenal ulcer, rash and urticarial reactions, asthmatic crises, anaphylaxis  
Naproxen sodium (NSAID) 5-7 mg/kg PO (500 mg) Gastralgia, gastric burning, nausea, vomiting, rarely gastric and duodenal ulcer, rash and urticarial reactions, asthmatic crises, anaphylaxis  
Acetylsalicylic acid (NSAID) 10-15 mg/kg/dose PO up to 6 doses/day Gastralgia, gastric burning, nausea, vomiting, rarely gastric and duodenal ulcer, rash and urticarial reactions, asthmatic crises, anaphylaxis  
Nimesulide (NSAID) 1-2 mg/kg PO (400 mg) Gastralgia, gastric burning, nausea, vomiting, rarely gastric and duodenal ulcer, rash and urticarial reactions, asthmatic crises, anaphylaxis >18 years

IM: Intramuscular; IV: intravenous; NSAIDs: Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug ; PO: by months; q: every *Controlled studies.

Table 6: Analgesics and NSAIDs [12].

Antidopaminergic agents

Antidopaminergic agents, such as prochlorperazine and metoclopramide, are indicated in the treatment of significant nausea and vomiting associated with migraine attack, in the emergency department (ED). A multi-center retrospective study of common practices in the ED for management of migraine compared numerous treatments (non-opioid analgesics, dopamine agonists and diphenhydramine): prochlorperazine was used with equal frequency to metoclopramide and appeared more effective than metoclopramide in preventing the return of patients in the ED [27]. In a 2011 study has been showed that prochlorperazine, when given intravenously with a load of intravenous fluids, determined a 75% improvement with 50% headache freedom at 1 h, and 95% improvement with 60% headache freedom at 3 h [13,28]. However, given the risk of dystonic reaction, it is usually recommended the combination with diphenhydramine. Its sedating effect could be beneficial for patients who need to sleep after their migraine attack [4]. One randomized double-blinded study comparing prochlorperazine and intravenous ketorolac found that prochlorperazine was more effective than ketorolac in reducing recurrence rate within 24 h [29].

Other neuroleptics, administered via the parental route, for the management of status migrainosus include haloperidol and chlorpromazine. Only one pediatric retrospective study of the IV use of chlorpromazine versus prochlorperazine found higher rate of relapse and side effects in the chlorpromazine group.

At the moment, there have not been carried out prospective study about the efficacy of intravenous neuroleptics in migraineurs children (Table 7) [30,31].

Drug (type of drug) Dose (maximum/dose) Adverse effects Contraindications
Prochlorperazine PO/PR: 2.5-5 mg/kg IM: 6.25 mg, max three time/die IV: 0.15 mg/kg (10 mg) Sedation, dystonia, akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, all rare  
Chlorpromazine 1 mg/kg/die PO Dystonia, akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, all rare  
Metoclopramide 0.1-0.3 mg/kg PO/IV (10 mg) Dystonia, akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, all rare Long QT syndrome, movement disorder
IM: Intramuscular; IV: intravenous; NSAIDs: Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug ; PO: by months; PR: Per Rectum

Table 7: Antidopaminergic agents [12].

Ergot-based therapies

The use of ergot alkaloids should be limited for their vasoconstrictive properties. The effect of dihydroergotamine is due to its 5HT-1A-1B-1D-1F receptor agonist affinity leading to central vasoconstriction. Common side effects include nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, flushed face, muscle cramps, vasospasm, transient elevations in blood pressure and bradycardia [32].

Oral dihydroergotamine is not effective in the acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents. In a small cross-over study dihydroergotamine was not more effective to placebo [33].

Triptans

Triptans are 5-HT1B/1D serotonergic receptors agonists and have an anti-migraine and antiemetic action. Triptans cause the cephalic vessels vasoconstriction, inhibiting the trigeminal perivascular nerve terminals and the release of vasoactive neuropeptides [34,35]. There are different formulations of triptans as injections (sumatriptan), nasal spray (sumatriptan and zolmitriptan), tablets (sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, almotriptan, eletriptan, naratriptan and frovatriptan) and dissolving tablets (zolmitriptan and rizatriptan). The intranasal, sublingual or subcutaneous route may be preferable in patients who have migraine associated with significant nausea and vomiting. Furthermore, the intranasal route may be preferable in patients who are unable to swallow pills [36]. Commonly adverse events include fatigue, dizziness, dry mouth, and nausea or vomiting with oral preparations, and taste disturbance, nasal symptoms, and nausea with intranasal preparations. If this happens, it is worth trying a different triptan or formulation.

According the most recent practice parameter guidelines for treatment of pediatric headaches analgesics and triptans are recommended as the first-line treatment for acute migraine [37]. Triptans are used to treat moderate or severe migraine attacks, while analgesics are reserved for mild or moderate ones. The triptan should be taken at the onset of migraine and may be repeated after two hours if required. It is necessary to give the patient and parent clear instructions on the maximum dose, “two doses in 24 hours and on no more than two days a week” to prevent transformation into an analgesic overuse headache (AOH). Contraindications are hypersensitivity to triptans, cerebrovascular or peripheral vascular syndromes, severe hepatic impairment, uncontrolled hypertension, hemiplegic migraine, pregnancy, and combinations with monoamineoxidase inhibitors, ergot alkaloids or other 5-HT1B/1D agonists (increasing the risk of serotonin syndrome).

Triptans should be considered as an acute treatment option for children and adolescents with migraines, although their use is mostly ‘off-label’ (Table 8). Few triptans have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for children migraine abortive therapy. In Italy only intranasal sumatriptan 10 mg is authorized from 12 years [38].

Drug Age Dose Adverse effects Contraindication
Sumatriptan 6-9 years* PO: 25 mg at onset, repeat once after at least 2 hours if needed, max 2 days/week Chest pain, flushing, tingling, tightness, flushing, dizziness, nasty taste (nasal spray)  <6 years
AIFA and FDA >18 years 10-17 years* PO: 50-100 mg at onset, repeat once after at least 2 hours if needed, max 2 days/week -
AIFA and FDA >12 years   IN: 10 mg at onset, repeat once after at least 2 hours if needed, max 40 mg/day, max 2 days/week  <12 years
AIFA and FDA >18 years   IN: 20 mg at onset, repeat once after at least 2 hours if needed, max 2 days/week SQ: 6 mg at onset, repeat once after at least 1 hour, max 2 days/week <18 years; pregnancy;
history of stroke, TIA, peripheral
vascular disease, WPW
syndrome
Rizatriptan FDA approved >6 years;   PO: 5-10 mg Chest pain, flushing, tingling, tightness, flushing, dizziness, nasty taste (nasal spray)  <6 years; pregnancy
Zolmitriptan FDA approved >12 years   PO: 2.5-5 mg IN: 5 mg at onset, repeat once after at least 2 hours, max 10 mg/day, max 2 days/week Chest pain, flushing, tingling, tightness, flushing, dizziness, nasty taste (nasal spray)  <12 years; pregnancy
Almotriptan FDA approved >12 years   PO: 6.25-12.5 mg    <12 years

FDA: US Food and Drug Administration; AIFA: Italian Medicines Agency; IM: Intramuscular; IN: intranasal; IV: intravenous; NSAIDs: Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug ; PO: by months; SQ: subcutaneous *FDA: “off label” in younger children

Table 8: Triptans [12].

According to a recent review on acute pharmacological treatment of migraine in children and adolescents, including 27 clinical studies, triptans appear to be effective in treating of pediatric migraine [21] (Tables 9 and 10). Generally triptans are safe, however show an increased risk of minor adverse events. No statistically significant differences regarding efficacy were found between the different subgroups of triptans: rizatriptan, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan were statistically more effective than placebo. It must be remembered that interpretation of results among studies of triptan efficacy in adolescents is difficult for the presence of high placebo response rates [39]. No statistically significant difference regarding efficacy was found between oral and intranasal triptans. Patients may prefer oral preparations in case of chronic rhinitis or intranasal preparations if they vomit. The association with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increases triptan’s effectiveness.

Study or Subgroup Triptan Placebo Risk Ratio
  n/N n/N  
1. Rizatriptan      
Ho 2012 39/98 31/102 1.31[0.89, 1.92]
Subtotal (95%, CI) Total events 98 102 1.31[0.89, 1.92]
2. Sumatriptan      
Ueberall 1999 9/14 2/14 4.50 [1.18, 17.21]
Hamalen 2002 27/59 15/58  
Subtotal (95%, CI) Total events 73 72 1.77 [1.06, 2.97]
Total (95% CI) 171 174 1.67 [1.00, 5.23]

Table 9: Comparison between triptans versus placebo in children, outcome Pain free [40].

Study or Subgroup Triptan Placebo Risk Ratio
  Events Total Events Total  
1. Almotriptan          
Linder 2008 212 544 50 170 1.10[0.88, 1.39]
Subtotal (95%, CI) Total events 212 544 50 170 1.10 [0.88, 1.39]
2. Eletriptan          
Winner 2007 31 141 20 133 1.46 [0.88, 2.43]
Subtotal (95%, CI) Total events 31 141 20 133 1.46 [0.88, 2.43]
3. Naratriptan          
Rothner 1997 52 226 16 74 1.06 [0.65, 1.75]
Subtotal (95%, CI) Total events 52 226 16 74 1.06 [0.65, 1.75]
4. Rizatriptan          
Winner 2002 48 149 40 142 1.14 [0.81, 1.62]
Visser 2004 91 233 75 240 1.25 [0.98, 1.60]
Ahonen 2006 34 96 17 96 2.00 [1.20, 3.33]
Ho 20012 87 284 52 286 1.41 [1.07, 1.87]
Subtotal (95%, CI) Total events 260 762 194 764 1.34 [1.13, 1.60]
5. Sumatriptan          
Hamalainem 1997 5 23 2 23 2.5 [0.54, 11.8]
Winner 1997 59 222 14 76 1.42 [0.94, 2.39]
Rothner 1999a 43 208 10 35 1.20 [0.45, 3.18]
Rothner 1999b 9 62 3 30 1.45 [0.42, 4.98]
Rothner 1999c 11 66 5 36 1.20 [0.45, 3.18]
Winner 2000 116 377 32 130 1.25 [0.89, 1.75]
Ahonen 2004 26 83 17 83 1.53 [0.90, 2.6]
Winner 2005 191 483 68 242 1.41 [1.12, 1.77]
Callenbach 2007 12 46 9 46 1.33 [0.62, 2.86]
Fujita 2014 16 74 20 70 0.76 [0.43, 1.34]
Subtotal (95%, CI) Total events 487 1644 180 771 1.27 [1.10, 1.48]
6. Zolmitriptan          
Ewers 2005 6 14 1 14 6.00 [0.83, 43.59]
Rothner 2005 108 483 32 162 1.13 [0.80, 1.51]
Lewis 2007 58 148 24 127 2.07 [1.37, 3.13]
Subtotal (95%, CI) Total events 259 933 50 599 1.66 [1.16, 2.38]
Total (95% CI) 1300 4250 577 2511 1.32 [1.19, 1.47]

Table 10: Comparison between triptans versus placebo in adolescents, outcome pain free [40].

Sumatriptan remains the most widely studied of the triptans. This, in combination with naproxen sodium, is more effective than placebo in treating adolescent migraine attack (in producing pain freedom), while there aren’t studies in children [22].

Intranasal sumatriptan is safe and effective in children moderate or severe migraine attack: in a randomized, double blind, placebocontrolled study a statistical difference, in producing pain freedom, was found at 2 hours in those who took the 20 mg nasal spray dose than placebo group [36,41]. The main side effect is taste disturbance.

An open-label study on the subcutaneous sumatriptan in treating of children and adolescents with migraine in the emergency department showed an overall efficacy of 72% at 30 min and 78% at 2 h, with a recurrence rate of 6% [42].

There are conflicting evidences regarding other triptans. Different American studies showed that oral and nasal spray Zolmitriptan is well tolerated and effective in improving headache symptoms [43,44].

Rizatriptan has been approved by FDA for the treatment of acute migraine after 6 years, using 5 mg for children less than 39 kg and 10 mg for those 40 kg or more. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial showed that rizatriptan has been well tolerated with minimal adverse effects including dizziness, somnolence, dry mouth [45,46].

FDA approved Almotriptan for the treatment of acute migraine after 12 years. It is more effective in the treatment of migraine attack than placebo, at the 12.5 mg dose [47].

No significant statistically difference has been showed between Eletriptan and placebo in improving pain at 2 hours post-dose [48].

Magnesium sulfate

Intravenous magnesium sulfate is increasingly being used in ED acutely for the treatment of pediatric headache; however there is a paucity of evidence for its use in children with headache.

A pediatric case series reported that patients with migraine ages 5 to 18 years old treated with a standard dose of intravenous magnesium sulfate (30 mg/kg of IV magnesium sulfate with maximum dose of 2000 mg) showed a favorable response in 35% of children and experienced minimal side-effects [49].

Preventive Treatment

The main indications of preventive treatment are high frequency of migraine attacks (1 to 2 per week or >3 to 4 per month), impairment of both the quality of life (e.g., lower score on PedsQL) and the daily activities (e.g., PedMIDAS score greater than 30 or Grade III or Grade IV), severe and prolonged attacks (>4 h), irregularity of school attendance and the ineffective, not tolerated, contraindicated or overused acute treatment of migraine attacks. In addition, we remember the presence of complex and severe accompanying symptoms or long uncomfortable aura symptoms [50-52]. The choice of the preventive drug should take into account any comorbidity, such as anxiety and depression. Although 1/3 of adolescent migraine patients have the criteria to undertake pharmacological prophylaxis, this is proposed in less than 20% of these patients [53].

Pain improvement is a gradual process and will not be instantaneous. For this reason, any drug used for prophylactic treatment should be evaluated for about 6-12 weeks before it can be considered ineffective. If effective, the medication should be continued for 6 months [54,55].

Prophylaxis treatment can be interrupted when severe migraine attacks are reduced to one or two per month (for 3-6 months). This period may be altered based on the school year. Children typically have improved headaches over the summer when they are out of school, so early summer provides an opportunity to reduce medication. Headaches often worsen with the start of school, in late spring and fall; thus, these are less desirable times to discontinue preventive medication [56].

The most commonly used medications for migraine prophylaxis are: beta blockers (propanolol), calcium channel blockers (flunarizine), the antihistaminics drugs (cyproheptadine), the antidepressants (amitriptyline) and the anticonvulsivants (valproate, topiramate and gabapentin) (Table 11).

Medication Dosage mg/kg per day (maximum/dose) Recommended daily dose Adverse effects Recommendation level
Amitriptyline 0.5-1 mg/kg (10 mg) 10-75 mg qhs Dry mouth, dry eyes, lightheadedness, dizziness, constipation, increased appetite, somnolence, prolonged QT Class IV
Nortriptyline 10 mg 10-75 mg qhs Cardiac (arrhythmia) No data
Topiramate 0.5-1 mg/kg/day 1-10 mg/kg/day Numbness, weight loss, cognitive impairment, fatigue, nausea, somnolence Class IV
Valproic acid 15-40 mg/kg/day 250 -1000 mg/day Somnolence, skin rash, weight gain, tremor, drowsiness, hair lossa, hematological or liver abnormalities Class IV
Zonisamide 1-2 mg/kg/day 100-600 mg/day Dizziness, nausea, irritability, somnolence Class IV
Gabapentin 10-40 mg/kg/day 300-1200 mg tid Sedation, ataxia, fatigue, peripheral edema Class IV
Levetiracetam 250 mg/day 500-1500 mg bid Dizziness, fatigue, irritability, somnolence Class IV
Cyproheptadine 0.2 mg/kg/day 0.25-1.5 mg/kg/day Sleepiness, weight gain, increased appetite Class IV
Propanolol 1-3 mg 2-4 mg/kg/day Hypotension, depression, dizziness Class II
Flunarizine 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/day (10 mg) 5-10 mg qhs Sedation, weight gain, fatigue, gastrointestinal discomfort Class I
Botulinum toxin 155 units 100 units Redness, temporary pain at the injection site, ptosis, blurred vision Class IV
qhs: every night before bedtimes; bid: twice daily; tid: three times daily

Table 11: Preventive treatments [65].

β-Blockers

Beta-blockers, particularly propanolol, are considered first-line prophylactic drugs in the majority of the available guidelines and systematic reviews. In the Italian guidelines [57] propranolol is listed as a second choice prophylaxis drug for pediatric migraine and some systematic review [58] report conflicting evidence about its use. Their action mechanism in migraine prophylaxis is not completely understood.

Propanolol: Propanolol is a nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blocker [59]. In older studies have been observed conflicting results. In a prospective, double-blind trial found a significant reduction of headache frequency with propanolol compared with placebo [60], while in another prospective, double blind crossover trial did not find any significant difference [61]. Recent comparative studies showed the effectiveness of propanolol in reducing headache frequency in children with migraine. In two randomized, prospective studies, comparing propanolol and sodium valproate, have been showed a significant reduction in headache frequency, but did not found a significant statistically difference between proponolol and valproate [61,62]. Equal efficacy in reducing of headache frequency has been found in an open, randomized comparison of propanolol and cinnarizine [63]. Propranolol efficacy in reducing the frequency and duration of pediatric migraine headache has been compared with pregabalin: a significant difference between these two groups was found [64].

All these studies have suggested the efficacy of propanolol in pediatric migraine treatment but results have been limited because none of the studies used placebo controls.

Usually the starting dose is 1 mg/kg divided in three doses without exceeding 4 mg/kg per day. Adverse effects are hypotension, dizziness and depression. Contraindications include asthma, diabetes, orthostatic hypotension and depression.

Calcium channel blockers

Flunarizine: Flunarizine is a nonselective calcium ion entry blocker. It acts on T-type ion channels [66]. Its actions in migraine prevention are still unknown.

In two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, children treated with flunarizine showed a significant reduction in headache frequency [67,68]. In a retrospective observational study, evaluating the flunarizine effects in different subtypes of migraine, was found a greater efficacy of flunarizine in the hemiplegic migraine [68]. A recent retrospective study comparing flunarizine and topiramate in pediatric migraine prevention showed similar effectiveness between the two drugs [69].

The recommended daily dose is 5-10 mg (every night at bedtime). The most common advent effects are sedation, weigh gain, fatigue and gastrointestinal discomfort [70].

According to the main guidelines or systematic reviews for preventive treatment of paediatric migraine flunarizine is recognized as the first choice drug for prophylaxis [55,71,72].

Antagonists of serotonin

Cyproheptadine: It is an antihistamine drug with anti-serotonergic, anti-cholinergic and calcium-blocking properties.

It is used for the prevention of pediatric migraine since the 1970s. No good scientific evidence supports the use of cyproheptadine in the pediatric population, but many clinicians use these medications with success over decades. A recent retrospective study and an open label study in children migraineurs under 12 years, treated with cyproheptadine at doses of 0.2-0.4 mg/kg/day, showed its effectiveness in reducing headache frequency. The combination of propanolol and cyproheptadine is most effective [73,74].

It is available in a liquid form for younger migraineurs who cannot swallow pills.

The daily dose varies from 2 to 8 mg/kg and may be administered in a single dose at bedtime, in order to avoid daytime sleepiness. Adverse effects include increased appetite, weight gain and somnolence.

Pizotifen: It is a serotonininergic antagonist that acts primarily on 5- HT2A and 5HT2C receptors. Moreover it has also anti-histaminergic properties.

A recent multicenter Italian study on the use and the self-perceived efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments in children and adolescents with migraine suggested that pizotifen and flunarizine were the most effective drugs (82% and 72%, respectively) [72]. Even if pizotifen is the only preventive drug for migraine licensed in Italy for pediatric age, its use is less frequent than flunarizine.

The recommended starting dose is 0.5 mg per day, and may be increased up to 1.5 mg (to be taken in more administrations during the day or once in the evening). Sandomigran is contraindicated in children under 2 years. Very common side effects are increase in appetite and weight increase. Common side effects are sedation (including somnolence), dizziness and nausea.

Tryciclic antidepressants (TCA)

The effectiveness of antidepressant for prophilaxis of migraine in children has been evaluated by few clinical studies. TCA represent the most widely studied antidepressants for migraine prevention.

Amitryptiline (AMI): Amitryptiline is the most used TCA for migraine prevention in children. Its efficacy in pediatric migraine prevention is controversial. Older studies have shown high placebo response rates (up to 50 to 60%) [75-79]. Most recently, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amitriptyline (1 mg/kg/day), topiramate (2 mg/kg/day) and placebo in children and adolescents 8 to 17 years of age with migraine showed no significant statistically differences in reduction in headache frequency or headache-related disability over a period of 24 weeks, but higher rates of adverse events [80].

A paper presented at the American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting in New Orleans (2012) showed that amitriptyline was safe and effective for migraine prevention in children and adolescents.

A randomized clinical trial, comparing cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) plus AMI versus headache education and AMI showed a greater reduction of number of headache days in the CBT plus AMI group [81].

The recommended initial dose of AMI is 0.25-0.50 mg/kg at bedtime to avoid somnolence. It should be titrated slowly over a period of 8-12 weeks, increasing by 0.25 mg/kg/day every 2 weeks [82]. The main side effects include dry mouth, dry eyes, lightheadedness, dizziness, constipation, increased appetite, somnolence, and a prolonged QT at doses of greater than 1 mg/kg. Finally, families should be advised of increased risk of suicidality and should be instructed to notify the physician immediately if this symptom appears [83,84].

Nortriptyline (NOR): Nortriptyline tends to be less sedating than amitriptyline, but there are no well-conducted scientific trials demonstrating the efficacy of nortriptyline.

There is an increased risk of arrhythmia. Dosage is similar, beginning with 10 mg, and escalating to 50-75 mg if tolerated.

Antiepileptics: This class has recently been used in the pediatric migraine prophylaxis. Both topiramate and valproic acid are FDAapproved for prevention of migraine in adults. Furthermore, topiramate was recently approved in adolescents over 12 years of age. Their therapeutic effects in migraine treatment are probably due to their N and T-type calcium channel blocking properties.

Valproic acid: It is considered first-line treatment for adult migraine prophylaxis. Several studies have suggested that valproic acid may be effective in children.

In a small retrospective study comparing the valproic acid with topiramate, both drugs were effective [85]. An open-label safety study focusing on the use of valproic acid in the adolescents migraine prophylaxis found a significant reduction of headache frequency in the first fourth months of therapy [86]. Other retrospective randomized clinical trial comparing the valproic acid with propanolol showed that both drugs were effective, but the mean headache frequency per month was lower in the propanolol group [87]. A recent meta-analysis on the pharmacological preventive treatment of pediatric migraine showed that valproic acid was not effective in reducing the frequency headache [88].

The recommended initial dose of valproic acid is 10-15 mg/kg divided in two daily doses. This dose can be increased with 15 mg/kg increments reaching a maximum dose of 60 mg/kg/day. The most common adverse effects include dizziness, drowsiness, alopecia, weight gain, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia and elevated pancreatic enzymes. Teratogenic effects must be considered in adolescent females.

Topiramate: Multiple studies showed the effectiveness of topiramate in reducing migraine disability in pediatric population.

In 2014, the FDA approved the use of topiramate for the prevention of headaches in migraine patients aged 12-17 years.

A recent meta-analysis of four randomized placebo-controlled trials on the use of topiramate in the prophylaxis of migraine in patients less than 18 years of age showed that topiramate may both not achieve a more effective clinical trial endpoint than placebo in the prevention of migraines and lead to more side effects or adverse events [89-92]. A recent study comparing topiramate and propanolol showed that topiramate was higher than propanolol group in the reduction of monthly headache frequency, duration attack and disability [93]. According to a recent trial comparing amitriptyline, topiramate and placebo for pediatric migraine [Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention (CHAMP) study], has been showed no significant statistically differences in reduction of headache frequency (52% amitriptyline, 55% topiramate, 61% placebo) or headache-related disability over a period of 24 weeks, but higher rates of adverse events. For this reason, the FDA has given final approval to two supplemental new drug applications (sNDAs) for topiramate extended-release capsule (Qudexy XR, Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc) to prevent migraine in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older.

The recommended dose of topiramate is 1-10 mg/kg/day, with a general dose of 50 mg twice per day. The most common side effects include decreased appetite, anorexia, abdominal pain, drowsiness, paresthesias, cognitive impairment (affecting the verbal fluency, concentration, and working memory). Rarely, hipohydrosis, renal calculi and glaucoma. To avoid significant side effects, particularly cognitive impairment, the dose should be started low and titrated slowly.

Levetiracetam: It is a pyrolidone derivative with an antiepileptic effect.

A small retrospective review showed a significant reduction of headache frequency from 6.3 to 1.3 headache/month (p<0.0001) in levetiracetam group [94]. Other open label study focusing on the use of levetiracetam in the adolescents’ migraine prophylaxis found a significant reduction of headache frequency and disability [95].

The recommended daily dose of levetiracetam is 500-1500 mg twice daily. It has a relatively desirable safety profile, with somnolence, fatigue, irritability, aggressiveness, mild memory and dizziness.

Zonisamide and gabapentin: Few clinical pediatric studies have been performed on the use of gabapentin and zonisamide in migraine prophylaxis.

In a very small retrospective study found that zonisamide is effective in reducing headache frequency (8 of 12 patients) [96]. Other study found that 80% of children treated with gabapentin showed a significant reduction of headache frequency [97].

The recommended daily dose of zonisamide is 100-600 mg per day, while for gabapentin is 300-1200 mg three times daily. The most common adverse effects of zonisamide include dizziness, nausea, irritability and somnolence. The main adverse effects of gabapentin include sedation, ataxia, fatigue and peripheral edema.

Pregabalin: It is an anti-epileptic drug. Pregabalin is commonly prescribed to alleviate nerve or neuropathic pain - a type of pain caused by damage to, or a disease affecting, nerves.

Pregabalin seems to be a well-tolerated and impressive choice for migraine prophylaxis in children. A recent randomized controlled trial showed that pregabalin has been more effective than propranolol: it was associated with a 83.5% decrease in headache frequency and 79.4% decrease in headache severity [98]. In this study, the mean pregabalin dose was 50 mg per day. It is clear that at higher doses more drug side effects may occur.

The main side-effects of pregabalin are drowsiness, dizziness, impaired balance and an inability to think properly. Less common side-effects include blurred vision, dry mouth, fatigue and weight gain.

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A)

Botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) is a purified neurotoxin complex produced by the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botolinum. The mechanism of action is unknown. Probably, it inhibits the release of migraine related neuropeptides (e.g., CGRP and SP) and glutamate.

According to the 2012 NICE guidelines this treatment is offered to patients failed at least 3 prophylactic therapies. It was approved by the FDA in 2010 for the treatment of chronic migraine in adults. It appears to be effective and well tolerated in adolescents [99,100].

In a retrospective case series of 10 patients with chronic daily headache, treated with 100 units of Onabotulnum Toxin A (OBOT-A), four patients reported improvement in headache, three with decreased frequency and one with only decreased severity [101]. A retrospective review on 45 pediatric chronic daily migraine patients receiving OBOT-A, showed a reduction of the monthly headache frequency and an improvement in the PedMIDAS score [81]. Most recently, in a small case series of chronic migraineurs (aged 13-17 years), seven of ten patients receiving OBOT-A, showed a good responder rate [102,103].

Main advantages include avoiding side effects of systemic medication, compliance, quicker onset of action than typical slow prophylactic escalation and lack of drug interactions in patients with other medical conditions. The most common adverse events are redness or temporary injection site pain, ptosis and blurred vision.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and receptor CGRP-r) antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies to calcitonin gene-related peptide and receptor (CGRP and CGRP-r-mAbs) appear more promising for migraine treatment because of considerably better efficacy and safety profiles. A recent meta-analysis suggests the effectiveness of CGRPmAbs in anti-migraine therapy in adults with few adverse reactions [104,105]. At the moment, there aren’t clinical studies in children or adolescents.

Complementary And Alternative Medicine (CAM)

Complementary and alternative medicine may play an important role in the migraine preventive treatment.

The main advantages of non-pharmacological therapy are: the absence of side effects and the best patient and family compliance. Patients prefer this approach to pharmacological therapies for one or more of the following aspects: insufficient or no response to pharmacologic therapy; limited tolerability to drugs, medical contraindications, pregnancy/breastfeeding and the frequent or excessive use of analgesic or acute medications.

These treatments include psychological and behavioral therapies on the one hand and nutraceuticals/supplements on the other.

Psychological and behavioral therapies

Psychological and behavioral treatments include Mindfulness, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Operant-Behavioural Therapy (OBT), Relaxation and Biofeedback Training or combination of these treatments [106].

Mindfulness has the purpose to teach individuals how to maintain focus on a stimulus while simultaneously allowing intruding thoughts/ feelings to be acknowledged, but not judged. Recent studies used mindfulness in a limited group of patients with migraine with encouraging results [107]. In a recent pilot study on mindfulness intervention in adolescents with chronic or episodic high frequency migraine, has been showed a reduction of headache frequency and medication intake and a good feasibility and acceptability of the treatments (although not specifically evaluated) [108].

CBT should be considered the first-line psychological treatment for individuals with chronic pain disorder. Main CBT’ indications are the parents' refusal to use drugs, psychiatric comorbidities (such as anxiety, depression, social phobia, performance anxiety), family problems, ineffectiveness or inadequate response to drug therapy [106,109,110]. There aren’t rigorous and reliable scientific evidence about CBT and other psychological treatments. A randomized clinical trial looking at children and adolescents with chronic migraine indicated that those patients treated with amytriptyline and CBT showed a reduction of headache frequency compared to those treated with headache education and amitriptlyne [109]. Many other studies, instead, showed a positive effect of CBT on migraine and its psychological comorbidities [106,107,111].

OBT focuses on pain behaviors as a major component of the pain problem, and postulates that they are subject to environmental contingencies. Three therapeutic techniques were shown to be effective: graded activity, activity pacing, and time-contingent medication management [112].

Biofeedback (BFB) Training is a method through which a subject receives information on its autonomic physiological functions (for example heart rate, skin conductance, muscle tone, respiratory rate) through instruments. The BFB training allows to decrease anxiety or improve achievements in short term missions such as sports. According to two recent meta-analyses, biofeedback techniques were highly efficient in management of migraine or tension-type headache in child and adolescent population [113-115].

Nutraceuticals/supplements

Vitamins and supplements could be an attractive option for families who wish to avoid prescription medications and their side effects. Alone or/and in combination, magnesium, riboflavin, coenzyme Q10 and the herbal extracts of butterbur, feverfew and ginkolide B have all been suggested as preventives for migraine [116]. Although there are only a small number of controlled trials, the results from the CHAMP study may increase the use of these supplements [117].

Magnesium oxide: It is an ion involved in brain excitation. Low levels of magnesium have been found in migraineurs. Few pediatric migraine prevention studies established equivocal results. It is recommended a dose of 400 mg daily. The most common side effect includes diarrhea [118,119].

Riboflavin (vitamin B2): It is a cofactor necessary for mitochondrial oxidation. Low levels of vitamin B2 have been found in migraineurs. There are few and controversial pediatric migraine studies. One randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study found that high doses of riboflavin were shown to be initially effective, although this difference was not maintained at 6 months. Other studies showed a high placebo response rate, which complicates interpretation of the results [120-122]. It is recommended a dose of 25-400 mg/day. The most common side effect includes bright yellow urine and diarrhea.

Coenzyme Q10: It is an antioxidant and a cofactor necessary for mitochondrial oxidation. Low levels of Coenzyme Q10 have been found in migraineurs. In a large open-label trial on pediatric migraine supplementation of Coenzime Q10 showed an improvement of headache frequency and disability scores [123]. It is recommended a dose of 50-100 mg/day. The most common side effect includes nausea, anorexia, dyspepsia, diarrhea.

Vitamin D: Low levels of vitamin B2 have been found in migraineurs. Some studies showed the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in reducing headache frequency [124].

Tanacetum parthenium: Feverfew is a derived from a weed plant Tanacetum parthenium. It has anti-inflammatory properties. There are not also studies on the efficacy and safety of feverfew in pediatric age [125,126].

Butterbur extract (Petasites hybridus): It contains pyrolizidine alkaloids. It has antispasmodic and anti-inflammatory properties. Two studies showed an improvement in headache frequency. Side effects are minimal and include burping. It has also a known carcinogenic effect [127,128].

Non-Invasive Neurostimulation

Non-invasive neurostimulation is an innovative strategy for the symptomatic and preventive treatment of migraine and cluster headache, even in episodic form. We remember two procedures.

The first, called non-invasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation (nVNS), consists in the application of a stimulator, called GammaCore, which electrically stimulates the vagus nerve on the lateral cutaneous surface of the neck.

The procedure, when it is used to interrupt the painful attack, consists in applying the stimulator for 2 minutes on both sides of the neck. In preventive use, however, the nVNS is performed 3 times a day, daily, for at least 3 months, each time providing an electrical stimulus lasting 2 minutes on each side of the neck.

The technique is safe and generally well tolerated. The nVNS has been shown to significantly influence the activity of glutamate in the trigeminal nucleus, a key center for the propagation of headaches.

In a recent Italian study non-invasive the nVNS used for the acute treatment of migraine without aura in adolescents, showed a favorable safety and tolerability. This option is able to reduce the number of medication for aborting attacks in this particular and sensitive category of patients where options without side effect are suitable [129].

Additional studies with larger population of patients and sham condition are warranted.

Other non-invasive neurostimulation technique is the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). In a recent review about nonpharmacological approaches for headaches in young age it was investigated the efficacy of single-pulse TMS in adolescents with chronic migraine. During the 12 week treatment period, patients were instructed to use the device twice daily: a significant reduction in headache frequency (33.8%) was found [130].

Discussion

Migraine in pediatric population, as well as in adults, is often unrecognized or misattributed to secondary causes such as sinus disease or emotional disorders. A detailed anamnesis is a very important component of diagnosis. It takes a lot of time and practical experience. History-taking consists in having the right suspicions, asking the right questions in the right sequence to arrive at the right diagnosis and initiate the right treatment [131].

In the literature, data on the current clinical practice on treatment of pediatric migraine are very limited.

We evaluated the use of acute and preventive drugs, nutraceuticals and non-pharmacological treatments.

Acute or symptomatic treatment is always more effective when given early during the attack. NSAIDs, especially ibuprofen, should be preferred to acetaminophen for treating acute attacks of migraine, because they were usually more effective and well tolerated. If NSAID are not effective, triptans could be used more frequently as first for treating migraine attack in adolescents.

Migraine prophylaxis includes a large number of drugs but relatively few rigorous, randomized controlled studies have been carried out in children and adolescents. According to the main guidelines or systematic reviews for preventive treatment of paediatric migraine flunarizine is recognized as the first choice drug for prophylaxis, followed by propanolol, amitryptiline, pizotifen, cyproheptadine and antiepileptic drugs (topiramate and valproate).

As concerns preventive treatments, further studies on nutraceuticals are necessary in particular to establish mechanisms of action of the molecules contained in these multiple compounds and their efficacy.

Therefore, the use of non-pharmacological preventive treatments (i.e. relaxation techniques, biofeedback, cognitive-behavioral therapy) should be implemented in clinical practice, especially in cases with contraindications or poor tolerability or efficacy to preventive drugs. The combination of behavioral approaches with pharmacological therapies has been shown to be superior to each individually and appear to maximize long-term efficacy [132].

Finally, according to the National Headache Foundation a correct management of headache includes writing and keeping a headache diary. It is very important in keeping detailed records of headache episodes, identifying trigger factors (avoiding them) and defining patterns migraine to begin the most effective treatments [133].

Conclusions

The treatment of pediatric migraine is multidisciplinary. It includes lifestyle changes (nutrition, stress, sleep, physical activity,…), symptomatic and preventive pharmacological therapies, nonpharmacological preventive therapies (psychological and behavioral therapies, nutraceuticals) and compilation of the headache diary.

Pediatric RCTs, based on larger samples sizes and innovative study protocols, involving multicenter studies and primary care services (to reduce selection bias), are needed to better understand the most effective and safe treatment strategies for pediatric migraine patients and define “responders” profile.

References

  1. Wöber-Bingöl C (2013) Epidemiology of Migraine and Headache in Children and Adolescents. Curr Pain Headache Rep 17: 341.
  2. Sheridan DC, Spiro DM, Meckler GD (2014) Pediatric migraine: abortive management in the emergency department. Headache 54: 235-245.
  3. 11th European Headache Federation Congress jointly with 31st Congress of the Italian Society for the Study of Headaches, Rome, Italy. J Headache Pain 18: 111.
  4. Blume HK (2017) Childhood Headache: a brief review. Pediatric Ann 46: 155-165.
  5. Papetti L, Capuano A, Tarantino S, Vigevano F, Valeriani M (2015) Headache as an emergency in children and adolescents. Curr Pain Headache Rep 19: 480.
  6. Brenner M, Lewis D (2008) The Treatment of Migraine Headaches in Children and Adolescents. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 13: 17-24.
  7. https://www.ichd-3.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/The-International-Classification-of-Headache-Disorders-3rd-Edition-2018.pdf
  8. Freitag FG, Schloemer F, Shumate D (2016) Recent Developments in the Treatment of Migraine in Children and Adolescents. J Headache Pain Manag 1: 1.
  9. Teleanu R, Vladacenco O, Teleanu DM, Epure DA (2016) Treatment of Pediatric Migraine: a Review. Maedica (Buchar) 11: 136-143.
  10. Whitehouse WP, Agrawal S (2016) Management of children and young people with headache. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed: December.
  11. Kacperski J, Kabbouche MA, O’Brien HL, Weberding JL (2016) The optimal management of headaches in children and adolescents. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 9: 53-68.
  12. Brna PM, Dooley JM (2006) Headaches in the pediatric population. Semin Pediatr Neurol 13: 222-230.
  13. Gelfand A (2018) Pediatric and Adolescent Headache. Headache 4: 1108-1136.
  14. Hershey AD, Powers SW, Vockell AL, LeCates L, Segars A, et al. (2004) Development of a patient-based grading scale for PedMIDAS. Cephalalgia 24: 844-849.
  15. Genizi J, Srugo I, Assaf N, Kerem NC (2017) Pediatric primary headache: pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. EMJ Neurol 5: 66-72.
  16. Genizi J, Srugo I, Kerem NC (2016) Primary Headache in Children and Adolescents: From Pathophysiology to Diagnosis and Treatment. J Headache Pain Manag 1: 2.
  17. Hämäläinen ML, Hoppu K, Valkeila E, Santavuori P (1997) Ibuprofen or acetaminophen for the acute treatment of migraine in children: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Neurology 48: 103-107.
  18. Richer L, Billinghurst L, Linsdell MA, Russell K, Vandermeer B, et al. (2016) Drugs for the acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents (Review). Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
  19. Damen L, Bruijn JK, Verhagen AP, Berger MY, Passchier J, et al. (2005) Symptomatic treatment of migraine in children: a systematic review of medication trials. Pediatrics 116: 295-302.
  20. O’Brien HL, Kabbouche M, Kacpersk J, Hershey A (2015) Treatment of pediatric migraine. Curr Treat Options Neurol 17: 326.
  21. Larkin G (1999) Intravenous ketorolac versus intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of migraine headaches. Acad Emerg Med 6: 668-670.
  22. Brousseau DC, Duffy SJ, Anderson AC, Linakis JG (2004) Treatment of pediatric migraine headaches: A randomized, double-blind trial of prochlorperazine versus ketorolac. Ann Emerg Med 43: 256-262.
  23. Messina LM, Correnti E, Drago F, Plicato G, Rocchitelli L, et al. (2018) Indomethacin-Responsive Headaches in Pediatric Age: Nosographic Aspects and Limitations on the use of Indomethacin in Pediatric Population. J Neurol Exp Neurosci 4: 36-41.
  24. Bachur RG, Monuteaux MC, Neuman MI (2015) A comparison of acute treatment regimens for migraine in the emergency department. Pediatrics 135: 232-238.
  25. Patniyot IR, Gelfand AA (2016) Acute treat­ment therapies for pediatric migraine: a qualitative systematic review. Headache 56: 49-70.
  26. Kanis J, Timm N (2014) Chlorpromazine for the treatment of migraine in a pediatric emergency department. Headache 54: 335-342.
  27. Kabbouche M, Powers S, Segers A, LeCates S, Manning P, et al. (2009) Inpatient treatment of status migraine with dihydroergotamine in children and adolescents. Headache 49: 106-109.
  28. Raskin N (1990) Treatment of status migrainosus: the American experience. Headache 30: 550-553.
  29. Hämäläinen ML, Hoppu K, Santavuori PR (1997) Oral dihydroergotamine for therapy-resistant migraine attacks in children. Pediatr Neurol 16: 114-117.
  30. Fridinger S, Szperka C (2018) Effectiveness of Intravenous Dihydroergotamine for Pediatric Headache: Does Headache Diagnosis Matter? Neurology 90.
  31. Tfelt-Hansen P, DeVries P, Saxena P (2000) Triptans in migraine: a comparative review of pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and efficacy. Drugs 60: 1259-1287.
  32. Wackenfors A, Jarvius M, Ingemansson R, Edvinsson L, Malmsjo M (2005) Triptans induce vasoconstriction of human arteries and veins from the thoracic wall. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 45: 476-484.
  33. Hershey A, Winner P (2005) Pediatric migraine: recognition and treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc 105: 2-8.
  34. Lewis D, Ashwal S, Hershey A, Hirtz D, Yonker M, et al. (2004) Practice parameter: pharmacological treatment of migraine headache in children and adolescents: report of the American Academy of Neurology Quality Standards Subcommittee and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 63: 2215-2224.
  35. Fox A, Sammons for the RCPCH (2013) The use of unlicensed medicines or licensed medicines for unlicensed applications in paediatrics.
  36. Sun H, Bastings E, Temeck J, Smith PB, Men A (2013) Migraine therapeutics in adolescents: a systematic analysis and historic perspectives of triptan trials in adolescents. JAMA Pediatr.167: 243-249.
  37. https://www.cochrane.org/CD005220/SYMPT_drugs-acute-treatment-migraine-children-and-adolescents
  38. Winner P, Rothner A, Saper J, Nett R, Asgharnejad M, et al. (2000) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sumatriptan nasal spray in the treatment of acute migraine in adolescents. Pediatrics 106: 989-997.
  39. Linder S, Winner P (2001) Pediatric headache. Med Clin North Am 85: 1037-1053.
  40. Linder S, Sowson A (2000) Zolmitriptan provides effective migraine relief in adolescents. Int J Clin Pract 52: 466-469.
  41. Lewis D, Winner P, Hershey A, Wasiewski W (2007) Efficacy of zolmitriptan nasal spray in adolescent migraine. Pediatrics 120: 390-396.
  42. Ahonen K, Hamalainen M, Eerola M, Hoppu K (2006) A randomized trial of rizatriptan in migraine attacks in children. Neurology 67: 1135-1140.
  43. Ho TW, Pearlman E, Lewis D, Hämäläinen M, Connor K, et al. (2012) Efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan in pediatric migraineurs: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using a novel adaptive enrichment design. Cephalalgia 32: 750-765.
  44. Linder S, Mathew N, Cady R, Finlayson G, Ishkanioan G, et al. (2008) Efficacy and tolerability of almotriptan in adolescents: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache 48: 1326-1336.
  45. Winner P, Linder SL, Lipton RB, Almas M, Parsons B, et al. (2007) Eletriptan for the acute treatment of migraine in adolescents: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache 47: 511-518.
  46. Gertsch E, Loharuka S, Wolter Warmerdam K, Suhong T, Kempe A, et al. (2015) Intravenous magnesium as acute treatment for headaches: a pediatric case series. J Emerg Med 46: 308-312.
  47. Kacperski J, Hershey AD (2014) Preventive drugs in childhood and adolescent migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 18: 422.
  48. Evers S (2008) Treatment of migraine with prophylactic drugs. Expert Opin Pharmacother 9: 2565-2573.
  49. Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, Goadsby PJ, LindeM, et al. (2009) EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine-revised report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 16: 968-981.
  50. Bonfert M, Straube A, Schroeder AS, Reilich P, Ebinger F, et al. (2013) Primary headache in children and adolescents: update on pharmacotherapy of migraine and tension-type headache. Neuropediatrics 44: 3-19.
  51. Kacperski J, Hershey A (2014) Preventive drugs in childhood and adolescent migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2014 18: 422-427.
  52. Hamalainen ML (2006) Migraine in Children and Adolescents A Guide to Drug Treatment. CNS Drugs 20: 813-820.
  53. Winner P (2008) Pediatric headache. Current Opinion in Neurology 21: 316-322.
  54. Papetti L, Spalice A, Nicita F, Paolino MC, Castaldo R, et al. (2010) Migraine treatment in developmental age: guidelines update. J Headache Pain 11: 267-276.
  55. Lewis DW, Ashwal S, Dahl G, Dorbad D, Hirtz D, et al. (2002) Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Practice parameter: evaluation of children and adolescents with recurrent headaches: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 59: 490-498.
  56. Ludvigsson J (1974) Propranolol used in prophylaxis of migraine in children. Acta Neurol 50: 109-115.
  57. Forsythe WI, Gillies D, Sills MA (1984) Propanolol (‘Inderal’) in the treatment of childhood migraine. Dev Med Child Neur 26: 737-741.
  58. Ashrafi MR, Shabanian R, Zamani GR, Mahfelati F (2005) Sodium valproate versus propranolol in paediatric migraine prophylaxis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 9: 333-338.
  59. Bidabadi E, Mashouf M. (2010) A randomized trial of propranolol versus sodium valproate for the prophylaxis of migraine in pediatric patients. Paediatr Drugs 12: 269-275.
  60. Togha M, Malamiri RA, Rashidi-Ranjbar N, Asa S, Mahvelati F, et al. (2012) Efficacy and safety of cinnarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine headaches in children: An open, randomized comparative trial with propranolol. Acta Neurol Belg 112: 51-55.
  61. Bakhshandeh BM, Rahbarimanesh AA, Sadeghi M, Sedighi M, Karimzadeh P, et al. (2015) Comparison of Propranolol and Pregabalin for Prophylaxis of Childhood Migraine: a Randomised Controlled Trial. Acta Medica Iranica 53: 276-280.
  62. Tajti J, Szok D, Csáti A, Vécsei L (2016) Prophylactic Drug Treatment of Migraine in Children and Adolescents: An Update. Curr Pain Headache Rep 20: 1.
  63. Abu-Arafeh I (2012) Flunarizine for the prevention of migraine - a new look at an old drug. Dev Med Child Neurol 54: 204-205.
  64. Sorge F, Marano E (1985) Flunarizine v. placebo in childhood migraine. A double-blind study. Cephalalgia 5: 145-148.
  65. Peer Mohamed B, Goadsby PJ, Prabhakar P (2012) Safety and efficacy of flunarizine in childhood migraine: 11 years’ experience, with emphasis on its effect in hemiplegic migraine. Dev Med Child Neurol 54: 274-277.
  66. Kim H, Byun SH, Kim JS, Lim BC, Chae JH, et al. (2013) Comparison of flunarizine and topiramate for the prophylaxis of pediatric migraines. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 17: 45-49.
  67. O'Brien HL, Kabbouche MA, Kacperski J, Hershey AD (2015) Treatment of pediatric migraine. Curr Treat Options Neurol 17: 326.
  68. Carville S, Padhi S, Reason T, Underwood M (2012) Diagnosis and management of headaches in young people and adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 345: e5765.
  69. Toldo I, et al. (2016) Survey on Treatments for Primary Headaches in 13 Specialized Juvenile Headache Centers. The First Multicenter Italian Study. Eur J Paediat Neurol 21: 507-521.
  70. Rao BS, Das DG, Taraknath VR, Sarma Y (2000) A double blind controlled study of propranolol and cyproheptadine in migraine prophylaxis. Neurol India 48: 223-226.
  71. Madani S, Cortes O, Thomas R (2015) Cyproheptadine use in children with functional gastrointestinal disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 62: 409-413.
  72. Price DD, Milling LS, Kirsch I, Duff A, Montgomery GH, et al. (1999) An analysis of factors that contribute to the magnitude of placebo analgesia in an experimental paradigm. Pain 83: 147-156.
  73. Cormier S, Lavigne GL, Choiniere M, Rainville P (2016) Expectations predict chronic pain treatment outcomes. Pain 157: 329-338.
  74. Faria V, Linnman C, Lebel A, Borsook D (2014) Harnessing the placebo effect in pediatric migraine clinic. J Pediatr 165: 659-665.
  75. Lewis DW, Winner P, Wasiewski W (2005) The placebo responder rate in children and adolescents. Headache 45: 232-239.
  76. Arruda MA (2013) No evidence of efficacy or evidence of no efficacy. JAMA Pediatr 167: 300-302.
  77. Scott W, Coffee CS, Chamberlin LA, Ecklund DJ1, Klingner EA, et al. (2017) Trial of Amitriptyline, Topiramate and Placebo for Pediatric Migraine. The New England Journal of Medicine 376: 155-24.
  78. Powers SW, Kashikar-Zuck SM, Allen JR, LeCates SL, Slater SK, et al. (2013) Cognitive behavioral therapy plus amitriptyline for chronic migraine in children and adolescents: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 310: 2622-2630.
  79. Hershey A, Powers S, Bentii A, DeGrauw T (2000) Effectiveness of amitriptyline in the prophylactic management of childhood headaches. Headache 40: 539-549.
  80. Hammad TA, Laughren T, Racoosin J (2006) Suicidality in pediatric patients treated with antidepressant drugs. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63: 332-339.
  81. Reeves RR, Ladner ME (2010) Antidepressant-induced suicidality: An update. CNS Neurosci Ther 16: 227-234.
  82. Unalp A, Uran N, Ozturk A (2008) Comparison of the effectiveness of topiramate and sodium valproate in pediatric migraine. J Child Neurol 23: 1377-1381.
  83. Apostol G, Lewis D, Laforet G, Robieson W, Fugate J, et al. (2009) Divalproex sodium extended-release for the prophylaxis of migraine headache in adolescents: results of a stand-alone, longterm open-label safety study. Headache 49: 45-53.
  84. Bidabadi E, Mashouf M (2010) A randomized trial of propranolol versus sodium valproate for the prophylaxis of migraine in pediatric patients. Paediatr Drugs 12: 269-75.
  85. El Chammas K, Keyes J, Thompson N, Vijayakumar J, Becher D, et al. (2013) Pharmacologic treatment of pediatric headaches: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 167: 250-8.
  86. Kai L, Dafan Y, Jiamin W, Abdoulaye IA, Yijing G (2017) Is topiramate effective for migraine prevention in patients less than 18 years of age? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Headache Pain 18: 69.
  87. Winner P, Pearlman E, Linder S (2005) Topiramate for migraine prevention in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache 45: 1304-1312.
  88. Lewis D, Winner P, Saper J, Ness S, Polverejan E, et al. (2009) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate for migraine prevention in pediatric subjects 12 to 17 years of age. Pediatrics 123: 924-934.
  89. Deaton TL, Mauro LS (2014) Topiramate for migraine prophylaxis in pediatric patients. Ann Pharmacother 48: 638-643.
  90. Fallah R, Divanizadeh M, Karimi M, Mirouliaei M, Shamszadeh A (2013) Topiramate and propranolol for prophylaxis of migraine. Indian J Pediatr 80: 920-924.
  91. Miller G (2004) Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in pediatric migraine. Headache 44: 238-243.
  92. Pakalnis A, Kring D, Meier L (2007) Levetiracetam prophylaxis in pediatric migraine - an open-label study. Headache 47: 427-430.
  93. Pakalnis A, Kring D (2006) Zonisamide prophylaxis in refractory pediatric headache. Headache 46: 804-807.
  94. Belman AL, Milazo M, Savatic M (2001) Gabapentin for migraine prophylaxis in children. Ann Neurol 50 Suppl 1: S109.
  95. Bali M, Rahbarimanesh AA, Sadeghi M, Sedighi M, Karimzadeh P, et al. (2015) Comparison of propranolol and pregabalin for prophylaxis of childhood migraine: a randomised controlled trial. Acta Med Iran 53: 276-280.
  96. Frampton JE (2012) OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX(R)): a review of its use in the prophylaxis of headaches in adults with chronic migraine. Drugs 72: 825-845.
  97. Turton K, Chaddock JA, Acharya KR (2002) Botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: structure, function and therapeutic utility. Trends Biochem Sci 27: 552-558.
  98. Ahmed K, Oas K, Mack K, Garza I (2010) Experience with botulinum toxin A in medically intractable pediatric chronic daily headache. Pediatr Neurol 43: 316-319.
  99. Kabbouche M, O'Brien H, Hershey AD (2012) Onabotulinumtoxin A in pediatric chronic daily headache. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 12: 114-117.
  100. Bernhard MK, Bertsche A, Syrbe S, Weise S, Merkenschlager A (2014) Botulinum toxin injections for chronic migraine in adolescents-an early therapeutic option in the transition from neuropaediatrics to neurology. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 82: 39-42.
  101. Olesen J, Diener HC (2004) Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the Acute Treatment of Migraine. New England Journal of Medicine 350: 1104-1110.
  102. Hou M, Xing H, Cai Y, Li B, Wang X, et al. (2017) The effect and safety of monoclonal antibodies to calcitonin gene-related peptide and its receptor on migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 18: 42.
  103. Powers SW, Kashikar-Zuck SM, Allen JR, LeCates SL, Slater SK, et al. (2013) Cognitive behavioral therapy plus amitriptyline for chronic migraine in chil­dren and adolescents: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 310: 2622-2630.
  104. Wells ER, Burch R, Paulsen RH, Wayne PM Houle TT, et al. (2014) Meditation for migraines: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Headache.
  105. Sansone E, Raggi A, GrignaniMatilde E, Leonardi M, Scaratti C, et al. (2018) Mindfulness meditation for chronic migraine in pediatric population: a pilot study. Neurol Sci 39: 111-113.
  106. Ehde DM, Dillworth TM, Turner JA (2014) Cognitive-behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain: efficacy, innovations, and directions for research. Am Psychol 69: 153-166.
  107. Martin PR (2010) Behavioral management of migraine headache triggers: learning to cope with triggers. Curr Pain Headache Rep 14: 221-227.
  108. Fisher E, Law E, Palermo TM, Eccleston C (2014) Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014: CD011118.
  109. Gatzounis R, Schrootenmg, Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW (2012) Operant Learning Theory in Pain and Chronic Pain Rehabilitation. Curr Pain Headache Rep 16: 117-126.
  110. Shiri S, Feintuch U, Weiss N, Pustilnik A, Geffen T, et al. (2013) A virtual reality system combined with biofeedback for treating pediatric chronic headache--a pilot study. Pain Med 14: 621-627.
  111. Blume HK, Brockman LN, Breuner CC (2012) Biofeedback therapy for pediatric headache: factors associated with response. Headache 52: 1377-1386.
  112. Kropp P, Meyer B, Landgraf M, Ruscheweyh R, Ebinger F, et al. (2013) Headache in children: update on bio-behavioral treatments. Neuropediatrics 44: 20-24.
  113. Bethell C, Kemper KJ, Gombojav N, Koch TK (2013) Complementary and conventional medicine use among youth with recurrent headaches. Pediatrics 132: e1173-1183.
  114. Powers SW, Coffey CS, Chamberlin LA, Ecklund DJ, Klingner EA, et al. (2017) Trial of amitrip­tyline, topiramate, and placebo for pediatric migraine. N Engl J Med 376: 115-124.
  115. Wang F, Van Den Eeden SK, Ackerson LM, Salk SE, Reince RH, et al. (2003) Oral magnesium oxide prophylaxis of frequent migrainous headache in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache 43: 601-610.
  116. Castelli S, Meossi C, Domenici R, Fontana F, Stefani G (1993) Magnesium in the prophylaxis of primary headache and other periodic disorders in children. Pediatr Med Chir 15: 481-488.
  117. MacLennan S, Wade F, Forrest K, Ratanayake P, Fagan E, et al. (2008) High-dose riboflavin in migraine prophylaxis in chldren: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Child Neurol 23: 1300-1304.
  118. Condo M, Posar A, Arbizzani A, Parmeggiani, A (2009) Riboflavin prophylaxis in pediatric and adolescent migraine. J Headache Pain 10: 361-365.
  119. Bruijn J, Duivenvoorden H, Passchier J, Locher H, Dijkstra N, et al. (2010) Medium dose riboflavin as a prophylactic agent in children with migraine: a preliminary placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial. Cephalalgia 30: 1426-1434.
  120. Hershey AD (2010) Current approaches to the diagnosis and management of pediatric migraine. Lancet Neurol 9: 190-204.
  121. Gordon C, DePeter K, Feldman H, Grace E, Emans S (2004) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158: 531-537.
  122. Pfaffenrath V, Diener H, Fischer M, Friede M, Henneicke-von Zepelin HH (2010) The efficacy and safety of Tanacetum parthenium (feverfew) in migraine prophylaxis - a double-blind, multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled dose-response study. Cephalagia 22: 523-532.
  123. Diener H, Pfaffenrath V, Schnitker J, Friede M, Henneicke-von Zepelin H (2005) Efficacy and safety of 6.25 mg tid feverfew CO2-extract (MMIG 99) in migraine prevention - a randomized, double-blind, multicenter placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia 25: 1031-1041.
  124. Oelkers-AR, Leins A, Parzer P, Hillecke T, Bolay H, et al. (2008) Butterbur root extract and music therapy in the prevention of childhood migraine: an explorative study. Eur J Pain 12: 301-313.
  125. Pottman R, Danesch U (2005) Migraine prevention in children and adolescents: results of an open study with a special butterbur root extract. Headache 45: 196-203.
  126. Grazzi L, Egeo G, Liebler E, Padovan AM, Barbanti P (2017) Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) as symptomatic treatment of migraine in young patients: a preliminary safety study. Neurol Sci 38: 197-199.
  127. Irwin SL, Qubty W, Allen IE, Patniyot I, Goadsby PJ, et al. (2018) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Migraine Prevention in Adolescents: A Pilot Open-Label Study. Headache 58: 724-731.
  128. Ravishankar K (2012) The art of history-taking in a headache patient. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 15: S7-S14.
  129. Faedda N, Cerutti R, Verdecchia P, Migliorini D, Arruda M, et al. (2016) Behavioral management of headache in children and adolescents. J Headache Pain 17: 80.
  130. https://headaches.org/resources/headache-diary-keeping-a-diary-can-help-your-doctor-help-you/

Citation: Pasculli M, Striano P, Ledda MG (2019) Pediatric Migraine Treatment: An Updated Review. Neonat Pediatr Med 5: 178. DOI: 10.4172/2572-4983.1000178

Copyright: © 2019 Pasculli M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top