Dersleri yüzünden oldukça stresli bir ruh haline sikiş hikayeleri bürünüp özel matematik dersinden önce rahatlayabilmek için amatör pornolar kendisini yatak odasına kapatan genç adam telefonundan porno resimleri açtığı porno filmini keyifle seyir ederek yatağını mobil porno okşar ruh dinlendirici olduğunu iddia ettikleri özel sex resim bir masaj salonunda çalışan genç masör hem sağlık hem de huzur sikiş için gelip masaj yaptıracak olan kadını gördüğünde porn nutku tutulur tüm gün boyu seksi lezbiyenleri sikiş dikizleyerek onları en savunmasız anlarında fotoğraflayan azılı erkek lavaboya geçerek fotoğraflara bakıp koca yarağını keyifle okşamaya başlar


Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Helicobacter pylori Negative Gastritis | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-069X
Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Helicobacter pylori Negative Gastritis

Bani Chander Roland1*, Daewoong Lee2, Ahmed Salem3, Sariat Ibrahim4, Yuriko Mori5 and Stephen Meltzer6

1Columbia University Medical Center: Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, 161 Fort Washington Avenue FL 8 New York, NY 10032, USA

2Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 60 Haven Avenue 17F, New York, NY 10032, USA

3Johns Hopkins University: Division of Gastroenterology, 2717 N Howard Street, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA

4Johns Hopkins University: GI Biomarkers Laboratory, 1503 E. Jefferson Street, Room 106 office address Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

5CHI Institute for Research and Innovation, 801 West Baltimore Street, Suite 302, Baltimore, Maryland 2120, USA

6The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine & Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1503 E. Jefferson Street, Room 112 Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Bani Chander Roland MD
Columbia University Medical Center: Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases
161 Fort Washington Avenue FL 8 New York, NY 10032, USA
Tel: 212-342-5124

Received date: January 14, 2016; Accepted date: Feburary 24, 2016; Published date: Feburary 29, 2016

Citation: Roland BC, Lee D, Salem A, Ibrahim S, Mori Y, et al. (2016) Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Helicobacter pylori Negative Gastritis. J Gastrointest Dig Syst 6:392. doi:10.4172/2161-069X.1000392

Copyright: © 2016 Roland BC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System


Background: Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection has previously been thought to account for nearly all chronic gastritis. However, recent studies have suggested that Hp-negative gastritis is common and increasing in prevalence in the United States. The etiology and associated risk factors for Hp-negative gastritis remain uncertain. 


Helicobacter pylori ; Helicobacter pylori negative gastritis; Hp negative; Hp negative gastritis risk factors; Hp positive gastritis; GERD; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Gastritis; Chronic gastritis


Gastritis typically presents as inflammation of the mucosal lining of the stomach, which can subsequently lead to the development of ulcers. The dominant etiology of gastritis worldwide has been thought to be Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection, which is also known to increase the risk of non-cardia gastric cancer by six to eightfold [1-3]. In cases of gastritis without evidence of Hp, the absence of bacteria expected has frequently been assumed to represent false negatives [4]. Explanations include sampling error, recent use of antibiotics that suppressed the infection but not the inflammation, and use of protein pump inhibitor (PPI) that decreased the numbers of bacteria and shifted their populations from the antrum to the corpus [5].

Emerging data, however, point to the distinct entity of Hp-negative gastritis. A cross-sectional study in 2013 involving 491 patients provided one of the robust, systemic evidence. The authors used the updated Sydney System to detect 200 patients with gastritis. 41 of them were found to be negative for Hp by serology, culture, and histology including histochemical and immunohistochemical staining [6]. Further circumstantial and direct evidence are now available, which demonstrated the lack of correlation between the Hp-negative and Hppositive groups by epidemiology, clinical sequel of chronic Hp infection, and follow-up biopsies [5,7].

The prevalence, etiology and associated risk factors for Hp-negative gastritis are yet to be clearly defined. Associations with alcohol, smoking, and PPI use have been implicated in prior studies. Histamine 2 receptor antagonists and NSAIDs have also been considered [6]. Others have suggested a significantly increased frequency of Hpnegative gastritis, of unclear etiology, in patients with functional dyspepsia, non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux, and erosive esophagitis [8]. Also, one recent community-based study reported that Hp antibody status was inversely associated with a GERD diagnosis and GERD symptoms [9]. A theory has thus emerged that the absence of Hp infection may be associated with both GERD symptoms and complications.

In light of the gap in current evidence, we sought to assess the prevalence of Hp-negative gastritis at a single tertiary care institution, and characterize the differences in demographics, clinical features, risk factors and medical co-morbidities including GERD between Hpnegative and Hp-positive gastritis.

Materials and Methods

Study group

We performed a retrospective study of 131 consecutive patients referred for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for the evaluation of upper GI symptoms at a single tertiary care center during a one-year period (from 7/2012 to 7/2013). Referral symptoms included dysphagia, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, weight loss, iron deficiency anemia, bloating, belching, or Barrett`s esophagus surveillance. Gastric biopsies were taken from all subjects. Biopsy sites included two from the gastric antrum and two from the corpus (body).

Survey of co-morbidities

Demographic assessments were made systematically in all subjects by chart review. Co-morbidities were determined by evaluating past medical history or were self-reported by the subjects.

We included the medical co-morbidities of esophagitis, GERD, functional dyspepsia, gastric or other cancers, dysmotility (e.g. gastroparesis or esophageal motility disorders), small bowel obstruction, diverticulitis, functional bowel disease including IBS,autoimmune disease with GI involvement, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO).

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)

All patients underwent EGD at a single endoscopy unit (JHMI) and had two gastric biopsies performed in the antrum and corpus and placed in two separate biopsy containers. The presence of gastritis, ulceration, erosions and other lesions was also derived from the endoscopy report.

Histopathology, serology, cultures

Diff-Quik staining method was used as the standardized method for all the cases of H. pylori . Biopsies were taken from the mid antrum and the greater curvature of mid corpus.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using STATISTICA (version 4.2, Stat Soft, Tulsa, OK). Two-tailed Student`s t-test was used for the comparison for two groups for continuous datasets. Two-tailed Fisher`s exact test and Chi-squared test were used for the comparison of two groups for categorical datasets with two and three or more categories, respectively, unless otherwise stated. Cases lacking data were excluded from statistical analyses, unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was noted at a p-value of less than 0.05, while non-significant trends were noted at a p-value of less than 0.1.


To determine the prevalence, demographics, and clinicopathological characterstics of Hp-positive and Hp-negative gastritis, records of 131 consecutive patients were reviewed. Among all patients, 50 (38.2%) had histologic evidence of gastritis on biopsies. Among these 50 patients, 39 (78.0%) had Hp-negative gastritis, while 11 (22.0%) had Hp-positive gastritis.

Demographic characteristics in gastritis patients are presented in Table 1. Among the 39 patients with Hp-negative gastritis, 24 (61.5%) were Caucasian, 8 (20.5%) were African-American, 3 (7.7%) were other races, and racial identity was unavailable in 4 (10.2%). Among the 11 patients with Hp-positive gastritis, 8 (72.7%) were African- American and 3 (27.3%) were other races.

Attributes Categories Hp-negative Hp-positive Total p-value
    39 (78.0%) 11 (22.0%) 50  
Gender Men 17 (43.6%) 5 (45.5%) 22 1
  Women 22 (56.4%) 6 (54.5%) 28  
Age (mean) 56.3 ± 16.1 49.5 ± 11.6 N/A 0.196
Race   White 24 (61.5%) 0 (0.0%) 24 <0.001
Black 8 (20.5%) 8 (72.7%) 16  
Other* 3 (7.7%) 3(27.3%) 6  
Unknown 4 (10.1%) 0 (0.0%) 4  
Nationality American 33 (84.6%) 8 (72.7%) 41 0.392
Non- American 6 (15.4%) 3 (27.3%) 9  
*Other consists of 2 Asian and 1 Middle Eastern for both Hp-negative and Hp-positive gastritis.

Table 1: Patient demographics of Hp-positive and Hp-negative gastritis.

No Hp-positive gastritis cases were Caucasian. There was no significant difference in gender distribution or age was observed. Thus, the Caucasian race was the sole demographic factor significantly associated with Hp-negative gastritis (24 of 39 Hp-negative cases, 61.5% vs. 0 of 11 Hp-positive cases, 0%; p < 0.001).

We also compared clinical and histopathological features (Table 2). Among all 39 Hp-negative gastritis patients, 2 (5.1%) had active chronic gastritis, while 37 (94.9%) had other forms of chronic gastritis consisting of 24 (61.5%) chronic chemical gastritis and 13 (33.2%) chronic non-active gastritis. In contrast, all 11 (100.0%) Hp-positive patients had active gastritis (vs. 2 of 11 Hp-negative gastritis cases, 5.1%; p < 0.001).

Attributes Categories Hp-negative Hp-positive Total p-value
39 11 50  
Gastritis activity   Chronic active 2 (5.1%) 11(100.0%) 13  
Chronic chemical 24 (61.5%) 0 (0.0%) 24  
Chronic inactive 13 (33.2%) 0 (0.0%) 13 <0.001
Gastritis location   Antrum 30 (76.9%) 3 (27.3%) 33  
Corpus 4 (10.3%) 3 (27.3%) 7  
Antrum and Corpus 3 (7.7%) 3 (27.3%) 6 0.016
  Unknown 2 (5.1%) 2 (10.5%) 4  

Table 2: Histopathological features of Hp-positive and Hp-negative gastritis.

Hp-negative and Hp-positive gastritis differed with respect to the anatomical distribution of the affected regions (p = 0.016, Table 2): Hpnegative gastritis had 30 cases (76.9%) limited to antrum, compared to Hp-positive gastritis with 3 cases (27.3%); 4 (10.3%) Hp-negative and 3 (27.3%) Hp-positive patients had corpus-only disease, while 3 (7.7%) Hp-negative and 3 (27.3%) Hp-positive patients had corpus and antrum disease. 2 (5.1%) Hp-negative and 2 (18.2%) Hp-positive patients were missing biopsy site information. Thus, patients with Hpnegative gastritis exhibited a significant predilection for antrum.

The study assessed the indications for EGD in Hp-positive vs. Hpnegative gastritis patients (Table 3), and compared previous history of Hp eradication, usage of PPIs, antibiotics, NSAIDs, alcohol, tobacco, and medical co-morbidities in the two patient groups (Table 4).

Indication   Hp-negative Hp-positive p-value
Suspected Hp + 2 (5.1%) 2 (18.2%) 0.206
- 37 (94.9%) 9 (81.8%)  
BE + 4 (10.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0.564
- 35 (89.7%) 11 (100.0%)  
IM + 2 (5.1%) 0 (0.0%) 1
- 37 (94.9%) 11 (100.0%)  
GERD symptoms + 14 (35.9%) 3 (27.3%) 0.728
- 25 (64.1%) 8 (72.7%)  
Abdominal pain + 8 (20.5%) 3 (27.3%) 0.688
- 31 (79.5%) 8 (72.7%)  
Nausea/ vomiting + 3 (7.7%) 2 (18.2%) 0.301
- 36 (92.3%) 9 (81.8%)  
Bloating/ belching + 2 (5.1%) 0 (0.0%) 1
- 37 (94.9%) 11 (100.0%)  
Dysphagia + 5 (12.8%) 1 (9.1%) 1
- 34 (87.2%) 10 (90.9%)  
Hx/FHx of GI malignancy + 3 (7.7%) 0 (0.0%) 1
- 36 (92.3%) 11 (100.0%)  
Anemia + 1 (2.7%) 1 (9.1%) 0.403
- 36 (97.3%) 10 (90.9%)  
Combined upper GI symptoms + 16 (41.0%) 5 (45.5%) 0.455
- 23 (59.0%) 6 (54.5%)  
Other + 2 (5.1%) 0 (0.0%) 1
- 37 (94.9%) 11 (100.0%)  
Multiple indications + 7 (17.9%) 1 (9.1%) 0.666
- 32 (82.1%) 10 (90.9%)  

Table 3: Indications for EGD in Hp-positive and Hp-negative gastritis.

Factor Hp-negative Gastritis Hp-positive Gastritis p-value
Previous HpTx + 5 (12.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0.573
- 34 (87.2%) 11 (100.0%)  
Co-morbidity + 28 (71.8%) 2 (18.2%) 0.004
- 11 (28.2%) 9 (81.8%)  
PPI + 16 (41.0%) 3 (27.3%) 0.498
- 23 (59.0%) 8(72.7%)  
ABX   + 1 (2.6%) 1 (9.1%) 0.402
- 37 (94.9%) 10 (90.9%)  
Unknown 1 (2.6%) 0 (0.0%)  
NSAIDs + 5 (12.8%) 3 (27.3%) 0.351
- 34 (87.2%) 8 (72.7%)  
Tobacco   + 11 (28.2%) 5 (50.0%) 0.283
- 25 (64.1%) 5 (45.5%)  
Unknown 3 (7.7%) 1 (9.1%)  
Alcohol + 17 (43.6%) 7 (63.6%) 0.314
- 22 (56.4%) 4 (36.4%)  
Note. Hp = Helicobacter pylori; Tx = treatment; PPI = proton pump inhibitor; ABX = antibiotics; NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Table 4: Use of PPI, antibiotics, NSAID, Alcohol, tobacco and presence of medical co-morbidities in Hp-positive and Hp-negative gastritis.

No indication for EGD was more prevalent with statistical significance in Hp-negative than in Hp-positive cases. Medical comorbidities were the only factor significantly associated with Hpnegativity (28 cases, 71.8% vs. 2 cases, 18.2%; p = 0.004).

Among the co-morbidities, GERD was the most common and the only co-morbidity that demonstrated significant association with Hpnegative gastritis (26 cases, 66.7% vs. 1 case, 9.1%; p = 0.001, Table 5).

Co morbidities   Hp-negative gastritis Hp-positive gastritis Total p-value
39 11 50  
All co-morbidities   + 32 (82.1%) 2 (18.2%) 34 (68.0%) <0.0001
- 7 (17.9%) 9 (81.8%) 16 (32.0%)  
GERD (includes esophagitis and BE)   + 26 (66.7%) 1   (9.1%) 27   (54.0%) 0.001
- 13 (33.3%) 10 (90.9%) 23 (46.0%)  
Esophagitis   + 9   (23.1%) 0 (0.0%) 9 (18.0%) 0.177
- 30   (76.9%) 11(100.0%) 41   (82.0%)  
IBS   + 4   (10.3%) 1 (9.1%) 5   (10.0%) 1
- 35   (89.7%) 10 (90.9%) 45 (90.0%)  
All cancer   + 5   (12.8%) 0   (0.0%) 5 (10.0%) 0.573
- 34 (87.2%) 11(100.0%) 45 (90.0%)  
Gastric cancer specifically (includes gastric carcinoid)   + 1 (2.6%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (2.0%) 1
- 38 (97.4%) 11(100.0%) 49 (98.0%)  
Esophageal or gastric motility disorder (includes gastroparesis and esophageal motility disorders such as spasm)   + 3 (7.7%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (6.0%) 1
- 36   (92.3%) 11(100.0%) 47 (94.0%)  
Connective tissue & Autoimmune disease (RA, CD, CRPS, fibromyalgia, lupus)   + 5 (12.8%) 2 (18.2%) 7 (14.0%) 0.641
- 34 (87.2%) 9 (81.8%) 43 (86.0%)  
all "other" co-morbidities (includes diverticulitis, SBO, etc)   + 2   (5.1%) 0   (0.0%) 2   (4.0%) 1
- 37 (94.9%) 11(100.0%) 48 (96.0%)  

Table 5: Correlations between co-morbidities and Hp-positive and Hp-negative gastritis.


Hp-negative gastritis comprised the majority (78.0%) of 50 consecutive gastritis cases at our institution. We found that it was much more common in Caucasians (61.5%) than in other races, particularly African-Americans, where the prevalence was only 20.5%. Other studies corroborated the increased prevalence in Caucasians (70.7%) vs. African-Americans (26.8%) [6]. Overall, this suggests that this common entity may be increasing in prevalence, at least at this tertiary care institution [5,6].

Though the true prevalence is unknown, the decreasing rate of the Hp infection in developed countries may contribute to this finding, by accentuating previously minor proportion occupied by Hp-negative gastritis [10,11]. On the other hand, it may representHsssdit mit an umbrella term encompassing purportedly associated factors, including PPI, s, alcohol, tobacco, IBD, celiac disease, autoimmune gastritis, a small portion of missing the bacteria by sampling error, and infection with other species including H. heilmannii, Streptococcus and Prevotella. Among these, prior studies have highlighted a significant association with PPI, NSAID, alcohol, and tobacco use [12-14].

In contrast, however, we found no association of Hp-negativity with PPI, NSAID, alcohol, tobacco, referral symptoms, or any specific risk factor. It was only significantly associated with the presence of medical co-morbidities, especially GERD which was found in 66.7% of Hpnegative pool. An explanation that ties these findings together with prior studies is that patients with GERD symptoms are likely to be on PPI treatment. Thus, it is possible that GERD has the direct correlation with Hp-negative gastritis, while PPI use is simply a confounding variable.

Prior studies suggested that the incidence of GERD has increased in parallel with decreasing incidence of Hp-positive gastritis [15]. Currently available literature support that Hp infection and GERD exhibit associations that are anatomically dependent. For example, with Hp eradication, Hp-positive gastritis patients tend to exhibit worsening of GERD symptoms, except antrum-dominant gastritis patients who show improvement [16]. Exact mechanism is unclear, and role of local inflammation and cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1-beta have been implicated. Furthermore, Hp infection enhances the acid suppression by PPI therapy [17-19]. These interesting finding coupled with our result supports previous speculation that Hp infection may even be protective against development of GERD [20]. The standard of care still is to eradicate Hp because of the risk of development or recurrence of peptic ulcer disease as well as two to three times higher incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma [21-28]. In the end, the possibility of protection against GERD conferred by Hp infection remains and needs to be further explored.

In our study, Hp-negative gastritis was frequently mild, focal, and chronic, where Hp-positive gastritis tended to be chronic-active or active. This is in line with current literature demonstrating low prevalence of sequelae such as peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer associated with Hp-negativity [17,18]. Anatomically, we found that the antrum was uniquely prone to Hp-negative gastritis as compared to other types of gastritis. We also observed that chronic chemical gastritis was a very common histopathologic entity in Hp-negative patients (61.5%), although other studies have reported a lower prevalence of chemical gastritis [6]. This finding suggests that chemical gastritis, not associated with Hp infection, may now be the predominant forms of this disease in the United States. Proposed etiologies of chemical gastritis include GERD, chronic bile reflux, NSAID, and aspirin, of which GERD is highlighted as the most significant factor in the result of our study [24].

The clinical relevance and prognosis of Hp-negative gastritis remain unknown and need to be further examined given the relatively high prevalence of this entity. For example, it is unclear if the risk of ulcer or cancer is increased, or if it predisposes to upper gastrointestinal symptoms. However, at least it is clear that in clinical practice, empirical treatment for H. pylori is not warranted in patients with gastritis without clear evidence for the presence of this infection. Also, it is worth noting that in pediatric gastritis patients with Hp-negativity, it is now recognized that their chief complaints and gastritis demonstrated poor association. In fact, evidence-based clinical guidelines for Hp infection in children suggest that the presence or absence of gastritis is not a part of the diagnostic workup [25]. Thus, routine treatment with PPI or H2 blockers is not advised.

Limitations of our study include the characteristics inherent to retrospective studies including imperfect control of bias and confounding variables. Also, as it was retrospective the biopsy procedure was not in accordance with the updated Sydney System requiring at least five specimens, and there was only one pathologist for review. Consideration of past history of Hp treatment was attempted where possible, but it could not be done for every case.

In summary, Hp-negative gastritis was a distinct entity characterized by the tendency to affect antrum, and it represented 78.0% of all gastritis at this institution. Caucasian race and comorbidity of GERD were significantly associated, while notably PPI, NSAID, alcohol, and tobacco use were not. This result raises the question whether Hp infection may provide protection against GERD through unclear mechanisms [26-28]. Clinically, this study provides implications for screening and management for appropriate population with Hp-negative gastritis. Future, prospective studies are needed to further delineate the natural etiology, risk factors, prognosis of this poorly understood and increasing clinical entity, as well as possible interactions associated with GERD and Hp infection.


Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 15678
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2016 - Jun 25, 2024]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 14814
  • PDF downloads : 864

Review summary

  1. Christen Eldred
    Posted on Oct 05 2016 at 2:56 pm
    This is a well conducted study. Furthermore, this paper yields new information in the field, which is not already well known. E.g. Stress gastritis in patients with co-morbidities is fairly well documented. I am not surprised with the other factors generating equivocal risk of Hp negative gastritis.

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh
Peer Reviewed Journals

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals