International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience
Open Access

Conflict zones, Psychological trauma

Mental health care in conflict zones remains one of the most critical yet neglected aspects of humanitarian response. As wars and civil unrest continue to displace millions worldwide, the psychological burden borne by affected populations deepens. Civilians in conflict zones face daily stressors ranging from bombings and forced migration to the loss of loved ones, livelihoods, and their sense of safety. For many, the effects are not only immediate but extend long after the violence ends (Bolton (2004)). Yet, the focus in such regions often remains on physical health, shelter, and food security, with mental health needs frequently overlooked. Despite global health organizations acknowledging the importance of psychological well-being, implementing mental health services in unstable and dangerous settings remains a major challenge. This article discusses the nature and scale of mental health issues in conflict zones, the barriers to addressing them, and the need for integrated, long-term support systems to aid recovery and resilience (Browne (1990)).

The psychological toll of conflict manifests in various ways. PTSD, anxiety disorders, depression, and substance abuse are frequently observed among individuals who have experienced or witnessed violence. Children are especially vulnerable; many grow up in environments dominated by fear, loss, and unpredictability, leading to developmental delays, behavioral problems, and deep-rooted trauma (Gershuny and Thayer (1999)). For adults, the psychological scars can lead to functional impairment, difficulty reintegrating into communities, and an inability to resume normal life even after the conflict subsides. A 2021 report by the World Health Organization estimated that one in five people in conflict settings live with a mental health condition, a rate much higher than in non-conflict areas. These figures underscore the scale of the issue, which continues to be underreported due to stigma, lack of awareness, and insufficient diagnostic tools (Harvey (1996)).

One of the fundamental barriers to mental health care in conflict zones is the collapse of healthcare infrastructure. Hospitals and clinics are often destroyed, medical staff flee or become casualties themselves, and mental health professionals are scarce. In many affected regions, even before conflict, mental health systems were weak or non-existent, and war only exacerbates these vulnerabilities. In such circumstances, even when psychological aid is available, it may not be culturally appropriate or sustainable. Furthermore, the stigma surrounding mental health in many societies prevents individuals from seeking help. This combination of systemic collapse, cultural barriers, and overwhelming need creates a silent epidemic of untreated trauma (Jones and Wessely (2007)).

Additionally, humanitarian organizations face immense challenges in integrating mental health services into emergency responses. Short-term missions often focus on immediate survival needs, relegating mental health to a secondary concern. Yet, trauma does not wait. In the chaos of war, early intervention can play a significant role in reducing the severity of long-term mental disorders. Psychological First Aid (PFA), community-based counseling, and resilience-building activities have shown promise in mitigating the immediate psychological impact. However, without long-term commitment and investment, such programs tend to dissipate once humanitarian teams (Raig and Wessely (2006)).

One effective approach involves incorporating mental health care into existing healthcare and community structures. Training local health workers and volunteers to recognize and manage common mental health conditions allows for continuity of care, even in the absence of specialists. Furthermore, culturally sensitive and community-led approaches can increase trust, reduce stigma, and encourage more people to seek help. Digital platforms and tele-mental health services are emerging as innovative solutions, particularly in areas where professionals cannot access physically due to ongoing violence or logistical constraints (Reyes and Elhai (2008)).

Resilience is another critical component in addressing mental health in conflict zones. Despite the hardships, many communities demonstrate remarkable psychological resilience and solidarity. Leveraging these community strengths through support groups, cultural rituals, and peer-led initiatives can foster recovery and rebuild a sense of agency. Resilience-building should be viewed not merely as a personal trait but as a communal process that can be nurtured through policy, education, and sustained investment in mental well-being (Smelser (2004)).

It is equally important to recognize the mental health needs of humanitarian workers and local responders who are regularly exposed to trauma. Burnout, secondary trauma, and compassion fatigue are prevalent among these individuals, yet mental health support for them is often inadequate. Prioritizing the psychological health of caregivers ensures a more effective and compassionate response system (Spytska (2023)). From integrating mental health into primary care and training local responders to fostering culturally sensitive, community-based interventions, a multifaceted approach is essential. Resilience, while a powerful force, cannot replace structured support systems and policy commitment. As the world continues to witness the devastating impact of armed conflict, the inclusion of mental health services must become a core component of humanitarian aid not a secondary concern. Only then can true healing and recovery begin for those living in the shadows of war (Weber and Reynolds (2004)).

Mental health in conflict zones is a pressing humanitarian issue that demands immediate and sustained attention. The psychological scars left by war are deep and enduring, impacting not just individuals but entire generations. Addressing these challenges requires a shift in how we perceive and prioritize mental health within emergency and post-conflict recovery.

Bolton, D (2004). Long-term effects of psychological trauma on psychosocial functioning. J Child Psychol. 45(5):1007-14.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Browne, I (1990). Psychological trauma, or unexperienced experience.1;12(4):21-34.

Google Scholar

Gershuny, BS., Thayer, JF (1999). Relations among psychological trauma, dissociative phenomena, and trauma-related distress: A review and integration. Clin Psych Rev.  1;19(5):631-57.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Harvey, MR (1996). An ecological view of psychological trauma and trauma recovery. J  Traum Str.9(1):3-23.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Jones, E., Wessely, S (2007). A paradigm shift in the conceptualization of psychological trauma in the 20th century. J  Anx Dis. 1;21(2):164-75.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Raig, E., Wessely, S (2006). Psychological trauma: A historical perspective. Psych.1;5(7):217-20.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Reyes, G., Elhai, JD (2008). The encyclopedia of psychological trauma. 11;6(8):20.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Smelser, NJ (2004). Psychological trauma and cultural trauma. 22;4:31-59.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Spytska, L (2023). Psychological trauma and its impact on a person’s life prospects. 30;9(3):82-90.

Google Scholar

Weber, DA., Reynolds, CR (2004). Clinical perspectives on neurobiological effects of psychological trauma. Neuro Psych Rev.14:115-29.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref