Radiation-Induced Arterial Injury in the Upper Limb
Received Date: Apr 13, 2016 / Accepted Date: May 25, 2016 / Published Date: Jun 01, 2016
In recent years, radiation combination therapy for malignant tumors has improved cancer survival, thereby increasing the importance of radiation therapy. In 1959, radiation-induced arterial injury (RIAI) was first reported by Thomas as a condition in which stenosis and obstruction of the blood vessels arise within the irradiated area following radiation therapy; there have been several subsequent reports regarding this. Although RIAI has been examined and reported, to date, there have been few reports of RIAI in the arteries of the upper limbs, and it cannot be said that the clinical features and treatment of this condition have been thoroughly examined and established. In particular, irradiation for breast cancer can cause stenosis and obstruction in the area extending from the subclavian artery to the axillary artery; however, the associated symptoms resemble the symptoms of lymphedema and neuropathy following surgery for breast cancer, and it is assumed that diagnosis is difficult, and many patients has been overlooked. Thus, in the event of such patients, careful examination should be performed with RIAI in mind. Irradiation can cause arteriosclerosis, and therefore, it is important that RIAI becomes common knowledge; further examinations should also be conducted in a larger sample size.
Keywords: Radiation-induced arterial injury; Radiation therapy; Breast cancer
In recent years, radiation therapy has been widely administered for malignant tumors, and it is a particularly important treatment in breast cancer. To date, studies have been conducted on RIAI as a complication following radiation therapy; however, there are few reports of such injury to the arteries of the upper limbs, and it cannot be said that the clinical features of this condition are fully understood. Therefore, we would like to examine and discuss the clinical features, effective diagnostic methods, and effective treatment methods for RIAI in the upper limbs.
RIAI was first reported by Thomas  as a condition in which radiation therapy causes stenosis and obstruction of the great vessels. Incidence and prevalence of radiation induced subclavian artery stenosis
To date, it has been considered that RIAI is rare after radiation therapy. However, because of advanced imaging technology and the fact that clinicians have become aware of the concept of RIAI, reports of RIAI have increased.
Lam  compared newly diagnosed patients with nasopharyngeal cancer patients before and after they underwent radiation therapy and reported that arterial stenosis was more common in the irradiated area of the post-radiation group compared with that of the pre-radiation group (56/71 vs. 11/51). Furthermore, arterial stenosis of 50% or more was only observed following radiation therapy.
In addition, the probability of carotid stenosis of 70% or more after radiation therapy is 6.3% according to Elerding  and 11.7%–16% according to Cheng . It is also reported that the symptom due to this vascular stenosis appears in 14.6% of the cases .
Breast cancer is the most common non-dermatological cancer among women in the US, with an estimated 60,290 noninvasive (in situ) and 231,840 newly diagnosed invasive cancers and 40,290 fatal cases in 2015 . Furthermore, the results of two randomized controlled trials from Denmark and Canada were reported in 1997 [26,27], which suggested that post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) combined with systemic chemotherapy for breast cancer not only reduced the rate of localized recurrence but also improved survival in the high-risk group. A systematic review conducted by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group in 2005  also confirmed that in the high-risk group with lymph node metastasis, PMRT not only improved the rate of local control but also increased survival. Furthermore, it has been reported that following breastpreserving surgery, the rates of local control and survival were improved by post-operative irradiation, irrespective of axillary lymph node metastasis.
Therefore, the importance of radiation therapy for breast cancer has increased in recent years. According to the “Japanese Structure Survey of Radiation Oncology in 2009 (first report)” by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) database committee, in the new patients who underwent radiation therapy, breast cancer was the most common cancer type (23.3%) based on the primary lesion .
RIAI in the carotid artery and RIAI in the subclavian to axillary arteries must have the same mechanism of onset. Therefore, considering the number of case reports, it is likely that many patients are not diagnosed, and we believe that clinicians need to be more aware of this condition.
The general mechanism of action can be broadly divided into three stages.
First, it is considered that irradiation causes endothelial dysfunction . Endothelial cell damage accelerates vascular permeability, and serum mucopolysaccharide is deposited on the endothelium, causing intimal hyperplasia. In addition, it has been reported that radiation exposure subsequently activates nuclear factor-kappa B  and can cause inflammation due to oxidative stress . It has been reported that inflammatory markers can rise soon after radiation exposure, which may be useful predictors of angiostenosis caused by RIAI; however, further evaluation of this finding is needed .
These changes ultimately promote arteriosclerosis, which leads to stenosis and obstruction.
Clinical features and symptoms
Clinical features of RIAI include the following: the irradiation site and the lesion site coincide, lesions can occur with relatively low radiation doses of approximately 40–80 Gy, several years may pass from irradiation until the appearance of symptoms, and the lesions pathologically appear to be the same as arteriosclerotic lesions [5,6,36-42]. It has been reported that the time from irradiation until the appearance of symptoms can range from 3 to 24 years, with a mean of 14.7 years .
Furthermore, it has also been reported that angiographic findings reveal the poor development of collateral circulation [23,24], which is attributed to the possible impact of dissecting tissue in the area extending from the subclavian to axillary arteries, such as the pectoral muscle and axillary blood vessels, during surgery for breast cancer. In addition, peripheral ischemic symptoms can be more severe than those in normal arteriosclerosis, which should be given due attention.
The reason why it has been scarcely reported on RIAI in the arteries of the upper limbs may be that they are overlooked because the symptoms of stenosis such as fatigue and numbness of the upper limb are resembled with the symptoms of lymphedema and nerve disorders that frequently occur after mastectomy. We believe this may prevent the detection of RIAI in the upper limbs .
RIAI is often difficult to differentiation from atherosclerosis. However, the feature of RIAI is fundamentally matches the lesion exposed radiation. Therefore, it is important to check whether the patient have received radiation therapy in the past.
Diagnosis is confirmed upon the observation of numbness, coldness, and fatigability of the upper limbs, as well as an absent or weak pulse. The bilateral difference in blood pressure of the upper limbs is assessed. In the event of a bilateral difference in blood pressure, ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography or angiography is useful.
The ankle–brachial index is also a non-invasive useful test .
The most frequently reported revascularization method is bypass surgery [12,14,15,17,18,20-23]. Mellièr  examined the outcomes of bypass surgery for subclavian or axillary artery stenosis caused by RIAI in four patients and reported that in all four patients, the surgery was successful. Similar good surgical outcomes were obtained in all the reports that we evaluated [12,14,15,17,18,20-23]. Only one patient was reportedly able to progress well with only medical therapy and exercise .
However, there are not reported whether medical treatment from the early stage is effective for prevent the progression of RIAI or not. Therefore, we should be considered about the medical treatment for RIAI hereafter.
On the other hand, there are relatively few reports of revascularization using PTA rather than bypass surgery, and we could find only five cases in our literature search [13,16,20,21,24]. We reported on a case in which calcification of the lesion was extremely severe, adequate dilatation by plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) was difficult, and although not unsuccessful, adequate dilatation could not be achieved . Furthermore, one case in the four successful bypass surgery cases that have been reported by Mellièr  is initially unsuccessful case by PTA. Hans  reported that symptoms reappeared 3 years and 9 months after POBA and that progress was good after bypass surgery.
As a result, in RIAI-induced arteriosclerosis, severe calcification can make it extremely difficult to perform revascularization using PTA, and good mid-to-long-term outcomes may not be anticipated. Therefore, bypass surgery, for which there have been many successful cases, should probably be considered first.
Effective treatment methods should be further examined in a larger sample size.
Although radiation therapy is currently an important treatment method for cancer, there is no doubt that it carries the risk of arteriosclerosis. In recent years, radiation combination therapy has improved cancer survival, thereby increasing the importance of radiation therapy. We believe that it is important for RIAI to be widely recognized. Further studies with a larger sample size should be performed. Radiation therapy, particularly for breast cancer, causes obstruction in the subclavian artery, the symptoms of which resemble those of lymphedema and neuropathy following surgery for breast cancer, and requires careful examination.
- Thomas E,Forbus WD (1959) Irradiation injury to the aorta and the lung. A.M.A. Archives of Pathology 67: 256-263.
- Lam WW, Leung SF, So NM, Wong KS, Liu KH, et al. (2001) Incidence of carotid stenosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after radiotherapy. Cancer 92: 2357–2363.
- Elerding SC, Fernandez RN, Grotta JC, Lindberg RD, Causay LC, et al. (1981) Mcmurtrey, Carotidartery disease following external cervical irradiation. Ann Surg 194: 609-615.
- Cheng SWK, Ting ACW, Lam LKL, Wei WI (2000) Carotid stenosis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Arch. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126: 517-521.
- Ahuja A, Blatt GL, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN (1995) Angioplasty for Symptomatic Radiation?induced Extracranial Carotid Artery. Neurosurgery 36: 399-403.
- Ohta H, Sakai N, Nagata I, Sakai H, Higashi T, et al. (2001) Bilateral Carotid Stenting for Radiation-Induced Arterial Stenosis. No ShinkeiGeka 29: 559-563.
- Mubarak NA, Roubin GS, Iyer SS, Gomez CR, Liu MW, et al. (2000) Carotid stenting for severe radiation-induced extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease. J EndovascTher 7: 36-40.
- Cohen JE, Rajz G, Lylyk P, Hur TB, Gomori JM, et al. (2005) Protected stent-assisted angioplasty in radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis. Neurol Res 27: 69-72.
- Kim PH, Kadkhodayan Y, Derdeyn CP, Moran CJ (2005) Outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting for radiationassociated stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1781-1788.
- Houdart E, Mounayer C, Chapot R, Maurice JPS, Merland JJ (2001) Carotid stenting for radiation-induced stenosis. Stroke 32: 118-121.
- Ting AC, Cheng SW, Yeung KM, Cheng PW, Lui WM, et al. (2004) Carotid stenting for radiation-induced extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease: efficacy and midterm outcomes.EndovascTher 11: 53-59.
- Thorleif E, Manfred H, Volker K (2013) Subclavian-axillary graft plus graft-carotid interposition in symptomatic radiation-induced occlusion of bilateral subclavian and common carotid arteries. Vasa 42: 223–226.
- Hinchcliffe M, Ruttley MS, Rees GC (1995) Case report: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of irradiation induced bilateral subclavian artery occlusions. ClinRadiol 50: 804-807.
- Stein JS, Jacobson JH (1993) Axillary-contralateral brachial artery bypass for radiation-induced occlusion of the subclavian artery. Cardiovasc Surg1: 146-148.
- Becquemin JP, Gasparino LF, Etienne G (1994) Carotido-brachial artery bypass for radiation induced injury of the subclavian artery. The value of a lateral mid-arm approach. J CardiovascSurg 35: 321-324.
- Guthaner DF, Schmitz L (1982) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of radiation-induced arterial stenosis. Radiology 144: 77-78.
- Julius HJ, Murray GB (1974) Axillary-Contralateral Brachial Artery Bypass for Arm Ischemia. Ann Surg 179: 827–829.
- Kretschmer G, Niederle B, Polterauer P, Waneck R (1986) Irradiation-induced changes in the subclavian and axillary arteries after radiotherapy for carcinoma of the breast. Surgery 99: 658–663.
- Roche-Nagle G, Fitzgerald T, McNeaney P, Harte1 P (1997) Symptomatic Radiation-induced Upper Extremity Occlusive Arterial Disease. EJVES Extra 11: 5–6.
- Mellière D, Becquemin JP, Berrahal , Desgranges P, Cavillon (1997) A Management ofradiation-induced occlusive arterial disease: a reassessment. J CardiovascSurg 38 :261-269.
- Hans SS, Tuma (1989) Failure of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty of Radiation-Induced Subclavian Artery Stenosis: Case Report. Vascular and endovascular surgery 23: 235-239.
- Hirano S, Katoh H, Sasaki S, Shiiya N, Sakuma M, et al. (1995) Brachiocephalic and Right Axillary Artery Occlusion 16 Years After Mastectomy and Radiotherapy. Jpn J VascSurg 4: 801-805.
- Saeki S, Shibahara H, Norimizu S, Taniai H, Kunou T, et al. (2004) Axillary Artery Occlusion Following Radiation for Breast Cancer. Jpn J VascSurg 13: 503-506.
- Yamanaka T, Fuatsu T, Satou H, Ichinohe Y, komatsu H, et al. (2015) A case of radiation-induced subclavian artery stenosis treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Journal of Cardiology Cases 12 54-1261.
- American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2015. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society, 2015. Last accessed October 30, 2015.
- Ragaz J, Jackson SM, Le N, Plenderleith IH, Spinelli JJ, et al. (1997) Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node—positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 337 :956-62.
- Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, Rose C, Andersson M, et al. (1997) Postoperative Radiotherapy in High-Risk Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer Who Receive Adjuvant Chemotherapy NEngl J Med 337: 949-55.
- Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, et al. (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival?an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366: 2087-106.
- Teshima T, Numasaki H, Nishio M, Ikeda H, Sekiguchi K, et al. (2009) Japanese Structure Survey of Radiation Oncology.
- Murros KE, Toole JF (1989) The effect of radiation on carotid arteries. Arch. Neurol 46: 449–455.
- Halle M, Gabrielsen A, Paulsson-Berne G, Gahm C, Agardh HE, et al. (2010) Sustained inflammation due to nuclear factor-kappa B activation in irradiated human arteries. J Am CollCardiol 55:1227–1236.
- Zhao W, Robbins ME (2009) Inflammation and chronic oxidative stress in radiation-induced late normal ti0ssue injury: therapeutic implications. Curr MedChem 16: 130–143.
- Gujral DM, Shah BN, Chahal NS, Senior R, Harrington KJ, et al. (2014) Clinical features of radiation-induced carotid atherosclerosis. ClinOncol 26: 94–102.
- Fonkalsrud EW, Sanchez M, Zerubavel R, Mahoney A (1977) Serial changes in arterial structure following radiation therapy, SurgGynecolObstet 145: 395-400.
- Cheng SW, Ting AC, Wu LL (2002) Ultrasonic analysis of plaque characteristics and intimal-medial thickness in radiation-induced atherosclerotic carotid arteries. Eur J VascEndovascSurg 24: 499–504.
- Atkinson JLD, SundtJr TM, Dale AJD, Cascino TL, Nichols DA (1989) Radiation-associated atheromatous disease of the cervical carotid artery: report of seven cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 24: 171-178.
- Jones TR, Fuusha JD (1986) Carotid revascularization after cervical irradiation. South Med. J 79: 1517-1520.
- Kitamura A, Kuroda S, Usikoshi S, Furukawa K, Asano T, et al. (2002) Three Cases of successful stenting for Radiation-induced Carotid Arterial Stenosis. No ShinkeiGeka 30: 1097-1102
- Kobayashi N, Nakagawa T, Tashiro K, Abe H (1986) Radiation-induced Bilateral Common Carotid Artery Stenosis-A report of one operated case. No ShinkeiGeka 14: 373-377.
- Nishi K, Uno M, Ueda S, Shinno K, Nagahiro S, et al. (1997) Carotid endarterectomy for radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis. Neurol Med Chir 37: 844-848.
- Tashiro T, Ikota T, Yamashita K, Ogura H, Shiokawa T (1985) A case of bilateral carotid radiation angiopathy. RinshoHoushasen 30: 909-912.
- Silverberg GD, Britt RH, Goffinet DR (1978) radiation-induced carotid artery disease. Cancer 41: 130-137.
Citation: Tetsuo Y, Toru F, Yoshimaro I, Hirotaka K, Yasunobu H, et al. (2016) Radiation-Induced Arterial Injury in the Upper Limb . Atheroscler Open Access 1:103.
Copyright: © 2016 Tetsuo Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
Open Access Journals
- Total views: 10576
- [From(publication date): 6-2016 - May 15, 2021]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 10378
- PDF downloads: 198