alexa
Reach Us +44-1625-70898
Study of Verification and Validation of Standard Welding Procedure Specifications Guidelines for API 5L X-70 Grade Line Pipe Welding
ISSN 2472-0518

Oil & Gas Research
Open Access

Like us on:

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Study of Verification and Validation of Standard Welding Procedure Specifications Guidelines for API 5L X-70 Grade Line Pipe Welding

Hafiz Abdul Ahad Qazi*
Quality Control Health and Safety Environment, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: Hafiz Abdul Ahad Qazi, Assistant Engineer Quality Control Health and Safety Environment, Pakistan, Tel: +923448344723, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Oct 30, 2017 / Accepted Date: Nov 02, 2017 / Published Date: Nov 04, 2017

Abstract

Verification and validation of welding procedure specifications for X-70 grade line pipe welding was performed as per clause 8.2, Annexure B and D of API 5L, 45th Edition to check weld integrity in its future application conditions. Hot rolled coils were imported from China, de-coiling, strip edge milling, three roller bending to from pipe, inside and outside submerged arc welding of pipe, online ultrasonic testing of weld, HAZ and pipe body, cutting at fixed random length of pipe, visual inspection of pipe, Fluoroscopic inspection of pipe, welding procedure qualification test pieces marking at weld portion of the pipe, tensile testing, guided bend testing, CVN Impact testing were performed. Detailed study was conducted to explore possible explanations and variation in mechanical properties, WPS is examined and qualified as per API 5L 45th Edition.

Keywords: Welding procedure specification; Welding procedure qualification record; Submerged arc welding; American petroleum institute; American society for testing materials; Tensile test; Guided bend test; Charpy V-notch impact test

Introduction

Welding procedure specification is a standard guideline used to perform a welding action. A WPS is designed and issued by welding engineer and is used by qualified welding operators and welders to perform welding operation so that in each weld, required mechanical properties can be achieved. In a typical WPS, essential variables material grade, voltage (tolerance of less than or equal to 7%), current (tolerance of less than or equal to 10%), welding speed (tolerance of less than or equal 10% for automatic welding), heat input (tolerance of less than or equal to10%)are given in a range while variables like type of welding process, method of welding electrode diameters, polarity, type of electrode and flux, shield gas type if any used are fixed and cannot be changed once a WPS is qualified. If these are to be changed in any case, a new welding procedure specification is to be made and welding procedure qualification (WPQR) tests have to be performed [1].

Methodology and Testing

To verify mechanical properties mentioned in coil manufacturer mill test certificate, Tensile Test, CVN Impact test samples were cut from as received coil, the testing was performed as per ASTM A370 [2] standard, the testing results are presented in Table 1 which is complying with clause 9.7, 9.8 of API 5L-45th Edition. After the verification of mechanical properties, Pipe manufacturing using verified coils was done using these steps, Hot rolled coil was charged using charging lever at Spiral SAW pipe mill where first de-coiling was performed through auxiliary driver rollers, three roller leveling at 140 Bar pressure, five roller leveling at 150 Bar pressure, strip was driven further by main driver rollers at 80 Bar pressure, both edges of plate was milled as per weld geometry design given in WPS, pre-bending of plate, three roller bending at 380 Bar pressure to form pipe, inside and outside welding on pipe was performed by qualified welding operators, Online ultrasonic testing of welds, HAZ and pipe body on full length of pipe to detect defects related to weld, HAZ and pipe body, fluoroscopic examination on full length of pipe was performed to verify soundness of the weld, marking of test pieces on inspected OK pipe was done, transverse tensile testing on two specimen were performed at 25 Degree Celsius to measure ultimate tensile strength picture representation of tensile test specimen [3,4]. Tensile testing machine, stress-strain diagrams, fracture appearance of tensile test specimen after the test are shown below in Figure 1. Guided bend testing on 4 specimen (cut from weld portion in transverse direction of pipe) two face and two root was performed to bend the specimen at 180 degrees over the mandrel (the mandrel dimension was calculated as per clause 10.2.4.6 of API 5L-45th Edition and then to visually inspect for any cracks occur during bending, CVN impact testing on 9 specimen on weld area and 9 specimen on Heat affected Zone area at ambient temperature and at 0 Degree Celsius was performed to measure energy absorbed in Joules during fracture termed as toughness [5]. Testing results of specimen cut from pipe are presented in Tables 1, 2 and Figures 1-4.

  Sample Sample Orientation Test Piece Average Thickness (mm) Test Piece Average Width (mm) Gauge Length (mm) Yield Strength (MPa) Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) Yield Ratio (Yield Ratio/UTS) Elongation (%)
Tensile Test Heat No-Coil No. 1 Transverse 17.55 38.10 50 590 630.82 0.90 37%
Heat No-Coil No. 1 Transverse 17.52 38.05 50 597 633.67 0.92 39%
Charpy V-Notch Impact Test
Sample Identification Heat No-Coil No. 1 Specimen Size (mm) 10 × 5 × 55 Energy Absorbed Converted to Full Sized Specimen (Joule) 280 % Shear Fracture >85
Heat No-Coil No. 2 10 × 5 × 55 270 >85
Heat No-Coil No. 3 10 × 5 × 55 267 >85

Table 1: Mechanical properties of as received coil.

Tensile Test Sample Identification Sample Orientation Test Piece Average Thickness (mm) Test Piece Average Width (mm) Gauge Length (mm) Yied Strength (MPa) Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) Yield Ratio (Yield Ratio/UTS) Elongation (%)
Weld 1 Transverse 17.58 38.10 50 N/A 651.82 N/A N/A
Weld 2 Transverse 17.52 37.99 50 N/A 651.98 N/A N/A
Charpy V-Notch Impact Test
Sample Identification Weld 1 Specimen Size-Half Size Reduced Specimen (mm) 10 × 5 × 55 Energy Absorbed Converted to Full Sized Specimen (Joule) 212 % Shear Fracture >85
Weld 2 10 × 5 × 55 240 >85
Weld 3 10 × 5 × 55 224 >85
HAZ 1 10 × 5 × 55 268 >85
HAZ 2 10 × 5 × 55 252 >85
HAZ 3 10 × 5 × 55 264 >85
Guided Bend Test
Sample Identification Face Bend Specimen Size 300 × 50 mm Visual Condition of specimen after bend test No cracks and open to surfaces defects observed
Root Bend 300 × 50 mm No cracks and open to surfaces defects observed

Table 2: Mechanical Properties of welded test specimens for welding procedure qualification record.

oil-gas-research-fractured

Figure 1: (Sequence of Picture Left to right): Prepared marked tensile specimen, fractured tensile specimen, fractured tensile specimen cone appearance, fractured tensile specimen cup appearance.

oil-gas-research-tensile

Figure 2: (Sequence of Picture Left to right): Universal tensile testing machine, coil tensile specimen stress-strain diagram, Automatic machine welding tensile specimen A1 stress-strain diagram, Automatic machine welding tensile specimen A2 stress-strain diagram.

oil-gas-research-specimen

Figure 3: (Sequence of Picture Left to right): Charpy Impact test machine, CVN weld and HAZ test specimen, fractured appearance of coil CVN specimen, Fractured surface of CVN weld specimen, Fractured surface of HAZ specimen.

oil-gas-research-appearance

Figure 4: (Sequence of Picture Left to right): Prepared guided bend face specimen, guided bend root test specimen, guided bent test machine, face bent specimen showing no crack appearance, root bent specimen showing no crack appearance.

Results and Discussion

From the Table 1, it has been observed that tensile strength value of as received plate was lower as compared to the results obtained from test weld test pieces. In addition to the filling material added during welding, since welding is a thermal fusion process, material which was joined through welding had to gone though heating and cooling cycles that caused the mechanical properties of the material altered as in our case from Table 2, it can be seen tensile strength of the welded specimen has been increased [6,7]. Figure 5 shows welding procedure specification issued by welding engineer and practically used by welders in this experiment, the welding procedure qualification was done through mechanical testing and the results are shown in Table 2 the results are complying with American petroleum institute 5L-45th Edition X-70 grade line pipe weld requirements hence the WPS was validated and Quality department head approved its welding procedure qualification records like the one shown in Figures 5-7.

oil-gas-research-specification

Figure 5: Welding procedure specification.

oil-gas-research-record

Figure 6: Welding procedure qualification record page 1 of 2.

oil-gas-research-procedure

Figure 7: Welding procedure qualification record page 2 of 2.

Conclusion

The weld metal is comparatively stronger, and the joint properties are controlled by weld metal chemical composition and microstructure. Although the welding wire is generally of a composition that matches that of the parent metal yet alloying elements are intentionally added in welding wires to improve final weldment mechanical properties major improvement in mechanical properties are observed due to the heating and cooling cycle that a material encountered during welding process thus grain structure of the material has been refined which in result increases ultimate tensile strength and impact toughness [8]. Mechanical Testing has been done against the welding joint made as per welding procedure specification, the results are complying with American Petroleum Institute requirement for weld joint of X-70 grade line pipe PSL 2 clause 9.7 and 9.8 of API 5L 45th Edition), Welding procedure specification has been validated by Quality Control department and permission to proceed has been given to the production department to continue welding practice as per approved welding procedure specification.

References

Citation: Qazi HAA (2017) Study of Verification and Validation of Standard Welding Procedure Specifications Guidelines for API 5L X-70 Grade Line Pipe Welding. Oil Gas Res 3: 147. DOI: 10.4172/2151-6200.1000147

Copyright: © 2017 Qazi HAA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top