Reach Us +1-218-451-2974
Good Work is Good for Health: The Societal and Individual Perspective | OMICS International | Abstract
ISSN: 2471-9846

Journal of Community & Public Health Nursing
Open Access

Like us on:

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Short Communication

Good Work is Good for Health: The Societal and Individual Perspective

Claire Holmes1 and Karen Walker-Bone2,3*

1Rheumatology Department, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, UK

2Arthritis Research UK/MRC Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, Southampton, UK

3MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, UK

Corresponding Author:
Karen Walker-Bone
Professor and Honorary Consultant, Department of Occupational Rheumatology
Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton
Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
Tel: (023) 80777624
Fax: (023) 80704021
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: July 19, 2017; Accepted date: July 21, 2017; Published date: July 28, 2017

Citation: Holmes C, Walker-Bone K (2017) Good Work is Good for Health: The Societal and Individual Perspective. J Comm Pub Health Nurs 3:189. doi:10.4172/2471-9846.1000189

Copyright: © 2017 Holmes C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Background: Neither public health nor traditional healthcare have generally concerned themselves with employment participation. Most of the outcomes we measure are health-related and in practice we rarely take note of the occupation of our patients or populations or consider the impact of our healthcare on their ability to work.

Methods: We report the results of a study of current clinical practice involving patients receiving outpatient care for chronic long-term conditions.

Results: Healthcare workers do not take their opportunities to discuss work participation with their patients.

Conclusion: Work participation needs more emphasis by healthcare commissioners and providers. The optimal way to achieve this would be for work participation to become a health outcome. Prioritisation of work would lead to important improvements in the health of individuals and societies.


Recommended Conferences

21st International Conference on Clinical Nursing and Practice

Amsterdam, Netherlands

World Congress on Nursing education and patient safety

Auckland, New Zealand

2nd World Congress on Trauma, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine

Prague, Czech Republic
Share This Page