alexa Retention of Implant-supported Fixed Restorations Using Different Provisional Luting Agents | OMICS International | Abstract
ISSN: 2332-0702

Journal of Oral Hygiene & Health
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Retention of Implant-supported Fixed Restorations Using Different Provisional Luting Agents

Mohamed Abdelmageed Awad1* and Tarek Rashad Abdelrehim2

1Associate Professor, Crowns and Bridges Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt and King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, KSA, Saudi Arabia

2Associate Professor, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt

*Corresponding Author:
Dr. Mohamed Abdelmageed Awad
Faculty of Dentistry
King Abdulaziz University, KSA
Tel: +966507680301
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: August 20, 2013; Accepted Date: August 30, 2013; Published Date: September 03, 2013

Citation: Awad MA, Abdelrehim TR (2013) Retention of Implant-supported Fixed Restorations Using Different Provisional Luting Agents. J Oral Hyg Health 1:112. doi: 10.4172/2332-0702.1000112

Copyright: © 2013 Awad MA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Retrievability of cemented implant-supported fixed prosthesis is desirable. Objectives: Compare retentive force of several provisional luting agents when used with cemented superstructures and one implant system. Methods: Five ITI solid screw implant fixtures and solid conical abutments with 6º taper were used. Five metal ceramic crowns were fabricated and cemented with five different provisional luting agents named Tem Bond, Temp Bond NE, Fynal, TNE, and ImProv. Tensile retentive force necessary to debond each casting was measured 30 minutes after cementation in a dry condition (n=10) and after storing and thermocycling for 72 hours (5-55ºC) in artificial saliva (n=10). Mean and standard deviation of retentive force was calculated for all cements. Data were statistically analyzed using two way analysis of variance at 5% level of significance. Tukey’s post hoc test was performed. Statistical software (SPSS, v.16) was used for data analysis. Results: This study provided a rank order of different provisional luting cements according to their ability to retain crowns. Storing and thermocycling of specimens in artificial saliva for 72 hours caused significant reduction in the retentive values of all provisional luting agents investigated. Conclusion: The results may help the clinicians for selecting luting agent, retentive enough

Keywords

Recommended Conferences

39th Asia Pacific Dental and Oral Health Congress

Madrid, Spain
Share This Page
Top